The Legacy of Margaret Sanger, the Whore of Babylon: A Threat as Great as Global Genocide by Islam
 |
| Margaret Sanger, above caption personifying the mission of her organization Planned Parenthood; below where she delivered a speech before the Ku Klux Klan |
With all the growing threats of the Islamic State, al Qaeda and Mexican drug cartels and even the Mexican military attacking our homeland (which has actually happened multiple times, but has garnered very little attention due to the media's choice to ignore it), there is one threat which in the history of mankind has easily wiped out more through the genocidal act of eugenics than Communism, Fascism or terrorism combined. When I mention the name of the founder of Planned Parenthood and the modern standard for radical feminism in America and across the globe, you will know her still as Margaret Sanger. Between 1879 and 1966, she lived a life far surpassing the general consensus' standards of libertinism, sexual profligacy or simply to be defined as immoral. To me, someone as evil as Margaret Sanger is neither moral nor immoral, because you then have to measure her by some standard that no one alive outside of that establishment could ever quantify, and a qualitative analysis into her psyche can only be compared to Adolf Hitler, who she served as a major influence in building his "Master Race", which of course she, too, advocated.
The matter of legalizing abortions on demand is abhorrent enough for most sensible human beings with a pulse and measurable body temperature warmth. To consider that birth control alone was not what Sanger's goal was at all is far more disturbing and a fact that in light of growing fears of President Obama illegally revoking specified American citizens' habeas corpus rights and imprisoning them in FEMA camp, must be considered by a realist. I do not advocate necessarily reading Alex Jones' news service per se, but as you have read me state many times before, where there is smoke, there is always a fire burning. Our job as responsible American citizens is to seek more information on what is reported through rigorous research and meticulous analytical attention to detail. It is no crime to be cautious or, as Ronald Reagan stated on several occasions during his presidency to trust, but verify; but to placate to the elitist establishment by being herded like sheep will only guarantee you a government ruled by wolves, according to Edward R. Murrow.
Evil exists in all shapes and sizes, in print or by audial word of mouth, through the thick and even the thin, but most assuredly it does through democracy should a mob of radical sans culottes be incited by financiers within the affluent Jacobin circles. Every major left-wing revolution since the French Revolution started with the fall of the Bastille on July 14, 1789 were waged under anarchists pitchforks and rifles, a pumped fist held high and proudly but not necessarily because they grasped the gravity behind the "why". And anarchy, just as socialism or its most extreme form in communism, could not exist as a state sovereign body if it were not for wealthy financiers who profited off their peasant or proletariats' miseries prior to the bloody insurrections. The American Revolution was a consensus by multiple plebiscites in the colonies, though for sure there were Tories very loyal to His Majesty's authority. Colonial legislative assemblies provided each colony a representative to the two continental congresses and provided for the common defense with a military of the willing. There were plenty who were willing, and as a result, the Spirit of 1776 remains still the catalyst the burns brightest within the hearts of true patriots. For those like Margaret Sanger, however, she would be most pleased at our current president's policies, for he is the first in his position to serve as a keynote speaker at any Planned Parenthood assembly, and his administration increased funding for Sanger's evil gift to the tune of $500 million per year, in which the total number of abortions during the first two to three years of his presidency rose in those clinics. Considering that socialism is unsustainable since it eventually runs dry of our earned incomes, it is spent well in the eyes of socialists in government, for if government cannot kill you before being delivered from the womb, it will simply claim it is a natural right for sustain a standard lifestyle that they fund you and your medical care, until the latter, like with our veterans, leaves ample opportunity to defund and to terminate you life to ensure cost effectiveness for those whose liberty to live is better suited. At that point, the two claims of natural rights and right to choose to abort or to deliver the baby becomes blurred, and no one can then discern just which one is.
The Sordid Psyche of Margaret Sanger
To grasp the gravity behind unbridled evil as with Margaret Sanger, consider her history and how she came to justify her amorality. It was Paul Kurtz who wrote the following celebrating the life of a harlot and genocidal heathen, courtesy of Worldview Weekend:
"In building naturalistic alternatives to religion, we need to focus on exemplary role models in history: humanist heroes and heroines…Among these are…Margaret Sanger." Paul Kurtz, Free Inquiry, August/September 2006, 8.
