Thursday, August 28, 2014

BREAKING: Michael Brown Allegedly a Party in a Second Degree Murder Case

BREAKING: MICHAEL BROWN ALLEGEDLY A PARTY IN A SECOND DEGREE MURDER CASE:

Ladies and gentlemen, this is literally hot off the presses, and news which I find for the young man's family and the community of Ferguson, MO to be most unfortunate. As you know that I read numerous news mediums, including international and state-run services, I also am subscribed to IJ Review, which considers itself an independent outlet with journalists from all political spectrums. Not ten minutes ago, I received notice over Allen West America on my Facebook this update of Brown's involvement in a Second Degree Murder case which was evidently covered up, and I should first preface this by updating you first on what was submitted a day or two ago to CNN, run by notorious Obama supporter Jeff Zucker who was fired by NBC for incompetence, regarding the issue of a mysterious audio recording where apparently Michael Brown was shot six times, but once where there was a pause, which entails nothing of serious consequence. It did, however, pique the interests of socialists in the media and within the Obama administration and Gov. Jay Nixon in Jefferson City. I will first post that audio clip, and then describe briefly about what has come of this revelation:



Considering the is "journalist" Don Lemon, I found this "revelation" yesterday upon learning of it to be at best suspect, but mostly likely, a hoax and a planted. The thought that the gun sounded like an automatic, not a semi-automatic, is disturbing considering the bullets are almost shot in a streamline manner like an automatic, where all is needed is to pull the trigger once for the bullets to fly almost as if a machine gun. Most police officers carry some form of .9 MM Glock pistol or a Baretta. And whenever I watch Mr. Lemon prove that the definition between differentiating an "automatic" or "semi-automatic" is rather entertaining, considering he claimed he purchased an AR-15, and that it is a matter of semantics:


"Nobody is arguing the Second Amendment. Nobody's arguing the semantics...." Thank God he is not a brain surgeon! He completely engaged in a massive U-Turn when he learned he had no clue about the difference between the two forms of guns. Of course, he did lie as well: Why would he demand that there be a public debate over the legalization of automatic pistols when he himself does not know what one is or what is a semi-automatic? I dare posit the theory he has never seen Dirty Harry, and is about as metrosexual as they come.

And that young man who recorded it? Well, he apparently was getting his rocks off as he did so. Who knows? Maybe he was beating something with his drumstick! 

At least 11 shots were fired; The Washington Times stated as many as 10. So if this pistol fired 10 or 11 shots, why was Darren Wilson using an AR-15 assault to do so? Most police forces employ, again, .9 MM Glock or Barettas, and those are semi-automatic; it would have been laboring for Wilson to pretend to be Lee Harvey Oswald on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository assassinating JFK with three shots over a matter of seconds. I am also waiting like Godot for who Don Lemon informs me was planted on the grassy knoll, or if he follows the old Peter Jennings school of thought by stating Oswald planned and executed the entire assassination. 

There is also this eyewitness account, albeit very much unintended and rather profanity-laced, where at the 6:00 mark details what happened:


To assist you through the garbled background noise, the following written dialogue will be provided:
@6:28/6:29 of video
#1 How’d he get from there to there?
#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck
{crosstalk}
#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him
{crosstalk}
#2 Then the next thing I know he doubled back toward him cus - the police had his gun drawn already on him –
[there is dispute here whether he says "doubled back" or "coming back."]
#1. Oh, the police got his gun
#2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him
{crosstalk}
#2 Police fired shots – the next thing I know – the police was missing
#1 The Police?
#2 The Police shot him
#1 Police?
#2 The next thing I know … I’m thinking … the dude started running … (garbled something about “he took it from him”)
It corroborates Officer Wilson's story exactly according to a friend's words:
Well, then Michael takes off and gets to be about 35 feet away. And, Darren’s first protocol is to pursue. So, he stands up and yells, “Freeze!” Michael and his friend turn around. And Michael taunts him… And then all the sudden he just started bumrushing him. He just started coming at him full speed. And, so he just started shooting. And, he just kept coming. And, so he really thinks he was on something.”
There is also the issue of the toxicology report declaring he had marijuana in his blood. I will not go into detail about this, but will provide you a link to read disputed studies for your personal reference over whether marijuana can cause psychosis.

Brown's accomplice, Dorian Johnson, admitted a few days ago he had filed a false police report and that his story for which he provided in an interview with CNN was a lie. Since the report I have from ABC 17 news in central Missouri briefly details his warrant for an arrest from 2011 and this revelation nearly a week ago, it too will be provided in a link.

***

Michael Brown: Murderer? You Be the Judge

As promised, so too shall I deliver. This again is courtesy of the IJ Review:
Charles C. Johnson, the Editor-in-Chief of Got News and the investigator who debunked the Everytown shootings map, is suing the St. Louis County Court to release Ferguson shooting victim Michael Brown’s juvenile arrest records.
As relayed by the website YoungCons.com, Johnson claims that he has “confirmed” Michael Brown was arrested in a case involving second-degree murder:
Johnson earlier reported on Twitter that he had two contacts in the St. Louis Police Department tell him that Michael Brown had a juvenile criminal record, thus prompting the lawsuit:



The reporter has been challenged on his rationale for seeking the juvenile records of Brown, and this is his response today:


As reported by Ryan Gorman of AOL News, the citizen journalist wants the alleged arrest records released to the public:
“To find out if those police officers are correct requires seeing Brown’s juvenile arrest record, which ought to be freely available given that he is dead and therefore has no right to privacy remaining,” insists Johnson. 
“Knowing the truth about Brown’s past will help us gauge the credibility of his parents and family who have called him a ‘gentle giant.’” 
Attorney Johnathon Burns, who is arguing the case, told KMOX that since the teen is deceased, his records are no longer sealed.
The lawsuit follows below, via SCRIBD:


The lack of transparency involving the Michael Brown shooting was a major factor in the conflagration in Ferguson. After the initial reports of the Ferguson shooting arose, numerous major news media outlets jumped on the story to frame it as a racially prejudiced police officer shooting an unarmed “gentle giant” when he either had his hands up or was running away.
When video surveillance photos of Michael Brown surfaced, the media questioned the police’s release of the information, which the Holder Justice Department wanted withheld from the public. The story of the strong-arm robbery accomplice Dorian Johnson that Brown was running away appears to be falsified with an initial autopsy failing to show gunshots in the back of Michael Brown.
The police deparment’s version of the story, as well as that of Wilson’s friend, and an unidentified witness commenting on the case, appear to corroborate the story that Brown continued to come at the officer after being initially fired at. The background evidence of the strong-arm robbery and any prior criminal incidents speak to the potential state of mind of Michael Brown during the fatal confrontation.
In any event, since the Ferguson rioting, the matter of Michael Brown’s death and how it occurred is a matter of public interest. The facts of the case must be divulged to the public, and that is the only way the second-guessing and the speculation will end.
CBS News reported a hearing for the lawsuit is scheduled for September 3rd.

***

Conclusion: Is the Purpose for the Wanton Transparency Due to "Racial Animus"? Did Dorian Johnson's Outstanding Warrant from 2011 Stem from Michael Brown's Part in a Second Degree Murder?

If push comes to shove, why are the socialists in power so concerned about the transparency of this case? Why are they hiding legally-mandated public information that should be made available for anyone who is murdered, including juvenile medical and legal documentation? And did Dorian Johnson have more to hide than we know? Why did Johnson suddenly come clean? Is there a mystery plea bargain set to provide him with legal immunity or at least lessen his charges for say, Second Degree Murder? I briefly skimmed Google to see what I could locate, but so far, no dice. The information is plentiful for Johnson's June 24, 2011 arrest in Jefferson City, the state capital of Missouri, but nothing has rendered any information regarding Brown's involvement in robbery. One such source is from August 24 in a Fox News blog. There will be a video provided as well as written commentary to read:
FOX NEWS


A key eyewitness in the shooting of unarmed teenager Michael Brown, whose death set off violent protests in the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, reportedly has a warrant out for his arrest.
ABC17.com reported Wednesday that 22-year-old Dorian Johnson, who was with Brown when he was shot, has a warrant out for his arrest for stealing in Jefferson County, Missouri from 2011.
Johnson also was charged that same year with lying to police, the station reported.
WND.com reported that the court clerk for the Municipal Court of Jefferson City confirmed that Johnson had been arrested June 24, 2011 for allegedly stealing a parcel. Johnson was also accused of lying about his identity and age. He was charged with larceny with an added count of false identification.
Johnson was scheduled for trial on July 31, 2013 but did not show, according to the clerk.
The clerk told WND.com that Johnson has a warrant for his extradition if he is arrested in a 50-mile radius of Jefferson City.
Johnson’s attorney Freeman Bosley Jr. told WND.com that the situation regarding Johnson’s legal troubles has been taken care of, and has no impact on Johnson’s credibility in the Brown case.
“(Johnson) was held in jail in St. Louis for 14 days, waiting on Cole County to come get him, based on the warrant,” Bosley told WND.com. “They never came, so the city let him go.”
***

Megyn Kelly, as you see, grilled the attorney general. And the attorney general is, per usual, is guilty of racial animus. There is no such thing as a "non-polarizing figure". And sadly, this lady sat there demanding "justice for Michael Brown" and in St. Louis, "African-Americans didn't vote for him". And fair and impartial? Well, tell that to Attorney General Eric Holder, President Barack Obama and Jim Crow, who she likely identifies as the personification of the entire white population in America. The fact is, she stated that while black voters didn't vote for prosecutor, the people of St. Louis, according to Megyn Kelly, did. And if the Democratic Party is not at all racist or impartial, then why are there far more white politicians still elected within that party over all others? It appears that the definition of what is the plantation today and who are the planters is a bit skewed at best.

