Why Conservatism Struggles to Dominate National Elections - and It Has Nothing to Do with Race and Gender Roles

Topic: Why Conservatism Struggles to Dominate National Elections - and It Has Nothing to Do with Race and Gender Roles

Cartoon of a greedy FDR and diminutive Congress. Based on Charles Dickens' Oliver Twist

I. Preface: Graduation from College - My Greatest Accomplishment Due to Sacrifices of My Health over 11 Years

My alma mater, the University of Tennessee, was founded in 1794 at Knoxville under the title "East Tennessee College". It is the second oldest state university nationally behind fellow SEC institution, the University of Georgia. I take great pride in being an alumnus at UT because it was my dream destination for higher education. I have been a lifelong Vol fan, watching my first full-season as a devoted follower during the 1989 when the Big Orange shared a threeway tie for the SEC Championships with Alabama and Auburn and won in dramatic fashion the 1990 Mobil Cotton Bowl Classic over SWC Champion Arkansas 31-27 during the latter years of its major bowl prestige destination. That Cotton Bowl Classic game is the first actual memory I have watching any postseason bowl game for Tennessee as I was only eight years old. Chuck Webb rushed for 250 yards on 26 carries for two touchdowns in what launched the Vols on its course to 18 years of dominance. I learned a great deal in my History and Political Science courses; my degrees are, in fact, in both those fields. I made strong, lasting friendships with my much younger peers and one professor who despite having nothing at all in common with me politically, will forever be a woman I treasure for how she always stood by me during my times of trouble whether or not I took any one of the four courses under her during those years. 

I attended college a very grueling 11 years, but not because I earned a Ph.D or any J.D. distinctions. I suffer from bipolar disorder, and because of this, I was forced to withdraw multiple semesters due to severe depression or mania crippling my capacity to function without extraordinary stress or fears of worse issues. I also suffered through four nervous breakdowns, each of which completely incapacitated me in the case of the last one in 2006, for two years after losing a job due to my having to call in frequently after major panic attacks, anxieties and finally my nerves crashing. From my first major in Music Education that lasted three days of class in August 2000 at UT, to five years of life in neutral at a local community college at my parents' insistence and finally, graduating from the University of Tennessee on May 11, 2012 just one month, four days shy of my 31st birthday, I take that one accomplishment in my adult life very seriously. Nature may take away my mental health and now it appears, chip away at my actual body due to five medications to counteract the side effects from the five psychotropic medications, but no one will ever be able to say I did not complete my college education, and I am eternally grateful to God, my family and so many close friends who never left my side even when I was not at my best with them.

Immediately below is a photograph of my family and I at graduation more than two years ago. It was held at Thompson-Boling Arena on campus. Mother is on the bottom right-hand side beneath my arm; Dad is to the back. But that little angel in sweat clothes is Laura, my now-30 year old sister. She was diagnosed at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 1988 with autism, and I actually recall well that week as I was no less than six depending upon the summer month the remainder of the family journeyed there for tests. I stayed at Granny's house that entire week, and I remember she and I saw Bambi at a theater in the Chattanooga area where she resided. Also that week, Granny canned preserves as I recollect, like peach preserves, because a  now-deceased old friend of hers spent significant time one day at her house. I once had photographic memory prior to my diagnosis with bipolar disorder in May 2002 at the age of 20; I had been diagnosed just a year before with severe depression due to my dreams of a career in music falling flat after physical abnormalities in my feet plus a grueling eight-class schedule almost destroyed me. I will never take for granted too many details in life again because I sacrificed much just to graduated in 11 years time.

The Henderson family, left to right: Mother, me (cap and gown), Dad (back) and Laura. Photo taken 5/11/12

My love for Laura, however, is most special. The day she was brought home following her delivery by Mother, I was not yet three years old. I recall that day, however, very clearly; I was lying on my bed in the old house in East Knoxville. Granny stayed with me that week, and as I lied in bed, eagerly awaiting the arrival of my new baby sister, it was she who laid down Laura beside me. It was a joy that even more than 30 years later I cannot adequately express. Her great contribution will forever be just her life involved with mine, but she will forever receive all the credit for serving as my greatest inspiration to fight during my darkest hours battling bipolar disorder and OCD. She is the single happiest human I have ever known, almost always smiling and that little hysterical laugh when she is excited is only exquisite due to that unbridled song she always sings and which must be playing in that nickelodeon in her mind. She cannot talk, unfortunately, so when she cries or is angry, it is nearly too much for me to bear. As you can see, she is only 5'2" while I am 6'3", and because of this, my nickname for her is, and forever will be, Boo-Boo, after the diminutive friend of Yogi Bear. 

A better shot of the two of us is right below.

Laura and me; May 11, 2012 at UT Spring Commencement

I would gladly lay down my life so that hers could be spared should the time ever arise. While my parents, Granny and my uncle and his family never wavered in their support and confidence, I did, and still do today. Without Laura, I would have never made it. All I have to do is take one good look at her, and I then can place my situation into a different perspective. Because of this, what video footage of college students who attend Harvard University as well as other colleges dominated by Marxists not only are disturbing in their bitter truth of our future's fate, but from the perspective of a person - me - who struggled just to go to class quite often while severely depressed or manic.

In concluding this tribute and mission statement for why I take education very seriously, read below Thomas Jefferson's letter to the headmasters of the University of Tennessee, formerly called East Tennessee College, from 6 May 1810, and how both his best hopes and his gravest concerns were proven prophetic.

To the Trustees of the Lottery for East Tennessee College

Monticello May 6. 10.Gentlemen

I recieved some time ago your letter of Feb. 28. covering a printed scheme of a lottery for the benefit of the East Tennissee college, & proposing to send tickets to me to be disposed of. it would be impossible for them to come to a more inefficient hand. I rarely go from home & consequently see but a few neighbors & friends who occasionally call on me. and having myself made it a rule never to engage in a lottery or any other adventure of mere chance, I can, with the less candor or effect, urge it on others, however laudable & desirable it’s object may be. no one more sincerely wishes the spread of information among mankind than I do, and none has greater confidence in it’s effect towards supporting free & good government. I am sincerely rejoiced therefore to find that so excellent a fund has been provided for this noble purpose in Tennissee. 50,000. Dollars placed in a safe bank will give 4000.D. a year & even without other aid, must soon accomplish buildings sufficient for the object in it’s early stage. I consider the common plan, followed in this country, but not in others, of making one large & expensive building as unfortunately erroneous. it is infinitely better to erect a small and separate lodge for each separate professorship, with only a hall below for his class, and two chambers above for himself; joining these lodges by barracks for a certain portion of the students opening into a covered way to give a dry communication between all the schools. the whole of these arranged around an open square of grass & trees would make it, what it should be in fact, an academical village, instead of a large & common den of noise, of filth, & of fetid air. it would afford that quiet retirement so friendly to study, and lessen the dangers of fire, infection & tumult. every professor would be the police officer of the students adjacent to his own lodge, which should include those of his own class of preference, and might be at the head of their table if, as I suppose, it can be reconciled with the necessary economy to dine them in smaller & separate parties rather than in a large & common mess. these separate buildings too might be erected successively & occasionally, as the number of professorships & students should be increased, or the funds become competent. I pray you to pardon me, if I have stepped aside into the province of counsel: but much observation & reflection on these institutions have long convinced me that the large and crouded buildings in which youths are pent up, are equally unfriendly to health, to study, to manners, morals & order: & believing the plan I suggest to be more promotive of these & peculiarly adapted to the slender beginnings & progressive growth of our institutions, I hoped you would pardon the presumption in consideration of the motive, which was suggested by the difficulty expressed in your letter of procuring funds for erecting the building. but on whatever plan you proceed, I wish it every possible success, & to yourselves the reward of esteem, respect & gratitude due to those who devote their time and efforts to render the youths of every successive age fit governors for the next. to these, accept in addition the assurances of mine.

Th: Jefferson

II. Conservatism Struggles in America Because Atlas Has Shrugged Away Our Youth's Education

When I graduated from UT more than two years ago, I knew well that the first 30 years of life were merely the beginning; in fact, for every second we live in our present, the future is forever ours, our destiny only our own to realize. I will never take for granted what I accomplished because the sacrifices were great and many, and my family and dearest friends paid an enormous price to ensure I held my end of the bargain to press forth and never capitulate to a momentary weakness. My grades were never great, but they were not at all terrible with the exception of one semester, which again resulted from severe depression. I did well, of course, writing papers and researching as those are crucial skills History students must develop, and they certainly aided in my approach towards learning about politics. I say I am a conservative not simply for the sake of doing so or even because it is posh; in fact, I face still major backlashes from friends I have known most of my life who are leftists while a great many others ended due to my deciding around 30 years old to stand my ground and to never yield to consensus, but rather guide by conviction. To note how some people around whom I grew up are so open-minded that what brains they have seemed to spill to the floor with the linoleum only to know the damage to its surface as its result is most disheartening, because guiding by consensus, to be open-minded, only tells me that such people are willing to abide by all other suggestions, ideas and concepts as well as social and cultural trends to which they are exposed blindly, without so much as a bat of an eyelash nor a question posed by an evident blase eye. But what is most disturbing is not that they are not willing to be open to other ideas, but rather they are discouraged by these social demagogical giants to avoid applying their own intellects and talents to the public discourse; individualism is discourage, while collectivism is mandated as a moral imperative so as not to offend others nor oppose the establishment. Like so many teenagers and young adults, I did this too; I wish now I could call upon H.G. Wells to lend me his time machine so I may travel back in time to change this. But it is through experience that we learn, how we grow as people and emerge from the ashes of our failures to become that bright fiery phoenix of Greek lore to blaze a new path the infinite space of the skyline we are willing to take flight. No one ever achieves any goal worthy of note without stepping outside his or her comfort zone; sadly, these are the people who face social consternation, persecution as well as to be met with the roasting embers of public ostracism because they dare to dream of things that have never been. A person will never achieve, per Andy Warhol, their "fifteen minutes of fame" nor be nail towering high above all others on a 2-x-4. These people are the colossuses for the new generation; they will also be the nails the social hammer beats down as its punishment. Moral relativity is only justified in order to engage in ideological flexibility should the calls of duty in times of crises beg our answer. To be absolute in moral virtue is to accept that you will never sell your for the sake of popularity. 

And as Margaret Thatcher once said:

“If you just set out to be liked, you would be prepared to compromise on anything at any time, and you would achieve nothing.” 

The Right Honourable The Lady Thatcher LG OM PC FRS  and Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (1979-90)

Wistfully, I now must demonstrate what today's collegians have devolved into academically. It is true that the leaders for tomorrow will be manufactured by their parents and forefathers of times gone by. And because this is one of the few absolute truths, what you are about to watch first is from an Internet socialist personality calling herself Liberal Girl. Watch in horror, and be prepared to feel shame. Not only has our public schools failed today's children, their parents are the cause as a collective for not only advocating for no better, but rather pining for much worse since the culture of dependency is a difficult one to kill.