Indeed, Sanger was a role model to those with neither a soul nor a shred of a conscience. Humanism is the synonym of atheism, but attempts to paint its portrait through rebranding it with a humane element. To have any speck of morality would require one call attention if the act of taking a life or worse, advocating the extermination of entire races or disabled people Sanger considered "human weeds" and "human waste", is at all a right for anyone to deny or to confiscate. Sanger never did; she had to find a manner to justify her sexual promiscuity by rewarding herself with a life filled without consequence for the causal act. To grip the enormity of Sanger's mental illness of narcissistic hypersexuality and what price to human it has cost, consider the following details from The Washington Post following the location of recorded tape of Sanger demanding that there be a moratorium on births for ten years in developing nations:
By Arina Grossu - - Monday, May 5, 2014Recent articles have reported on an unearthed video from 1947 of Margaret Sanger demanding “no more babies” for 10 years in developing countries. A couple of years ago, Margaret Sanger was named one of Time magazine’s “20 Most Influential Americans of All Time.” Given her enduring influence, it’s worth considering what the woman who founded Planned Parenthood contributed to the eugenics movement.Sanger shaped the eugenics movement in America and beyond in the 1930s and 1940s. Her views and those of her peers in the movement contributed to compulsory sterilization laws in 30 U.S. states that resulted in more than 60,000 sterilizations of vulnerable people, including people she considered “feeble-minded,” “idiots” and “morons.”She even presented at a Ku Klux Klan rally in 1926 in Silver Lake, N.J. She recounted this event in her autobiography: “I accepted an invitation to talk to the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan … I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses … I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak … In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered” (Margaret Sanger, “An Autobiography,” Page 366). That she generated enthusiasm among some of America’s leading racists says something about the content and tone of her remarks.In a letter to Clarence Gable in 1939, Sanger wrote: “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members” (Margaret Sanger commenting on the ‘Negro Project’ in a letter to Gamble, Dec. 10, 1939).Her own words and television appearances leave no room for parsing. For example, she wrote many articles about eugenics in the journal she founded in 1917, the Birth Control Review. Her articles included “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The Purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925) and “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928), to name a few.The following are some of her more telling quotes:“While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit. They are excellent means of meeting a certain phase of the situation, but I believe in regard to these, as in regard to other eugenic means, that they do not go to the bottom of the matter.” (“Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” Feb. 1919, The Birth Control Review).“Eugenics without birth control seems to us a house builded upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit” (“Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” Feb. 1919, The Birth Control Review).“Stop our national habit of human waste.” (“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 6).“By all means, there should be no children when either mother or father suffers from such diseases as tuberculosis, gonorrhea, syphilis, cancer, epilepsy, insanity, drunkenness and mental disorders. In the case of the mother, heart disease, kidney trouble and pelvic deformities are also a serious bar to childbearing No more children should be born when the parents, though healthy themselves, find that their children are physically or mentally defective.” (“Woman and the New Race,” 1920, Chapter 7).“The main objects of the Population Congress would be to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring[;] to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.” (“A Plan for Peace,” 1932).In a 1957 interview with Mike Wallace, Sanger revealed: “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world — that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin — that people can — can commit.”This line of thinking from its founder has left lasting marks on the legacy of Planned Parenthood. For example, 79 percent of Planned Parenthood’s surgical abortion facilities are located within walking distance of black or Hispanic communities.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Abortion Surveillance report revealed that between 2007 and 2010, nearly 36 percent of all abortions in the United States were performed on black children, even though black Americans make up only 13 percent of our population. A further 21 percent of abortions were performed on Hispanics, and 7 percent more on other minority groups, for a total of 64 percent of U.S. abortions tragically performed on minority groups. Margaret Sanger would have been proud of the effects of her legacy.Arina Grossu is director for the Center for Human Dignity at the Family Research Council.
_________________
I believe Sanger would have been one of the billions of victims of her own madness. The question then begs to be asked: Just who would be exempt from Sanger's curse to the world? Perhaps another page would better explain, as it provides a brief historical and psychological profile:
1. "Margaret [Higgins] Sanger was born on September 14, 1879, in the small industrial community of Corning in upstate New York, the sixth of eleven children. Her father, Michael Higgins, was an Irish Catholic immigrant who fancied himself a freethinker and a skeptic." George Grant, Grand Illusions: The Legacy of Planned Parenthood (Franklin, TN: Adroit Press, 1992), 47.2. Margaret Higgins married William Sanger with "ties in radical politics by attending Socialist, Anarchist, and Communist meetings down in Greenwich Village…Margaret shed her bourgeois habits and took to Bohemian ways. Instead of whiling the hours away in the elegant shops along Fifth Avenue, she plunged headlong into the maelstrom of rebellion and revolution…getting acquainted with the foremost radicals of the day: John Reed, Eugene Debs, Clarence Darrow, Will Durant, Upton Sinclair, Julius Hammer, and Bill Haywood. She joined the Socialist Party." Ibid. 49, 50.3. Margaret Sanger "began to read everything in Emma Goldman's library including the massive, seven-volume Studies in the Psychology of Sex by Havelock Ellis…She told William that she needed emancipation from every taint of Christianized capitalism, including the strict bonds of the marriage bed." Ibid. 51.4. Margaret Sanger published a paper called The Woman Rebel. "It was an eight-sheet pulp with the slogan 'No Gods! No Masters!' emblazoned across the masthead. She advertised it as a 'paper of militant thought,' and militant it was indeed. The first issue denounced marriage as a 'degenerate institution,' capitalism as 'indecent exploitation,' and sexual modesty as 'obscene prudery.'" Ibid. 53.5. "Margaret's English exile gave her the opportunity to make some critical interpersonal connections as well. Her bed became a veritable meeting place for the Fabian upper crust: H. G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Arnold Bennett, Arbuthnot Lane, and Norman Haire. And of course, it was then that she began her unusual and tempestuous affair with Havelock Ellis. Ellis was the iconoclastic grandfather of the Bohemian sexual revolution…he had provided the free love movement with much of its intellectual apologia." Ibid. 57.6. By 1922 her book The Pivot of Civilization "was one of the first popularly written books to openly expound and extol Malthusian and Eugenic aims. Throughout its 284 pages, Margaret unashamedly called for the elimination of 'human weeds,' for the cessation of charity, for the segregation of 'morons, misfits, and the maladjusted' and for the sterilization of 'genetically inferior races.'7. After divorcing William Sanger, Margaret married J. Noah Slee, president of the Three-in-One Oil Company and a millionaire. Before the wedding ceremony she had Slee sign a prenuptial agreement. "It stipulated that Margaret would be free to come and go as she pleased with no questions asked. She was to have her own apartment and servants within her husband's home, where she could entertain 'friends' of her own choosing, behind closed doors. Furthermore, Slee would have to telephone her from the other end of the house even to ask for a dinner date. Margaret told her lovers that with that document, the marriage would make little or no difference in her life-apart from the convenience of the money, of course. And she went out of her way to prove it; she flaunted her promiscuity and infidelity every chance she could get." Ibid. 60.8. "Margaret Sanger was not content to keep her lascivious and concupiscent behavior to herself. She was a zealous evangelist for free love. Even in her old age, she persisted in proselytizing her sixteen-year old granddaughter, telling her that kissing, petting, and even intercourse was fine as long as she was sincere." Ibid. 64.9. "Margaret Sanger was committed to the revolution. She wanted to overthrow the old order of Western Christendom and usher in a 'New Age.'" Ibid. 64.10. "I look forward to seeing humanity free someday of the tyranny of Christianity no less than Capitalism." Sanger, Ibid. 65.11. "Today, Planned Parenthood is continuing Sanger's crusade against the church. In its advertisements, in its literature, in its programs, and in its policies, the organization makes every attempt to mock, belittle, and undermine Biblical Christianity." Ibid. 65.12. "When Leon Trotsky came to the United States briefly in 1917, he met Margaret Sanger and her friends and came away with a feeling of great revulsion. In his memoirs, he recorded nothing but distaste for the rich, smug Socialists he encountered in the Village. He said they were little better than 'hypocritical Babbits,' referring to the Sinclair Lewis character who used his parlor-room Socialism as a screen for personal ambition and self-aggrandisement. Sanger and the other Village elitists were revolutionaries only to the extent that Socialism did not conflict with wealth, luxury, and political influence." Ibid. 64.13. "But Sanger was an ardent, self-confessed eugenicist [an activist for a Master Race], and she would turn her otherwise noble birth control organizations into a tool for eugenics, which advocated for mass sterilization of so-called defectives, mass incarceration of the unfit and draconian immigration restrictions. Like other staunch eugenicists, Sanger vigorously opposed charitable efforts to uplift the downtrodden and deprived, and argued extensively that it was better that the cold and hungry be left without help, so that the eugenically superior strains could multiply without competition from the 'unfit.' She repeatedly referred to the lower classes and unfit as 'human waste' not worthy of assistance, and proudly quoted the extreme eugenic view that human 'weeds' should be 'exterminated.'" Edwin Black, War Against The Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign To Create A Master Race (New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 2004), 127.14. "More than a Malthusian [humans would run out of food], Sanger became an outspoken social Darwinist, even looking beyond the ideas of Spencer. In her 1922 book, Pivot of Civilization, Sanger thoroughly condemned charitable action. She devoted a full chapter to a denigration of charity and a deprecation of the lower classes." Ibid. 129.15. "Sanger condemned philanthropists and repeatedly referred to those needing help as little more than 'human waste.'" Ibid. 129.16. "Sanger's solutions were mass sterilization and mass segregation of the defective classes, and these themes were repeated often in Pivot of Civilization." Ibid. 131.17. In Sanger's book, Woman and the New Race, she declared, "Many, perhaps, will think it idle to go farther in demonstrating the immorality of large families, but since there is still an abundance of proof at hand, it may be offered for the sake of those who find difficulty in adjusting old-fashioned ideas to the facts. The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Ibid. 133.18. "At times, Sanger publicly advocated extermination of so-called 'human weeds.'" Ibid. 133.19. "Sanger surrounded herself with some of the eugenics movement's most outspoken racists and white supremacists. Chief among them was Lothrop Stoddard, author of