The Racist Animus of Barack Obama, Live and in Ferguson, MO Doing What Hes Does Best - Organizing a Community Riot

The Racist Animus of Barack Obama, Live and in Ferguson, MO Doing What Hes Does Best - Organizing a Community Riot

Forget Orwell and Big Brother. Barack Obama has been watching us for years.

To Barack Obama and the now-Marxist Democratic Party poised to embark upon the penultimate putsch of the American Dream and her people's sovereignty, if you are not an inner city urban black person living amid Global South-standards of morbid poverty, you are not black enough; you are an "Uncle Tom". If you are Hispanic and reside in the U.S. already, you are not Latino(a) enough; you must be illegally a resident and undocumented, but still earn more than those who are employed. And while the Islamic State may at anytime finally topple Baghdad and is only meeting resistance from the brave Kurdish rebels - particularly the women, who Muslim men fear that if they are killed by them, they will not receive their 72 virgins in Paradise - Obama is not only content with this, he is the Islamic State. Today, it was reported that Kuwait declared the Council of American Islamic Relations (CAIR) a terrorist organization because it has been linked for years to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. 

Yet Obama, in all his delusional mental vacancy, found time to fly to St. Louis to meet with protesters inside Ferguson, MO organize the coming war in the community. This is a page straight from his forbearer in the community organization business on the South Side of Chicago, Saul Alinsky, who employed Marxist measures to organize labor bosses and organized crime to enforce the Democratic Party's absolute power in what is modern-day America's closest example alongside Detroit and Washington, D.C. of communist political machinery. As you might suspect, the results have been disastrous and continue to grow far worse by the day even as murders in Chicago have drastically declined to near-record low rates and numbers over the past three generations due to concealed carry laws being implemented across the state of Illinois from Springfield. 

Barack Obama is more Marxist than any president in America's history. His family members and even mentors in college and the Rev. Wright were all the same; he has also been tied alongside his brother Malik (a.k.a. "Roy") have been tied to the potentially genocidal plans in Egypt and across the Arab League and for the president, he likely launched the Arab Spring as a means to achieve his end. This article, however, will address only the fire he just exacerbated in Ferguson, MO, one where as Billy Joel once sang "we didn't start fire" but which cannot be hidden even if the left-wing media were to try. I received this news earlier today of the frightening details of what is known about what Obama stated. If it is true, he has hearkened upon the true legacy of Nelson Mandela, who was not a man of peace, but a communist genocidal maniac who ordered from his prison cell the necklacing of white Afrikaners in the quest of ending Apartheid. And at the end of the day, it was not Mandela who ended it, but the conservative F.W. DeClerk, who through the lens of working alongside his predecessor, P.W. Botha, understood that in order for a people to be free, the state cannot enslave them by declaring them secondary citizens when especially they comprised of nearly two-thirds of the nation's population in South Africa. Like any communist, Mandela receives all the credit; DeClerk is largely forgotten to have been the other Nobel Peace prize winner in 1994 alongside Mandela. And because of this, DeClerk is considered erroneously to be a racist while Mandela is now a terrorist exalted to the level of a god globally. 

I. Barack Obama to Ferguson, MO Protesters: "Stay on Course"

Indeed, an event that Jefferson might equate to a "firebell in the night" has been rang in as the inevitable, but by the state of Missouri. None other than Barack Obama himself flew to St. Louis to meet with Ferguson, MO protesters in order to organize the calm before his decreed storm. After, what else can community organizers do well if it does not entail militant communist uprisings?

Per The New York Times, the following is provided which Gateway Pundit unearthed deep within that article's details from November 16 (yesterday) which should have us all thanking God the Democrats did not succeed at all in confiscating all Americans' firearms:

U.S.

In Ferguson, Tactics Set for Grand Jury Decision in Michael Brown Case

By JOHN ELIGON, JULIE BOSMAN and MONICA DAVEY NOV. 16, 2014

Demonstrators lay in the middle of a street on Sunday during a so-called die-in in University City, Mo., near Ferguson. Credit Whitney Curtis for The New York Times

FERGUSON, Mo. — Several dozen people gathered in a dim church basement here on Thursday night to share plans for what to do if a grand jury chooses not to indict the white police officer who shot Michael Brown, an unarmed black youth, three months ago. Among their ideas was to descend in large numbers on the nearby county seat of Clayton at 7 a.m. on the day after the grand jury’s announcement to snarl business.