You decide. I already have. The issue with transparency to this state prosecutor enjoys as much clarity as the boards on many of the government-funded housing she supports maintaining as the status quo living quarters for the black community nationally without any hope for social advancement. If the Democratic Party did not have a largely poor black community nationally in our inner cities, who would ever want to vote for them? Today, the gap between the wealthiest Americans and the quickly evaporating middle class and soaring total of those living below the poverty line is staggering. The height of socialism in America was during World War II; it is not a coincidence that when FDR's New Deal economic plans left the nation in worse economic shape than what he had inherited in 1933, he turned to foreign policy and may well have committed treason to enter the U.S. into a global war that the people did not want. The paradigm of warfare/welfare is rather a telling account of why deficits have soared, our currency is worthless compared to pre-Sixteenth Amendment America (federal income tax) and the Federal Reserve manipulating monetary supply through interest rate hikes or devaluations, and the matter of Otto von Bismarck's very words on why he created the first social welfare state in Germany while chancellor in a study conducted by FEE:
 “My idea was to bribe the working classes, or shall I say, to win them over, to regard the state as a social institution existing for their sake and interested in their welfare.”
The following, in concluding this article, demonstrates why America is on the brink of another war, as well as proving why the Democratic Party historically and at present is the party of the nation's war mongers, from Minyanville:
Minyanville > Business News
How Welfare and Warfare Are Destroying Our Country
By Jim Quinn Jul 20, 2010 12:15 pm
There are no easy choices left. But unless we act now, this may be our last crisis.
PrintPRINT   POST COMMENTS
Most people in America associate the Democratic Party with spending on welfare programs and the Republican Party with spending on warfare. Until reading Niall Ferguson's brilliant The Ascent of Money, I never realized that welfare and warfare have gone hand in hand for more than a century.
The immortal German warmonger Otto von Bismarck was the first politician to introduce social insurance legislation in the 1880s. His reasoning wasn't strictly humanitarian. According to Bismarck, "A man who has a pension for his old age is much easier to deal with than a man without that prospect." Bismarck was a shrewd politician who realized that when you provide people something for nothing, they'll vote for you. When you go to war with France, a population sedated with entitlements is more easily malleable and controllable.
David Lloyd George rolled out pensions and national insurance in Great Britain prior to World War I in order to win votes. Politicians began a century of addiction to welfare programs, as the poor voted for those that promised them the most. The world has now reached its limit of unfunded promises. The financial crisis in the last two years was caused by politicians throughout the world promising benefits to their citizens and paying for these benefits with borrowed money. Margaret Thatcher aptly summed up what has happened: "The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money."
The world has run out of other people's money.
Britain expanded its social welfare state during and after World War I. With demobilization in 1918, it introduced unemployment insurance as a method to keep former soldiers from disrupting their country. Winston Churchill rolled out an ever-growing array of social programs to keep the lower classes from revolting. The Japanese government, after World War II, initiated national insurance for sickness, injury, childbirth, disability, death, old age, and unemployment. Nations began to cover all citizens against everything that could possibly go wrong.
Is it a coincidence that the largest expansions of the US welfare state occurred in the 1930s before a World War, in the mid 1960s in the midst of the Vietnam War, in 2003 at the outset of the Iraq invasion, and in 2010 as we continue to fight wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? It was essential for politicians to buy off the populace before conducting undeclared wars in far-off lands.
Why? Who has benefited from entitlement spending and endless warfare? Politicians and the military industrial complex benefit. The way to get elected in the US since the 1930s has been to promise voters benefits while ignoring the long-term costs. The defense industry and its lobbyists benefit by creating phantom enemies around the globe and stirring up the masses through fear and propaganda. The other beneficiary has been the banking syndicate and their printing press called the Federal Reserve. The welfare promises and constant warfare over the last century wouldn't have been possible without the Federal Reserve and its ability to create constant inflation.
Guns & Butter
Politicians discovered that the populace will go along with their never-ending military adventures if they were bought off with promises of generous pensions, free medical insurance, subsidized housing, unlimited drug benefits, farm subsidies, tax loopholes, and thousands of other voter boondoggle payoffs. The Federal Reserve printed the fiat currency, the military industrial complex created the enemies, young Americans fought and died in foreign countries in undeclared wars of choice, and corrupt politicians promised unlimited benefits to the masses in search of votes while rigging the tax system to benefit the rich and powerful.
The creation of the Federal Reserve and the Federal Income Tax in 1913 unleashed politicians from the chains of fiscal responsibility. The "guns versus butter model" was turned upside down. Before the Federal Reserve was created the US had to choose between two options when spending its finite resources: It could buy either guns (invest in defense/military) or butter (invest in production of goods), or a combination of both. Politicians handed out butter to the masses and M-16 rifles to our young men. All of the New Deal and Great Society social programs are dependent upon unlimited amounts of debt to be issued for all eternity or until the entire corrupt house of cards collapses.
The beauty of socialism and the welfare state is that when a country is young and vibrant, with a rapidly growing economy, the many pay for the benefits of the few. The baby boom that occurred throughout the modern world after World War II granted politicians the means to expand their welfare pledges. The more politicians promised, the more votes they received. It was a beautiful scheme, until reality struck.
Ferguson provides the reality check in The Ascent of Money:
Yet there was a catch, a fatal flaw in the design of the post-warfare welfare state. What had started out as a system of national insurance had degenerated into a system of state handouts and confiscatory taxation which disastrously skewed economic incentives.
The larger the welfare state becomes, the lower economic growth, higher inflation, and lower productivity overcome the social benefits. As unions become stronger, the economic system becomes more dysfunctional and warped. The economy in a welfare state becomes bogged down in misallocation of resources, mal-investment, rules, regulations, and distorted pay structures. Incentives to increase profits are eliminated. Incentives to create new businesses and to boost efficiency are purged as bureaucracy gains increasing power. As the populations of the welfare states age, there are only a couple of alternatives for the politicians who never looked beyond the next election when passing legislation to hand out more entitlements. Politicians increase taxes on the productive to pay entitlements for the unproductive. The entitlement promises are so great in the United States that politicians couldn't possibly raise taxes high enough to pay for them. This is where a willing central bank steps in and prints money and allows politicians the easy out of borrowing to pay the entitlement promises. This method works until it doesn't. Ask Greece and Spain.
Turning Japanese 

The welfare state really gained momentum after World War II with Japan and Great Britain leading the way. Ferguson describes the beliefs that overtook the developed world:
From now on, the welfare state would cover people against all the vagaries of modern life. If they were born sick, the state would pay. If they could not afford education, the state would pay. If they could not find work, the state would pay. If they were too ill to work, the state would pay. When they retired, the state would pay. And when they finally died, the state would pay their dependents.
With a post-war worldwide baby boom, the taxes easily paid for the benefits in the early years. The myopic politicians and bureaucrats failed to consider that life expectancy would increase from 62 years old in 1935 to 78 years old today, a 26% increase in 75 years. They also failed to anticipate that the baby boomers would have fewer children. The average family size has plunged from 3.5 in 1935 to 2.5 today, a 29% decline. After the implementation of Johnson's Great Society programs in the late 1960s, the percentage of families with two or more children plummeted from 36.7% in 1970 to 23.7% in 2007.  
As usual, any program conceived by politicians always has unintended consequences because they haven't properly considered the potential scenarios. A properly run Ponzi scheme like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid requires that enough new money come into the system from new suckers to pay off the old suckers. With the old suckers living much longer than anticipated and not enough new suckers being born, politicians have resorted to doing absolutely nothing. Any politician who proposes any adjustment, restriction, or cut in these programs is immediately ridiculed, spat upon, and run out of office by the AARP and the entitled classes.
The US is about to experience what Great Britain and Japan have already experienced. The major difference is that Japan and Great Britain didn't have to fund warfare along with welfare like the US has been doing for half a century. This experiment of delusion won't end well.
Great Britain's experiment in socialism came crashing down much sooner than Japan, as its population was much older. Its system degenerated into a system of state handouts, high taxation, no economic incentives, slow productivity, high inflation, and economic stagnation. Social transfers rose from 2.2% of GDP in 1930 to 10% in 1960, 13% in 1970, and 17% by 1980. Unions controlled the politicians and resisted all efforts to institute incentives based upon traditional capitalistic principles. Margaret Thatcher was able to slow the advancement of the welfare state for awhile, but was unable to put a stake through its heart. Great Britain continues its long-term decline with a GDP equal to Italy's today. Japan, on the other hand, appeared to have figured it out, with the most dynamic welfare state economy in the world from 1970 until 1990. But then the wheels came off. Demographics have a way of ruining the best laid plans of politicians.
As the life expectancy of the Japanese has risen to the highest in the world at 83 years old, the birth rate in the country plunged. There are more people dying than are being born every year in Japan. They're the oldest society on earth, with 21% of the population over the age of 65, versus 12.8% in the United States. Japan has been in a two-decade-long slump and has squandered its national wealth on wasteful stimulus programs while failing to address the impossibility of fulfilling its welfare state promises. Japan's welfare budget is equal to three-quarters of tax revenues. Its debt exceeds one quadrillion yen, or 170% of GDP. On its current path toward 240% of GDP, Japan is doomed. As recently as the early-1970s, social expenditures amounted to only about 6% of Japan's national income. In 1992 that portion of the national budget was 18%, and it was expected that by 2025, 27% of national income would be spent on social welfare. 
Niall Ferguson sums up the situation for most of the developed world:
Longer life is good news for individuals, but it is bad news for the welfare state and the politicians who have to persuade voters to reform it. The even worse news is that, even as the world's population is getting older, the world itself may be getting more dangerous.
Dangerous Liaison
The United States has hit the proverbial jackpot, with a rapidly aging population, a $106 trillion unfunded liability, an administration that has piled more unfunded health-care obligations upon our future unborn generations, politicians who refuse to address the crisis, and as icing on the cake 700 military basis spread throughout the world and an annual defense budget of $895 billion equaling the total spending of the next 11 countries combined.
The number of Americans over 65 will surge by 35% over the next 10 years and then by an additional 30% in the following decade. Baby boom demographics have caught up with politician promises. Therein lays the dilemma. Every day 10,000 Americans turn 50 years old. They won't vote for anyone who promises to cut their entitlements. It's the American way to ignore long-term problems until the crisis arrives. Politicians could have proactively addressed the out-of-control entitlement issue 10 years ago. They didn't. Now it's too late. The crisis is upon us.
 
The US government is on a "burning platform" of unsustainable policies and practices with fiscal deficits, chronic health-care underfunding, immigration, and overseas military commitments threatening a crisis if action is not taken soon.
-- David M. Walker
The United States of America is the modern-day Roman Empire. Any reasonably intelligent person with a calculator can figure out that this will end in economic collapse. And still, we do nothing. Not only do we do nothing, we push our foot down on the accelerator by spending $2 trillion on wars of choice, commit $16 trillion to new drug coverage for seniors, and national health care for all at an unknown cost. There's one law that can't be skirted. An unsustainable trend won't be sustained.
 
Fallacies & Fear
The chart below paints a picture of impending disaster. There are no easy choices left. Massive tax increases, enormous benefits cuts, or some combination of the two will be required to avert a catastrophe. Greek-like demonstrations, protests, and strikes are in our future. 
 
The mindset of close to 50% of the US population is exactly the same as the socialists in Greece. In the latest edition of The Casey Report reporter Jayant Bhandari describes the mindset of the entitled class:
While sitting in a coffee-shop in Athens, I struck a conversation with a very smart-looking, confident girl while we sipped our rather expensive Euro 4 coffee. She was proud of spending time lying on the beaches and buying expensive clothes. By not taking on too much, she was contributing to the world's peace and happiness. She claimed to be doing a good deed by spending money, which kept the economy going through increased money circulation. Saving money, she said, was bad, something only a selfish person would resort to. 
"Fewer working hours mean work for other people and hence less unemployment," she said. While I was thinking that she was likely a spoiled child of rich parents, she added, with bright, clear eyes, that the rich should be heavily taxed. Realizing something was missing, I couldn't help but ask if she was on public assistance. Without a blink, with supreme confidence, and a complete absence of any guilt, she said, "Yes."
The reason she didn't lie is because she did not feel an iota of guilt for being on dole. Those memes have been systematically annihilated. This is a life in complete contradiction to the natural principles. Not only does the educational system teach falsehoods, the machinations of the system are such that there are seemingly no consequences to misguided living.
The same attitude about saving versus spending took root in the United States in the early 1980s. Citizens became consumers. The only way for a country to achieve long-term growth is for its citizens to save more than they earn. These savings can then be invested within the country to insure that prosperity would continue for future generations. A country of only consumers will eventually collapse under the weight of debt and lack of investment. 
 