The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy."20. "Shortly after Stoddard's landmark book was published in 1920, Sanger invited him to join the board of directors of her American Birth Control League, a position he retained for years." Ibid. 133.21. "Another Sanger colleague was Yale economics professor Irving Fisher, a leader of the Eugenics Research Association." Ibid. 134.22. "Among the leading psychiatrists at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry was Ernst Rudin, who headed the genealogical and demographic department. Rudin would soon become director of the institute. Later, he would become an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression." Ibid. 285.23. "Rudin was the star of German eugenics." Ibid. 286.24. "Sanger's magazine and the immediate predecessor to the Planned Parenthood Review-regularly and openly published the racist articles of the Malthusian Eugenicists. In 1920, it published a favorable review of Lothrop Stoddard's frightening book, The Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy. In 1923, the Review editorialized in favor of restricting immigration on a racial basis. In 1932, it outlined Sanger's 'Plan for Peace,' calling for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilative concentration camps for all 'dysgenic stocks.' In 1933, the Review published 'Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need' by Ernst Rudin, who was Hitler's director of genetic sterilization and a founder of the Nazi Society for Racial Hygiene. And later that same year, it published an article by Leon Whitney entitled, 'Selective Sterilization,' which adamantly praised and defended the Third Reich's racial programs." George Grant, Grand Illusions, 95, 96.25. "Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood and 1957 'Humanist of the Year.'" Claire Chambers, The Siecus Circle: A Humanist Revolution (Belmont, MA: Western Islands, 1977), 233.26. "In an article appearing in The Humanist, author Miriam Allen DeFord describes it this way: 'It was the radicals-political, economic, and religious-among whom Margaret Sanger found her first supporters: and she herself was one of them. Her father, Matthew Higgins, was a Socialists and the 'village atheist' of Corning, New York. The word 'Humanism' in its present religio-scientific meaning was not then current. But call it Freethought or Rationalism or Secularism, it was and it remained Margaret Sanger's creed. The first paper she founded and edited as called The Woman Rebel, and its masthead bore the motto: 'No gods, no masters.'" Ibid. 323,324.27. "Another leftist affiliation of Mrs. Sanger's was membership in the American Round Table of India, which is cited in the House Committee on Un-American Activities' Appendix IX as a "Communist front.' The secretary of this front was Robert Norton, cited as a 'well-known member of the Communist Party.'" Ibid. 324.28. "While abroad in 1914-15, Mrs. Sanger added spice to her life history by a liaison with the notorious Havelock Ellis, who, with Ethical Culture leader Percival Chubb, had been a principal organizer of the socialistic Fabian Society of Great Britain. Ellis was a sexual pervert and drug user, who, with a circle of fellow leftists, pioneered in the experimental use of hallucinogens in private orgies." Ibid. 325.29. "Ellis was clearly a pathological case. He urged his wife into Lesbianism and drug addiction…Ellis finally drove his wife into a state of mental collapse, which became complete when he wrote to her about his intimate relationships with Margaret Sanger." Ibid. 325.30. "Until her death in 1966, Margaret Sanger was honorary chairman of Planned Parenthood. Among other significant honors won by Mrs. Sanger in her lifetime was the 'Humanist of the Year' Award for 1957." Ibid. 326.31. This is Margaret Higgins Sanger Slee, who is, according to Paul Kurtz, editor of Free Inquiry, a heroine of the Secular Humanist movement. Can anyone seriously imagine Margaret Sanger replacing, for example, Winston Churchill, encouraging the Brits not to surrender to Adolph Hitler with her message of atheism, socialism, social Darwinism, eugenics, free love, etc. On the contrary, Churchill was exhorting his fellow Brits to stand against Hitler and his Nazi (eugenics) movement by defending Christianity and Western Civilization. (See Deborah Davis Brezina, The Spirit of Churchill (Murfreesboro, TN: Avalon Press, 2006)."Those who plow iniquity and those who sow trouble harvest it. By the breath of God they perish, and by the blast of His anger they come to an end." Job 4:8,9_____________________
No true human being of any degree of conscience or measurable morality who declare this to her husband as she "began to read everything in Emma Goldman's library including the massive, seven-volume Studies in the Psychology of Sex by Havelock Ellis…She told William [Sanger] that she needed emancipation from every taint of Christianized capitalism, including the strict bonds of the marriage bed." Considering radical feminism's aversion publicly to be objectified sexually or to witness any supermodel or celebrity profiting off her natural physical aesthetics, Sanger contradicted their goals by promoting everything save for the legalization of prostitution. Feminism, then, could not be possible if its most basic tenet, whoring one's body under the misleading guise of sexual freedom and the emasculation of a perceived patriarchal world order, was not there. And considering most women despise these harlots of militant scene who donne vagina suits and burn bras, this is the standard the media and Hollywood, which socialism within the Democratic Party champion in their many millions in fortunes they donate as funding, issues as an absolutism or else.
As most abortionists demand the world acknowledge any baby at all stages of fetal development to not be a human, they almost never attempt to provide medical evidence to the contrary, or if they do, it usually originates at a Planned Parenthood clinic. But Sanger, as the originator of eugenics and abortion, actually admitted that a fertilized gamete is a living, breathing human lifeform! At that, what she really stated was how she advocated genocide, not the destruction of a clump of cells forming an inanimate piece of tissue. Do not take my word for it; read the following quotes provided by Evolution and the American Abortion Mentality by Paul G. Humber, M.S.:
Sanger — "Babies in the Womb"!