As horrific as today's collegians truly believing that America not only had one founding father, but that his name butchered George Washington and Thomas Jefferson's legacies even as she had likely no clue that George Jefferson was Sherman Hemsley's main character in the legendary 1970's/80's sitcom The Jeffersons. I might find humor in this if she meant for it to be a joke, but there is nothing about that declaration over which she was joshing us. The academic degradation and the devolution of tomorrow's best laid plans and hopes for a more prosperous world appear doomed to a fate worse than physical or spiritual death. Social decadence through the ignorance manufactured through intellectual apathy begets to free people the atrophy of free will and liberty so as to ensure our masters grow more powerful by each new darkest hour.

Most of America's presidents attended Ivy League universities or other elite schools like Stanford University and Duke University. We are taught to believe that when a student out of high school or a prep academy is accepted into Harvard University - historically one of the three top ranked Ivy League schools alongside Yale and Princeton - that individual is not only rich, but highly intelligent and driven to a life less ordinary than most. In considering this, I am shocked still to view what questions were asked of Harvard students about general political and social issues. They had no shot at squirming out of these situations once their very disturbing answers were delivered.

Woe is the world for tomorrow. The Islamic State is considered no threat, but the U.S. is per Harvard students. In one sense, though, their ignorance might serve them. Obama is the Islamic State because he is funding their weaponry and munitions, vehicles and yes, operating training camps run by our intelligence operatives. It is sad, but their ignorance actually pegged their political hero by way of being wealthy hipsters. 

Now, to Fresno State University, where the hippies apparently still pervade nearly 50 years after their failure to stay grounded, and how that pot from along the Haight-Asbury must have rotted their brains.

So, if Fresno is moving forward, I would far rather retreat backward. 

You may recall last year for Independence Day I posted the following video. Mark Dice, author and activist, asked random people along the beaches in California why America celebrates the Fourth of July. I choose to revisit this because the problem has only grown far worse.

Once you view these pathetic answers by young adults in California and Harvard University, can anyone deny that Kimberley Guilfoyle is not absolutely correct to sarcastically tell young women who vote based on their vaginas to "go back on Tinder"? Watch again, and tell me she is not absolutely correct.

Militant feminists in Tennessee are violently angry that Amendment 1 passed with a 54-46 margin, meaning a significant portion of actual women who approved, not tomorrow's prostitutes being funded to stay home and ensure that business stays good as regular customers for Planned Parenthood. Today's culture for women, the true war on women, teaches them that "yes" always means "no" and that consensual sex will always be subject to a convenient lie never to be checked nor successfully contested by their male victims. As TN House Speaker Beth Harwell (R) has introduced a bill that would require pregnant women to have ultrasounds performed before they can choose to carry through with an abortion is drawing the spat venom from the wealthy party favor Sandra Flukes or incestuous child molester Lena Durhams of the nation, the issue boils down to why Tennessee's militant feminists may soon grow far more so: they do not want Tennessee's taxpayers to have the right to determine how we pay for their abortions on demand. They never admit this, and they demand Tennesseans pay for their libertine behaviors' convenient mistakes. The more sexualized American society grows, the closer the present rape culture will reverse - and by reversing the rape cultural trends, the men will be raped, but in the twisted sense that "yes" always will mean "no". A challenge to toss out the will of the people's vote on the Amendment 1 referendum is being petition, and being met with stiff resistance by the state election commission in Nashville. To consider how in multiple states, men convicted of rape and child molestation can now be castrated does not concern militant feminists because they were the political bloc who achieved this sentencing policy. Thus, the nickname militant feminism hates most - FemiNazi - is actually a relevant, accurate description. After all, Sanger herself directly influenced Adolf Hitler through their mutual colleague Dr. Ernst Rudin, a German psychiatrist who was the architect of Hitler's own eugenics program which like Sanger, was designed to construct his "master race". Therefore, through accusations of racism under the Democratic Party's platform may you find why eugenics is a policy that is very well concealed among those who never read. Why else would 79% of Planned Parenthood clinics be located in poor black and Hispanic neighborhoods, while 34% of all abortions nationally are performed on black babies, of which the black community only comprises a very disproportionate 13% of the national population as the second largest minority group?

III. Conclusion: Socialism Cannot Thrive Unless It Manufactures a Crisis to Prey Upon the Uneducated Peoples of Large Urban Areas It Dominates Politically Through Corruption, Force and Even Murder

One of my most despised congresswomen in Washington is that racist intellectual giant Sheila Jackson-Lee. How she ever slid out of her mother's birth canal is baffling given her very questionable educational background with respect to America's history. Only in America can a political party grow more popular among a demographic the more these voters continue to elect candidates to the nation's growing idiocracy. To listen to her discuss how the Constitution of the United States is 400 years old should not come as a shock given she admits she is in favor of expanding government's plantation, with her the black Simon Legree cracking a most repressive whip.

It is understandable why Rep. Jackson-Lee supports a hard eugenics policy through systemic compulsory abortions and sterilization in the spirit of Margaret Sanger and current Obama science czar, John Holdren. She wants to engage in population controls; sadly, the decrease in total abortions over the past 41 years even as the population grows far higher even without that decline would indicate that the socialist movement seems to be killing its own. After all, there are more conservatives in America today than at any time since the early 1950s, according to The Washington Post. We have Obama to thank for this. 

Socialism in America cannot survive unless it can dominate the large inner city voters. How else would they do this other than through Obama's lone qualification as a Marxist community organizer, or through corrupt trade and labor union bosses in the back pockets of violent organized crime syndicates? The city of Chicago has not voted a Republican as mayor since before World War I. Detroit, now attempting to declassify their bankruptcy even as it continues to receive water and other humanitarian supplies from across the river in Canada, last elected a GOP mayor abou 60 years ago, in which the UAW has since destroyed the domestic automobile industry through violent strikes and corrupt bargains during collective bargaining agreement negotiations. Just this past month, Nashville conceded defeat to the UAW after it filed a grievance complaint to the NLRB following a 100-vote victory for factory workers not to unionize in the Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga. It has since been discovered that Gov. Bill Haslam (R) and perhaps even Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) accepted some $300 million in kickback bribes, and now the plant is fully unionized and suddenly a new line of SUVs rolling through. Volkswagen advocated unionization, but the factory workers voted it down resoundingly. Like true Marxists, however, labor bosses never listen to democratic mandates by workers; and today, there is a large scab list compiled of employees refusing to pay member dues who now are facing intimidation. 

Saul Alinsky can be credited for Chicago historically serving as the most corrupt city in America for his organizational means through Marxist principles. Recently, Hillary Clinton's letters of correspondence with Alinsky surfaced from her youth as he died in 1972. Yet now that the Democrats' true color - the red of Marxist-Leninism - have sprung a leak through their blue veil, the black community has suddenly begun a potentially debilitating shift that should enough turn conservative and vote for GOP candidates, the Democrats may lose its role as a major political force for at least a generation. I suspect a Seventh Party system on the eventual tip off the iceberg. If you need to understand why this is poised to transpire, listen to the harrowing story of one South Side Chicago pastor Corey Brooks, whose church was vandalized and he, his family and his congregation's lives threatened due to his public support for now-victorious Illinois GOP governor-elect Bruce Rauner.

There! You heard it from a man who stands by God and his conviction begat him by The Lord, not along the party line of Chicago machtpolitik. In a city where 92% of young black men are unemployed, Pastor Brooks' assertion that Chicago's urban poor reside on government's plantation is not only refreshing, but unfortunately resulted in his persecution. When socialists in the Democratic Party cannot persuade your support through pressing advocacy for a "voluntary" vote, they will either rig voting machines or simply attempt to first bully and then kill you. What Pastor Brooks endured should happen to no one. What you are seeing is how Democrats in all major urban areas have a stranglehold they refuse to relinquish as if a Soviet cadre unit run by commissars. That universal acceptance always declared to be true of every Democrat will only be conditioned if the black community tows their line. If not, their heritage as the party of slavery and Jim Crow bleeds through.

This is a photograph of Pastor Brooks' church. Horrific though it is, he is fortunate to that point he is not either hurt or far worse off:

For more on this horrific crime, please read The Chicago Sun-Times. 

Finally, to the co-architect of Obamacare Jonathan Gruber. I listened to a long list of videos on his comments. There have been at least five more leaked to the mass media. When you listen to his incendiary admission that only the "stupid(ity)" among the American people will vote for Democrats due to the measure's intended wanton transparency, understand now why those young adults - Harvard and Fresno State University students - and the beach bums of Southern California will always vote Democrat because they will be provided with a bribe in the process even as Obama and Nancy Pelosi "learn" of the comment or deny they know Gruber at all.

My Response to Megyn Kelly's Post on Facebook on the Suicide of Brittany Maynard As a Patient with Mental Illness

My Response to Megyn Kelly's Post on Facebook on the Suicide of Brittany Maynard As a Patient with Mental Illness

Megyn Kelly, host of Fox News Channel's The Kelly File; Named by Time as one of the 100 most influential people in the world for 2014

Post by Megyn Kelly.

From the perspective of a patient with severe bipolar disorder and OCD, I will only state that it has been four years since I last attempted suicide. I suppose I see things a bit differently than some, and I would like to share with you what those are.

The worst of the two evils to bipolar disorder is depression. When I battle this as I am now, life becomes a tale of the absurd. I believe always that I have no sense of purpose nor resolve, that what actions I take and the ideas I express are constantly second guessed as the inane ramblings of a mad man and, worse still, my being met with scorn, derision and constant scrutiny when I cannot possibly explain how I am faring or my mental processes. These days, I simply do not express my issues at all unless they grow too extreme to continue being dammed without a leak. Once that pressure is unbearable, no Dutch boy can possibly be so brave as to plug the hole in the dyke without one day finding the floodgates immersing him in the abysmal sea of despair.

If I were to have spoken to Ms. Maynard, I almost guarantee that she would have demonstrated having suffered from severe depression. If one is well-equipped at the art of deception, this can easily be masked. The fact she retracted her decision twice to first extend her life until it was clear she had no physical capacity to experience the joy of the love of her life indicates this with a very high probability for accuracy. When someone decides suicide is the means to the end of a life no longer worth living, that tends to not at all be true. What Ms. Maynard truly wanted was for the pain to subside, to escape the misery, not to die. She never would have chosen death had she been informed there was a chance she would enter remission or even might be cured. She would not have altered her course to end her life had she not believed life is too precious to simply become the sand in the hourglass' final descent. To fight to live even in the inevitability of death is the finite measure for an always penultimate end. In desperation, she chose the final solution, and there can be no U-Turn towards bearing witness for what might have been.