A day earlier, a different group, chanting “no justice, no profit,” met in St. Louis to announce it will boycott the region’s retailers during the Thanksgiving shopping period as a response to Mr. Brown’s death.

Since August, a disparate array of demonstrators — some from longstanding organizations, others from new groups with names like Hands Up United and Lost Voices — has been drawn here to protest not just the shooting of Mr. Brown, but also the broader issues of racial profiling and police conduct.

Continue reading the main story

RELATED COVERAGE

Gov. Jay Nixon in Weldon Spring, Mo., on Tuesday. Some demonstrators criticized his plan as an overreaction that might only heighten potential anger.Missouri Governor Says National Guard Is Still Option in FergusonNOV. 11, 2014

The Dellwood Lounge, off West Florissant Avenue, whose owners boarded the windows when they heard that insurance would not cover the cost of replacing broken glass.Ferguson Waits Uneasily for Grand Jury’s DecisionNOV. 7, 2014

Police Officer in Ferguson Is Said to Recount a Struggle OCT. 17, 2014

Now, with the grand jury’s decision expected in the coming days, the groups are preparing with intricate precision to protest the no-indictment vote most consider inevitable. Organizers are outlining “rules of engagement” for dealing with the police, circulating long lists of equipment, including bandages and shatterproof goggles, and establishing “safe spaces” where protesters can escape the cold — or the tear gas.

A police officer in University City, Mo., looked over chalk outlines left by demonstrators after a so-called die-in on Sunday. Credit Whitney Curtis for The New York Times

Yet the most important part of the planning may also be the hardest: how to prevent demonstrations from turning violent. Organizers say they want their efforts here to blossom into a lasting, national movement. So they say they hope for the protests to be forceful, loud and unrelenting, but without the looting or arson that could undermine their message. But they also know that some among the ranks may be more volatile and harder to control.

“We’ve come to the conclusion that we really don’t want violence,” said one organizer with Lost Voices, who goes by the name Bud Cuzz. “We want to fix this. We still want to fight to make the laws change. We still want to raise awareness. But we don’t want the city to turn upside down.”

Montague Simmons, a leader of the Organization for Black Struggle, said there was a growing circle of demonstrators with “a clear message about what we are about and what kind of behavior we are looking for.” Yet beyond their carefully orchestrated plans for a series of shows of protest and civil disobedience, leaders here acknowledge that there are disagreements about what form of response is fitting and whether militant acts might spill over into violence.

At least one group has said on Twitter that it was offering a reward for information on the whereabouts of the officer, Darren Wilson, and, at another point, that it was “restocking on 7.62 & 9 mm ammo.” Law enforcement authorities said they would not discuss individual groups, but that they were “constantly looking,” at several groups, according to Brian Schellman of the St. Louis County Police, “trying to separate the rhetoric from the actual threats.” 

Immediately after Mr. Brown’s death on Aug. 9, protests began. For days, people marched and chanted along West Florissant Avenue, not far from where the shooting took place and, for brief periods, the protests grew violent. Stores were looted, and the police said demonstrators threw gasoline bombs and tried to set fires. The police used tear gas and rubber bullets. Protesters said the police response was an overreaction to just a few in the otherwise peaceful crowd.

Though the confrontations quieted, the demonstrations have continued nearly nightly since. About 50 organizations, including Mr. Simmons’s, have joined forces in a “Don’t Shoot Coalition,” and the level of planning is intense.

In dozens of training meetings like the one held at the church here on Thursday, demonstrators have been given lists of items to keep at the ready for when a decision is announced: gloves, maps, protest team names and phone numbers, medical supplies and a “jail support number,” in case of arrest, to be written in permanent marker on a protester’s arm. Leaders have shared text alert numbers to keep in constant contact.

They have announced safe spaces in area churches where leaders say protesters can warm up and stay clear of the police, as well as “hot spots,” locations around Ferguson where demonstrations seem likely. In another indication of the level of planning going on, some leaders say they intend to carry out their acts of protest even if the grand jury brings charges against Officer Wilson to show that the issues raised by this case reach beyond a single shooting. One more sign of the elaborate organizing: the group Hands Up United has produced its own polished video.