Another insidious development occurred earlier in the century (about the time Hitler himself was forming his ideas). It involved Margaret Sanger (1879-1966), the founder of Planned Parenthood (a major promoter of abortions in America today). She has been given the unusual title, "Father of Modern Society." 4 Her evolutionary mentality will be documented below, but first there should be a consideration of her views relating to abortion.In her Woman and the New Race, Sanger offered a conflicting message about this issue. On the one hand she wrote, "I assert that the hundreds of thousands of abortions performed in America each year are a disgrace to civilization." 5 Pro-lifers would heartily agree! She even referred to "babies" in the womb—not using the now "politically correct" term, fetuses: "There will be no killing of babies in the womb by abortion." 5Her message was inconsistent, however. Not only did Linda Gordon, author of Woman's Body, Woman's Right—a major work dealing with the history of birth control in America—indicate that Margaret Sanger "defended women's rights to abortion," 6 Sanger herself, in the very volume denouncing abortion already cited, wrote, "The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." 5 This hardly sounds pro-life.Whatever may be said of Sanger's confused views, her legacy is an organization that certainly encourages and participates in the killing of thousands and even millions of, to use her phrase, America's "infant members." What was it about her philosophy that allowed for this?"Defectives," "Dependents," and "Morons"!Hitler's link to evolution has already been documented.1 He put survival of-the-fittest into action, and millions of "unfit" people died as a result.Many Americans believe that something comparable to what happened under the leadership of Hitler is happening now in America. "Babies in the womb," most of them healthy and fit, have been slaughtered by the tens of millions in the United States of America — 4,000 every day!What some may not realize is that the same poisonous philosophy that infected Hitler also influenced Margaret Sanger. She said Charles Darwin observed "that we do not permit helpless human beings to die off, but we create philanthropies and charities, build asylums and hospitals and keep the medical profession busy preserving those who could not otherwise survive." Her view was that such philanthropies and charities were "ameliorative" at best, and that some so-called benevolences were "positively injurious to the community and the future of the race."Her following words (content-wise) sound like they could have been spoken by Adolf Hitler himself: "The most serious charge that can be brought against modern 'benevolence' is that it encourages the perpetuation of defectives, delinquents and dependents. These are the most dangerous elements in the world community, the most devastating curse on human progress and expression."One wonders how far Sanger would like to have taken her eugenics. She reported a study of the United States Army and concluded that "nearly half—47.3 percent—of the population had the mentality of twelve-year-old children or less—in other words, that they were morons." 7On the racial dimension, Linda Gordon (cf. above) quotes from a letter written by Margaret Sanger to Clarence Gamble on October 19, 1939: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out the idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." 6 Many years prior, Sanger said, "Whether or not the white races will be ultimately wiped off the face of the earth depends, to my mind, largely upon the conduct and behavior of the white people themselves. (Applause.)" 8Birth control for Sanger was "nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit." A eugenist, she defined the field as "the attempt to solve the problem from the biological and evolutionary point of view." She wanted to change things "to the construction and evolution of humanity itself." 8 She advocated applying "a stem and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring." 9 Revealing pro-choice tendencies, she went on to promote the notion of giving "certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilizations." 9Ms. Sanger assumed "the evolutionary process of man" 10 and argued that the "intelligence of a people is of slow evolutional development" 5 She hoped for a motherhood that would refuse "to bring forth weaklings."5 Such a motherhood "withholds the unfit brings forth the fit." 5 She wrote of "woman's upward struggle" 5 and described the "lack of balance between the birth rate of the 'unfit' and the 'fit'" as "the greatest present menace to civilization." 7Rejection of Only Solution!The Lord Jesus Christ sanctified life in the womb by living there Himself for nine months (Isaiah 49:5, cf. Luke 1:35). He also created every womb that was ever made (John 1:3). As the promised "seed" of the woman (Genesis 3:15), He came to rescue daughters (like those for whom Margaret Sanger expressed concern throughout her writings) from their burdens of pain, suffering, sin, and death. He came to set them free (John 9:36), and many women would testify that they have indeed been set free and will be set free even from death.Margaret Sanger, however, wrote of a different Jesus—"a Jesus who (would) not die upon the cross." 5 In place of the real Jesus who understands suffering intimately, she chose the hollow shell of evolutionary "science." Sadly, she wrote, "Interest in the vague sentimental fantasies of extra-mundane existence, in pathological or hysterical flights from the realities of our earthiness, will have through atrophy disappeared, for in that dawn men and women will have come to the realization . . . that here close at hand is our paradise, our everlasting abode, our Heaven and our eternity." 7 But how is Margaret Sanger qualified to make such pronouncements?Her present bodily "abode" is very undesirable (coffin? charred remains?), but Jesus is alive with a resurrected body in heaven! After He was resurrected, He proclaimed, "I am He that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death" (Revelation 1:18).Jesus' teachings about the future, contrary to Margaret Sanger's preachings, were neither "vague sentimental fantasies" nor "pathological," and they will never "atrophy." Heaven and earth may pass—but His words will never pass away (Matthew 24:35). He emphatically said, "I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die" (John 11:25,26)
______________________
Sanger's concept of mankind's eternal gratitude for sparing it and the world the scourge of the "unfit", "morons", "dependents" and "defectives" echo what the Democratic Party for nearly 50 years has supported as its purported platform for the observation of human rights and liberty through social equity. But what perverse definition of equity did Sanger, one of the foremost socialists in world history, ever provide that did not seek to offset the costs of a prohibitive measure for maintaining such an agenda? If socialism cannot succeed in killing a person before he or she is ever born, they will do so in other ways. And why not? It is happening right now in our VA Hospitals, where the Democrats for five years have lied, stating that Republicans have voted down additional funding. What really troubled the agenda was once The Daily Caller revealed the enormous budget surplus within the Department of Veterans Affairs, which means Obama superficially engaged in frugality to save a penny for a fictional rainy day in his perverted eye:
VA Expects To Have More Medical-Care Funding Than It Can Spend For The Fifth Year In A Row11:46 AM 05/27/2014The Obama administration’s Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) expects to have more money for medical care than it can spend for the fifth fiscal year in a row, The Daily Caller has learned.Republican lawmakers and veteran groups are currently calling for the resignation of VA Secretary Eric Shinseki over secret waiting lists kept at the Phoenix VA Medical Center that led to preventable veteran deaths.Despite liberal claims that VA needs more funding, based on a report from the labor union the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) that VA is underfunded, the scandal-plagued department actually has a surplus in medical-care funding.VA expects to carry over $450 million in medical-care funding from fiscal year 2014 to fiscal year 2015. VA received its full requested medical care appropriation of $54.6 billion this fiscal year, which is more than $10 billion more than it received four years ago.This is part of an ongoing trend.VA carried over $1.449 billion in medical-care funding from fiscal year 2010 to 2011, $1.163 billion from fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2012, $637 million from fiscal year 2012 to 2013, and $543 million from fiscal year 2013 to 2014.The Daily Caller reported that VA spent more than $3.5 million on furniture the night before the government shutdown on the last day of fiscal year 2013 so as not to lose that money in the department’s budget the next fiscal year.