In grappling my near-nightly prayer that I not again reawaken to bear witness the next morning, I am always pleased in the end that I did not die once I awaken. I consider myself a Christian, but I approach my adherence to The Word of God by reading my online Bible sites based upon a chosen topic and research it accordingly. I am not Catholic, but I have read much of St. Thomas Aquinas' Summa Theologica, and I marvel how Christianity can articulate best what the flaws of science are never absolutisms graduating from theorems and postulations. As I understand, so too do I see practicing medicine as only serving that best possible action - a practice. Medicine is not an absolute truth, just as recently the presence of black holes and the concept of the Big Bang are being redebated by the astrophysics community on if they ever exist(ed). Medicine has achieved great strides since the days of Hippocrates, but to this very day, the world still is mystified what exactly caused the Black Death during the Middle Ages that killed at least 200 million people globally as it is believed the bubonic and pneumonic plagues were actually Ebola, which can spread in the same manners as both. As HIV/AIDS have yet been cured, much less cancer, nothing about medicine will ever lead to the curing of all our ills. Stem cell research is still a phenomena where researchers are learning its vast possibilities, but much remains unclear. As the right to life can never be guaranteed to progress beyond the womb, the last rite, death, is the lone absolute truth for any state of nature to be. Once Ms. Maynard understood this, her decision became too excruciating and unbearable to decide "how" and not "if" and "when". And as she determined the choice to die was for her the best option, it was not God whispering such a monumental action to be taken in her mind, but her own demons she could not overcome which silenced her.

Albert Camus stated this when discussing suicide, and it is a remark though only recently I stumbled upon, I consider most profound, as it will be closing my wistful reflection never finished, of an end with the drama's curtain calls proving most unkind, and to a very lengthy reply to Megyn Kelly's post.

Albert Camus, 7 November 1913 – 4 January 1960. Portrait from New York World-Telegram and Sun Photograph Collection, 1957

"But sometimes, it takes more courage to live than to shoot yourself."

(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Post by Megyn Kelly.

My Responses to Claims that Jesus Married Mary Magdalene and of Atheism's War on Christianity

My Responses to Claims that Jesus Married Mary Magdalene and of Atheism's War on Christianity

Portrait of Jesus and Mary Magdalene, where Mary Magdalene was borne witness to Jesus' Resurrection, 15th Century by Titian

Post by The Revolution.

Having never read this document but knowing well it is divergent with other apocryphal accounts that include her marriage to John the Baptist, I will never take this seriously since this account was first located in Britain and secondly did not include a Greek or Latin translation from the Aramaic, in which the Apostles' accounts were each recorded in Greek under first St. Paul (nee. Saul of Tarsus) and later his protege and the first pope, St. Peter. As a Christian as well as a historian with a political science degree, much can be stated as to the ambiguity of such claims.

The Gospels of Jesus were recorded in Greek and Latin sermons of the Apostles and His crucifixion verified by Roman records under Pontius Pilate to have, in fact, transpired, while scientists again are reneging on whether the Shroud of Turin is really not that upon which Jesus was wrapped after further tests continue to conflict with the disputed data or prior carbon dating tests. To date, the Dead Sea Scrolls have been located that pre-date Jesus and in fact, St. Peter, credited with serving as the first pope or the Bishop of Rome through his association with St. Paul (Saul of Tarsus, which Tarsus was a Greek village occupied by Rome), were both directly connected. The matter that Noah's Arc may well have been located in Turkey on Mount Ararat will confirm The Old Testament's account to be true and that the account of this latest attempt to describe Jesus and Mary Magdalene's relationship was in an Aramaic document located in Britain likely nearby the Domesbury book, coinciding at some time perhaps before or after the victory by William the Conqueror over King Harold at Hastings as depicted along the Bayeux Tapestry. As Roman legions constructed aqueducts and Hadrian's Wall in Britannia in approximately 122 BC and which the empire was still occupants of the Isles as Jesus was believed to have been crucified by Pilate in approximately 32 AD, the empire was present even during the time of its republican predecessor. No mention of Mary Magdalene's relationship with Jesus aside from her discipleship was ever divulged by the Apostles, and there are divergent accounts of Magdalene even to the point of ambiguity to her identity in the New Testament Apocrypha which you may read briefly below, including that she married John the Baptist. She is considered to be the second most important female presence in the Gospels behind the Virgin Mary. In a traditional marriage, the wife will always be supreme in her husband's life over the mother. Jesus is The Son of God, not of the flesh of man like Muhammad, in which the Qur'an disputes Jesus as being The Son as well as ever being crucified and instead, to have been Allah's (God's) slave, while proclaiming the people of The Book to have been lied to about Isa's divinity, which is Arabic for Jesus, as the Qur'an and its Hadiths were not written until at some point after 1500 AD. It is believed Muhammad was born around 560 AD and would therefore not have ever coincided with any Apostle record in Greek or Latin. For those deriding why Christianity as early as 1054 AD experienced a series of schisms which initiated first in the division of Catholicism into Eastern Orthodoxy and in the 16th Century with the Reformation, politics and human interpretation mix very badly with interpreting any doctrine of divinity that does not intermingle with humanist comprehension. This is why Islam can claim that 160 or more verses commanding violence under Sharia law as prescribed by Muhammad are unequivocal and absolute since Muhammad was a man and not the son of Allah, but his prophet who interpreted a manifestation as he claimed to have been the recipient of an epiphany or perhaps the hallucination of what would transpire into 1,400 years of the apocalyptic conquest for jihad as directed by a bloodthirsty mad man. He is still far deadlier than Hitler or any communist due to connecting himself with a false god not of either Judaism or Christianity in order to kill all who to this day refuse to acknowledge his absolutism by "voluntary submission". To be Christian is to give one's life to Christ voluntarily; to fail to convert to Islam means certain death or facing being taxed the jizya alongside institutional persecution.

To atheists who hate the vision of The Cross while celebrating the nearly-complete recognition of Islam as a official state established faith under Sharia law, Jesus will always hate your sins as well as all that have ever been committed, but He will always love the sinners. Communism failed in part because millions of people died attempting to practice their faiths, particularly Christianity in the Soviet Union as well as Judaism, because it thwarted the omnipotence of the state under totalitarianism, and which is still occurring in the People's Republic of China today with the slaughters of more Tibetan Buddhists as well as Christians whose churches continue to be bulldozed and its followers arrested for the same reason; not coincidentally, the Soviet empire that embraced atheism collapsed beneath the weight of men who postured as gods, and Cuba today recognizes Roman Catholicism as a legal religion with more than 52% of its citizens identifying themselves as such, no longer mandating secularism. Jesus is a Savior advocating peace through love, not submission under the penalty of beheading as the only choices for a voluntary conversion, in which "submission" is the direct English transliteration for the Arabic term "Islam".

The Grand Mosque in Mecca.

How ironic that the bulk of modern scientific theories were not derived by atheists who believe to be intellectually superior to all humans who are not, but by the likes of Christians as Nicolas Copernicus, Galileo Galilei, Johannes Kepler, Tycho Brahe, Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, Gregor Mendel, Rene Descartes, while even the love child of secular lore Charles Darwin struggled his entire life with his scientific theory of natural selection through evolution (which in the time he had to spend aboard the HMS Beagle, could never have been proven as an absolute truth given thousands of years of observation would have been necessary in order for empirical evidence to be witness), and the faith he renounced but multiple times flirted with returning to his youth's roots. Key philosophers as St. Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther who decried the Vatican's employment of indulgences to supersede the Grace that God begets all to be necessary to ascend to Heaven, Niccolo Machiavelli, Sir Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes and Edmund Burke, Soren Kierkegaard and C.S. Lewis who served as major foundations for Western civilization's philosophical plancks were all Christian. Legend even states that upon Darwin's death that he repented before a witness, which continues to be disputed, and to reflect upon his writings and activities will corroborate that his intellectual foundation was unstable because his soul never settled into reconciling it with the blind faith he was taught to observe as a young man. To consider even Christian scientists and philosophers comprise of a plurality of the world's greatest minds to be wrought with illogic by generalizing an entire faith predicated under the bigotry comprised by a stereotype is not only a fallacy at best, but false in that those who reside in China still are vastly illiterate among the peasantry aside from the doctrinal teachings the Chinese Communist Party requires as if they are catechisms, or how under Mao Zedong, who enjoyed a godlike reverence, resulted in his ideological fanaticism slaughtering a recorded estimate of 72 million working in collectivized labor units in rural countrysides under the atheist principle that through communism may the utopian vision of man be realized. The problem laid in of course the poorly conceived plan during the Great Leap Forward that through defertilizing the soil due to over tilling, excessive deforestation and even killing sparrows due to their annoyance, famine plagued the nation and through executions, 40 million likely died. From 1966 through Mao's death ten years later from what atheism never cured in ALS, the Cultural Revolution engaged under blind faith in the man history recorded to be known as "the Great Helmsman" killed perhaps an additional 11 million, which cannot be quantified by numbers along. When atheist governments under communism relied upon a Joseph Stalin archetype as well who became the god of the Soviet Union through his cult of personality, millions perished to serve him even as decades later it was learned that communism engaged in its diffusion through a social Darwinist principle derived under Thomas Malthus of depopulating the masses. Ironically, abortions through Margaret Sanger's advocacy of eugenics as the medical science of genocide founded by Galton nearly a century before are socialist principles of devout humanists, to kill "the unfit", "human weeds" and "morons", to eliminate blacks and Jews, Slavs and yes, eventually Christianity and its gift to the world, the capitalism Marx renamed that he so despised, she did so in order to justify her voracious debauchery even as she married wealthy men so that she could pursue her evil initiatives. For a woman who made her fortune engaging in such horrific acts as her direct influence on Adolf Hitler's own eugenics program through their mutual colleague Dr. Ernst Rudin, few along the atheist lunatic fringe under socialism's founding principle take offense at accusations of racial targeting, always citing to the compassion it bestows unto the poor. Considering how the Bolshevik Leon Trotsky despised Sanger upon meeting her due to her love of capital wealth as a communist, atheism is the most religious faith manufactured in human history by social subversives who only through anarcho-capital measures could the cause of revolution be achieved under mob violence by a vastly illiterate sans culottes Parisian populace. Consider how the wealthy Jacobins under Maximilien Robespierre centrally-planned and manufactured its own pagan religion in the attempt to mobilize the masses in old cathedrals, it stands to reason - a trait that never has graced atheism's modus operandi that through man's own finite designs will they ultimately meet their predestination of their final failures - that had the Ancien Regime not been eliminated at its most crucial element at the First Estate, the Roman Catholic Church, the peasants of the countryside would at least had the opportunity to read The Bible, thereby nullifying the lesson the left-wing's first experiment failed by after the Reign of Terror and later the Directory upon the coup d'etat which brought Napoleon Bonaparte to power. It is not a coincidence then that he employed the Vatican as his centerpiece to consolidate his authoritarian principles since totalitarianism during the Revolution failed on the sole principle of "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" that was defined under false pretenses by men designing to become gods, because he employed in stealth the Revolution's spirit which failed due to the inherent flaw of absolute power corrupting absolute.