Beverly Jones spoke on Thursday in St. Louis during a direct-action training meeting for protesters. Credit Whitney Curtis for The New York Times

And they have proposed 19 “rules of engagement” with law enforcement authorities, including tolerance for “more minor lawbreaking” (like thrown water bottles) and 48 hours’ notice for the protesters before a grand jury decision comes in. Some of the rules have been agreed to during talks with law enforcement authorities, leaders said, but others have been rejected.

At the meeting here, Derek Laney, an organizer for a group called Missourians Organizing for Reform and Empowerment, drew a fine line on the question of how far to go. He said the protesters wanted to be peaceful, but they also wanted to rouse the community.

Mr. Laney said: “We want to appear strong and forceful because we believe in what we’re pursuing. But we also definitely want everyone to know we’re committed to nonviolence. We want to disrupt. We want to make the comfortable uncomfortable.”

Organizers declined to provide details of their new plans, but they pointed to the “Weekend of Resistance” in October as a model. The acts of civil disobedience throughout the region that weekend included protesters stepping into a police line to be arrested outside the Ferguson police station and unfurling banners inside St. Louis City Hall. In another hint at what may be ahead, protesters on Sunday held a “die-in” that stopped traffic on a local street while they lay in the snowy road as their bodies were outlined in chalk.

Continue reading the main story

Protest leaders here say there have been conflicts, at times, over leadership, tactics and even over individuals. The St. Louis County Police say they are still investigating a report by a university student who says he was beaten after a strategy meeting last week and questions about whether he was trying to broadcast the events. Some protest leaders say he was not harmed.

But leaders say that is the nature of a movement that has taken place, in part, on social media and that does not match an earlier-era protest structure where a single, outspoken leader might have led the way. “This is not your momma’s civil rights movement,” said Ashley Yates, a leader of Millennial Activists United. “This is a movement where you have several different voices, different people. The person in charge is really — the people. But the message from everyone is the same: Stop killing us.”

At times, there has been a split between national civil rights leaders and the younger leaders here, who see their efforts as more immediate, less passive than an older generation’s. But some here said relations have improved in recent weeks.

Some of the national leaders met with President Obama on Nov. 5 for a gathering that included a conversation about Ferguson.

According to the Rev. Al Sharpton, who has appeared frequently in St. Louis with the Brown family and delivered a speech at Mr. Brown’s funeral, Mr. Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating. He said he hopes that we’re doing all we can to keep peace.”

Protest leaders said wholesale change was ultimately what they were demanding, though not all agreed on what that meant. Some called for the removal of the Ferguson police chief or the entire department. Others said they want the police to wear cameras; civilian review boards for all police shootings; or a requirement that ethnic and racial makeup of police departments match the communities they serve.

“It must be changing how police and citizens relate to one another,” said Michael T. McPhearson, the co-chairman of the Don’t Shoot Coalition. “We’re calling for police accountability, police transparency, changing how the police do their work. If there’s an indictment or if there’s not an indictment, we still have that work to do.”

A version of this article appears in print on November 17, 2014, on page A12 of the New York edition with the headline: In Ferguson, Tactics Are Set for Grand Jury Decision in Brown Case. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe

___________________

"This is not your momma's civil rights movement". How every indicting indeed of how six years of communism under Barack Obama have led to a new movement far worse than any America has ever before seen, perhaps worse than the Antebellum Era controversy over abolitionism and state nullification rights. Today, any opposition to the black community and to the president himself is met with the charge of the white person being "racist" or evil due to repressing the black community's right to be killed by the federal government under that the despicable heading "white privilege". The Democratic Party has for over 80 years thrived upon the very powerful weapon it alone possesses to create class warfare between the "haves and the have-nots". But today, just who are those "haves"? It appears that 13% of the racial demographic that is today's black community own America from their front porch swings in the ghettos of inner cities, and the Democrats will tell you they are the true black community - the blackest of the black - and they now rule by the mobs this nation as emblematic of Michael Brown's mother speaking before the United Nations in what had to have the toughest translation job ever for an English language interpreter since she likely speaks in Ebonics. The same is to be stated about the LGBT community, comprised of no more than 3% of America's total population and of course, the new influx of illegal immigrants which has not fared as well as Obama would have liked since 40-49% of all Hispanic voters sided with the GOP, of which a total of one-quarter of the entire eligible American electorate took to the polls - including those in most states who were not required to possess a Voter ID. How intriguing then that the elections were won by far more lopsided margins than what originally was projected. 