__________________
Herbert Hoover, the last of the GOP progressives to serve as president, stated the infamous phrase of every family should have a house with a two car garage and 2.5 children. That would be nice if it was either a sustainable plan financially or, in today's language, if you are legally permitted to be born. As Sanger subsisted outwardly as a Bohemian beatnik predecessor or its hippie cousin, she lived in the lap of luxury; even Leon Trotsky, one of the foremost Bolsheviks of the communist revolution in Russia, despised her for being a hypocrite. Even Trotsky relied upon private financiers alongside V.I. Lenin to fund their revolution, for Lenin himself grew up in a wealthy middle class Russian family. So long as the rich are less rich who are in opposition, those who are loyal and bankroll the ruling oligarchy's regime will be preserved and added to it. It is another social Darwinism trait, and one which Sanger, like most Democrats in public office today, live by through the stealth of smoke and mirrors.
Of course, as previously stated, Planned Parenthood received record funding from the Obama administration. Fox News reported this January 8, 2013 of totals reaching $542 million in taxpayer funds:
Planned Parenthood receives record amount of taxpayer support
Published January 08, 2013
FoxNews.com
Planned Parenthood reported receiving a record $542 million in taxpayer support in fiscal 2012, marking a steady increase in government funding despite Republican-led efforts at the state and federal levels to cut off that stream.The funding figures were included in the abortion provider's annual report released Monday. The numbers showed roughly 45 percent of Planned Parenthood's budget now comes from taxpayer dollars.Pro-life groups quickly seized on the report to renew their calls for Congress to "defund" Planned Parenthood."Americans are sick and tired of underwriting the nation's largest abortion business," said Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the Susan B. Anthony List.Republican Tennessee Rep. Diane Black said the report "underscores the pressing need to cut off all federal funding for Planned Parenthood."The Republican-controlled House voted in the last session to strip federal funding for the organization But the measure did not advance.Separate efforts at the state level to yank funding have been blocked by the courts. Mostly recently, a federal appeals court in October blocked Indiana from carrying out a law to cut Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood.According to the latest annual report, the $542 million in taxpayer support last year counted Medicaid money. The total represents a steady increase, up 11 percent from $487 million the year before; that amount was up 34 percent from $363 million the year before that.Planned Parenthood spokesman Eric Ferrero said in a statement that the latest report shows "that we remain one of the nation's leading providers of high-quality, affordable health care for women, men, and young people."Planned Parenthood also slammed a renewed effort in Congress by Black and others to strip certain federal funding to the group."Some members of Congress just don't get it. Two years ago, the first order of business for Tea Party Republicans was blocking women's access to health care and defunding Planned Parenthood, and now they're at it again," president Cecile Richards said. "They apparently learned nothing from the results of the last election, when Americans said overwhelmingly that they do not want politicians dictating women's access to health care. This legislation would limit women's access to the wide range of preventive health care services that Planned Parenthood health centers provide, including cancer screenings, breast exams and birth control."The latest annual report also showed Planned Parenthood performed nearly 334,000 abortions in 2011, which The Susan B. Anthony List said was a record. Though federal funding is not supposed to go toward abortions, pro-life groups and lawmakers still suggested a connection between the increases."Planned Parenthood has spent much of the last few years demanding that taxpayers add millions more to their coffers, citing their non-profit status and so-called focus on women's health. What have we received for our money? While government subsidies to Planned Parenthood have reached an all time high, so too has the number of lives ended by this profit-driven abortion business," Dannenfelser said.Planned Parenthood argues that it provides a range of services aside from abortions. The annual report showed the group provided STD treatment and testing for 4.5 million people. Planned Parenthood provided cancer screening and prevention services for 1.3 million people.The group also provides pregnancy tests and contraceptive services.
__________________
In fact, Planned Parenthood is a profit-driven factory of the macabre, and why when Kermit Gosnell was found guilty last year, the organization's only regret was in how the women who died were treated, not for a single loss in life of the post-legal term babies aborted. When you profit off of eugenics and genocide, changes are good you also are being contracted out in writing or by blood money by the federal government. And like the military industrial complex President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned all Americans in 1961 about its dangers, so too should a conservative president do the same for industrialized eugenics corporations.
