Sunday, July 27, 2014

Courtesy of Herman Cain, Cain TV: Audio of President Obama Threatening the Governors of the United States of America

Topic: President Obama Threatens the Governors of the United States of America

Ladies and gentlemen, we have read before about a year ago when Texas Governor Rick Perry stated boldly how President Obama openly threatened our governors with federal action should they disobey his directives. We recently read this again out of Gov. Perry amid this taking a stand against Obama and his refusal to enforce the rule of law regarding securing America's borders. Perry, unlike any other politician has publicly gone on record to state, believes there is a conspiracy brewing, and he should. There is a conspiracy, and we must correlate what we are seeing with sometimes thousands pouring our borders by the day with the number of revolutions in Latin America as with Venezuela, and we must not at all exclude why Operation: Fast and Furious was conducted as the Mexican military continually crosses our borders to attack our border agents and, indeed, has invaded our sovereignty territory as a result with some of these weapons, as have various drug cartels south of the border and gangs. 

 The following video details this, and is about 12 to 13 minutes in duration:


As the media and Hollywood continue to defy the safety of Main Street U.S.A. - true Americans such as you and myself - one notable author of supernatural phenomena and suspense thrillers Stephen King tweeted the following from his cushy abode in chilly bowels of Hell itself, New England:


It reads like a really bad Stephen King novel of late, does it not? My parents for years have wonder aloud if the man is mentally disturbed based upon the content of his novels, or how twisted they are.  As many of his film adaptations have comprised of a setting nearby the general region where he lives, I sometimes have wondered this myself. It is clear that Mr. King is an atheist or, if Christian, among the most notorious hypocrites in the history of our nation's very visible public figures. I presented for him a few of my own tweets in reply which were never answered since he receives an enormous number of his own due to his large following. They are below, with the lone alteration from the actual one on Twitter being my adjusting the handle for the Tea Party since I accidentally hit a wrong button on my keyboard as I was finishing it to send out. You will see this below:
To be sure, Mr. King is extraordinarily wealthy, and he earned this through his authorship. According to Wikipedia, the following is true about his rather lavish lifestyle:
King and his wife own and occupy three different houses, one in Bangor, Maine, one in Lovell, Maine, and they regularly winter in their waterfront mansion located off the Gulf of Mexico, in Sarasota, Florida. He and Tabitha have three children, Naomi, Joe and Owen, and four grandchildren. 
Rest assured, ladies and gentlemen, that he does not reside in Cabot Cove, Maine, and he sure is not Jessica Fletcher from Murder, She Wrote, as played the by the lovable Angela Lansbury. And according to Britain's The Daily Mail, information, though vague, is found regarding his enormous fortune:
Very vague estimates of his total net worth put it somewhere between $200 and $400million, and Forbes said that he earned $45 million in the 2007-2008 fiscal year alone. 
As Mr. King wants to pay more in taxes, he apparently has an issue with Christians, which apparently through his tweets, have to be all members of the Tea Party. And as he may well be worth nearly a half-billion dollars as the figures appear to be uncertain (and at that point, one million is easily measurable, but $400 million and above merely is as matter of still possessing so much in pecuniary numbers as to whether or not you can ever spend it all), he never once offered to move to Texas or the other collection of border states to build the same $50 million vacation resort that the Obama administration has done without the public being informed. If he did, he might have room to either boast or complain about the little children running around in his backyard. 