Two generations of Americans have been brought up to believe they're owed a pension, owed tax subsidized housing, owed free health care, and owed the right to happiness provided by Big Brother. The conviction that government can coddle and provide for all the underachievers, disadvantaged, and unambitious in society has taken root like a weed. This belief is a fallacy.
The other fallacy that's been bought hook, line, and sinker by the American public is that American-style democracy can be spread around the globe through force by utilizing the most powerful military in the history of mankind. In 2000 the US expenditure on defense was less than $400 billion. The Obama 2011 budget proposes military spending of $895 billion. That level is eight times the next highest country. The country that we're supposed to fear as the biggest threat to world peace, Iran, spends $10 billion per year on its military. This is 1.1% of the annual US spending level. The war on terrorism has cost more than $2 trillion since 2001. Do you feel safer than you did on September 10, 2001?
The country has been in constant military conflict across the globe since the 1940s and Congress has never carried out its Constitutional duty to declare war. The military industrial complex and the politicians they control have subverted the US Constitution in order to enrich themselves at the expense of the citizens. The United States of America in 2010 is Greece, but with the biggest baddest military machine ever conceived as our backstop. The only difference between our socialist state and those that are tottering toward collapse is that we're also burdened with policing the world. This guarantees that our empire won't collapse with a whimper, but with a big bang.
The US welfare-warfare state isn't the result of any one political party's agenda. The Republican Party and the Democratic Party have cooperated to achieve this result. Republicans passed the largest entitlement expansion since LBJ in 2003. Democrats have just proposed the largest military budget in the history of mankind. It isn't easy to run the national debt from $5.7 trillion in 2000 to $13.1 trillion today. It takes cooperation and mutual ineptitude on the part of both parties to achieve such a spectacular result. Thirty billion dollars unfunded unemployment extensions are attached to bills to pay for the war in Afghanistan. If you vote against the bill, you're not supporting our troops and you want to kick people out into the street. The two sides pretend to offer alternatives to the American people, but their agendas coincide:
"Mystical references to society and its programs to help may warm the hearts of the gullible but what it really means is putting more power in the hands of bureaucrats."
-- Thomas Sowell
The hard truth is that every human life ends in a tragedy. There's no amount of money that can be spent by government bureaucrats to alter this fact. Baby boomers can keep running on their treadmills, popping vitamins, and trying to stay a step ahead of the grim reaper, but the grave beckons. The real tragedy is that because of the fiscal irresponsibility of politicians and the boomer generation, future generations of Americans will for the first time in US history have a lower standard of living than their parents. The wealth of the nation has been frittered away by statists and warmongers. The current fiscal path of the country is unsustainable. The immediate actions required to avoid a catastrophic collapse are: 
1. At least a 50% reduction in annual military spending
2. A drastic scaling back of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits based on age, means testing and instituting real-market competition.
3. Scrapping the entire income tax system and replacing it with a VAT or flat tax.
4. Eliminating useless government agencies like the Department of Energy and Department of Education.
5. An across-the-board 25% reduction in every government program.
6. The elimination of the Federal Reserve and the linking of the US dollar to a basket of commodities including gold, silver, oil, and agricultural products, in order to restrict corrupt politicians from spending money we don't have.
These six steps are the talk of a crazy man. There's no chance of any being implemented today. We all know that the American way is to ignore imminent problems until they morph into a crisis. Unless we act now, this may be our last crisis. The choice is ours.


Saturday, August 16, 2014

If This Video is Not At All Doctored, There is Footage Recorded of Barack and Michelle Obama as well as the Kenyan Ambassador Admitting He is From Kenya, Not Hawaii

The Smoking Gun to End Barack Obama's Illegal Presidency?


Late Libyan Dictator Muammar Gadhafi, who reportedly was killed in Sirte, Libya in 2011
"The black people’s struggle has vanquished racism. It was God who created colour. Today Obama, a son of Kenya, a son of Africa, has made it in the United States of America."
- Closing remarks at the African Union summit (4 February 2009), quoted in RFI English (4 February 2009) "Kadhafi closes AU summit, division over plans for 'United States of Africa'" by Zeenat Hansrod
_______________________ 

Ladies and gentlemen, as I concluded watching the 2001 Chicago Bears game over YouTube where safety Mike Brown intercepted a pass and returned it for the game winning touchdown for the second consecutive week versus the Cleveland Browns, I happened to locate the brief video below where the president and Michelle Obama both admit he is from Kenya, not Hawaii. If indeed this was recorded and not completely edited or doctored aside from the splicing of footage segments in an editing room, have we here the appropriate evidence to bring down the president and the Cabinet which serves as his conduits to the total destruction of the United States of America and the world? 

As the world currently is a-blaze, he is the arbiter of each cause; he is funding terrorism, and he incites it and anarchy here at home. He just cut out funding for military supplies entirely for Israel to defend itself, which spelled its doom and the fall of Zion. If Israel falls, so too will America and Western Civilization, and then the world. 



_____________________

This is the URL to a website discussing the strange phenomena behind why the site proprietor believes the president is the antichrist. It likely is a coincidence, but again, I researched much of these facts last year and drew many of these conclusions as odd happenstance details. Read as you will, but derive your own conclusions and do so with what for you personally is an open-mind.


Conclusion: Did Muammar Gadhafi Unintentionally Warn America About President Obama?

Did the late Libyan dictator Muammar Gadhafi warn America and the world unintentionally about Barack Obama? Read the following closing comment from his address before the African Union on February 4, 2009, just weeks after the president's first inauguration. In a true irony, Obama just attended and delivered a keynote address at an African economic summit where the Democratic Party's intellectual giant and elitist, Vice President Joe Biden, stated the following where he sincerely believed Africa is a nation, not a continent. This was posted in Britain's The Daily Mail. It should not surprise anyone given how he stated that America's key objective during the past campaign is spelled with three letters: "J-O-B-S".





Video of a Webcast by Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi to an American audience in April, 2010, in which he praised President Barack Obama as a “son” of Africa.
In a letter to President Barack Obama on Wednesday, Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi called for an end to airstrikes on his forces and addressed the American leader as “our son,” apparently referring to Mr. Obama’s African heritage.
Colonel Qaddafi also assured Mr. Obama that he has not taken the American military action personally, and even endorsed his campaign for reelection in 2012.
As White House Press Secretary Jay Carney reminded reporters on Wednesday, the letter was “not the first,” from the Libyan leader to the American president. In a previous letter sent on March 19, just before the first international airstrikes, Colonel Qaddafi assured Mr. Obama that “even if Libya and the United States enter into war, God forbid, you will always remain my son.”
Colonel Qaddafi also referred to Mr. Obama as “a son” of Africa in a Webcast to an American audience in 2010 (embedded above).
Here, from The Associated Press, is the complete text of the Libyan leader’s latest letter (with unusual English spellings and grammar as in the original):
Our son, Excellency,
President Obama
U.S.A
We have been hurt more morally that physically because of what had happened against us in both deeds and words by you. Despite all this you will always remain our son whatever happened. We still pray that you continue to be president of the U.S.A. We Endeavour and hope that you will gain victory in the new election campaigne. You are a man who has enough courage to annul a wrong and mistaken action. I am sure that you are able to shoulder the responsibility for that. Enough evidence is available, Bearing in mind that you are the president of the strongest power in the world nowadays, and since Nato is waging an unjust war against a small people of a developing country. This country had already been subjected to embargo and sanctions, furthermore it also suffered a direct military armed aggression during Reagan’s time. This country is Libya. Hence, to serving world peace … Friendship between our peoples … and for the sake of economic, and security cooperation against terror, you are in a position to keep Nato off the Libyan affair for good.
As you know too well democracy and building of civil society cannot be achieved by means of missiles and aircraft, or by backing armed member of AlQuaeda in Benghazi.
You — yourself — said on many occasions, one of them in the UN General Assembly, I was witness to that personally, that America is not responsible for the security of other peoples. That America helps only. This is the right logic.
Our dear son, Excellency, Baraka Hussein Abu oumama, your intervention is the name of the U.S.A. is a must, so that Nato would withdraw finally from the Libyan affair. Libya should be left to Libyans within the African union frame. The problem now stands as follows:-
1. There is Nato intervention politically as well as military.
2. Terror conducted by AlQaueda gangs that have been armed in some cities, and by force refused to allow people to go back to their normal life, and carry on with exercising their social people’s power as usual.
Mu’aumer Qaddaffi
Leader of the Revolution
Tripoli 5.4.2011
While it is not certain that Colonel Qaddafi wrote the letter himself, he does speak some English, as he demonstrated inthis 1969 interview, conducted one month after he seized power in a military coup (a French voice-over covers the questions but not his answers): 
__________________________

Below are articles of Gaddafi's speech before the African Union on February 4, 2009 when he was elected its president. This details, which conclude this article, are where he mentioned the president's being born in Kenya.
Libya's Gadhafi Praises Obama, Urges Him To Lead US Boldly 
2-4-09 8:21 AM EST 
ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia (AFP)--Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi Wednesday lavished uncharacteristic praise on a U.S. leader, describing Barack Obama's accession to the White House as a victory against racism and urging the first black U.S. president to lead his country boldly. 
"The black people's struggle has vanquished racism. It was God who created color. Today Obama, a son of Kenya, a son of Africa, has made it in the United States of America," he said. 
Gadhafi, who has ruled over Libya for four decades, was speaking at the closing ceremony of an African Union summit in Addis Ababa which saw him take the reins of the 53-nation continental organization. 
"We hope he will be well protected and want him to be undaunted. America doesn't belong to the whites alone. I hope he will be able to accomplish the change he carries in him," he said. 
Gadhafi's elevation to A.U. chief stirred debate at the summit, with some nations unhappy about the choice. Under A.U. rules, the post rotates among Africa's regions, and this year was set to go to a North African leader. Gadhafi was the only one present. 
Over the past decade, Gadhafi has distanced himself from his fellow Arab leaders and turned most of his diplomatic attention to unifying the African continent. 
Oil-rich Libya was long considered a state sponsor of terrorism by the U.S. 
But in October last year, Libya paid the U.S. $1.5 billion as part of a settlement agreement over the 1988 bombing of an airliner over Lockerbie, Scotland, that was the last hurdle to a full normalization of ties with Washington. 
(END) Dow Jones Newswires 
02-04-090821ET 
Copyright (c) 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. 