Eugenics was not at all confined to Margaret Sanger, but she did make it a posh institutional practice to industrialize genocide according to Rebecca Messall in her op-ed in The Denver Post:
GUEST COMMENTARY
Margaret Sanger and the eugenics movement
POSTED: 06/03/2010 01:00:00 AM MDT
By Rebecca R. Messall
On a Sunday dedicated to honoring motherhood, May 11, 2010, the Denver Post chose to celebrate everything glaringly responsible for preventing or terminating motherhood. And, to someone like me who is slightly older than the "Pill" and who was 18 at the time of Roe v. Wade, the appearance of the Post's Mother's Day article was curious because there is much more that people should know about the threesome of Margaret Sanger, the "Pill" and Planned Parenthood, the nations' largest abortion provider.
Margaret Sanger belonged to an organization called the American Eugenics Society, organized in the early 1900's. Members from the American Eugenics Society actually formed Sanger's original group whose name was changed to Planned Parenthood, but even the latter's first three presidents were officers or members in the AES, including Alan Guttmacher. Sanger is listed as a member in 1956 under her then-married name, Mrs. Noah Slee.
Later called social biology, genetics, and population control, eugenics was a "scientific" endeavor born from evolutionary biology. It was never confined to state-sponsorship under Communists and Socialist dictators. Eugenics operated quite openly in the United States, England and around the world. The efforts of the American Eugenics Society resulted in many states passing laws to sterilize more than 63,000 Americans. Several states passed official apologies in the 1990's. The eugenics movement, particularly Margaret Sanger, ranted against the Catholic Church for opposing eugenic legislation and ideology.
Leaders of the American eugenics movement were later troubled that Hitler tarnished the word "eugenics;" however, they did not abandon the quest for a thoroughbred stock of humans, such as Margaret Sanger herself touted. They simply chose new words to describe eugenics. As recently as 1968, one of the leading evolutionary biologists and an officer in the American Eugenics Society, Theodosius Dobzhansky, said that the word "genetics" meant the same thing as "eugenics" and commended the goals of eugenics. The control of reproduction remained the primary goal of eugenics in order to improve the human gene pool. Throughout its existence Planned Parenthood has been a key tool to reduce or eliminate births among blacks, other minorities and the disabled.
The Post's Mother's Day article typifies the popular narrative, which was really a sophisticated marketing campaign so good that no one questions it. Almost never, anyway. It sought to convince women to become customers of a then-unpopular product by convincing them that, prior to the commercial launch of the Pill in the 1960's, our mothers and grandmothers were veritable slaves to their wombs, their husbands and the very concept of marriage.
Coincidentally, of course, legal abortion also covered up the "Pill's" failure rate. In the new movie, "Blood Money," former abortionist Carol Everett says her abortion facility intentionally passed out low dose birth control pills to increase the likelihood of customer pregnancies and those money-making back-up abortions.
In the 70's, one of the messages was that women had a singular duty not to add another child to a polluted, war-torn mad, mad world which would be blown up at any minute by nuclear war. However, the other sub-text, the one where evil should have been blatantly denounced if media, politicians, academia and the rest of us had not been so - to put it charitably - timid, was the pronouncement that disabled and minority children were particularly "unwanted" and specially targeted for elimination through abortion and the parallel development of genetic tests for destructive uses.
Now, nearly all Downs Syndrome babies are terminated before they are born, as part of a public policy by the U.S. Supreme Court laid down in Roe and reiterated again and again. Pro-life leader Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King, Jr. writes, "Abortion and racism stem from the same poisonous root, selfishness."
Largely, the eugenics/population control movement has been powered by huge trusts with billions of dollars in global assets. As investment vehicles, they likely receive income from corporations engaged in a global distribution of birth control pills, IUDs, patches, injections and so forth. If so, their capital holdings, dividends and bonuses are gilded by U.S. taxpayer funding for the system of product distribution, funding appropriated as a quid pro quo from politicians grateful for the campaign donations. Money talks. Blood money.
Rebecca R. Messall is a practicing attorney in Denver. She is the author of the article, "The Long Road of Eugenics: From Rockefeller to Roe v. Wade," Fall 2004 Human Life Review (New York). EDITOR'S NOTE: This is an online-only column and has not been edited.***
Conclusion: Socialism as "Blood Money" - Industrialized Genocide for the Free Market Hypocrital Marxists
Socialism is the bastard child of capitalism, and ironically, Karl Marx is the originator of that term so often used to day. It is only appropriate then to understand why capitalism at its purest can and will subsist of its own designs without socialism to taint its autonomy; yet socialism still cannot survive without a free market objective and is therefore, a failed economic theory masquerading as a centrally-planned model abolishing the central planners, but in fact those small few in power are capitalizing off their proletariat population's sweaty brows. It then is further obscured at how the smallest percentage of the one percent in power control the majority of wealth while their proletariat serfs till off the land, rake their muck and shine their shoes as they whistle in their secret boardroom.