Why else, then, did Rousseau and later Marx and Engels fear over all Christianity but barely paid attention to Judaism and Islam? Why has every society who forced out the right to worship ultimately failed as the cries of their oppressed peoples yearning to pray toppled the atheist Soviet Union? Why now has Cuba permitted religious freedom even as it remains officially a secular state in the post-Soviet world? And why again, my atheist antagonizers, do you seek to ban Christianity, but have barely attacked Islam and are promoting the rise of Satanism globally even as your own movement has erected its own churches as if its own religion? Hypocrisy precedes the imperfections latent within mankind because they will lead by virtue of our deaths alone to our accomplishments one day being forgotten, advanced through new technologies or even that we will become regarded as fools. Only God can be the absolute, while the hubris of the megalomaniacs who espouse atheism in order to become gods on Earth simply fade into sea as if a setting sun. So far as I see, the manifestation of materialism has never been explained even as today, atheism continues to delve into its own demise by embracing an intelligent design without true knowledge of its state. When asking how what transformed a vacuumed void into the state of nature, the law of thermodynamics as part of Einstein's theory of relativity only states that by man's capacity, matter can be neither created nor destroyed. If you cannot explain why even the theory of a man born a Jew never explored the manifestation of existential materialism, the fundamental truth continues to pervade that no scientific discovery will ever be an absolute positive since they never graduate beyond the postulation of theories without one day being revisited upon contradiction. As religion cannot be explained either, the difference is in this: a supreme, omnipotent being will always have an Alpha and Omega tale, forever tell you it creates and destroys all and will describe in detail what you can only comprehend because science never will. To transform atheism from a principle of nihilism and the state of void into its own religion is not only hypocritical, but the manner of trying to legitimize whatever foundation you have as if a house divided that is collapsing, and why the new atheist religion that stands for nothing but man's mechanizations is threatened by Christianity over all others because its follows know that the faith never will die while atheist societies always do. Even the Big Bang and black holes are being disputed again, so if empirical evidence is impossible to prove those theories, why bother persecuting the Christian messengers of God who understand their shortcomings? To continue arguing only for the sake of agreeing with me is the irony of all ironies since atheists always follow their passe scientific cliches that that which is not perfect or physically seen cannot exist due to human perfection, over which science proves time and again to be the hallmark of its inherent imperfect principles.

Post by Glenn Beck.

This morning, I received updates on more and more replies that continue to grow more bitter by the day. They comprise of both sides of this debate, both atheists and Christians, who are virulently defending their positions. To the best of my ability, I have endeavored to maintain a level approach to my points, but I am sorely disappointed not so much in the atheists' tactics of science and false generalities, but of my Christian partners in their level of vitriol and hate growing more venomous over the past week in abandoning their compassion and love even for sinners.

Why am I less disappointed in the atheists than I am my fellow Christians? The answer lies in what truly defines our faith, and why it separates the body of Christ from all others, which is free will and the right to choice. As I am a historian and political blogger with a very broad following, I see the uphill battles we Christians continue to climb from both the dogmatic perspective of our Lord as well as what mankind applies or destroys through its misapplications of what is intended. When I read of the atheists who so angrily are protesting Glenn Beck's post, I see an unbridled anger which will never be extinguished. No nations having adopted atheism or a secular policy in national religion have ever provided legal protections for people of faith; in fact, they have persecuted them, engaged in genocidal acts or imprisoned them as in the Soviet Union and China in gulags and labor reeducation camps. The methods behind this are synonymous between each communist nation having employed such brutal repression of the free will of the human spirit. They all demanded uniformity, not under a godless state ruled under the dictatorship of a proletariat, but of the falsely self-anointed legitimacy each dictator creates by consolidating his power as a godlike despot. Through such mechanizations to exalt themselves above their taught human superiority over the worldly realm, they become worshipped, venerated as infallible and never possibly wrong even as science time and again discredits them because they revise what does not serve their agenda. Still, despite wiping clean the slate of all vestiges of God, atheist rulers with the godlike complex could never do so to God, because God guarantees all mankind the rights to life, liberty and property per their acquisition of happiness.

Poster honoring the memory of peoples of faith who died during the Bolshevik Persecution in Ukraine

To read Russian history is to grasp how no other state has ever persecuted Jews more viciously. Russia once contained the world's largest Jewish population, but because it clashed with the tsardom's hegemony within the Russian Orthodox Church, no state controls over their activities were easily applied as they did not attend Christian services. Over the remaining 150 years of the Russian Empire, major reforms were enacted, particularly by Catherine the Great and Alexander II. Catherine liberalized substantially the Russian policy on religious tolerance, only to renege on such policy as the Charter of the Towns of 1782. Russian citizenship was based on membership to the state church. While initially Jews were granted full citizenship following the Polish partition in 1772, they were levied an additional tax not unlike the jizya in Islam. Eventually, she revoked this in 1785 as she grew more autocratic as the French Revolution approached. To consider that, too, pogroms slaughtered the Jewish peoples in the rural countryside, millions have died and are still being persecuted today, particularly in the fight between Moscow and Ukraine's military. The former Soviet Union is still primarily secular; the communist spirit has not yet died, or Vladimir Putin would not be attempting to recreate the empire.

Catherine II, also known as Catherine the Great, Empress and Autocrat of All the Russias (1729-96)

Soviet Propaganda of Joseph Stalin as the Father Figure of the State's Children 

Some grasp this and state Christianity has indeed been brutal, and they would be correct since this should never happen to anyone. But under communism, all vestiges of the faith were banned since what once was the tsarist regime's autocratic rule through the divine right of tsars, the Soviet Union was all things to all people under threat of the gun. The Politburo through the state medium TASS issued the state's propaganda as part of its totalitarian absolutism. Communism sought to not only abolish the family order, but to do so first through commandeering all scholastic standards, to deny parents the right to raise their children and in perhaps the most damning measure of attempting this, what had been centuries of Russian Eastern Orthodox ecunmenical tradition and culture were largely wiped away, revised from the historical record as churches were demolished, and such cults of personality under Joseph Stalin replacing this with the atheist standard suddenly applying indoctrination through a god on Earth. As Lord Acton's immortal wisdom is true how "absolute power corrupts absolute", what was advertised during the Bolshevik Revolution as a utopian model for total equity only wiped the slate of one form of religious serfdom in order to replace it with one far more deadly should one have chosen not to comply. To corroborate this statement, Stalin declared the following as a philosophical planck in Soviet polity:

"One of Ivan the Terrible's mistakes was to overlook the five great feudal families. If he had annihilated those five families, there would definitely have been no Time of Troubles. But Ivan the Terrible would execute someone and then spend a long time repenting and praying. God got in his way in this matter. He ought to have been still more decisive!"

Even Stalin acknowledged at the Teheran Conference in 1943 that the struggle to ensue between East and West boiled down to God and the Devil:

"God is on your side? Is He a Conservative? The Devil's on my side, he's a good Communist."

Once one grasps how according to Stalin, "Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed," the power of an atheist state is not to be consolidated by the relationship of its peoples to a faith's moral code, but to establish totalitarian controls at the most centralized means, where morality once pervasive, died, and a world where the amoral govern absolute through coerced secularization. It can only be achieved under absolute state controls of public schools, through state health care and compulsory military conscription. When atheism rises, the rulers exalt themselves to the role of master and commander over all whom they surveil. As Western democracies go, religious freedom is taken for granted, only for atheism under Marxist-Leninist standards to revoke gradually this right to all free practice of a faith.

Christianity, therefore, has always been the most persecuted of all faiths. Every time it has faced total annihilation through genocide or state partitioning, like with Rome and under Soviet communism, it eventually toppled entire empires and replaced their order with Christianity, as applied in the Council of Nicea. The empires once persecuted Christians, but the indomitable will of human freedom toppled these walls partitioning those with their relationships with God and Jesus from ever again being denied discourse at His altar. If George Soros, a devout atheist, opposes Christianity so virulently, why else would he state the following?

"Next to my fantasies about being God, I also have very strong fantasies of being mad."

Considering atheism has ascended to its own established religion in a church, it begs to question why it has adopted the key tenet by choice, of Christendom's doctrine of salvation through the voluntary acceptance of Christ's Grace as the King of Kings? Christianity is entirely voluntary, predicated upon the greatest choice one can make in establishing a relationship with God and Jesus, but suddenly, there is the First Church of Atheism. You make of it what you will, but I believe what has always been a faith of disbelief is on the brink of an historical penultimate collapse and a great spiritual awakening in God.

For more information on the new atheist religion, please visit the Official Website of the First Church of Atheism

***

Bonus Material: The Three Secrets of Fátima

The Three Secrets of Fátima were a series of apocalyptic visions and prophecies which some believe were given to three young Portuguese shepherds, Lúcia Santos and her cousins Jacinta and Francisco Marto, by an apparition of the Blessed Virgin Mary, starting on 13 May 1917. The three children claimed they were visited by a Marian apparition six times between May and October 1917. The apparition is now popularly known as Our Lady of Fátima.

According to the official Catholic interpretation, the three secrets involve Hell, World Wars I and II, and the attempted assassination by gunshot of Pope John Paul II (which occurred on May 13, 1981).

Our Lady showed us a great sea of fire which seemed to be under the earth. Plunged in this fire were demons and souls in human form, like transparent burning embers, all blackened or burnished bronze, floating about in the conflagration, now raised into the air by the flames that issued from within themselves together with great clouds of smoke, now falling back on every side like sparks in a huge fire, without weight or equilibrium, and amid shrieks and groans of pain and despair, which horrified us and made us tremble with fear. The demons could be distinguished by their terrifying and repulsive likeness to frightful and unknown animals, all black and transparent. This vision lasted but an instant. How can we ever be grateful enough to our kind heavenly Mother, who had already prepared us by promising, in the first Apparition, to take us to heaven. Otherwise, I think we would have died of fear and terror.

You have seen hell where the souls of poor sinners go. To save them, God wishes to establish in the world devotion to my Immaculate Heart. If what I say to you is done, many souls will be saved and there will be peace. The war is going to end: but if people do not cease offending God, a worse one will break out during the Pontificate of Pope Pius XI. When you see a night illumined by an unknown light, know that this is the great sign given you by God that he is about to punish the world for its crimes, by means of war, famine, and persecutions of the Church and of the Holy Father. To prevent this, I shall come to ask for the Consecration of Russia to my Immaculate Heart, and the Communion of reparation on the First Saturdays. If my requests are heeded, Russia will be converted, and there will be peace; if not, she will spread her errors throughout the world, causing wars and persecutions of the Church. The good will be martyred; the Holy Father will have much to suffer; various nations will be annihilated. In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph. The Holy Father will consecrate Russia to me, and she shall be converted, and a period of peace will be granted to the world.

J.M.J.

The third part of the secret revealed at the Cova da Iria-Fátima, on 13 May 1917.