***

As more Hollywood celebrities who for years were registered Democrats and often public demanded the party should move much further to the Left now watch in horror what the president is doing, Angelina Jolie herself has expressed how much she hates Obama for turning America into a socialist, and Joan Rivers... well, she is still the sassy and saucy Joan Rivers, referring to Michelle Obama as a lesbian and the president I believe as being gay, neither detail I frankly care about in the least; she also, however, is pro-Israeli. And Howard Stern, of course, has publicly launched an assault on the president and socialists along the Far Left who wish to see Israel destroyed by her neighbors in the following video:

I will say, having watched many years ago the heavily-censored coverage of the Howard Stern radio show during the late 1990s and early 2000 when I was in my late-teens into my early 20s, he comes about everything honestly, and this is why I have such a deep respect for him. Stern is lewd; yes, and because of constantly facing large fines from the FCC for violating laws over free public radio airwaves, he now operates over Sirius-XM satellite radio where to date there no regulations because it is a paid subscription to now listen to him. One thing, though, is clear: while he might have made Jenna Jameson's career as the most famous female adult film star in the genre's history take flight as he had her numerous times as a guest on his show performing her lewd acts (not on him, of course) over the airwaves, he is true to his nature as a shock jock. He will tell it his audience exactly as he sees it, whether or not one agrees or finds his perspective extraordinarily vile. Stern would not have gone of his rocker in this clip had he not felt strongly about it, and he named various names in the world of sports and entertainment he finds to be disgusting in their anti-Israeli sentiments. 

Herman Cain and the Veterans Association Deaths and Discharged Officer Confiscation:
Herman Cain, 2012 GOP Presidential Candidate and Owner of Godfather's Pizza
For those who do not know Herman Cain, he ran for the GOP nomination as president of the United States in 2012. His campaign actually took the lead at points over Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich, but collapsed once allegations of sexual harassment and the obligatory affair(s) creeped into the foray. Like with all conservatives, one a scandal arises, it usually means your political career is over, or at least if for Cain, his campaign came to an unceremonious halt and retracted. He owns Godfather's Pizza, and is a billionaire off his shrewd management of the corporations monetary resources. Cain knows how to manage a corporation's funding, and I dare say that should he somehow manage to be elected president - at this point with black mark against his record, highly unlikely - he would a very strong steward of the nation's monetary policy and labor to ensure America spends wisely and well, and within her means. In fact, he intended that his fabled 9-9-9 plan - which, including the payroll tax, capital gains tax, and the estate tax, call for a 9% business transaction tax, 9% personal income tax, and a 9% federal sales tax - would account for a balanced agenda, particularly in terms of ensuring that while entrepreneurs did not at pay close to the level of personal income tax rates as well as all other levels of income would see a dramatic cut in their totals, businesses would balance the rest of what was necessitated to form his ideal measures for funding government. Unfortunately, the man who actually had a planned agenda to present was blackballed in favor of those who ran and enjoyed greater successes based upon talking points and no substance.

For more on Mr. Cain, you may refer to Bio.com:

Such is life and its trends within American politics, where the people vote for politicians almost solely upon appearance and charisma, but rarely upon what agenda he or she has on tap. But Mr. Cain, who currently remains a very active political activist for the Tea Party conservatives domestically, has been paying particularly close attention for quite some time to the mounting list of Obama scandals which now are merging alongside his foreign policy in consolidating his global power, a startling series of events I believe is his playing the role of Russian President Vladimir Putin's redheaded stepchild to smack around while he prepares for the inevitable launch of an all-out invasion of the rest of Ukraine as he intends to perhaps topple all of Europe, which seems too fearful as it did with Neville Chamberlain in 1938 when, after the Munich summit, announced as he held high the agreement upon returning to London that Hitler would invade no more nations after the Sudetenland "... there is peace in our time." And while Europe, except for today the United Kingdom with current British Prime Minister David Cameron taking a stand and forcing the European Union members on the continent to grasp what history has previously wrought upon the continent due to appeasement, continues to remain fearful and simply engages in appeasement as Russia continues to slowly acquire more territory through its rebels engaging in state-funded proxy warfare, the Obama administration has a rather bizarre investment in Ukraine which as I have said numerous times now, involves Vice President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, serving on the executive board of the nation's largest private oil corporation, Burisma Holdings, which again I will provide the link and the full article:


Burisma Holdings’ Board Member Hunter Biden outlines his mission for the Company
“Burisma’s track record of innovation and industry leadership in the field of natural gas means that it can be a strong driver of a strong economy in Ukraine. As a new member of the Board, I believe that my assistance in consulting the Company on matters of transparency, corporate governance and responsibility, international expansion and other priorities will contribute to the economy and benefit the people of Ukraine.”
The Chairman of the Board of Directors of Burisma Holdings, Mr. Alan Apter, noted: “The company’s strategy is aimed at the strongest concentration of professional staff and the introduction of best corporate practices, and we’re delighted that Mr. Biden is joining us to help us achieve these goals.”
For more information contact the press office at media@burisma.com
Curiously, the Democrats seem to love oil more than they let on. That is because socialism could never exist unless there are anarcho-capitalists funding it. This is why I fear a Rand Paul presidency due to his doubtlessly abiding by Murray Rothbard's foundation for the libertarian movement as its founding father, as he seems intrinsically committed suddenly to defending Ukraine as he now uses the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 to justify his decision after before insisting we steer clear of such a conflict.

***

For Obama, it is a moot point now that he intends to destroy America completely, and he is about to do so through the United Nations controlling our borders and potentially coming to the aid of Detroit as it is now receiving water from Canada. Should Obama do as he is poised to upon Gov. Perry's inevitable action of turning back the president's immigration representatives intent upon informing Perry following a pointless inspection that he must turn away his National Guard unit, it is highly likely that the UN under Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon will deploy its military forces to Texas and Arizona, where the outrage has reached its zenith at the state capitals, to occupy them and to engage in what Ban will have "convinced" Obama to do following the president's charade of meeting with Latin American dictators and leaders to reclassify the present term illegal immigrants to a new and most dangerous term which suddenly will involve the UN as refugees. As these illegal immigrants have been flown into the U.S. for now two years while the president has managed to cloak his activities to near perfection, once he has reclassified them as refugees, he not only will have handed over our borders to the south to the UN, but so too he will have officially transferred sovereignty of the American people as the nation's electorate over to Ban and Obama, who the latter has increased substantially America's funding as the largest financier of the world governing body. And once this occurs, America, for all intents and purposes, will be no more, a Pan American state south of the Canadian border, unless the people revolt, as the first action Obama will take will be to fully aligned America with the UN gun agreement to ban them globally in order that he can do as he will with, in theory, no form of political or popular opposition under the penalty of FEMA internment or death. After all, the following story from The Inquistr is rather frightening in light that a man who reportedly conspired to assassinate the president from South Dakota was sentenced to death: 
Obama Assassination Plot? Deryke Matthew Pfeifer’s Death Threats Claimed God Would Kill The President

An Obama assassination plot resulted in the arrest of a man named Deryke Matthew Pfeifer by the Secret Service. Before being arrested, the Alabama man also issued many Obama death threats on his Facebook page.
In a related report by The Inquisitr, the number of Obama assassination plots have slowly been increasing over the years. It’s claimed the Secret Service investigates hundreds, if not thousands, of Obama death threats each year, although the Secret Service will not verify these numbers. For example, in 2013 a militia threatened the president, claiming Obama is a “dictator” and that the “authority to kill Obama comes from the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution.” Two years ago. a White House shooter was charged with an Obama assassination attempt and this year a man named James McVay was given the death penalty for his Obama assassination plot because he murdered a little old lady while trying to carry out the death threat. There were even some conspiracy theories that Obama’s fake interpreter was a pre-programmed assassin who messed up.
In the case of Mr. Pfeifer, court records show that he called in an Obama death threat to federal authorities on June 29. He even threatened to blow up a Social Security Administration building in Jackson, Michigan. The man also posted threatening videos on his Facebook page. On July 3, the Secret Service arrested the man for these threats.
But once Pfeifer was interviewed by the Secret Service, it became clear that the man was not carrying out the Obama assassination plot himself. Instead, Pfeifer told agents that “God told him that God was going to destroy Obama and everything around him.” The man claimed that God was speaking through him and desired Obama dead, but did not want Pfeifer to carry out the deed directly. Instead, it’s said that God would kill the president.