Where does Obama fit in? Again, I provided the above-provided link from Gateway Pundit to expose his poorly-maintained agenda which was just exposed:

President Obama met with Ferguson protest leaders on November 5th, the day after the midterm elections. The meeting was not on his daily schedule. He was concerned that the protesters “stay on course.”

What does that mean?

And why is the president meeting with the violent Mike Brown protesters before a verdict is reached in the court case? 

The New York Times hid this in the 21st paragraph of their report:

But leaders here say that is the nature of a movement that has taken place, in part, on social media and that does not match an earlier-era protest structure where a single, outspoken leader might have led the way. “This is not your momma’s civil rights movement,” said Ashley Yates, a leader of Millennial Activists United. “This is a movement where you have several difference voices, different people. The person in charge is really — the people. But the message from everyone is the same: Stop killing us.”

At times, there has been a split between national civil rights leaders and the younger leaders on the ground here, who see their efforts as more immediate, less passive than an older generation’s. But some here said relations have improved in recent weeks.

Some of the national leaders met with President Obama on Nov. 5 for a gathering that included a conversation about Ferguson.

According to the Rev. Al Sharpton, who has appeared frequently in St. Louis with the Brown family and delivered a speech at Mr. Brown’s funeral, Mr. Obama “was concerned about Ferguson staying on course in terms of pursuing what it was that he knew we were advocating. He said he hopes that we’re doing all we can to keep peace.”

Obama wants the protesters to stay on course?

Unbelievable.

____________________

The incitement of rabid dogs already frothing at the mouth for years to kill those of us who Rep. Charlie Rangel himself referred to as "white crackers" within the Tea Party contingent will be bloody. But thankfully, record numbers of firearms have been purchased by all people in the St. Louis area as radical protests have deluged over into the downtown area that had no involvement. To consider that one organization - the Organization for Black Struggle - is linked to the Muslim Brotherhood is the disturbing truth of all, as are the inevitable deluge of the Nation of Islam led by the Louis Farrakhan and the New Black Panthers. Islam is not precluded from the federal government's incitement of virulent violence to manufacture the situation where martial law might be order under Executive Order #13,603, but also the launch of the official Islamification of a major urban metropolitan area just as we saw the House of Representatives and the National Cathedral being required to host Islamic prayers services. In the House, I must add, each congressman was required to bow before Allah. 

On the subject of the Organization for Black Struggle, the first details I will provide are from Breitbart on October 4, 2014:

The cable news klieg lights, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson may have moved on, but residents of Ferguson, MO continue to experience nearly nightly unrest stemming from the shooting death of Michael Brown. Eye witnesses have told Breitbart News that pro-Palestinian and other Muslim activist groups are a growing presence in the protests. On October 10th, a number of these groups, named "The Palestine Contingent," are planning to join a "Weekend of Resistance" in Ferguson to highlight the connection between the midwest community and Gaza.   

From its call to action:

Local groups including the Organization for Black Struggle and the St. Louis Palestine Solidarity Committee, joined by national groups listed below, are inviting those who support the Palestinian struggle for liberation to stand in solidarity with the people of Ferguson as part of a Palestine contingent in response to the call. We recognize that none of us is free until all of us are free.

The effort is part of a broader protest and direct actions planned over the holiday weekend. On Monday, organizers hope to engage in "direct actions" of civil disobedience throughout the St. Louis areas. The "Palestine Contingent is planning "[a]ction focused on a target highlighting intersections of militarized policing in Ferguson and Palestine."

The "Palestine Contingent" includes: St. Louis Palestine Solidarity Committee, Organization for Black Struggle, U.S. Palestinian Community Network, Muslims for Ferguson, US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, Council on American Islamic Relations – St. Louis, Palestinian BDS National Committee,

National Students for Justice in Palestine, Palestinian Youth Movement, American Muslims for Palestine

and African Americans for Justice in the Middle East and North Africa.

The details of what happened this summer in Ferguson remain unclear. As the facts of the situation became more complicated, the national media largely left town. Radical leftists, however, seem to have poured into Ferguson in their wake.