I write in obedience to you, my God, who command me to do so through his Excellency the Bishop of Leiria and through your Most Holy Mother and mine.
After the two parts which I have already explained, at the left of Our Lady and a little above, we saw an Angel with a flaming sword in his left hand; flashing, it gave out flames that looked as though they would set the world on fire; but they died out in contact with the splendour that Our Lady radiated towards him from her right hand: pointing to the earth with his right hand, the Angel cried out in a loud voice: 'Penance, Penance, Penance!'. And we saw in an immense light that is God: 'something similar to how people appear in a mirror when they pass in front of it' a Bishop dressed in White 'we had the impression that it was the Holy Father'. Other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious going up a steep mountain, at the top of which there was a big Cross of rough-hewn trunks as of a cork-tree with the bark; before reaching there the Holy Father passed through a big city half in ruins and half trembling with halting step, afflicted with pain and sorrow, he prayed for the souls of the corpses he met on his way; having reached the top of the mountain, on his knees at the foot of the big Cross he was killed by a group of soldiers who fired bullets and arrows at him, and in the same way there died one after another the other Bishops, Priests, men and women Religious, and various lay people of different ranks and positions. Beneath the two arms of the Cross there were two Angels each with a crystal aspersorium in his hand, in which they gathered up the blood of the Martyrs and with it sprinkled the souls that were making their way to God.

Tuy-3-1-1944

A Proposition for a Party Platform for a Conservative GOP or New Political Party, and a Convention of the States per Article V

A Party Platform for a Conservative GOP or New Third Party:

I. Preface: A Choice for America's Future Generations

As Roger Stone posted over Twitter and which I received in my feed, today's American political environment has lost all dynamics differentiating between the Democrats and the Republican Party. I discussed this in my last article, and why either a full-scale assault on the GOP must be undertaken far more aggressively than what the Tea Party is simply placing before the conservative establishment that is the largest political contingent in the nation over moderates and liberals, or to leave the party and recreate our destiny for which we stand for what we demand to be the change from business as usual. The party platform within the GOP has long remained ensconced amid a void of a steady identity; even during the Reagan Revolution, many of his congressional, senatorial and even his own Cabinet colleagues obstructed his efforts to build a trimmer government so that we the people would be in charge, not lobbyists or wealthy bankers and entrepreneurs from both parties who cannot identify with the residents living along Main Street, U.S.A. while they profit off Hollywood Boulevard and Wall Street. Populism is the GOP's greatest weakness, but as conservatism advocates culture and tradition through any nation's historical heritage, the people in Middle America comprised of farmers, poets and sailors are the truly exceptional individuals who best exemplify the message of what Americana truly means and should be once again. We do not want a state downtrodden by perpetual class warfare to be emblematic of racial tensions, soaring income discrepancies due to the wealthy growing more so through tax breaks and exemptions at the expense of the middle class and poorest Americans growing much poorer off to the point of synonymy. Such a path is not one conducive to growth, but rather a predatory model for casino economic policies that create financial and technology sector industrial bubbles always endangering the economy to a decline through recessions and massive job losses. Through the Federal Reserve, monetary policies have now for 98 years resulted in the devaluation of the coinage through the issuance of massive paper fiat currency with no weighted value and resulting in massive inflation as demands soon arise for higher and more dangerous increases of a minimum wage, or what socialism refers to as a living wage. This model is unsustainable; prior to the rise of Woodrow Wilson in the Election of 1912, no meaningful measure for inflation was necessary because federal deficits remained low even as the currency actually deflated, not to the contrary. It is as some might say why Thomas Jefferson virulently opposed the establishment of a centralized bank to control the supply of money through artificial economies of scale, and how through rates of public expenditure, generations which manage to pay down their debts to government will eliminate the likelihood of the manifestation of one-half the wars on Earth.

Government is far too large, too expansionist and furthermore as Ronald Reagan stated, a cancer whose metastasis is the surest thing to eternal life we will ever see on God's green Earth. Red tape begets inefficiency due to large and overlapping bureaucracies which often are nearly identical in their functions. The more government grows, that cancer metastasizes and engulfs the life force of the American Dream: free enterprise, capitalism through the opportunity at entrepreneurial investments where the talents and initiative of the individual are confiscated by obscene confiscatory measures for taxation and the alarming growth in service sector conglomerates, militant labor and trade unions. The Democratic Party sells its product well, for all it needs to do is play off the poor versus the rest of the world which left them behind to feed off its dust. Sadly, the most obscene examples of morbid poverty reside in the slums and tenements of major urban areas where their condition is subsidized until they meet early graves, as welfare is never altered at the same rates of change as how monetary supply inflates or deflate. Health care initiatives prior to Obamacare were once the best among all nations, though never accredited as such by the United Nations (UN) and its subsidiary international medical regulatory apparatus, the World Health Organization (WHO). While America's medical system was once the envy of Canadian civilians who would drive south of the border to receive first rate care based upon the market share of their needs with far less in wait times, the United Kingdom was rated just last year as suffering the indignity of the average National Health Service (NHS) patient being 45% more likely to die from neglect, including time waiting for care. What Sarah Palin warned us more than six years ago about death panels has now grown into a systemic plague that includes massive surplus budgets for the Department of Veterans Affairs, but a record number of our veterans dying due to intentional neglect in VA Hospitals. While Americans who once could afford through their employers to purchase quality private health care coverage on a market scale of their utilities even as the poor had the opportunity to receive either Medicaid or to be well-provided with extraordinarily inexpensive care and even voluntary private donations by the wealthy in an unprecedented show of global altruism, today, these traits for what makes for a good American are not only discouraged, but outlawed. When Obamacare was created under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), it was not merely intended to provide an ostensible platform for predatory taxes through the back door at the expense of the average civilian having any access at all to readily-available care, but to maintaining a consolidated compilation of all Americans individual tax records and background checks available at any hospital; the goal is to achieve the total abolition of voluntary care at liberty's expense for compulsory human freedom by the force to be liberated of all independence on one's own person and absolute dependence on the state and peer taxpayers. Taxation in the 21st Century is far more pernicious to the preservation of America's historical commitment to the sanctity of liberty and human freedom not because it creates cost inhibitive pricing once government engulfs private industry and free enterprise, but rather due to it has become the means to the end of Uncle Sam's nephew Big Brother serving as the state's eyes and ears of its perversion of the clandestine peeping Tom. 

Our obligations to protectionist setups in the international community have created far more wars than they have prevented. But while isolationism is a measure for a harsh dictation for a nation's peace, it conflicts with foreign trade, which begets problems over territorial claims rich in raw materials and energy resources. Our commitment to NATO is now an extraordinarily strained alliance because continental Europe has only grown more opposed to our presence as the leader of the coalition today mired in the undesirable standoff with a resurgent Russian war machine that now is a capitalist system and therefore more capable of mobilizing a more extensive line of funding for its military, as well as the rise of Islamic terrorism to the tune of nearly a quarter of the continent's population now identifying themselves as Muslims because of near non-existent immigration laws. For more than 75 years, Europe has feared massive outbreaks of warfare to the point where British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's proclamation of there being "peace in [their] time" has become the mirror in which its leaders reflect the terrible mistake at appeasing Adolf Hitler in Munich in 1938. And in order to stifle rampant growth to abate concern and fear, the media in Europe is far worse in censoring what is reported, manufacturing a pan cultural dearth of awareness in social and continental trends in rising Islamism and fascism. When Christians and Jews are under attack by either or, or anyone at all, this is not our idea of a just society, an America in which we once knew well that is no longer one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

II. A Call for a Convention of the States

In 1787, the new Constitution of the United States of America was completed and issued for distribution and ratification. On the first day of the summer of 1788 (June 21), New Hampshire ratified the document as the ninth and final minimum required state to do so. On March 4, 1789, the new and current federal government of the United States was launched, its capital in New York City and our collection of some of America's most brilliant minds to set the standards for precedents yet to be. Government was far smaller 225 years ago, but was racked with the burden of a massive debt from the war for independence. Birthed from this conflict in how best to pay down this debt was our First Political Party system waged between the Hamiltonians of the Federalist Party (led by Alexander Hamilton) and the Democratic-Republicans under Thomas Jefferson (Jeffersonians). The debate was whether to create a centralized bank or to oppose, and Hamilton, the Treasury Secretary, championed a central bank. Jefferson feared the rise of such an imposing monolith in government in that it would manufacture a goliath establishment superseding the sovereignty of the people, and as is true today, the core of government's functions and the very litmus test for the democratic process is state control of our currency's flow through monetizing and purchasing an indefinite and unchecked quantity of bonds and securities. Today, as Jefferson feared, the Federal Reserve is the largest source of our federal debt, more than double what America owes the People's Republic of China in terms of our total trade deficit.

The Federalists consolidated the central government's power through corruption. In passing the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, the controversy arose from the pens of Jefferson and his protege and successor as president James Madison's Virginia and Kentucky Resolution the nullification crisis, which eventually led to civil war. To speak against the federal government during the Quasi War with France subjected the American people to imprisonment and their revocation of habeas corpus. The unintended consequence was indeed civil war; it also provided grounds for future debates on states' rights which have piqued a new interest today. And today during the 21st Century, not since the Civil War have the American people sought to reclaim our country and national sovereignty, our authority as the electorate and the general will who tells government what to do and not the other way around. The buck stops with us; we can fire our elected governors when they engage in policies poorly conceived. 

The Constitution enables the lone concrete measure for the rights of America's states to topple a tyrannical national government; it is our light switch to turn off when the sun threatens to set on the great American experiment in democratic republicanism. 

As our sovereignty is in danger of being subjugated to the whims of a corrupt oligarchy, we no longer have the right for our state legislatures to appoint our United States Senators per the Seventeenth Amendment. Today, the rights of the states have nearly been dissolved, as the Tenth Amendment has been circumvented time and time again in favor of consolidating the federal government's absolute power which grows by the day. 

The United States Supreme Court today serves not as a court for legal interpretation, but rather has become a third federal legislative body engaging in judicial activism, not originalism of constitutional legal content. Today, it subverts the rule of law created by legislators, in lieu of imposing a panel of nine justices' de facto common law statutes. Many laws are not at all legal; they are rulings of precedent with no concrete merit. The High Court in concert with our own Congress have circumvented the general will of we the people. The buck now lies upon Harry Truman's successors' desk, and in the case of Barack Obama, under constant scribbling from his pen as he is calling his hitmen on the phone. And while Obama continues to reach out to get in touch with his mob supporters and labor bosses, he is not getting in touch with the most important someones - you, me and the rest of America, those of us among the farmers, poets and sailors residing on Main Street, U.S.A. He has engaged in the final coup d'etat against his employers, we the people. 

While the Seventeenth Amendment has destroyed the last vestige of state-influenced representative government and the Tenth Amendment all but having been swept beneath the rug, just one dust bunny from the old document remains which has yet been revoked: Article V. And it is through Article V that we the people have the final say in whether our government at its present modus operandi survives or should be deposed either piecemeal or as a whole.