Deryck Matthew Pfeifer, alleged conspirator in assassination attempt on President Obama
Because of the nature of the Obama death threats, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Alabama requested that Deryke Matthew Pfeifer undergo mental evaluation.
There you have as many as three confirmed assassination attempts as well as several very bizarre conspiracy theories bordering along the lines of something Ron Paul would concoct as he did with September 11, 2001 by claiming, alongside Michael Moore, that George W. Bush was the chief architect. The disturbing issue is with the felon who was sentenced to death in South Dakota over a murder committed in accessory to his intent to assassinate the president. Again, The Inquistr will referenced and the article in print provided:
Obama Assassination Plot: James McVay Earns Death Penalty Sentence For Murder
An assassination plot on President Barack Obama by a man named James McVay has earned him a death sentence.
In a related report by The Inquisitr, it’s not like an Obama assassination plot is unusual. In 2013, a militia threatened the President, claiming Obama is a “dictator” and that the “authority to kill Obama comes from the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution.” And two years ago a White House shooter was charged with an Obama assassination attempt. There were even some conspiracy theories that Obama’s fake interpreter was a pre-programmed assassin who messed up.
Now James McVay pleaded guilty to the 2011 murder of 75-year-old Maybelle Schein:
“McVay walked away from a minimum security unit at the state penitentiary on July 1, 2011. He shoplifted then drank alcohol and cough syrup, then spent the night under a bridge in Sertoma Park. He awoke, asked Satan for guidance, then saw and slid under Schein’s partially-opened garage door. He stabbed her eight times then stole her car." 
The reason he stole the car in the first place was in order to enact his assassination plot on President Obama. McVay says he was planning on driving to Washington D.C. where he would somehow carry out his threat.
Under South Dakota law, McVay qualified for the death penalty because he committed the murder in order to obtain something of value, which classified the crime as “wantonly vile or inhuman.” But McVay’s defense argued that he suffered from a mental illness. After a two week trial the jury unanimously decided to give a verdict of guilty and handed down the death sentence. If the decision had not bee unanimous the sentence would have been reduced to life in prison without parole.
Do you think James McVay deserves the death penalty for his President Obama assassination plot?
_______

How interesting and at the same time, extraordinarily frightening to read that a man who apparently is mentally-ill by way of his calling upon Satan to guide him towards murdering not Obama per the quoted paragraph, but the Maybelle Schein. Keep in mind, too, that while John Hinckley Jr. nearly succeeded in assassinating President Ronald Reagan in 1981 because he claimed Jodie Foster told him to, he still remains in psychiatric care facilities, though they are beginning to grant him some freedom outside as he continues to show signs of gradual rehabilitation to where he is considered safe enough to stay some outside his facility. And if he is mentally ill, would this not have entitled him to psychiatric evaluation? Therein lies another problem, as numerous state psychiatric hospitals which house mentally-ill patients incapacitated to where they are a danger to themselves and society have been closed as part of budget cuts. My cousin residing in San Francisco has stated before how crime has escalated in part because of transient mentally-ill patients having traveled there from the East Coast are either homeless vagrants and rob or mug pedestrians, or of course the murder issue due to their manifestations. There are, however, still psychiatric facilities not run by the states in operation, but as with one I was treated for severe depression over three years ago, because it is private, they do not house such individuals longer than what their insurers allot the funding, and this is usually a form of state health provider such as Tenn Care in Tennessee where I live or Medicaid; recall this was 2011 when I last was hospitalized and Obamacare had not yet taken effect. As the administration has feigned interest in abolishing the death penalty and which the California courts recently struck down that law due to the inconsistencies in the details such as a wrongful conviction and the two major charged inhumane executions where the convict suffered for a long period of time, it is very intent upon attacking its enemies apparently regardless of whether there is a mental illness or the person was clearly engaged in a carefully conceived plan that happened to be revealed to authorities. 