It all reads above like an Orwellian masterpiece in the bleak utopia of a dystopian world, does it not? Prepare yourself, ladies and gentlemen, because it indeed is happening, and it is not at all limited simply to aborting the unborn child. So long as the poor inner city black community and incoming illegal immigrants who are Hispanics are funded to remain poor, Planned Parenthood clinics will increase in concentration in these communities just to killed the poor, unwashed and racially inferior in the eyes of Sanger and her most infamous disciple, Adolf Hitler. Should the fears of conservatives, Christians and Jews being interned in FEMA camps transpire, we will not at all receive the same lap of luxury of treatment as to this point all illegal immigrants are enjoying in the way of $50 million luxury vacation spas and resorts. To consider how Los Angeles reported is placing the homeless into internment camps, or at least is reportedly planning to do so, is most disturbing; or how the State of New York has order the entire LGBT population to enlist in a directory to be monitored so as to assist in providing social services is beyond misleading and disingenuous, for it reads like a page out of a historical narrative about Nazi Germany or any Islamic state, which the latter is too fascist:
State agencies launch LGBT data-collection effort
New York State is launching a campaign to collect coordinated data on residents’ sexual orientation as part of a comprehensive effort to improve health and human services for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender New Yorkers, the state’s health department announced Wednesday.
It would be the first such statewide effort in the country, Dan O’Connell, director of the state Health Department’s AIDS Institute, said in an interview with Capital.
Eight state agencies will soon begin collecting the self-reported, voluntary data on LGBT people who use their services. The agencies are: the Department of Health, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Office for the Aging, Office of Mental Health, Office of Alcohol and Substance Abuse Services, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Office of Children and Family Services and Office for People with Developmental Disabilities.
The agencies will ask people using their public services to self-report their sexual orientation on forms, along with other identifying data state agencies typically collect.
O’Connell said the health department’s efforts to collect data on LGBT residents has become more plausible in recent years.
“In the past, this wouldn’t have been likely to happen" O'Connell said, because there was so much stigma associated with being LGBT. "But that conversation really has changed over time,” he said.
A 2011 Institute of Medicine report showed that limited data collection on health issues specific to the LGBT community had made it more difficult to identify disparities in the kinds of care available to them.
If that data was available, the state could develop better ways of addressing health problems like H.I.V./AIDS and certain types of cancers prevalent among gay men.
For example, O’Connell said, “70 percent of all new [H.I.V.] infections are among men who have sex with men. We need to be able to track this population.”
Being able to keep track of the transgender population could also yield other information that helps the state address non-health issues, like discrimination and financial disparities, O’Connell said. While medical researchers have provided estimates of LGBT state populations for years, this type of government effort to collect comprehensive data on LGBT New Yorkers is unprecedented, he said.
“This is happening at a time when people are really rethinking LGBT rights,” O’Connell said. “LGBT rights aren’t just marriage equality. It has to do with having the same rights as everyone else."
O’Connell said the new data collection effort represents a transformation in the way the state and the government treat non-heterosexual New Yorkers.
“You’re taking something that 40 years ago was a crime and we’re at a place where people are openly talking about it,” he said. “It’s an important moment and what this shows is that we want this to be as routinely captured as any other information we gather about any other human being.”________________
How unfortunate for Mr. O'Connell and the representatives of the political class of the LGBT community of New York that he is willing to sacrifice his Fourth Amendment implied and inferred right to privacy only to achieve a false sense of security. When the day arrives that another breach of his social contract with the nation as a free gay man transpires, what else then will he be willing to forfeit of his sacred liberty and fortune? The idea that the NSA continues to spy on unsuspecting people globally is truly startling even in the aftermath of its revelation last year and of course, Edward Snowden's dissemination of an undeniable truth which has been the norm for nearly 13 years. Considering that it was then-Senator Joe Biden who authored the precursor to the PATRIOT Act in February 1995, some two months prior to the April 19 Oklahoma City bombing, only to lie and claim he did so afterward is scary. The act may have been passed into law, rebranded and repackaged, and signed into effect by George W. Bush, but in times of crisis, desperation which begets discontent will then lead to foolish behavior that is not so evident until many years later. I never supported the passage of the PATRIOT Act, but Biden and Hillary Clinton sure did, and so did every Democrat.
To our old acquaintances Margaret Sanger and her protege Adolf Hitler, your legacies really were forgotten by those who failed to read of your sordid histories, but your actions and legacies remain very much alive and destructive to our world today more than ever before. As radical Islam stands to destroy the world in the name of its god and false prophet, it publicly praises Adolf Hitler's final solution for the Jewish question, and by association, to his inspiration, Margaret Sanger. The world unequivocally rues the day Hitler was conceived, but had Sanger known of his parents in Austria, she likely would have attempted to talk them into aborting him. How ironic indeed that in the land of the free, the Whore of Babylon was born and inspired the state-regulated genocide of some 1.5 billion babies since World War II, and nearly 55 million alone in the U.S. Not bad for a woman who as an unapologetic socialist calling for the total abolition of capitalism and Christianity, she used both to achieve her goal, and succeeded through deceit and dereliction of any responsibility or morals. And if what I provided for you is not convincing enough, perhaps you should read the following tweets that inspired this post in closing from Democratic Party congressional candidate Mike Dickinson.
No comments:
Post a Comment