Article V of the Constitution is the shortest but most powerful tool the American people have always held when the rule of constitutional law might one day be subverted in its place, a dictatorship or oligarchical absolutists. It states this below:

Article. V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

On April 2, 2014, the blue-state stronghold of Michigan triggered the new shot heard 'round the world when it became the 34th state to approve a convention of the states, meaning it now measured three-fourths who have tired of suffering from business as usual. Atlas had for too long shrugged; America voiced its intent that we the people are prepared to lift that weight on our shoulders to secure the blessings of liberty. Changes both wholesale and in the parts of the whole are necessary, and action will be taken. Business will no longer be conducted as usual.

III. Revision of the Executive and Legislative Power

A democracy's power trends towards defederalizing as time passes; that is a matter of human nature, and that is the trend which must be reconciled and deterred. When a president of the United States unconstitutionally governs unilaterally, it must be checked and stopped dead in his tracks by the other two branches of government. Barack Obama has not only defiled the democratic processes of the will of his electors, he has denied all forms of federal representation through congressional circumvention its voice through their constituency so that he may serve himself as the corrupt Leviathan, alone and absolute. Executive Orders have replaced congressional mandate, an issue which must be rectified for once and all time.

What steps to curtail executive overreach should be taken? I propose the following:

• Require approval of all executive orders issued in order to ensure no executive abuse of power is enforced over that of congressional authority.
• Revocation of all executive privilege for the president of the United States and Cabinet officials. 
• Repeal of the War Powers Resolution of 1973.

The role of the vice president has largely become a ceremonial position. The vice president presides over ceremonial functions the president has no time to attend. He also campaigns, but often does not reflect the exact views of his superior.

For both the Executive and Legislative Branches, the Necessary and Proper Clause will be readdressed and restricted:

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 18

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

The adjustments are as follows:

• No law may be passed and implemented beyond those regarding economic and national defense and security policies. To all other measures which must be addressed, the Tenth Amendment statute will be observed as an absolute policy, as provided below: 

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

• Therefore, each state has the right to nullify any law found to be unconstitutional so long as each are consistent as prescribed under both the Necessary and Proper Clause and the Tenth Amendment.

The Twelfth Amendment issued the edict that the presidential ticket is to include his vice presidential partner. It states the following:

AMENDMENT XII

Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804.

Note: A portion of Article II, section 1 of the Constitution was superseded by the 12th amendment.

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; -- the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. [And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. --]* The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

*Superseded by section 3 of the 20th amendment.

This amendment, too, must be repealed. The vice presidency, being too ceremonial since the early days of the people's republic, needs to earn its keep in the federal government or be cut out of the equation. I propose the following alteration in order to engage the vice president in his duty as a political figure:

• As with the British House of Commons in Parliament, the vice president of the United States must preside over the U.S. Senate as the prime minister over his colleagues. He should lead all activities and bring before the Senate policy proposals. The vice president will no longer be an elected position, but rather one which is appointed by the party in the majority's Chairperson and approved by the Senate.
• In maintaining the spirit of the Twelfth Amendment's purpose, the vice president will retain its role as status quo in its continuity as the president of the Senate. 

To be discussed at a later time, the idea that the vice president as the president of the United States Senate may be reconsidered as an appointment by his colleagues. The Seventeenth Amendment, which declares United States Senators are to be elected by way of a plebiscite, should be repealed and the reinstitution of state's rights in employing the Senate as the voice of each state immediately enforced. 

IV. Alterations of the United States Congress' Electoral Processes and Term Limits

For every four years of a presidential term, there are two congressional elections in which every member of the House of Representatives must run for reelection as well as reclaim their party's nomination in primaries. This time honored tradition has stood firm and resolute throughout the course of history, while the Senate has drastically become altered as a sub-executive branch gentleman's club. The United States currently recognizes term limits only for the presidency, but many Americans, most affirmatively within the conservative establishment, demand that term limits be placed on each legislator's tenure in office. The Legislative Branch which directly represents the American people at its smallest common denominator has become the single greatest apparatus for an oligarchy of crony capitalists who  profit handsomely off the miseries of the constituencies while never rendering change on those they serve. Lobbyists and billionaire entrepreneurs control the power of Washington politics, funding politicians to manifest national pockets of political dynasties in their districts where no other presence has true opportunity to serve their constituents, the residents I call true Americans owning Ma and Pop shops and businesses along Main Street, U.S.A. 

In order that each state regain its strength of voice in the federal government, the following must drastically be altered:

• The apportioned statute within AMENDMENT XVII, passed by Congress May 13, 1912. ratified April 8, 1913 modifying Article I, section 3, of the Constitution to repeal the direct popular elections of U.S. Senators by the people and this power returned to state legislatures. Sudden vacancies are also to remain status quo, in direct control of state governors and their legislative branches.

In the interest of returning government of the people, by the people, for the people, it has to be returned and maintained in firm control to we the people. I cannot emphasize enough that we the people rule America, our elected politicians do not tell us what they want us to do. As a result, I propose the following alterations:

• Term limits for members of the House of Representatives are to conclude after 18 consecutive years and only may be re-contested by former congressmen no earlier than six years following last serving in office. 
• Term limits for the United States Senate must be limited to three six year terms which added together, grant each a possibility of 18 years in power. Once this period is completed, the outgoing senators may not again be considered for reappointment until his or her seat is again to be revisited at the end of that six year period out of office. 
• The present systems for state apportionments of two U.S. Senators and population-based congressional representation will stand. However, as large urban areas often misrepresent the rest of these states' political interests (for example, the Chicagoland area in Illinois causes that state to trend towards electing Democrats to the Senate while the remainder of a primarily rural state vote solidly for the GOP), new districts based upon the size of each metropolitan area will be drawn up to compromise for those misrepresented by more densely populated cities. The compromise will be to grant the District of Columbia full representation as with all other cities in the Electoral College and of course, the House of Representatives. They will not be granted U.S. Senators since they are not states.

Government works for we the people. As Ronald Reagan stated so masterfully and yet in such simple terms as any politician would suffice it to say, be ashamed at how he or she falls far short of this expectation, "We the People tell government what to do; it doesn't tell us." And yet, for more than 100 years, the American people have gladly handed over their sovereignty by empowering lawmakers to rule more absolutely through corrupt bargains and bribery by taxing their incomes and providing nothing of substance in return for what they paid so dearly through their labors with what they could have apportioned better themselves. 

V. Deregulating Monetary Policies and Privatization of Federally-Operated Corporations

As stated in the preface to this platform for a new conservative party, the foundation of the American political system was furled within the controversy over establishing a national bank. Alexander Hamilton insisted that to fully consolidate federal controls of all tax revenue and issuance of a single currency, a federal bank centrally positioned would house and disperse funds. In fearing the damage history has recorded to have been incurred by nations with powerful central banking controls, Thomas Jefferson implored that one never be established as it could lead to the piling of one massive debt atop of many generations of others since there was no mentioning of a statute mandating a balanced budget for each fiscal year. Over the course of the subsequent two centuries, Jefferson's concerns have not only proven prophetic, but potentially an axiom for foreshadowing the cause for a post apocalyptic America and world.

In a letter addressed to one letter to Antoine Louis Claude Destutt de Tracy of December 26, 1820, Jefferson advised future generations to not spend beyond what money it draws in revenue:

"It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world." 

Per usual, the preeminent Founding Father was correct. Four declarations of war plus a handful of conflicts along the Plains versus Western Indian tribes amounted to a fewer total war deaths in combat than World Wars I and II, Korea and Vietnam combined, alongside other smaller operations. The devaluation of the national currency through printing fiat money has piled high one debt atop of so many others while constant adjustments of interest rates to combat inflation and deflation artificially are injecting more money into the economy with no base unit for value has led to the costs of commodities skyrocketing in price and debts through interests while the monetary supply is virtually worthless by pre-Federal Reserve standards. Enter socialism, the preeminent warmonger Otto von Bismarck's gift beget to the world during his time as German Chancellor.

Why did Bismarck create the idea of the social welfare state that is what we know today as socialism? Perhaps reading his remark better provides understanding to the ends he achieved through its mean:

“My idea was to bribe the working classes, or shall I say, to win them over, to regard the state as a social institution existing for their sake and interested in their welfare.” 

Thus to the nonrevisionist historians like myself, if Bismarck could bribe the plebiscite into doing with them as he wanted, they would willingly follow the state into any war or nationalized initiative blindly and filled with vigor and trust. Such a trend hit America during the 1890s once Bismarck had imposed such a policy on Germany.

An American admirer of the new social welfare state that the Kaiser's Germany had become named Frederic Howe inscribed the following in his account of the system titled Socialized Germany:

"The state has its finger on the pulse of the worker from the cradle to the grave. His education, his health, and his working efficiency are matters of constant concern. He is carefully protected from accident by laws and regulation governing factories. He is trained in his hand and in his brain to be a good workman and is insured against accident, sickness, and old age. While idle through no fault of his own, work is frequently found for him. When homeless, a lodging is offered so that he will not easily pass into the vagrant class." 

He did, however, acknowledge socialism's major drawback. It requires that a people forego their right to liberty in order for the state to well-provide for them:

“The individual exists for the state, not the state for the individual. This paternalism does not necessarily mean less freedom to the individual than that which prevails in America or England. [T]he German enjoys a freedom far greater than that which prevails in America or England. This freedom is of an economic sort. . . . It protects the defenseless classes from exploitation and abuse. It safeguards the weak.”  

Sadly, he is correct. Socialism safeguards the weak and defenseless classes from individuals exploiting each other among the masses. But he never mentioned who provides the tax revenues to ensure socialism might survive. One needs only to recall how Democrats still clamor on "that decade of moral decadence during the 1980s" resulted from the rich growing far more so while the poorer was much worse off than under Jimmy Carter, but then due to what were nearly 20 million new jobs created under Reaganomics, the ratio of taxation was 55% for the wealthiest Americans in the top 10% while the remaining 90% provided the additional 45%. Today under the Obama devolution of American economic policy to Neo-Marxist measures of micromanagement at the central controls, a record 70% and rising of our taxed earnings are paid for by the wealthiest 10% even as their corporations earn record earnings and their own wealth experiencing unprecedented growth due to Obamacare mandates and the trend of states and cities voting to raise the minimum wage causing the layoffs of massive totals of jobs, increased inflation in these areas, food and commodity prices rising ever faster by the month and advent of transhumanism replacing these jobs with machinery and computers due to cost effectiveness. As Obama continues to increase taxation even among the poorest Americans, our federal deficit is 106% of the total GDP; in other words, the federal government is losing money despite record levels of tax revenue from hiked figures and uncontrolled public expenditure programs. 

Yet, the GOP continues to oblige the Democrats by not opposing nor even attempting to negotiate a manner to either avoid or lessen the blow of a debt ceiling increase. The more this trend transpires, the more money is spent and the less our money buys that is apportioned to appropriate items for the public good. Executive overreach and abuse have curtailed any true attempt by Congress to check the Obama administration's activities not so much due to the president's enormous power, but because our elected representatives are, too, complicit in his money laundering, pandering to special interests and the corrupt bargain dealt us while he prospers to great wealth off the backs of those who elected him.