As McVay conjured Satan as his reason for manifesting such a plot, this is one mental illness for certain most would attribute to needing hospitalization or some variation of housing for his own safety as well as others. But why is the Secret Service issuing a potential red flag by very oddly placing Pfeifer in a facility to be evaluated in Alabama? And for that matter, if Pfeifer is being set up for his "attempt" due to his act of mental incapacity, what stops the president from simply declaring all Christians to be mentally disturbed, as Pfeifer declared his reasoning for targeting Obama, for all intents and purposes, was because God said he (Pfeifer) had to protect American's Second Amendment rights even as Obama continues to insist that each state pass and sign into effect laws which provide for the Islamic law of Sharia to be instituted? It hearkens upon the very disturbing proposal by Sens. Dianne Feinstein and later her colleague in the U.S. Senate from California Barbara Boxer, to ban the legal purchase and possession of all firearms for military veterans because, as Feinstein put it, all suffer from PTSD:

She is only afraid of this as is our president: they consider our veterans of the U.S. Armed Forces and current officers stationed at bases domestically to be the government's greatest threat to what they consider to be their sovereignty, not that of we the people. 

The Boxer bill is below directly from GovTrack.us:



II
113th CONGRESS
2d Session
S. 2445
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
June 5, 2014
 (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to theCommittee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To provide family members and close associates of an individual who they fear is a danger to himself, herself, or others new tools to prevent gun violence.
1. 
Short title
This Act may be cited as the  Pause for Safety Act of 2014 .
2. 
Definitions
In this Act—
(1) 
the term close associate means, with respect to an individual—
(A) 
a dating partner, friend, co-worker, or neighbor of the individual; or
(B) 
any other person who has a relationship with the individual so as to be concerned about the safety and well-being of the individual, as determined by a State;
(2) 
the term family member means, with respect to an individual, a spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandchild, or grandparent of the individual;
(3) 
the term firearm has the meaning given the term in section 921 of title 18, United States Code;
(4) 
the term gun violence prevention order means a written order, issued by a State court or signed by a magistrate (or other comparable judicial officer), prohibiting a named individual from having under the custody or control of the individual, owning, purchasing, possessing, or receiving any firearms;
(5) 
the term gun violence prevention warrant means a written order, issued by a State court or signed by a magistrate (or other comparable judicial officer), regarding an individual who is subject to a gun violence prevention order and who is known to own or possess 1 or more firearms, that directs a law enforcement officer to temporarily seize and retain any firearm in the possession of the individual;
(6) 
the term law enforcement officer means a public servant authorized by State law or by a State government agency to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of an offense; and
(7) 
the term wellness check means a visit conducted by a law enforcement officer to the residence of an individual for the purpose of assessing whether the individual poses a danger to the individual or others due to a mental, behavioral, or physical condition.
3. 
National gun violence prevention order and warrant law
(a) 
Enactment of gun violence prevention order law
In order to receive a grant under section 4, on the date that is 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, each State shall have in effect legislation that—
(1) 
authorizes a gun violence prevention order and gun violence prevention warrant in accordance with subsection (b); and
(2) 
requires each law enforcement agency of the State to comply with subsection (c).
(b) 
Requirements for gun violence prevention orders and warrants
Legislation required under subsection (a) shall be subject to the following requirements:
(1) 
Application for gun violence prevention order
A family member or close associate of an individual may submit an application to a State court, on a form designed by the court, that—
(A) 
describes the facts and circumstances necessitating that a gun violence prevention order be issued against the named individual;
(B) 
is signed by the applicant, under oath; and
(C) 
includes any additional information required by the State court or magistrate (or other comparable judicial officer) to demonstrate that possession of a firearm by the named individual poses a significant risk of personal injury to the named individual or others.
(2) 
Examination of applicant and witnesses
A State court or magistrate (or other comparable judicial officer) may, before issuing a gun violence prevention order—
(A) 
examine under oath, the individual who applied for the order under paragraph (1) and any witnesses the individual produces; and
(B)
(i) 
require that the individual or any witness submit a signed affidavit, which describes the facts the applicant or witness believes establish the grounds of the application; or
(ii) 
take an oral statement from the individual or witness under oath.
(3) 
Standard for issuance of order
(A) 
In general
A State court or magistrate (or other comparable judicial officer) may issue a gun violence prevention order only upon a finding of probable cause that possession of a firearm by the named individual poses a significant risk of personal injury to the named individual or others.
(B) 
Notification
(i) 
In general
The court shall notify the Department of Justice and comparable State agency of the gun violence prevention order not later than 2 court days after issuing the order. The court shall also notify the Department of Justice and comparable State agency of any order restoring the ability of the individual to own or possess firearms not later than 2 court days after issuing the order to restore the individual’s right to own or possess any type of firearms that may be lawfully owned and possessed. Such notice shall be submitted in an electronic format, in a manner prescribed by the Department of Justice and the comparable State agency.