 _______________

Thursday, August 14, 2014

The Islamic State, Boko Haram, al-Qaeda and the Taliban, Hamas and Barack Obama: The Global Terrorism Connection Through Qatar and Pakistan

Topic: Boko Haram: The Forgotten Strong Arm of Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State in Nigeria Also Slaughtering Christians

In all the chaos in Iraq, Syria and Lebanon with the Islamic State having officially established the first caliphate since the fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1924, one other terrorist organization has ironically been forgotten. You will recall how just four months ago, the infamous photographs of notable celebrities and world leaders hold tight their pieces of cardboard with that hashtagged phrase #BringBackOurGirls, with no more disgusting shot circulated than Michelle "Mooch" Obama's puppy dog face even as she continued to engage in fundraisers in subsequent days and weeks speaking in racist tones, declaring all high school and college graduates should engage in detecting "Thoughtcrime" from their family members and reporting them. Since then, the Nigerian terrorist cell known as Boko Haram has long been forgotten in the annals of our domestic media, with Fox News barely mentioning them at all, much less MSNBC and CNN, who are supporting publicly terrorism globally. But while our media has long forgotten that organization, the girls have still not been returned to sender, and Boko Haram is now engaged in slaughtering Christians too, to the tune of slitting the throats of 100 about two days ago or so. To read the headlines, little is reported about the Nigerian genocide of Christians and those who are of the Western cultural persuasion, but it really should not at all be so since the conservative media has repeated reported this crisis of the global apostasy for at least two years whereupon it came to light that Boko Haram suddenly turned on the Obama administration. And do not believe for a moment that he and Michelle were at all concerned about the 270 girls the organization took hostage. The president foolishly waged a social media campaign to smear Boko Haram as a cell of barbarians. For Obama, however, this backfired; the girls are still not free, the military has not at all appeared in any capacity except for peace envoys and military advisers, and Boko Haram is still committed to destroy infidels and the Western cultural in Europe and the Americas. The article from Mad World News will detail this sad series of events below:
Boko Haram Competing with ISIS: 100 Christians Burned Alive, Throats Slit in Massacre
IN NEWS, WORLD NEWS / BY DOM THE CONSERVATIVE / ON AUGUST 12, 2014 AT 3:42 PM /
Boko Haram Competing with ISIS: 100 Christians Burned Alive, Throats Slit in Massacre



At lest 100 Christians have reportedly been butchered by Islamic terrorists during a bloody massacre in the town of Gwoza, Nigeria.
The attack took place on August 6th, when Boko Haram insurgents stormed the predominantly Christian town of more than 276,000 people.
Civilians suffered their town being burned, bombed, and ransacked as the heavily armed Muslim group swept through. Anyone who stood in the way were slaughtered in the most horrific ways:
The full magnitude of the attack and the Nigerian military response was unknown as most sources have been forced to flee to Cameroon or Adamawa state, but on the initial day of the assault Pirda Tada, a Christian resident of Saha village, told Morning Star News that Boko Haram gunmen arrived in Toyota Hilux vehicles and motorcycles and attacked houses with Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs) and fuel-bombs.
“I thank God for sparing my life, but three of my neighbors and members of our church were killed during the attack,” Tada said. “These Christians in our village had their throats slit with knives while their hands were tied behind their backs. Some houses were bombed as the Boko Haram gunmen were chanting, ‘God is great!’ in Arabic.”
Six Christians were killed at Saha village, and the insurgents destroyed houses and shops and burned the Church of Christ in Nations (COCIN) building in Pegi Barawa village, Tada said. Boko Haram rebels on July 19 had attacked Saha and Pegi Barawa village, near Gwoza; six Christians were reported to have been killed in Saha village.
Follow Us On Pinterest
John Gula, a leader in the Christian community in Gwoza, told Morning Star News by phone that 42 Christians were killed at Attagara village; 24 in Agajara; four in Angurva; 20 in Agapalwa; one in Amuda; three in Alavawa; 13 in Chinene; three in Arboko; one in Ashigashiya; and one in Ngoshe.
It is estimated that more than 300,000 Christians have been displaced from the greater area, forcing many to flee to neighboring Cameroon.
http://morningstarnews.org/2014/08/massacre-in-predominantly-christian-gwoza-nigeria-said-to-leave-100-dead/
Homes, businesses, and churches were bombed and burned as a warning to Christian residents to convert to Islam and submit to Sharia law.
Boko Haram, much like ISIS, seeks to overtake one town at a time until the entire nation of Nigeria is under Islamic rule. Once a city is captured by insurgent forces, Islamists implement Sharia law, which requires even non-Muslims to follow Quranic laws. Dimmis, non-Muslims in Muslim countries, will be forced to pay a high tax for remaining a non-Muslim in an Islamic state, if they are allowed to live at all.
Boko Haram proved they haven’t forgotten about Gwoza refugees who got away, sending a startling message of their intentions:
“You have been fleeing your homes, but we are still pursuing you, because the soldiers with you people cannot protect you,” the letter reads. “Your lives, farmlands and other property are also not safeguarded. Allah willing, we shall not fail to attack your communities and the listed churches in this letter.”
With relentless attacks from Hamas in Gaza and countless innocents slaughtered by ISIS in Iraq, the world will continue to see massacres as in Gwoza as Islamists across the globe become motivated by the jihads.
__________________

Make no mistake, ladies and gentlemen: Every Islamic terrorist cell is linked together. In fact, Boko Haram was reported weeks following the hashtag controversy having links to our old enemies in Afghanistan and Pakistan, al-Qaeda. Peter Weber of The Week addressed this in his May 12, 2014 article:
Who's financing Boko Haram?
It will be quite difficult to effectively combat the Nigerian terrorist organization without understanding its cash flow
Boko Haram's tactics are so brutal and senseless that even al Qaeda and other Islamist terrorist organizations think the group goes too far. But large operations to kidnap more than 200 schoolgirls and wantonly massacre hundreds of unarmed villagers take more than skewed morals and careful planning — they also take money, in this case truly filthy lucre. And Boko Haram has ample cash in a part of Nigeria and West Africa where money is scarce. Where do they get it?
"Analysts say the actual source of the funding is as elusive as the militants themselves," says Heather Murdock at VOA News. But Boko Haram is clearly getting richer. Its weapons have shifted from relatively cheap AK-47s in the early days of its post-2009 embrace of violence to desert-ready combat vehicles and anti-aircraft/anti-tank guns. Here's a look at what we know, and what we suspect, about the organization's financial support:
Kidnapping
Abducting hundreds of schoolgirls, possibly to sell as "brides," is how Boko Haram gained international notoriety. But additionally, "kidnapping has become one of the group's primary funding sources, a way to extract concessions from the Nigerian state and other governments, and a threat to foreigners and Nigerian government officials," says Jacob Zenn at West Point's Combating Terrorism Center.
It has been a lucrative source of cash, too. Last year, Boko Haram secured $3 million and the release of 16 prisoners in exchange for a French family of seven it seized in northern Cameroon. The group has claimed credit for a few kidnappings since then, but they are widely suspected of carrying out dozens of other abductions-for-ransom in northern Nigeria, says Zenn. "Virtually all of the kidnapping victims were mid-level officials, or their relatives, who were not wealthy enough to have security details, but could afford modest ransoms of about $10,000."
Robbery
Along with ransom money, "Boko Haram has partly financed its militant operations by attacking and robbing banks," says David Doukhan at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism. The group has robbed hundreds of banks in its home province of Borno and two other northern regions of Nigeria, and nabbed convoys and successful businesses. If that sounds not particularly pious for a fundamentalist religious group, "the robbery is justified by Koranic interpretation that bank robbery is permitted, since the money from the banks is considered 'spoils of war,'" Doukhan adds. Some estimates put Boko Haram's thievery spoils at about $6 million.
Taxes and protection money
Boko Haram has demanded and received protection money from the governors of the northern Nigeria states since 2004, says Taiwo Ogundipe at Nigeria's The Nation, citing an unidentified spokesman for the group and other captured Boko Haram operatives. "The Northern governors are overwhelmed about the strength of the group and are aware of the capabilities of Boko Haram operatives in their respective states," the spokesman said.
That was in 2011. From then until at least mid-2013, Boko Haram was the de facto ruler of large swathes of Nigeria. "It would appear that they have established bases in certain parts of the northeast that nobody can even penetrate or go to, and they’ve excluded every symbol of authority in those areas," Clement Nwankwo, at the Policy and Legal Advocacy Center in Abuja, told VOA News in May 2013. "Some even say they are in control of various local governments in the northeast and are collecting taxes and running the show in those places."
Foreign terrorist organizations
Boko Haram is widely believed to have received funding from regional and international Islamist terrorist organizations, though how much and from which groups is in dispute. The Daily Beast's Eli Lake reports that the group received some early seed money from Osama bin Laden in 2002, through a disciple named Mohammed Ali who bin Laden sent to Africa with $3 million for like-minded militant organizations.
"We are not saying all $3 million went to Boko Haram," the International Crisis Group's E.J. Hogendoorn tells The Daily Beast. "What I can tell you from talking to lots of conservative Muslims in Nigeria is that there was a lot of money coming into northern Nigeria, there are many sources of that money. One of those sources was from al Qaeda."
The group has also reportedly gotten money from Algerian al Qaeda offshoot al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) and Somali group al-Shabab. One motive those groups have is setting up friendly safe havens in the region. "I think there must be some funding coming from extremist groups, coming from some extremist groups who want perhaps to create a base in northern Nigeria," Nwankwo tells VOA News.
Foreign civic groups
There are a handful of non-militant groups accused of shuttling money to Boko Haram, including Britain's Al-Muntada Trust Fund and Saudi Arabia's Islamic World Society. "Monetary practices embedded in Muslim culture, such as donating to charities and informal money-transfer centers, have compounded the difficulty in tracking down terrorist financial links," says David Doukhan at the International Institute for Counter-Terrorism.
***
While the details of Boko Haram's finances remains nothing if not murky, understanding "funding of Boko Haram is quite a very crucial question," retired army captain and security consultant Aliyu Umar tells VOA News. "If we can get to the bottom of that then we can cut off the source of the funds."
Then there's the reason that may matter in the U.S. The fact that the U.S. didn't formally designate Boko Haram a terrorist organization until last year has become the focus of a partisan attack against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who was in office when the Obama administration was debating the move. Key to the accusation is the idea that adding the group to America's terrorist list would have made a difference, presumably by restricting funding to Boko Haram. We can't evaluate that charge without knowing where the Nigerian Islamists get their money.
____________

Britain's Al-Muntada terrorist cell trust fund and the Saudis are contributing, and no one at all would be surprised at those nor with al-Qaeda, which has been relatively quiet or unmentioned within the media domestically. But the Iranian English language news service Press TV explains that in fact, the Obama administration through the CIA created the organization and trained them, as you will read within the following text:
Boko Haram 'created and funded by CIA': Randy Short 

The US Central Intelligence Agency has created and funded Boko Haram, a Takfiri group that abducted about 300 Nigerian girls last month, says American analyst Randy Short.
Boko Haram “is a CIA-created and funded group,” Short said, adding the group’s “weapons come from Libya. We know that the commander of the so-called Libyan revolutionary forces, Mr. (Khalifa) Hifter was trained by the CIA.”
Speaking in an interview with Press TV on Thursday, Short said the United States aims to break down Nigeria into a micro state.
“There is larger scheme by the Angelo American white supremacist imperialistic power complex to break down the state they have invented in colonial eras for their purposes,” he said.
President Barack Obama said on Wednesday the US has deployed dozens of troops to Chad to help locate the kidnapped schoolgirls in neighboring Nigeria.
However, Short said the US already has troops in the region.
“There are thousands of American personnel already there, this has been going on for a while, the whole purpose is to destroy Nigeria.”
“Mr. (Zbigniew) Brzezinski, who is Obama’s advisor for Africa along with Ms. Susan Rice wanted to break Africa to micro states,” he said.
“They don’t give a damn about black women…they’ve been working to destroy the Nigerian state for decades, they don’t care anything about those girls,” he noted.
According to senior American defense officials, the US military is using spy drones as well as manned aircraft over Nigeria to locate the girls who were abducted on the night of April 14th in a small town in northeastern Nigeria.
AT/AGB 
_____________________

Well, this is at least entertaining, but I would not be surprised if at least the issue of funding Boko Haram is true. Based upon this gentleman's rant, I am not even going to the trouble to search deeper than the three pages over Google which contain nothing other than his serving as an international social rights activist with every form of media - Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn, for example - but not so much as a Wikipedia article to his name. He rants like a man more disturbed than the communist Sociology professor of two classes I took and earned in each an "A". Dr. Short cannot be taken seriously as he is accusing Barack Obama, who is half black, of being racist against his own race by attempting to wipe them out through genocide. It borders along the same lines of the bizarre Alex Jones. 