_______________________

The news of the Organization for Black Struggle would likely not be so great a cause for alarm as it is had it not included CAIR, which was declared by the United Arab Emirates (UAE) again today as a terrorist organization. CNSNews has this portion with further length details:

(CNSNews.com) – Two Islamic groups in the U.S. that portray themselves as moderate and mainstream expressed shock to learn at the weekend that the United Arab Emirates had included them in a list of terrorist organizations.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which describes itself as “America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization,” and the Muslim American Society (MAS), which calls itself “a religious community service organization,” were among more than 80 groups whose designation was approved by the UAE cabinet and announced on Saturday.

Others listed included al-Qaeda and its various affiliates in Pakistan, Syria, Yemen and North Africa; the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS/ISIL); the Muslim Brotherhood and several of its U.K.- and Europe-based affiliates; and some Iranian-backed radical Shi’ite groups.

Conspicuously absent was Hamas, despite being the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). Like most Arab states the UAE is a vocal supporter of the Palestinian cause.

Also not listed was Iran’s Shi’ite proxy in Lebanon, Hezbollah – a curious omission since Hezbollah-linked groups in the Gulf states and Iraq were included.

___________________

Hamas is ironically omitted from the new declarations. Most Muslims support the Palestinian cause to fight Israel; that is a historical initiative one should expect even as most Americans oppose the rise of a Palestinian state that never before existed.  Hezbollah, a Shi'ite terrorist strongarm for the Lebanese government, is connected to Iran, the world's largest Shi'ite Islamic theocracy. Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State, now in a pact to fight the West and the Kurdish rebel forces, would be declared as terrorists, but like all Sunni terrorist cells, they are connected to Hamas, who is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood - the parent of the vastly expansive tree of genocidal barbarians. Superficially, the UAB looks to have declared to the world its stance in unison with the West to defeat al-Qaeda and the Islamic State, but through the glaring omission of Hamas, which again is another offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, the motto from President Reagan of "trust, but verify" must eternally be observed since Hamas has already reached out to the Islamic State. Hezbollah, meanwhile, is fighting the Islamic State and soon al-Qaeda in order to preserve Beirut's sovereignty; Iran, again, is preparing for war against both al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. The fact some foreign policy experts believe that neither Syria nor Lebanon exist today could point to why the UAE did not declare Hezbollah as a terrorist cell as they are aligned with the Assad regime in Damascus, another of Tehran's allied nations surrounding Iraq should all three forces converge to encircle the Islamic State and al-Qaeda. 

***

III. Conclusion: The Eye of the Storm Had Been Setting for Over a Year

Amid the furling embers of a raging wildfire from Ferguson in August was lost to most how such an event had been planned, or at least there was a contingency initiative. On August 14, 2014, USA Today provided the following article which perhaps explains how the Obama administration, the Rev. Al Sharpton, the Missouri National Guard and yes, the Islamist organizations have all been preparing to riot once the legal details on Michael Brown are announced... and the federal government will likely be providing them the weapons to do so.

Ferguson, Missouri erupted into a fourth night of rioting following the fatal shooting of unarmed black teenager Michael Brown, by a police officer. Now, it's journalists who are getting caught up in the fray.

David Mastio and Kelsey Rupp 1:44 p.m. EDT August 14, 2014

Department of Defense provided surplus military vehicles, rifles, pistols to local police departments.

UPDATE: St. Louis County law enforcement agencies received twelve 5.56 millimeter rifles and six .45 caliber pistols from the Department of Defense between Aug. 2, 2010, and Feb. 13, 2013, a Missouri public safety official confirmed Thursday. Ferguson, Mo., is within St. Louis County. The Pentagon allows information on "tactical" equipment to be released only at a county level, so which police department(s) in the county received the weaponry is not available.

Pentagon fueled Ferguson Confrontation

The Pentagon might not have boots on the ground in Ferguson, Mo., where 18-year-old Michael Brown was shot by police on Saturday, but it does have wheels on the street.

Michelle McCaskill, media relations chief at the Defense Logistics Agency, confirms that the Ferguson Police Department is part of a federal program called 1033 that distributes hundreds of millions of dollars of surplus military equipment to civilian police forces across the United States. The materials range from small items, such as pistols and automatic rifles, to heavy armored vehicles such as the MRAPs used in Afghanistan and Iraq.

USATODAY

Police forces pick up surplus military supplies

"In 2013 alone, $449,309,003.71 worth of property was transferred to law enforcement," the agency's website states.

According to McCaskill, the most recent transfer of military equipment from the Department of Defense to small Ferguson was in November and included two vehicles as well as a trailer and a generator. Details on the vehicles and their intended uses have not been released by the Pentagon. Information on any prior transfers is also unavailable. 