Sound monetary policy and fiscal restraint are the keys to not only ensuring the peace of our world by the utilities responsibly observed by each government, it also leads to more prosperity on average rather than social austerity for those not in power or footing the bill for a false economy of scale to keep the poor, poorer under the guise that the wealthy are growing less rich. A government that refuses to live within its means will borrow from those who toil to ensure it has the funds to squander, and therefore these governments become indebted to their own taxpayers, but rarely reimburse them.

Therefore, a hard economic policy intertwined with strict fiscal controls are imperative and will be proposed as follows:

• For every Fiscal Year (FY) in Washington, a budget must be submitted, thoroughly detailed and crafted to be debated regarding the needs which must be reconciled as a matter of providing for the common welfare and national defense. 
• The budget must be balanced, with no provisions unless under strictly-enforced guidelines in which that budget may exceed its annual figure, such as in the case of an attack on U.S. territory, with our NATO allies in Europe or South Korea and Japan as well as Taiwan where we currently have defense pact agreements to which we are by our honor committed. All surplus income will be divided into halves, with 50% paying down on national debt and the other redistributed to the American people as its natural stimulus. To override a balanced budget amendment law for one fiscal year only, a majority of 3/4 of both the House of Representatives and the Senate are required. 
• The Federal Reserve will be dissolved and all responsibilities to regulate interest rates delineated to individual private banking firms in order to decentralized state control of monetary supply. By this measure, the risk from a fixed source of a systemic economic collapse is greatly decreased as well as the apparatus which serves as the nation's largest holder of federal debt will no longer contribute to further borrowing from the American people's savings or purchasing bonds and securities for matters superfluous to what is necessary to maintain government's daily functions. As well, no federal bailouts or purchases of private enterprise or financial institutions may be transacted, nor any private sector business or corporation ever nationalized through excessive regulations or direct state takeover.
• The Sixteenth Amendment, which provides for a progressive income tax which includes both marriage tax penalties and death taxes, must be repealed as well as the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) dissolved. Doing so provides the federal government the basis to end legal marriage as defined under any standard so as to resort to its place under the freedom of religion portion of the First Amendment. To take from what civilians earn in order to provide to those who refuse to work only encourages dependency and initiates the rise of financial insolvency for those who do. A indirect tax to be determined at a later time will be enforced that is market driven and prevents the possibility for any taxation on the American people's earnings. The amendment will be provided as follows:

• AMENDMENT XVI 

Passed by Congress July 2, 1909. Ratified February 3, 1913.

Note: Article I, section 9, of the Constitution was modified by amendment 16.

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

• In accordance to Article I, Section 8, Congress will retain the right to raise taxes for federal revenue, but no longer progressive income taxes in maintaining the spirit of the total repeal of the Sixteenth Amendment. Article I, Section 8 states specifically the following:

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. 

• All state-run corporations are to be sold off as shares to the general public at cut rates compared to actual cost per share. All federally-operated banking lenders such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae are to also be sold off as shares to the private sector at cut rates compared to the actual cost per share. To do this privatizes public industry and creates the opportunity to own property and have a stake of the financial sector's trends. 
• Through Congress alone may any action to engage in a military operation be approved at the request of the president of the United States. It therefore requires that the president present forth a request to engage in any exercise or shift in our national defenses within our borders or internationally, and must be approved by a margin of 3/4 of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. 
• Because of the sensitivity of warfare's enormous costs, the War Powers Act of 1973 which grants authority to the president of the United States to order military operations against foreign nations is no longer legal; it must require a joint congressional measure to declare any major conflict as war. In our defense agreements with Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and in NATO, any act of aggression against our allies is therefore an attack on the United States of America. Therefore, this measure is to be automatic grounds for the president to seek a declaration of war. In abiding by the Monroe Doctrine (1923) and the Roosevelt Corollary (1905), our commitment to the security of the Western Hemisphere will also serve as grounds for a declaration of war. In addressing this interest based upon our treaty with allies under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), it should be proposed that a military alliance be declared with all member states in protecting the national security and trade interests for one and all. No outside interference may rightly impair this arrangement unless a full partnership agreement among the all member states is agreed to.
• Per NAFTA's mandate, no preclusive measures towards entering into energy agreements among any of our partners can be blocked by the president or his administration, and only a simple majority in both chambers of Congress is necessary to approve of U.S. entry in such agreements. Any punitive action by a member nation of NAFTA to impede on U.S. rights to the free engagement of energy exploration and trade must be referred to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and to the NAFTA regulatory commission.
• All future international trade pacts must be approved by Congress and signed into law by the president.

In ensuring such preventative measures, the object is to avoid warfare so as to prevent massive losses in lives defending a peace that America should never be involved under other circumstances. 

VI. Consolidation and Deregulation of Federal Bureaucracies 

The Federal Government has become a monolith of titanic proportions, and to suggest it is anything less would deemphasizing the concept of hyperbole. The growing trend in red tape has become a great danger to all who do not meet the prerequisite of an agency in order to acquire political support. Cabinet positions and other regulatory agencies have become bureaucratically inefficient to the point of overlapping into what is not needed. There are federal agencies few are aware exist; the federal law enforcement agencies like the FBI, NSA, DHS and U.S. Marshalls need only to be one complete entity, but fully reined in to protect the American people's Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Probable cause in the war on terror, while well-intended under George W. Bush due to an unprecedented incident with the September 11, 2001 attacks on our domestic soil, have become sources for the present administration's Gestapo, SS as well as the Soviet Union's NKVD and KGB. Rather than denationalizing domestic terrorists having emigrated from overseas, more naturalized American citizens have been targeted for opposing the Obama administration through any one of a number of bureaucracies and Cabinet departments. The rule of law only applies to some, and to those whom it protects, they do not obey it and will exploit others who do through legal fraudulence and illegal surveillance. The trend must end; no American, Democrat or Republican, black or white or Asian and Hispanic, Christian or Jewish or any Muslim who has not been traced to any links with Islamic terrorism will ever again be permitted to live above our law of the land, Constitution, and the state and local authorities. Domestic terrorist organizations and political party establishments proven to support financially or through direct policy from any level of government to be linked to any cell or to organized criminal syndicates will be declared as such and banned through legal law enforcement investigative procedures (issued search and arrest warrants). Any non-U.S. citizen linked to terrorist organizations and organized crime will be arrested and deported, and those who engage in acts of terror will be arrested and tried in military court tribunals as they do not meet the qualifications to be prosecuted as American citizens. To deny any American citizen his or her right to habeas corpus, the president of the United States and any federal official or lawmaker included, Congress alone has the authority to do so, to suspend the right for one or for any organization or the nation. Such prerequisite requires a 2/3 vote for congressional approval and will take effect immediately. Any declaration of martial law is also contingent upon congressional approval and will require a 3/4 vote total from both chambers. Following this, the Bill of Rights cannot be infringed upon in any manner, and the addition of both the right to vote universally at the age of 18 as well as a firm, concrete wall of separation between church and state are to be added as constitutional amendments.

Which Cabinet positions within the Executive Branch to be either consolidated, deregulated or dissolved are arbitrary to how the best apply or relate to others. The following will by my proposal for such measures in order to cut funding and become more cost effective and increase efficiency:

• Vice President - This position is to become the full-time presiding figure in authority in the Senate, to cast the decisive vote in the case of a tie and to lead the processes of debates, roll call voting and managing all senatorial committees including the issuance of chairpersons and casting the 51st and decisive vote in the case of a tie. The vice president will serve as the head of the party in the Senate, appointed by the majority party to serve in such capacity and will no longer be referred to as "vice president", but instead as the Senator Primus.  
• Department of State - Remains as status quo.
• Department of Treasury - Remains as status quo.
• Department of Defense, Veterans Affairs and Department of Transportation - The three departments will be consolidated, as the sole purpose the U.S. Interstate and Highway System was constructed was to ease the processes of mobilizing the armed forces in the case of an invasion or terrorist attack. The interstates will be deregulated on the federal level in harmony with the results with the German Autobahn, with no denoted Speed Limit, but that right is to be exercised at the discretion of each state per the Tenth Amendment. Veterans Affairs will be operated by military medical staff to ensure that a full understand based upon the sensitivity of military injuries or PTSD can be placed into proper perspective and funded adequately. 
• Department of Justice and all federal law enforcement agencies will be consolidated and regulated under the control of a central committee which in a vote among the Attorney General and the heads of the Secret Service detail protecting the president and federal lawmakers, FBI and DEA will determine the course of action for investigations and whether or not federal search and arrest warrants are to be obtained.
• Department of the Interior - This agency will sell off all federally-owned land and shut down all Indian reservations before finally being dissolved. It serves no purpose but as the administration's czar for confiscating land paid for by the taxpayers but is declared forbidden to trespassers. Following these policies, it will be dissolved, never again to return in any capacity.
• Department of Agriculture will be dissolved and all authority to regulate domestic initiatives delegated to the state and local levels of civil government, and for those involving international cooperatives to the Department of State. 
• Department of Commerce and Department Labor - These will both be consolidated in order to issue economic policies and deal with labor disputes and union corruption and intimidation of workers. A committee will delineate and determine the rights to patents and trademarks as well as busting monopolies to promote fair competition in avoiding rising antitrust issues. The new consolidated Cabinet position will be responsible for regulating the Social Security Administration, including providing an option for all Americans to either pay into the traditional system or to invest in some measure in  private stock options, with artificial federal controls to prevent suddenly losses in the prime of any recession.
• Department of Health and Human Services - This will remain in the interest of maintaining controls over Medicare for the elderly and Medicaid for any American citizen who is unemployed. No universal health care service will ever be permitted in the wake of the disastrous Affordable Health Care Act and in learning the lessons of the misallocation of monies to treat properly our veterans who fought for and defended our freedom to live in a property-owning democracy. All regulations of health care beyond Medicare and Medicaid are to be delegated to the states, with no exceptions.
• Department of Energy - This will be dissolved and its authority delegated to individual states to establish regulatory agencies based upon need. 
• Department of  Education - This will not only be dissolved, but all public education school systems gradually privatized through reallocating all tax dollars paid into each state legislature to afford Americans to attend any private school based upon parental prerogative. Additional monies will be provided based upon need to those among the poorest Americans to have the same opportunity to a quality of education, unregulated and to attend any school based upon the same standard for parental prerogative. 
• Department of Homeland Security - Dissolved. It has become the president's vehicle to persecute political opposition by force. It now reflects the Gestapo and SS under Adolf Hitler and the KGB and the NKVD in the former Soviet Union.
• The Office of Management and Budget will all be fully engulfed and dissolved through consolidation with the Department of the Treasury as there are no true purposes for additional bureaucracies that overlap due to the rising red tape and growth in public expenditures just to ensure their trending overbearance. 
• The Council of Economic Advisers and Small Business Administration will become fully engulfed and dissolved into the Department of Labor as it serves as overlapping bureaucracies perpetuating the overbearance in regulations and ostensible ambiguity of the federal economic policies.
• The U.S. Envoy to the United Nations will be dissolved because no future administration will ever again be legally permitted to participate in the UN organization. The UN has become an international conduit for global Islamic terrorism as well as with organizations like the Irish Republican Army, and is pro-Communist and opposes Israel's right to exist by its own charter from 1948. Once this position is eliminated, the U.S. will fully end its association with the UN and revoke its right to continue setting as its headquarters in New York City.