***

Conservative political commentator Daniel Greenfield authored an article published online on Frontpage Mag a diametric opposite take on what the radical Far Leftist Dr. Short stated earlier, but did not at all appear to be mentally-delusionary. His analysis, also from May, states the following:
Obama’s Alliance with Boko Haram
May 13, 2014 by Daniel Greenfield 221 Comments
Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.
Leftist policy is the search for the root cause of evil. Everything from a street mugging to planes flying into the World Trade Center is reduced to a root cause of social injustice. Throw poverty, oppression and a bunch of NGO buzzwords into a pot and out come the suicide bombings, drug dealing and mass rapes.
It doesn’t matter whether it’s Boko Haram, the Islamic terrorist group that kidnapped hundreds of Nigerian schoolgirls, or a drug dealer with a record as long as his tattooed arm.
Obama and Hillary resisted doing anything about Boko Haram because they believed that its root cause was the oppression of Muslims by the Nigerian government. Across the bloody years of Boko Haram terror, the State Department matched empty condemnations of Boko Haram’s killing sprees with condemnations of the Nigerian authorities for violating Muslim rights.
Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton haven’t championed #BringBackOurGirls because it’s a hashtag in support of the kidnapped girls, but because it undermines the Nigerian government. They aren’t trying to help the kidnapped girls. They’re trying to bring down a government that hasn’t gone along with their agenda for appeasing Boko Haram and Nigerian Muslims. 
Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton haven’t championed #BringBackOurGirls because it’s a hashtag in support of the kidnapped girls, but because it undermines the Nigerian government. They aren’t trying to help the kidnapped girls. They’re trying to bring down a government that hasn’t gone along with their agenda for appeasing Boko Haram and Nigerian Muslims.
The hashtag politics aren’t aimed at the terrorists. They’re aimed at helping the terrorists.
There’s a reason why the media and so many leftists have embraced the hashtag. #BringBackOurGirls isn’t a rescue. It denounces the Nigerian government for not having already gotten the job done even as the State Department stands ready to denounce any human rights violations during a rescue attempt.
Obama and Boko Haram want to bring down the Nigerian government and replace it with a leadership that is more amenable to appeasement. It’s the same thing that is happening in Israel and Egypt.
State Department officials responded to Boko Haram attacks over the years with the same litany of statistics about unemployment in the Muslim north and the 92 percent of children there who do not attend school. When Hillary Clinton was asked about the kidnappings by ABC News, she blamed Nigeria for not “ensuring that every child has the right and opportunity to go to school.”
Clinton acted as if she were unaware that Boko Haram opposes Muslim children going to school or that it would take the very same measures that her State Department has repeatedly opposed to make it possible for them to go to school. This is a familiar Catch 22 in which the authorities are blamed for not fixing the socioeconomic problems in terrorist regions that are impossible to fix without defeating the terrorists and blamed for violating the human rights of the terrorists when they try to defeat them.
The mainstream media has been more blatant about carrying Boko Haram’s bloody water. Their stories begin with the kidnapped schoolgirls and skip over to a sympathetic reading of history in which Boko Haram only took up arms after government brutality. 
 ____________________

Only two very important details equate the Press TV analysis by Dr. Short and this piece by Greenwood. One is the U.S. is supporting and, as a result which the Greenwood article carefully avoided stating due to either a lack of direct proof or the fear of the Obama administration's lawless retribution against him, the administration has funded Boko Haram just as it has the Islamic State and Hamas, al-Qaeda and the Taliban, Hezbollah and of course Iran, the largest accredited state sponsor for terrorists.  Eerily, the conspiracy theorists from two slightly differing angles on the matter are most frightening. The first one from Dr. Short mentioned corporations, which in truth would neither shock me nor appear bizarre considering 18 companies control nearly 80% of our GDP. 

***

The next article is from Global Research. It has a very damning indictment on the Boko Haram association with the Obama administration:
Is Boko Haram An “Intelligence Asset”? Terror Attack in Nigeria Opens Door to Africom
By Kurt Nimmo
Global Research, May 10, 2014
infowars.com
Region: sub-Saharan Africa
The establishment media has yet to report on a deadly attack in Gamborou Ngala in the Borno State. According to a report posted today by Vanguard, a Nigerian newspaper, the jihadist terror group Boko Haram stormed the town and killed around 300 people.
Boko Haram’s official name is Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad, which translated from the Arabic means “People Committed to the Propagation of the Prophet’s Teachings and Jihad.” The group is a Takfiri offshoot of the Salafi movement. Salafi-Takfiris attack other Muslims and Christians they consider apostates. Boko Haram has worked to impose sharia law in Nigeria, north Cameroon and Niger. It has killed Christians, bombed churches, attacked schools, police stations, government installations, and has kidnapped western tourists.
Prior to the attack, the establishment media covered an announcement on Monday issued by the Obama administration stating the United States will send military, intelligence and law enforcement advisors to Nigeria to help the government there locate and rescue more than 270 teenage girls abducted by Boko Haram.
According to the Los Angeles Times, the team will not be used for military purposes and will share intelligence investigative services in the search for the students kidnapped April 14 from a rural high school in Nigeria’s predominately Muslim northeast. Obama said the abductions may “mobilize the entire international community to finally do something against this horrendous organization.” In October 2013, the U.S. designated Boko Haram a terrorist group.
In 2012, Obama invoked the War Powers Resolution to increase the number of U.S. military personnel deployed to Nigeria. The incoming Commander of the U. S. Africa Command (Africom) at the time, Gen. David M. Rodriguez, said Boko Haram operations threatened Nigeria, Cameroon, Niger, Mali and Chad. Rodriguez said the U.S. has authority in Africa in response to the threat posed by al-Qaeda.
In 2012, The Nigerian Tribune reported Boko Harm’s funding was traced to the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia, specifically from the Al-Muntada Trust Fund. In 2005, The Center for Security Policy stated “Al-Muntada has, incidentally, been particularly active in promoting Wahhabi-style Islamism in Nigeria… Al-Muntada… pays for Nigerian clerics to be ‘brainwashed’ in Saudi universities and imposed on Nigerian Muslims through its well-funded network of mosques and schools.”
Similar schools, known as madrassas, were established in Pakistan during the CIA’s covert war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. They were financed by Saudi Arabia and its network of charities. “Between 1982 and 1992, some 35,000 Muslim radicals from 43 Islamic countries in the Middle East, North and East Africa, Central Asia and the Far East would pass their baptism under fire with the Afghan mujahideen,” writes Phil Gasper. The Afghan mujahideen would ultimately produce al-Qaeda and the Taliban.
In addition to support by the Saudis, Boko Haram has received indirect assistance from NATO via Libya’s al-Qaeda mercenaries.
“During an interview conducted by Al-Jazeera with Abu Mousab Abdel Wadoud, the AQIM leader states that Algeria-based organizations have provided arms to Nigeria’s Boko Haram movement ‘to defend Muslims in Nigeria and stop the advance of a minority of Crusaders.’ It remains highly documented that members of Al-Qaeda (AQIM) and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who fought among the Libyan rebels directly received arms and logistical support from NATO bloc countries during the Libyan conflict in 2011,” writes Nile Bowie.
AQIM and Boko Haram, however, pose less of a threat in Africa than China does. “The US and France plan to counter the threat along with Africa’s puppet government’s that will pose a challenge to China’s economic and diplomatic influence in the region,” writes Timothy Alexander Guzman.
Nigeria is the 13th largest oil producer in the world. The western Africa nation’s other natural resources include natural gas, tin, iron ore, coal, limestone, niobium, lead, zinc and arable land.
“The US and French governments want to assure themselves that the new Chinese leadership will not continue its beneficial relationships with resource-rich African nations that have been a success in the past. Therefore, the ‘War on Terror’ will create instability and will disrupt China’s economic growth.  AFRICOM mission is to create war in the name of fighting terrorism and that is what ‘US national security interests’ in Africa is really about.” 
___________________

Recall recently that President Obama, Vice President Biden and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi attended the African Economic Summit, where both the latter referred to Africa as a "nation". Was this merely a matter of uniting the continent in fighting its abject poverty, or something far more insidious? W.E.B. DuBois, who has been dead more than 50 years, worked towards the eventual goal to manifest a Pan African state governed under communism, but died in August 27, 1963 in Ghana. But as Pamela Geller reported in Breitbart, not only did the media fail to report the missing girls to be Christian, it lied and claimed they were all Muslims:
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION: BOKO HARAM HAS 'LEGITIMATE CONCERNS'

For reasons that only Barack Obama can answer, the State Department took far too long to designate the savage Muslim group, Boko Haram, a terrorist organization. When State Department officials finally did designate it a foreign terrorist organization, they did so while never mentioning that the people being terrorized were Christians who are being targeted for their beliefs. The media doesn’t mention it, but the kidnapped schoolgirls who have finally brought this evil group to international attention are Christians.