(ii) 
Update of databases
As soon as practicable after receiving a notification under clause (i), the Department of Justice and comparable State agency shall update the background check databases of the Department and agency, respectively, to reflect the prohibitions articulated in the gun violence prevention order.
(4) 
Issuance of gun violence prevention warrant
(A) 
In general
After issuing a gun violence prevention order, a State court or magistrate (or other comparable judicial officer) shall, upon a finding of probable cause to believe that the named individual subject to the order has a firearm in his custody or control, issue a gun violence prevention warrant ordering the temporary seizure of all firearms specified in the warrant.
(B) 
Requirement
Subject to paragraph (6), a gun violence prevention warrant issued under subparagraph (A) shall require that any firearm described in the warrant be taken from any place, or from any individual in whose possession, the firearm may be.
(5) 
Service of gun violence prevention order
When serving a gun violence prevention order, a law enforcement officer shall provide the individual with a form to request a hearing in accordance with paragraph (6)(F).
(6) 
Temporary seizure of firearms
(A) 
In general
When a law enforcement officer takes property under a gun violence prevention warrant, the law enforcement officer shall give a receipt for the property taken, specifying the property in detail, to the individual from whom it was taken. In the absence of a person, the law enforcement officer shall leave the receipt in the place where the law enforcement officer found the property.
(B) 
Temporary custody of seized firearms
All firearms seized pursuant to a gun violence prevention warrant shall be retained by the law enforcement officer or the law enforcement agency in custody, subject to the order of the court that issued the warrant or to any other court in which an offense with respect to the firearm is triable.
(C) 
Limitation on seizure of firearms
If the location to be searched during the execution of a gun violence prevention warrant is jointly occupied by multiple parties and a firearm is located during the execution of the seizure warrant, and it is determined that the firearm is owned by an individual other than the individual named in the gun violence prevention warrant, the firearm may not be seized if—
(i) 
the firearm is stored in a manner that the individual named in the gun violence prevention warrant does not have access to or control of the firearm; and
(ii) 
there is no evidence of unlawful possession of the firearm by the owner.
(D) 
Gun safe
If the location to be searched during the execution of a gun violence prevention warrant is jointly occupied by multiple parties and a gun safe is located, and it is determined that the gun safe is owned by an individual other than the individual named in the gun violence prevention warrant, the contents of the gun safe shall not be searched except in the owner’s presence, or with the owner's consent, or unless a valid search warrant has been obtained.
(E) 
Return of firearm to rightful owner
If any individual who is not a named individual in a gun violence prevention warrant claims title to a firearm seized pursuant to a gun violence prevention warrant, the firearm shall be returned to the lawful owner not later than 30 days after the date on which the title is claimed.
(F) 
Right to request a hearing
A named individual may submit 1 written request at any time during the effective period of a gun violence prevention order issued against the individual for a hearing for an order allowing the individual to own, possess, purchase, or receive a firearm.
(7) 
Hearing on gun violence prevention order and gun violence prevention warrant
(A) 
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (E), not later than 14 days after the date on which a gun violence prevention order and, when applicable, a gun violence prevention warrant, is issued, the court that issued the order and, when applicable, the warrant, or another court in that same jurisdiction, shall hold a hearing to determine whether the individual who is the subject of the order may have under the custody or control of the individual, own, purchase, possess, or receive firearms and, when applicable, whether any seized firearms should be returned to the individual named in the warrant.
(B) 
Notice
The individual named in a gun violence prevention order requested to be renewed undersubparagraph (A) shall be given written notice and an opportunity to be heard on the matter.
(C) 
Burden of proof
(i) 
In general
Except as provided in clause (ii), at any hearing conducted under subparagraph (A), the State or petitioner shall have the burden of establishing probable cause that the individual poses a significant risk of personal injury to the individual or others by owning or possessing the firearm.
(ii) 
Higher burden of proof
A State may establish a burden of proof for hearings conducted under subparagraph (A) that is higher than the burden of proof required under clause (i).
(D) 
Requirements upon finding of significant risk
If the named individual is found at the hearing to pose a significant risk of personal injury to the named individual or others by owning or possessing a firearm, the following shall apply:
(i) 
The firearm or firearms seized pursuant to the warrant shall be retained by the law enforcement agency for a period not to exceed 1 year.
(ii) 
The named individual shall be prohibited from owning or possessing, purchasing or receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive a firearm for a period not to exceed 1 year, a violation of which shall be considered a misdemeanor offense.
(iii) 