A state public safety official told USA TODAY that the Pentagon does not allow detailed information on "tactical" equipment to be released at a police force level, only at a county level. According to a document provided by the official, police forces in the same county as Ferguson received advanced rifle sights and night vision equipment between 2012 and 2014.

There is no evidence that any such equipment has yet been used in the Brown case and its aftermath. But such "police militarization" is just one element of an often toxic relationship between minority communities and local police.

Since the creation of the 1033 program by Congress in the early 1990s, the program has distributed $4.3 billion of excess equipment, ranging from innocuous office supplies to bomb-disposing robots and other advanced technology. The flood of military supplies — along with the continuing drug war and grant programs from other federal agencies that provide military-style equipment — has pushed the culture of police forces far from its law-enforcement roots.

Indeed, the motto of the 1033 program is "From Warfighter to Crimefighter."

So it is not a surprise that police officers often seem prepared for war. In Ferguson, that change is most dramatically revealed in the images of camouflage-wearing police officers with assault rifles, body armor and multiple extra magazines facing unarmed protesters with their hands preemptively raised in the air.

The disturbing trend of police militarization permits law enforcement agencies to view people in their communities as threats, rather than as citizens with rights, reports TheWashington Post's Radley Balko, who has covered the militarization of the police extensively.

Elsewhere in Missouri, agencies participating in the 1033 program have acquired "aircraft (both fixed wing and rotary) and four-wheel drive vehicles (such as pickup trucks, blazers, ambulances and armored personnel carriers)," according to the state's Department of Public Safety.

If there's one thing a community in turmoil does not need is for anyone to turn up the heat as protesters and police face off and tempers simmer. But before a local police officer fired his first shot at the unarmed teen, the U.S. military helped make sure there was plenty of fuel to bring things to a boil.

David Mastio is the Forum Editor of USA TODAY, where Kelsey Rupp is a Collegiate Network Fellow.

The original headline on this column was, "Pentagon fueled Ferguson Confrontation."

________________________

The Defense Department provided the city of Ferguson, MO itself with $449,309,003.71 in 2013. Why does any small suburb of a major urban area that is comprised of more than two-thirds blacks need with just under a half billion dollars for one year's worth of arms and munitions from the world's most powerful military? For the Democratic Party that dominates the St. Louis-area as well as the Obama administration, what the federal government giveth, it can taketh away. In this, if the federal government can provide a people with their livelihood's sustainability, it can also kill them when it is no longer politically-expedient to let them live. It appears such an initiative as with opening at a disproportionate figure of abortion clinics in poor black communities is consistent with engaging in measures of population control by any means necessary. Dr. Alveda King, the niece of her legendary father and conservative Martin Luther King, Jr., has often stated that the deadliest place for a black person is within the womb. If a black person survives child birth, the government will fund his or her capacity to survive on bread and water until an opportunity arrives to kill and exploit it as white prejudice at work.

My blog entry from August 28, titled BREAKING: Michael Brown Allegedly a Party in a Second Degree Murder Case, discusses how Michael Brown was in the middle of a 2nd Degree Murder Investigation.

The last name for Michelle McCaskill should be familiar to those following politics very closely. Claire McCaskill is the United States Senator from Missouri, and a Democrat. As both are alumna of the University of Missouri in Columbia, they are likely related, but beyond that, I was unable to procure further information. If I find more, you will know.

Just as I prepared to finish this article, a very intriguing and potentially deadly video from one Mike Arman on October 28, 2013 surfaced. The officer is reportedly Darren Wilson arresting this gentlemen for filming him after repeated warnings to put down the camera. According to Mad World News, the arrest was allegedly illegal.

According to The Daily Dot, the following was revealed:

As the Daily Dot reports:

According to the official police report filed by Wilson at the time, Arman was arrested for “Failure to Comply, as he refused to comply with all the requests needed in order to complete the summons process.”

Gawker reports the charge was dropped after Arman showed the video to his attorney, and he beat another charge against him—violating pit bull regulations—“by proving his dog was actually a bull dog.”

The arrest report is below, as well as the video recording. No mention of the Arman's race is on it. If he is black, he is the whitest sounding one I have ever listened to.

Ferguson police incident report: Darren Wilson arrests Mike Arman by Jon Swaine

And finally, the video.