But the State Department implied that the group had other motivations. “These designations are an important and appropriate step,” the State Department said, “but only one tool in what must be a comprehensive approach by the Nigerian government to counter these groups through a combination of law enforcement, political, and development efforts, as well as military engagement, to help root out violent extremism while also addressing the legitimate concerns of the people of northern Nigeria.”
Boko Haram originated in northern Nigeria, where there is strong support for the imposition of Islamic law – which is also Boko Haram’s goal.
The idea that a devout Muslim group that slaughters in the cause of Islam practically every day and whose very name means “Western education is sinful” has “legitimate concerns” exposes the dangerous motives of the pro-jihadist Obama administration.
Boko Haram sets schools ablaze. Boko Haram targets teachers and doctors, but above all, Christians. They murdered over 2,596 people in the first three months of 2014. What possible legitimate concerns could these savages have? Imposing Islam is not a legitimate concern.
“Legitimate concerns” – was the Obama administration referring to CIA director John Brennan’s notorious statement that “jihad is a legitimate tenet of Islam?”
The mainstream media’s sudden interest in the abducted girls and Boko Haram is amazing. Back in 2012, my organization, the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), ran a citywide bus campaign in New York, highlighting the savagery of jihadists against Nigerian Christians. One hundred bus ads called attention to the victims. The ad read, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support the Nigerian Christians. Defeat jihad.”
These ads were attacked by media and cultural elites as “anti-Muslim” “hate” ads, condemned by the same two-faced quislings in the mainstream media who are now writing furious editorials demanding that these abducted girls be saved.
This devout Muslim group, whose official name is The Congregation of the People of the Sunnah for Dawah and Jihad, has been waging bloody jihad in Nigeria for years, while the U.S. government, the United Nations and the mainstream media yawned. Here are just a few of the stories that should have touched off an international media firestorm, but didn’t:
Last Monday, they stormed the town of Gamboru Ngala, torching houses and murdering at least 300 people. They set houses on fire and shot those who tried to escape.
  • In mid-April, according to Reuters, they “killed at least 60 people in an attack on a village in northeast Nigeria, while a separate attack killed eight people at a teacher training college.”
  • In late March, the Nigerian jihadists “killed 19 people and abducted 15 others in different villages of Agatu local government area in Benue state.”
  • On March 5, they “attacked a cluster of villages in Plateau state, killing 16 Christians and destroying numerous homes.”
  • The day before that, on March 4, they “burned 11 people to death inside their homes in northeastern Nigeria, where frequent attacks have claimed at least 130 lives in the past four days alone.”
  • And on the day before that, March 3, they “killed at least 29 people in an attack on a town in north-eastern Nigeria’s Borno state.”
  • Several days before that, on February 27, they “killed at least 37 people in three separate attacks in northeast Nigeria, including at a theological college” – a Christian college, of course.
  • Two days before that, they “burned children alive,” entering a college in northeast Nigeria before dawn, setting it afire, and murdering 43 students. A teacher said that they “shot and slit the throats of children who tried to escape through the windows,” while others used machetes to hack students to death.
  • Five days before that, they “attacked the northeastern town of Bama on Wednesday, opening fire on a school, shooting or burning to death 47 people and trashing the palace of a traditional ruler.”
  • In late January, they “used explosives to attack a village in north-east Nigeria, killing 52 people and razing more than 300 homes.”
That isn’t even a full list of their attacks just this year. And why are they committing all this bloodshed and savagery? Boko Haram leader Abubakar Shekau has said, “The reason why I will kill you is you are infidels, you follow Democracy… Whoever follows Democracy is an infidel.” In a video, members of this group said, “We are working for Allah and must bring Shariah to existence; we are committed to protecting Muslims from being annihilated by infidels. We are going to kill them. We will enter Churches and slaughter Christians… We are calling on all Muslims to come out and fight Jihad.”
Few people cared. I wrote on February 25, “When are good and decent people going to be free to speak about Muslim supremacist savagery? Instead, reporting on these stories of unimaginable horror is considered ‘islamophobia.’ That’s where we are in the modern age of the savage.”
Maybe the attention that the kidnapped girls has brought to this group will finally result in concrete action to stop this bloodlust. How many more people must they slaughter? It is not a good sign that the denial and willful ignorance are continuing: Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday blamed Boko Haram on poverty, saying that “much of this challenge comes out of this poverty where young people are grabbed at an early stage, proffered a little bit of money.” In reality, poverty doesn’t cause terrorism. Studies show that jihadis are generally wealthier and better educated than their peers.
Let's have some uniformity in outrage against all jihad groups, not just against one monstrous incident but the ideology behind the global jihad. Only then can we begin to defeat this scourge.
Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the ResistanceFollow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.
_____________________

Like any good socialist of the Marxist school of thought, or sociology, its founding academic tenet under Max Weber and Emile Durkheim, the Obama administration is engaged in promoting a means for class warfare in championing a known terrorist cell which it refused to classify as such until one year prior to the kidnappings. Is their any coincidence why these kidnappings happened? This was Boko Haram's intention; to hold these girls hostage, to promote outrage globally, to force they as an organization to be recognized as a legitimate entity. Essentially, they wanted to force the president to reveal them to the world, to Americans who knew little to nothing about them, and to expose him for the fraudulent, repugnant orchestrator of global Islamic terrorism under his design to manufacture a global empire either through the public eye or using stealth. Well, stealth failed miserably, and while the rest of the world understands what the president is doing behind the scenes, most Americans have not the slightest clue. Part of this is due to the vast majority of our media of Obama sycophants covering his tracks through modern yellow journalism, while the remainder is unfortunately about 90% of our population of adult age who are too daft to care.

One of word of advice I provided a friend of mine who is a journalist for Mad World News named Amanda Shea: Never trust the domestic media without also resorting to researching international publications. This is indeed true, and it matters none at all if you choose to read Chinese, Russian, Iranian or North Korean state media. Where there is smoke, there will always be a fire, and your job is to learn where the wind will blow the flames. 

***

Global Jewish Advocacy provided an article for those with inquiring minds to link together all al-Qaeda based terrorist cells on August 5 of this year. You may read it below as well as the link:
All in the (Terrorist) Family

The world of Islamist terror groups is riven with a confused pattern of conflict and competition, yet when it comes to jihad— fighting against Western values, Christians, Jews and Israel—that world is one big happy family.
Militant Sunni and Shi’ite Muslims—currently killing each other in Iraq and Syria—are able to overcome their bitter theological and political disputes to condemn America and the West. Meanwhile in Gaza, Hamas, an offshoot of the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood, and Islamic Jihad, inspired by Shi’ite Iran, compete over who can shoot more missiles into Israel. 
Hezbollah, the Lebanese-based, Iranian-controlled terror organization, is fighting for the Syrian regime of Bashar Assad, while Hamas supports the Sunni rebels—primary among them the extremist Salafist Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS). An offshoot of al-Qaeda, ISIS has declared a “caliphate” in the areas it controls, has imposed Muslim law there, and kills any Christian who refuse to convert or leave. ISIS has announced its intention of destroying Israel once the Arab states that surround it have been conquered and American influence has been eliminated.
ISIS considers Hamas far too moderate, citing its entrance into a unity government with Fatah as proof. Yet that has not stopped hundreds of ISIS and allied al-Qaeda terrorists from entering Gaza and helping Hamas fight Israel. 
Boko Haram, the African branch of al-Qaeda, has taken over much of Northeast Nigeria with the aim of turning it into an Islamist state. It has banned Western education and killed, kidnapped and forcibly converted Christians. Boko Haram has strong ties to ISIS and the other jihadi organizations.
And then there’s Iran, which views the United States as the “Great Satan (Israel is the “Little Satan”). For a while, in retaliation for Hamas support for the Syrian rebels, Iran stopped pouring funds and weapons into Gaza. But Iran has resumed funding and arming Hamas, and Hassan Nasrallah, leader of the Iran’s puppet terror group Hezbollah, has publicly pledged full support to Hamas in its struggle against Israel.
Yes, it’s hard to keep track of all those Islamist groups, but their common denominator is quite simple—hatred of everything we stand for
_______________

Yes, all of these Islamic terrorist cells and state sponsors of this scourge against mankind and the right to simply survive hate not only all what Western Christendom and its Jewry stand for, but too Hindus - which Pakistani Islamists slaughtered as many as 2 million of these innocent peoples near the disputed Kashmir territory in 1970-71 - plus Buddhists. They are also attacking Chinese civilians in their cities; recall that China is again, governed by a communist government. The lone chance a global war will not be waged between those wishing to survive Islam and those within that Satanic faith intent upon exterminating all who fail to convert for apostasy is to play all sides against one another. Unfortunately, that merely delays the inevitable war or series of conflicts against the equally-evil victors.

The danger as the article infers is in the following, and why Barack Obama is funding the Islamic State, Hamas and is likely the ruler of the Muslim Brotherhood:
  • The Islamic State is aligned with Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, as well as Boko Haram due to their each adhering to the Sunni branch of Islam.
  • Iran, a Shi'ite Islamic republic, continues to fund both Hezbollah and the Islamic Jihad, as well as Hamas to destroy Israel. However, it is torn as to who to support between the West and the Islamic State, which seeks to end its influence in Syria by toppling the Bashar al-Assad government in Damascus.
Clearly, the Obama foreign policy doctrine of dartboard chaos severely miscalculated its trust in Boko Haram. It funded it to topple the government in Lagos for failing to adhere to the president's insistence to form a Pan-African state in harmony with his ideological hero, W.E.B. DuBois', wishes. He wishes to do so as a socialist protectionism cooperative, secular of course on the surface except for his likely clandestine adherence to the Islamic faith judging by past photographs and capacity to speak perfect Arabic in reciting prayers within the religion and to do so with no outside accent whatsoever. As Lagos failed to achieve the president's objective for it, the administration initiated its support for Boko Haram as a cell of freedom fighters. It has been stated many times how one's terrorist is somewhere else a dreaded terrorist cell. And the president, as the world's largest state sponsor of Islamic terrorism, is intent upon manufacturing the entire Middle East and Africa as one large empire or superstate - under Islamic, which will be known as a caliphate for his purposes but instead run by socialists within the faith, himself included.