The court shall notify the Department of Justice and comparable State agency of the gun violence prevention order not later than 2 court days after issuing the order. The court shall also notify the Department of Justice and comparable State agency of any order restoring the ability of the individual to own or possess firearms not later than 2 court days after issuing the order to restore the individual's right to own or possess any type of firearms that may be lawfully owned and possessed. Such notice shall be submitted in an electronic format, in a manner prescribed by the Department of Justice and the comparable State agency.
(iv) 
As soon as practicable after receiving a notification under clause (iii), theDepartment of Justice and comparable State agency shall update the background check databases of the Department and agency, respectively, to reflect—
(I) 
the prohibitions articulated in the gun violence prevention order; or
(II) 
an order issued to restore an individual's right to own or possess a firearm.
(E) 
Return of firearms
If the court finds that the State has not met the required standard of proof, any firearm seized pursuant to the warrant shall be returned to the named individual not later than 30 days after the hearing.
(F) 
Limitation on hearing requirement
If an individual named in a gun violence prevention warrant is prohibited from owning or possessing a firearm for a period of 1 year or more by another provision of State or Federal law, a hearing pursuant to subparagraph (A) is not required and the court shall issue an order to hold the firearm until either the individual is no longer prohibited from owning a firearm or the individual sells or transfers ownership of the firearm to a licensed firearm dealer.
(8) 
Renewing gun violence prevention order and gun violence prevention warrant
(A) 
In general
Except as provided in subparagraph (E), if a law enforcement agency has probable cause to believe that an individual who is subject to a gun violence prevention order continues to pose a significant risk of personal injury to the named individual or others by possessing a firearm, the agency may initiate a request for a renewal of the order, on a form designed by the court, describing the facts and circumstances necessitating the request.
(B) 
Notice
The individual named in the gun violence prevention order requested to be renewed undersubparagraph (A) shall be given written notice and an opportunity to be heard on the matter.
(C) 
Hearing
After notice is given under subparagraph (B), a hearing shall be held to determine if a request for renewal of the order shall be issued.
(D) 
Issuance of renewal
Except as provided in subparagraph (E), a State court may issue a renewal of a gun violence prevention order if there is probable cause to believe that the individual who is subject to the order continues to pose a significant risk of personal injury to the named individual or others by possessing a firearm.
(E) 
Higher burden of proof
A State may establish a burden of proof for initiating a request for or issuing a renewal of a gun violence prevention order that is higher than the burden of proof required undersubparagraph (A) or (D).
(F) 
Notification
(i) 
In general
The court shall notify the Department of Justice and comparable State agency of a renewal of the gun violence prevention order not later than 2 court days after renewing the order. The court shall also notify the Department of Justice and comparable State agency of any order restoring the ability of the individual to own or possess firearms not later than 2 court days after issuing the order to restore the individual’s right to own or possess any type of firearms that may be lawfully owned and possessed. Such notice shall be submitted in an electronic format, in a manner prescribed by theDepartment of Justice and the comparable State agency.
(ii) 
Update of databases
As soon as practicable after receiving a notification under clause (i), the Department of Justice and comparable State agency shall update the background check databases of the Department and agency, respectively, to reflect—
(I) 
the prohibitions articulated in the renewal of the gun violence prevention order; or
(II) 
an order issued to restore an individual's right to own or possess a firearm.
(c) 
Law enforcement check of State firearm database
Each law enforcement agency of the State shall establish a procedure that requires a law enforcement officer to, in conjunction with performing a wellness check on an individual, check whether the individual is listed on any of the firearm and ammunition databases of the State or jurisdiction in which the individual resides.
(d) 
Confidentiality protections
All information provided to the Department of Justice and comparable State agency pursuant to legislation required under subsection (a) shall be kept confidential, separate, and apart from all other records maintained by the Department of Justice and comparable State agency.
4. 
Pause for Safety grant program
(a) 
In general
The Director of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services of the Department of Justice may make grants to an eligible State to assist the State in carrying out the provisions of the State legislation described in section 3.
(b) 
Eligible State
A State shall be eligible to receive grants under this section on and after the date on which—
(1) 
the State enacts legislation described in section 3; and
(2) 
the Attorney General determines that the legislation of the State described in paragraph (1)complies with the requirements of section 3.
(c) 
Use of funds
Funds awarded under this section may be used by a State to assist law enforcement agencies or the courts of the State in carrying out the provisions of the State legislation described in section 3.
(d) 
Application
An eligible State desiring a grant under this section shall submit to the Director of the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services an application at such time, in such manner, and containing or accompanied by such information, as the Director may reasonably require.
(e) 
Authorization of appropriations
There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section .
5. 
Federal firearms prohibition
Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended—
(1) 
in subsection (d)—
(A) 
in paragraph (8)(B)(ii), by striking or at the end;
(B) 
in paragraph (9), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; or; and
(C) 
by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:



