My Commentary Upon a Photograph with a Message Courtesy of "Young Americans for Liberty" via Julie Borowski

(Above: Julie Borowski, libertarian media political figure. You may access her Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/JulieBorowski)  Julie Borowski writes to ask you: "Young Americans for Liberty (great organization!) asked for our response to the State of the Union. Here's mine. What's yours?" (Above: Borowski holding a sign written upon a sheet of paper about Obama's failed economic endeavors.) My Response to Ms. Borowski's Public Inquiry: If President Obama is truly serious about real economic growth, he will cease this farce of proposing -- or rather, signing illegally hundreds of executive orders -- more and more socialist solutions which have never worked in America, never worked in Western Europe including with our greatest ally, Britain, whom the president has alienated as he has the majority of the world -- and ultimately collapsed the Soviet Union and its satellite states beneath its iron curtain, which Ronald Reagan destroyed many years before it might have actually occurred. President Obama's economic policies are really not even considered true policies, but rather are "anti-growth" and too concerned with "spreading the wealth" as he told Joe the Plumber in 2008. But what I want to know is since the president is intent upon redistributing wealth as once occurred in the former Soviet Union and Maoist China while, in theory, the rich were less rich or their clout was derived from being advanced to a high government position, did this make the poorer more economically-affluent? No! Of course not! Rather than creating the concept of all being wealthy under the rule of law, what Obama, as well as those totalitarian rulers and those in Western Europe, really implemented as part of their artificially constructed economies of scale was, and is, make the wealth less economically affluent while here domestically, Obama hands out tax breaks to those such was within Hollywood or major billionaire software, investment, and media moguls who support, fund, and campaign commercially for the Democratic Party. Yet, the middle class suffers because they are having their tax rates hiked substantially beyond the majority's (the bottom 98%) capacity to pay. When that occurs, those within the lower middle class bordering upon the poverty threshold slip below it, and there then is more who are impoverished than before. The poor who were already living in poverty never experience a true improvement in their quality of life because while they may be handed a government-subsidized pay increase via welfare, Obama will eventually raise minimum wage, the prices of goods will then artificially be increased substantially, and rather than providing an answer to mitigate the situation for the poor and middle class, all levels of income except for those within Obama's good graces will suffer, poverty will increase rather than the contrary, and economic growth will actually slip into a major double or triple-dip recession with the inevitable steep rising inflation due to artificially inflating pay wages which will inflate the price of goods and services... unless Obama foolishly decides to engage in price fixing, which failed miserably during the presidencies of Nixon through Carter and nearly collapsed the economic infrastructure due to the artificial price of goods and services not meeting the true costs of production and for purchase from their manufacturers, especially when profits did not manifest even with the proposed greater volume of buyers. Expanding government to employ more workers only to deny them Obamacare health care coverage is low. As Obamacare, a far more insidious form of socialized medicine than what Britain and Canada have due to its nigh inaccessibility to the general public who then are taxed heavily for not signing up for the program, is essentially linked to the IRS, NSA, Homeland Security, and of course DHS. The American people's rights to privacy as implied by the Third and Fourth Amendments have been destroyed, and we as a people now reside in a police state where every input we place within an electronic medium is tracked, and those in dissent with the powers-that-be are targeted and often find themselves in legal trouble as has Dinesh D'Souza.  My final words here are as follows. People need to take care in reading the fine print of what every candidate claims he or she will do to improve the nation. When you listen to a charismatic politician such as Obama from Chicago, a city well-renowned as being the most corrupt in the U.S. due to more than 100 years of Democratic Party domination and the policies and illegal ties to the local mafia as part of the Machtpolitik practices and he (or she) chants "Yes, we can," all while his hypnotized audience blindly follows his every word; when celebrities such as Oprah and Kanye West declare him "a god," or when Obama travels to Egypt and is hailed based upon a hadith within an Islamic text as "the Mahdi" or "the promised warrior" by Arabic news agencies, there is danger. Obama narcissistically proclaims he is a divine figure with regards to his reach for great power, and I fear that before his last day in office has concluded, the world may find itself amid a cataclysmic conflict involving the Middle East, Russia, China, France, and likely the United Kingdom as there are military and economic alliances forming as we speak.