***

And finally, the Nigerian connection between Boko Haram, the Muslim Brotherhood and President Obama is discussed below by DC Clothesline Online:
The Nigerian Connection – Boko Haram, Obama, and Qatar
Posted on May 21, 2014 by William Michael
“Allah ghayatuna Al-rasul za’imuna. Al-Qur-’an dusturuna. Al-jihad sabiluna. Al-mawt fi sabil Allah asma amanina. Allah akbar, Allah akbar.”
“God is our goal, the Quran is our Constitution, the Prophet is our leader, struggle [jihad] is our way, and death in the service of God is the loftiest of our wishes. God is great. God is great.”
-Muslim Brotherhood chant
President Obama (left) and a Boko Haram operative.
Last month Boko Haram, a franchise of al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, kidnapped 276 young girls in Nigeria.  This horrifying situation reminded this country, apparently even the White House, that Islamic fascism was still a serious threat to world peace.  As if kidnapping innocent children was not bad enough, Boko Haram then announced their intentions to sell the girls into slavery.  Prior Boko Haram’s threat that the children, who are mostly Christian, would be sold in the “marketplace,” President Obama publicly ignored the kidnapping.  But, even the Obamas found this promise of forced (sexual) servitude so shocking that Michelle launched a Twitter campaign- #bringbackourgirls.
Emphatically, it should not have taken an announcement by Boko Haram to wake Obama up to reality of Islamist groups and human trafficking.  That al Qaeda and such groups have for a long time been modern day slavers is actually old news.  Not only has al Qaeda practiced slavery in North Africa, but they are a force[1] in the Asian sex slave trade as well.  Indeed, Qatar, the home of the al Qaeda’s parent organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, has one of the most oppressed (read: enslaved) labor forces in the entire world, despite also having the highest GDP per capita in the world.  There’s some real income inequality for you.  Nevertheless, it took the clear and sustained outrage of a shocked world to get the Obamas to join the protest against Boko Haram.  At least on the surface of things.
Here are some quick facts about Nigeria, and why the Boko Haram Islamist insurgency is important for the world to pay attention to.  Nigeria has both the largest population in Africa (170 million) and Africa’s largest economy. This is thanks, in part, to massive reserves of oil.  Boko Haram has been trying to violently overthrow the government of Nigeria since 2001, but in the last few years, especially since 2011, the situation has gotten considerably more tenuous for the Nigerian state.  In 2014 alone, there have been (at least) 11 deadly attacks.  If the Nigerian state were to collapse, and an Afghanistan-like environment of anarchy were to emerge (as has emerged in Libya since the end of Gaddafi’s rule), there is little doubt that the wars already raging in the Central African Republic and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, not to mention South Sudan and other places on the continent, would spill over into Nigeria.
Moreover, like in Nigeria, the conflicts in the Sudan, CAR, and DRC involve Islam and Christianity.  Should Boko Haram succeed, Africa would be in a state of near total war – total religious war.  It would be very hard to stop this chaos and animosity from spreading across the entire world.  Already Europe has seen the ascendency of a fascist-oriented political Right, an ideology whose resentment of Muslim immigrants transcends parties and nations.  Whether it is National Front in France or Vlaams Belang in Belgium, the parties of the Nouvelle Droit on the continent make their animosity toward non-Christian immigrants a central part of their political platforms.  For this reason, Europe would be especially vulnerable to violence if Boko Haram is not suppressed.
Obama’s Stance.  Or Dance?
In the days since the kidnapping made international headlines, a curious pattern of policy positions have been unearthed involving the Obama administration’s State Department, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the view the administration in general of Boko Haram.  The State Department, despite the increasing urgency of the situation, and additionally, reports that Boko Haram had originally received seed money from Osama bin Laden, refused to designate Boko Haram a terrorist organization.  As Andrew McCarthy put it in his May 13 article:
“Instead, ignoring what Boko Haram pronounces its goals to be, the Obama administration portrayed it as a diffuse organization with no clear agenda that was ascendant due to the policies of the Nigerian government (which is under Christian leadership). As the Boko Haram threat got progressively worse, the State Department and the White House theorized that it could be defused by better government engagement with the Muslim population in Northern Nigeria, and that designating Boko Haram as a terrorist organization—which would have triggered our law’s array of counterterrorism tools and squeezed the organization financially—would raise its prestige while encouraging more government repression against Muslims.”
It’s hard to fathom how the State Department could fail to see the hallmarks of al Qaeda in Boko Haram, whose very name means “western education is forbidden [according to Islam].”  If there is still any doubt, Boko Haram made it clear when they hoisted the al Qaeda flag over the kidnapped children.  Perhaps this stance by Hillary should not perplex us.  It was Hillary, after all, who insisted that the United States had a right to arm the Libyan rebels in overthrowing Gaddafi, despite the fact that many of them were essentially al Qaeda.  Since then, Libya has failed to stabilize, while becoming a hotbed for drug trafficking Islamic cartels.  (Drug trafficking is another signature of Islamist movements, especially al Qaeda.  This theme will be expanded on and explained below.)
And yet Hillary’s State Department’s obliviousness was not an oversight – it appears to be State Department policy.  For in May 2013, the Nigerian government conducted air strikes against Boko Haram positions in northeastern Nigeria.  Secretary of State John Kerry, at once, urged restraint, cautioning the Nigerian government of Goodluck Jonathan “to respect human rights and not harm civilians.”  Let us recall the number of civilians that Obama has effectively ordered killed each year by U.S. drone strikes in the alleged hunt for al Qaeda terrorists (who seem to be more menacing than ever): 2,400 have been killed in drone strikes from 2009 through the end of 2013, many of them civilians.  With hypocritical allies like Clinton, Kerry, and their boss, Obama… good luck, Jonathan.  You definitely need it.
The Libyan Arms Grab
What could explain the sudden prominence and threat of Boko Haram, which was, up until 2011, not viewed as an existential threat to Nigerian society?  There rise seems to coincide with the fall of Gaddafi and the dispersing of his massive weapons caches.  Note that in Iraq, when Saddam Hussein was defeated, it was the very Iraqi weapons which were formerly under state control that fueled the al Qaeda insurgency of the Islamic State of Iraq, or ISI (no pun intended on the part of the author).  Several sources, including Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, suggest the the Obama administration, specifically the CIA acting under the aegis of the Hillary’s State Department, was using the compound in Benghazi as an arms shipment point to rebels (i.e., al Qaeda et al.) in Syria.  Would it not make perfect sense that the some of the weapons went south, into Nigeria?  And into the Central African Republic, which has also seen a horrific spike in violence since 2011?
What is the Obama administration doing in Africa?  It is a question worth considering.  Additional food for thought comes from Mali.  In 2012, the United States, along with the United Kingdom and France, sanctioned the government of Mali following a military coup.  The coup in Mali was a direct result of the previous government’s impotence in effectively thwarting Islamist insurgencies in the north, such as al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).  Why would the United States and other NATO allies sanction a government that was fighting al Qaeda from overtaking their country?
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s dictum applies: “Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.”  Is Obama really arming and supporting al Qaeda?
The remainder of the article will explore this proposition and offer evidence of why this conclusion looks likely.
Rhymes with “Gutter”
Qatar, the little known country on the Arabian peninsula with the “worst” counterterrorism reputation in the region (worse, ahem, than Iran), who also hosts two of the largest American bases in the entire world, Al Udeid and As Saliyah, and who had 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed on payroll, once again appears to be at the center of a scandal.  This time, research proves that Boko Haram was founded with the support of the Qatari royal family through a Mauritanian proxy.  Not only that, but Qatar was a strong supporter of the Libyan rebels, not only as an advocate through Al Jazeera, but going so far as to participate in military operations.  Qatari fighter jets bombed Gaddafi targets, and Qatari special forces reportedly provided basic infantry training to rebel fighters.
There are several aspects that connect the Qataris to the Boko Haram and their allied Islamist insurgencies.  Members of the Qatari royal family, the al Thanis, were reported to be among the early supporters of Boko Haram.  The former president of Mauritania, Maaouya Sidi Ahmed Ould Taya, a Sunni Muslim, currently resides in the capital of Qatar, Doha.  Taya has been linked to Boko Haram (providing “lots of funds”), which was founded in 2002 as, one report puts it, a “money making venture.”  Taya now teaches at a Ahmed bin Mohammed Military School in Qatar.
It may seem bizarre to start an Islamist group as a money making venture. Yet it is perfectly sensible, considering that the unpoliced regions of North Africa are smuggler territory.  Take, for example, the case of al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).  Formed in 1998 out of the Groupe Islamique Armé (an Algerian insurgency group), they operate across northern Africa, including in Mali, Algeria, Chad, Libya, Tunisia, Niger, and Morocco. AQIM is known for kidnapping (sound familiar?) and smuggling, most notably cigarette smuggling.  In 2009, a Boeing 727 was discovered, torched, in the Malian city of Gao.  It had departed from Venezuela, and was reported filled with cocaine.  This was dubbed “Le Boeing de la Coke” by the French press.  Smuggling, whether cigarettes or cocaine, kidnapping, slavery, and jihad – that is the AQIM/Boko Haram way.  Is it any wonder that when interviewed, one Somali who joined Boko Haram was quoted as saying, “At least I could get a job.  The rate of unemployment is a threat to security.”
Drugs are nothing new for the Muslim Brotherhood Qataris.  It has already been reported that they are in a strategic venture with the Pakistani National Logistics Cell, who serve as heroin transporters for the Taliban (and couriers for NATO in Afghanistan).  But why stop with opium?  Cocaine is at least as profitable, and it’s a whole different market.  Diversification is a basic business principle, and the Qataris, who operate a huge sovereign wealth fund (Qatar Investment Authority), understand this concept well.
King David’s Empire
If there is one man who has a lock on Islamism and drugs it is the Indian born Dawood Ibrahim.  Among the most wanted men in the world, he enjoys the protection of the Pakistani ISI (intelligence agency) for his enterprise, dubbed D-Company.  A major player in Bollywood, Ibrahim has also been tied to several infamous terror attacks, including the 1993 and 2008 bombings in Mumbai, which killed hundreds.  In addition to running the Hawala system (used for money laundering), Ibrahim profits handsomely from the Taliban’s opium operations.  The market for South American cocaine appears to be one of his newer ventures, for in 2009 Ibrahim’s brother Anis was granted a passport by the government of Belize, a country known for drug transiting and money laundering.  (Wonder who ordered up Le Boeing de la Coke?)  Additionally, Dawood Ibrahim has been tied with the crystal meth business.  So vested is Dawood with the Muslim Brotherhood and the ISI, that he reportedly pledged 30% of his earnings to the ISI in exchange for continued protection.
On a slightly different subject, Ibrahim got his start with the Hindu mafia crowd.  These are the same people who are close with the Hindu Nationalists, represented by the Bharatiya Janata Party, or BJP.  The BJP, and their leader, the violent, murderous Narenda Modi, just happened to win the Indian elections in a huge landslide victory this month.  The BJP itself comes out of the Indian RSS, a movement which idolizes Adolph Hitler (much like the Muslim Brotherhood).  Modi, who very likely has back channels to Ibrahim’s criminal organization, will now be the Prime Minister of India.
This network of Islamism and South American drug cartels probably sounds crazy.  Yet how else do you explain the fact that Californian members of the (El Salvadoran) drug cartel MS13 have recorded themselves on video fighting the Islamists (on the side of Bashar al-Assad) in Syria?  Yes, alongside the MS13 “homie” is a member of the Armenian Power gang, dressed in Hezbollah military garb.  In this global turf war, Sunni Islamists/Muslim Brotherhood/al Qaeda are facing off against Hezbollah/Iran/MS13/Armenian organized crime.  Hezbollah, a Shiite fundamentalist group (unlike the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood), is a major player in the cocaine business, operating in Mexico as well as Venezuela.
All of this may appear to be so unseemly that it is unfathomable that the United States would ever be involved.  There are good reasons for American entanglement.
The Qatari’s American Playthings
Below is a sampling of the American establishment’s entrenchment with Qatar.
Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service
Among America’s most respected universities, Georgetown has a campus in Doha for the School of Foreign Service.  According to their own website, “The University’s on-going academic discussions with policymakers, independent actors and decision makers, positioned in Washington, D.C and in Doha, Qatar as the center of east-west relations has ensured the relevancy and vibrancy of Georgetown’s programs of study for the coming century.”
Yup, we train American diplomats in Doha – the same Doha that finances terror from Africa to Syria to Europe to Asia.  This may, possibly, help explain how Huma Abedin, despite her various documented family connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, became one of Hillary’s closest confidants.  Huma was her Deputy Chief of Staff at the State Department, and before that her “body woman.”  Under Hillary’s tenure, State even befriended the international mouthpiece of the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Jazeera superstar Yusuf al-Qaradawi, in order to negotiate with the Taliban.
Carnegie Mellon Qatar
Carnegie Mellon has a substantial footprint in Qatar.  They offer no less than five majors of study, including Biological Sciences, Business Administration, Computational Biology, Computer Science, and Information Systems.
This may sound relatively harmless (or not), until you remember that that Carnegie Mellon is partnered with the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security for project involving cyber security, including preventing cyber attacks.  As Carnegie Mellon’s website explains:
“The Software Engineering Institute (SEI) is a federally funded research and  development center sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense and operated by Carnegie Mellon University. The SEI’s core purpose is to help others make measured improvements in their software engineering capabilities.”
While the SEI is not physically in Qatar, Carnegie Mellon Qatar clearly has leveraged the expertise of their parent university, which is integral to the nation’s cyber security.
Boeing
Boeing, America’s preeminent aerospace manufacturer, as well as a critical military contractor, is described by one senior executive as in a kind of “marriage” with Qatar.  Said their Vice President for Sales, “The relationship is very strong; it’s kind of like a marriage. Sometimes things are okay and sometimes you’re fighting a little bit.”  Not only does Boeing sell commercial airliners, such as the new Boeing 787 Dreamliner, to Qatar Airlines, which has grown faster than any airline in the world in recent years, but also Apache attack helicopters.
ExxonMobil
The largest American oil company has been in Qatar since the early 1990s. Helping the al-Thanis exploit the world’s third largest natural gas reserves (behind Iran and Russia, incidentally two of their greatest geopolitical foes), as of 2010 ExxonMobil had approximately 550 employees in Qatar.  Qatargas, the state monopoly LNG company for which ExxonMobil works, had revenues of $37.2 billion in 2011.  So intertwined in the affairs of Qatar is the company that in 2013, they sponsored the “Qatar ExxonMobil Open 2013,” an annual tennis tournament, for the 19th straight year.
As has been noted in previous articles, these universities and companies are just a taste of the American involvement with Qatar.  Other notable presences include (the foreign policy think tank) The Brookings Institution, Weill Cornell Medical College, Texas A&M, Northwestern University, and Virginia Commonwealth University.
Conclusion
To support the hunt for the Nigerian girls, Obama has pledged reconnaissance drones. Nevermind that NATO airstrikes were deployed to remove Gaddafi, who had, following 9/11/2001 been cooperating with U.S. authorities.  The plight of these children apparently do not merit American military might.  Meanwhile Canada, a nation which many perceive as the paragon of a peaceful international nation, has sent special forces to aid in the search (albeit, allegedly, they will not engage in any fighting).  Meanwhile, a very recent report has suggested that all of North Africa is on the verge of political catastrophe: “Instability and insurgent network activity across Northern Africa in Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Mali, Morocco and Tunisia — and the proliferation of that type of activity into and across Europe — has been increasingly worrying security officials in recent years.”
Considering the larger picture of American entanglement in Qatar – the only open supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood, the financiers of terror, a nation which profits handsomely from slavery and narcotics while purporting to be holy rollers – is it any surprise that we find ourselves routinely on the side of Qatar and their Islamist insurgent groups?  Whether in Libya, or Syria (where rebels are now observed firing American missiles), or Nigeria, the United States under Obama’s leadership has predictably acted as mercenaries for the Muslim Brotherhood and their various manifestations across the globe.  To stop this will be tantamount to challenging some of the most revered American institutions, including the preeminent airline manufacturer and oil companies, the American military (who has two massive bases there), the State Department, and a sizable chunk of academia.  Yet if nothing is done, chaos, the chaos that makes smuggling humans and drugs so much easier (and more profitable), will continue to spread.
Finally, it should not be considered taboo to suggest the Obama administration is on the wrong side of this battle, wittingly, willfully, and wholeheartedly.  According to an article in The Daily Beast:
“The dispute inside the intelligence community falls along familiar lines about al Qaeda. The White House has emphasized the distinctions between al Qaeda’s core and its affiliates and other aspiring jihadists, who the White House sees as operating almost entirely independent of the central group.
However, another faction inside the U.S. intelligence community—one that comprises the current leadership of the Defense Intelligence Agency and others working in the military—see al Qaeda as a flatter organization that coordinates between nodes and operates through consensus in the model of an Islamic Shura council.”
The time for wondering whether there is a coordinating body at work for the global jihad is over.  Qatar fulfills this role, and the Defense Intelligence Agency seems to understand that.
Following the pattern of so many military commanders working for this administration, on April 30, the Chief of the Defense Intelligence Agency for the past two years, Lt. General Michael Flynn, announced he would be retiring at the end of the summer.
[1] The Naxali are a Maoist insurgency group based out of eastern India.  They have been known to cooperate with the Pakistani ISI, a supporter of Islamic terrorism as well as the protectors of Osama bin Laden, as well as the Abu Sayyaf Group, an al Qaeda group in the Philippines.
William Michael’s article first appeared at The New York Young Republican’s Club website.
_____________________