(10) 
is subject to a court order that prohibits such person from having under the custody or control of the person, owning, purchasing, possessing, or receiving any firearms.
; and
(2) 
in subsection (g)—
(A) 
in paragraph (8)(C)(ii), by striking or at the end;
(B) 
in paragraph (9), by striking the comma at the end and inserting ; or; and
(C) 
by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:



(10) 
who is subject to a court order that prohibits such person from having under the custody or control of the person, owning, purchasing, possessing, or receiving any firearms,
.
6. 
Full faith and credit
Any gun violence prevention order issued under a State law enacted in accordance with this Act shall have the same full faith and credit in every court within the United States as they have by law or usage in the courts of such State from which they are issued.
7. 
Severability
If any provision of this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this Act, or an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected.
***

No wonder our veterans are being left to die on years-long waiting lists at the Veterans Association (VA) Hospitals. I believe this is part of eradicating the Democratic Party's threat to its totalitarian hegemony, most particularly for the president, by simply using them today as a legal measure for exterminating them akin to concentration camps run by the Nazis or gulags within the former Soviet Union.

 Conclusion: President Obama Threatens the Nation's Governors:

In referring again to Herman Cain, he merely rehashed what has occurred now for the entirety of the president's five and a half years in office. So, without further ado, I will simply conclude this with the actual audio recording, with Mr. Cain leading into the actual audio of Obama's threats with his commentary, and ask you in your replies what you believe to be occurring as we continue to watch more international incidents brought upon the world and our nation by President Obama which coincide with our domestic federal target scandals by multiple bureaucracies:

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)