Not only do both China and Japan own shares in America due to our enormous trade deficits with both nations, so too does Qatar, the world's wealthiest nation in terms of per capita income, which also controls our largest oil corporation as a de facto state corporation. Oil historically serves as the catalyst of wars. As time passes, oil becomes a great source of the unprecedented bloodshed of Islamists who also corner the market in the drug trade in cooperating with South America. This article does not once discuss the Golden Triangle of Southeast Asia; neither will this article, but it will be a topic for discussion very soon.

Conclusion: Was Dr. Randy Short Correct?

As the president appears to be the strong arm for the Muslim Brotherhood, does this also mean he is the supreme leader of that organization too?  Why else is he concerned if Boko Haram and the long network of links spawned by al Qaeda seem to corner the market globally in oil and the drug trade? This is too the issue with the Golden Triangle involving the Burmese government's cooperation with Laos and Thailand, the latter of which just saw its military successfully throw a coup d'etat of its own democratically-elected government with the blessing of its king. Dr. Short indeed pegged the story of the CIA under Obama prepping Boko Haram to topple first Nigeria and later, the Central African Republic. It has, in effect, achieved these goals after Mali, for example, was toppled. As last month the world learned less than one week following the two Ukrainian jet fighters being shot down by Russian anti-aircraft missiles how an airliner "crashed" in Mali, how French President Francois Hollande chose to include the possibility of terrorists shooting down the plane and yet little since has been reported aside from the weather being terrible and could have served as the reason behind the tragedy, why indeed must all these issues be hush-hush? Why else would the president choose to open our borders to the entire Latin American region of the world, in which leaders of international drug cartels plus Islamic terrorists may enter our nation undetected and eventually to be subsidized? Why indeed does Sen. Rand Paul support amnesty as well as a potential war with Russia over defending Ukraine simply due to his commitment to honor our alliance with the British to defend the nation in accordance to the Budapest Referendum of 1994? Why, too, was the late Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto assassinated on December 27, 2007 when she divulged to the late British journalist David Frost that Osama bin Laden was murdered six years earlier in 2001 by Saeed Omar Sheikh, who currently is in a Pakistan prison sentence to be executed for more than 12 years?


If you missed the key portion of the interview at the six minute mark, the bottom video will focus solely upon it. Recall too as stated in a prior blog article how Gen. Pervez Musharraf suspended Pakistan's constitution the following day in fear that he was about to be overthrown via coup d'etat, likely by the ISI.


The president, in my opinion, is intent upon legalizing the sale and retailing of currently-banned illicit drugs beyond the simple support to do the same for marijuana. This has nothing to do at all with providing the American people with the liberty of purchasing medically-harmful foreign substances simply to appease his millennial supporters, but rather to engage in the drug trade himself in a legal capacity. Since you read my prior article discussing how he continues to fund contras for both rebel alliances in states unfriendly to his policies or governments combatting freedom fighters who would subvert his global design for his totalitarian designs, it only makes sense to topple Venezuela to place right-wing rebels who are friendly to him in power in Caracas, or to topple the current Panamanian government so that we have de facto control again of the Panama Canal to corner the trade routes in the Western Hemisphere to push out Chinese and Russian vessels as both nations are engaging in a shift into our hemispheric dominion of hegemony, and for learning measures to topple Cuba and, for all intents and purposes, discover the key to their health care system in order to enforce the Affordable Care Act as a means to keeping tabs with Main Street, U.S.A. once the rumored microchips are installed in the next three years if the law is not outright repealed. The fact the president just three months ago traded five of the Taliban's highest ranked officials and used Qatar as the conduit to complete the transaction for the derelict St. Bowe Bergdahl, whose father is a known supporter and correspondent for the Taliban and therefore, al-Qaeda, is more than simply a matter of curiosity with no ties that bind. Pakistan, whose ISI (Inter-State Intelligence) created the Taliban government in Kabul nearly a generation ago and also funded al Qaeda and provided for Osama bin Laden his base for operations in Tora Bora, Kandahar and in Pakistan itself, is the Central Asian power broker to the Qatari government's dominance of the Arab League region for terrorist cells. As we funded al Qaeda in Libya, where the same weaponry read the Islamic State in Syria and Boko Haram in Nigeria, the president is intent upon molding a coalition of states that are either favorable already to his policies and were funded by our tax dollars during the initial stages of the Arab Spring to topple each of the old secular dictatorships in favor of those to connect Obama with his inner web of what might be considered sultanates ruled under Sharia law. He publicly supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and considered aiding financially in its maintenance of absolute power under the guise of democracy so that he had a friendly government in Cairo as they were toppled by another coup d'etat; why else would the new government insist upon frisking John Kerry upon landing in Cairo for the peace talks? Egypt has publicly supported Netanyahu's quest to destroy Hamas once and for all; yet the Obama administration continues to fund Hamas illegally, paid Qatar $11 billion dollars to bolster its defenses on the same day that UN Gen. Sec. Ban Ki-moon flew the state's chartered jet to Cairo on July 21. The fact that Boeing is in bed with the Qatari government in accord to the strategic arrangement with our government must not at all ever be discounted. It reads like a bad Alex Jones article, but sadly, it is not at all incredible since many of his reported conspiracies are now being revealed publicly.

America rules the world, which now reeks of Big Brother, of George Orwell's fears for the world, of the Manor Farm and all the animals living to serve the pig dictator, Napoleon, who forced his partner Snowflake to flee after sicking his dogs on him. The PATRIOT Act, unintendedly of course, led to the current breaches of constitutional power by President Obama. That act, however, is unconstitutional because it violates the Fourth Amendment right to being free from the government's unlawful attempts at searches and seizures for American civilians. And now that we now are a nation no longer with borders, what then defines an American citizen? Is there even such a thing as an American citizen or a United States of America today, or in Obama's mind, the world is, indeed, America? If he chooses to declare everyone American civilians, can he also do the same by signing an executive order stating that any citizen may have his or her citizenship revoked, in which case the rule of law under our present constitutional legal code no longer is applied to them? Could he set up FEMA camps for conservatives, Christians and Jews or his political enemies - enemies of the state - just as he has for the deluge of illegal immigrants who now reside in $50 million dollar vacation resorts allegedly paid for by the Koch brothers according to Michael Savage in a previous article? We indeed do live in times which try our souls, and if we fail to hang together and fight, we shall surely hang separately. Terrorism is not just a half world away, he resides in Washington, D.C. at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue inside the White House when he is not on a posh golf course or flying cross country to a Democratic Party fundraiser at a Hollywood celebrity's home.