Our goal is to ensure that government not only operates more efficiently, but with as little risk afforded it to engage in the rising, alarming corruption we today have witnessed under Barack Obama. 

VII. Domestic Policy on Trade and Labor Unions

With respect to the rights of trade and labor unions, their power has long overstepped the right of corporate bosses whose capacities to pay for employees have been disproportionately surpassed by their inability to afford the tool and dye for them to manufacture their products. Such policies as supported unconditionally by Democrats for decades have not only led to the death of our industrial capacity to employee workers with skills to serve as the manufacturers of America, but have indeed overlapped into their hegemony in inner cities in cooperating with organized crime and community organizers to employ Marxist tactics in intimidation and even murder in order to grow their power. No Republican has been elected to the mayoral position in Chicago due to this since before World War I; likewise, Detroit, which now resembles the poorest city among developed nations, has not elected any other mayor who was not a Democrat in over 60. Strikes have historically become more militant and deadlier by the decade and risk the full economic collapse of the American free enterprise miracle that long has funded their right to exist. The right to establish collective bargaining agreements no longer is arbitrary to two parties, but rather to labor bosses and the organized crime and federal government which funds their criminal activities. The process of delegitimizing the awesome labor power has succeeded in its launch under Gov. Scott Walker (R-WI) in Wisconsin and has now spread to California, where teachers are engaging in the same movement to thwart big labor and trade unions.

In 1979, the United Kingdom experienced its Winter of Discontent when militant coal miners and industrial trade unions engaged in strikes even as the subverted the Labour Government of Prime Minister Jim Callaghan's brokerage of the social contract. Their methods were indeed Marxist; cars would be stopped in the middle of streets, the driver and passengers forcibly removed and often beaten and sometimes killed in an effort to intimidate Parliament to concede to their demands. Those who dared cross picket lines were met with even worse fates, while even the garbage collection services in London as one man put it left as high as 10 feet piles of trash on the city streets while on strike. The economy had been brought to its knees as Britain's financial insolvency resulted in the Callaghan Government handing over its monetary duties and economic policies to the IMF. When Margaret Thatcher ascended to the role of prime minister, her platform would drastically change the British economy from one of socialism causing the country to fall into the abyss of communism to one where it now has become the healthiest economy among G7 nations through Thatcherism's gift of free enterprise and democracy. She also crippled trade unions from ever usurping power over Westminster's authority again, as their power is virtually nonexistent, having never recovered following the Thatcher standard of arming police forces with immense rioting gear and pulling the plug on the social contract.

Through labor unions in Detroit may you find another outlet for the Islamic terrorist community from Dearborn to attain greater and more fundamentally damaging power. Dearborn, MI is the nation's largest Islamic community and a home for violent crimes from rape to honor killings on a scale yet to be revealed ostensibly by our media nationally. It is crucial that all ties to not only organized crime and corruption in government, but also to Islamic terrorism to be finally severed once and for all time. How this will be accomplished is a very dangerous strategy that may never fully destroy their presence in America's crawl, but will be offered as a point to start so as to be adjusted as time surpasses. 

• The point for debate must begin with dissecting the Wagner Act of 1938. Within it lies the legal right to unionize as was passed by Congress and signed into law by Franklin Delano Roosevelt the last year his focus was on the economy. That year, the economy retracted to pre-FDR levels of unemployment and poverty due to the New Deal initiatives never yielding any measure economic growth and the printing presses cranking out valueless money overtime to pay for workers to engage in employing themselves. It was a win-win for Democrats and big labor unions like the UAW and the AFL-CIO who may legally intimidate and do harm unto workers refusing to pay their membership dues, even turning blind eyes to suspicious murders in order to grow their power base in the large urban areas. The First Amendment right to a peaceful assembly was in essence rejected and destroyed by passing the Wagner Act of 1938, and as a result. labor and trade unions have militarized, mobilized through community organizers and the Mafia to strike fear into the hearts of those who choose to cross the picket lines of both they and their own city councils and mayors. Without unions, the Democratic Party could never survive as a force for militancy and murder in America since their power base resides in the largest urban areas across the nation. The goal to repeal the Wagner Act of 1938 may be impossible, but as Gov. Walker has proven in defying his own physical safety as well as his family's, there are many ways to cripple their ability to thrive and survive. 
• The goal to fundamentally cripple corrupt militant unions will be modeled after the Walker standard. Deregulating the right for unions to require as an absolute all employees of an industry to pay in dues as a member by force must be passed and declared a criminal act to place such dissenters on "scab lists". The check that must serve as the mate to the imbalance in favor of union power in collective bargaining agreement negotiations cannot be achieved by government or union leaders who are in a strategic partnership, but rather by the American people who do not approve of their corruption. 
• Lastly, no union can legally be permitted to require through coercive compulsion to force employees to be union members without due process of law. To be employed by union businesses is to slip into the role of nationalizing the private sector the back door. To ensure unions do not strike under any conditions violently through militant force, all police forces will be armed heavily with rioting gear and more arms to contain the dangers unions pose.

To continue to permit militant trade and labor unions in conjunction with community organizers, organized crime and inner-city political machines to topple what little industry remains is to cripple American self-reliance upon its very capable means to achieve our own goals will continue expanding international trade deficits to foreign economic powers like China and Japan. To have hope to end America's decadence as a debtor nation is to one day become the nation to whom foreign states become indebted. The more foreign debts spiral higher out of control, the greater the prospect for warfare there will be. The prospect of energy independence will surely aid this surge as America - the world's largest supplier of oil and third in terms of crude - could employ the Keystone XL in concert with Canada to employ this leverage in order to engage in negotiations to alleviate this problem.

VIII. Reforming the U.S. Supreme Court

At present, the U.S. Supreme Court continues to abuse more egregious its role as the interpreters of the Constitution by way of de facto legislating laws on the basis of social justice through revising the original document. Constitutional lawyers, historians and political scholars refer to this as judicial activism, and it has created an uncanny standard for manufacturing laws, not upholding or killing unconstitutional statutes. Laws not on the legal record are so due to the High Court setting its agenda against the republic, killing the federalist standard upon which this great nation was founded. 

There are a number of issues to reconcile with respect to the U.S. Supreme Court. Should there a time limitation for each justice? What about each court justice ascending to his or her position by popular vote? With respect to the High Court, I prefer to maintain the status quo. The High Court lasts for a few years as it is at any present point, but as most are elderly and either die or retire, new blood is added with modern positions on the issues most affecting Americans. In maintaining the spirit of the Judiciary Branch, their job description along will be adjusted in terms of "how" and not "what".

The following recommendations are to be made for the convention to consider in revising the Constitution per Article V:

• The U.S. Supreme Court and its subordinate appellate courts will only address federal laws legislated by Congress and signed into effect by the president. The standard of federal overbearance on the rights of the states to exercise the Tenth Amendment principle of nullification due to the unconstitutionality of federal laws must be returned to the people per their colloquial cultural trends and values legally at unprecedented levels never before enjoyed under the present Constitution. The Article of Confederation granted enormous power to each of the original 13 states, but too much led to the national assembly having little power to engage in foreign policy and trade, much less national defense, due to each state being independent in issuing currency and regulating interstate commerce.Aside from unconstitutional laws very reasonably granting to each state the right to nullify from Washington, no court case originating under the state or local jurisdictions can be addressed at the U.S. Supreme Court unless states violate any amendments to the federal Constitution.
• Only state courts may try or hear cases by each individual state and local municipality's legal statute's standards. State and local laws can only be tried so far as the limit of the state supreme courts permit. Only state or local statutes found to be unconstitutional to the federal Constitution can be address at the federal levels. As several states and local governments elect their judges, the spirit of maintain the cultural imperative at all levels is the intent, but for the previously mentioned lone exception.

IX. Foreign Policy with Respect to National Defense and Military Initiatives 

Most crucial to the plight of all governments is to ensure diplomatic relations with foreign states must be cordial and strategic with respect to trade and our national security. Much can be said by reacquiring economic independence with respect to America's potential to become history's greatest energy superpower and to work towards reacquiring our industrial might. Labor unions have crippled the capacity of the latter; our left-wing foes within the environmentalist fringe have hampered the former. The Democrats continue to obstruct the capacity of American ingenuity in both fields either through those militant trade and labor unions and, of course, the greatest capacity ever to ensure the American people never again fall prey to an OPEC-style of oil embargo. Democrats, however, only advocate totalitarian controls over all facets of the economy so they may ensure that through the lies they may diffuse of conservative detachment from land and biodiversity conservationism, it is better to continue suffering through statist dependency than to harm land that will never be touched due to their tax dollars squandering what we the people may be shot dead if we are found trespassing.

No more crucial imperative than securing our borders must be addressed and reestablished as soon as possible. A nation without borders is no longer a nation, but a de facto pan statist model that soon will result in a massive statist empire. How might this be addressed? Consider the following:

• All territorial borders must be secured and tightened to where no illegal alien may safely cross over without facing the fate naturalized Americans face for trespassing. Because of this, the southern border with Mexico must be militarized with strict orders to shoot any illegal alien on sight should all warnings fail to coerce their reversal of course. This will not exclude women or adolescents, though children will be recovered and such issues reconciled on individual bases. 
• Along the Canadian border, stricter controls will be enforced with regards to passport regulations and more concrete and firm security presences. As Canada's own parliament was hit by an Islamist, the U.S. must spare no task too menial because national security is never a sacred obligation too great. Americans seeking to cross over both the Canadian and Mexican borders will also be scanned for greater security purposes in order to prevent the escape of criminals to foreign states with no extradition treaties with the U.S. There is the necessity too to ensure America's partners comprised of the NAFTA treaty must be protected from any unforeseen terrorist migration where none is wanted because terrorism affects all people. 
• Foreigners with work visas may continue to find employment under the condition that like any immigrant working towards citizenship, they too must pay taxes and never confiscate even one penny of the American taxpayers' earnings. As a result, all candidates for citizenship must procure a job within 183 days (or approximately one-half of a year) of settlement or face deportation in order to prevent rises in welfare abuse and corruption. Foreigners who are laid off may apply for the same standard for unemployment benefits, but once their grace period concludes, they will face deportation. No non-naturalized resident will be granted the right to habeas corpus than those born or are citizens of the U.S. possess in order to mitigate counterterrorism initiatives, while the law granting automatic naturalization for infants born to illegal aliens or non-citizens will no longer apply due to frequent welfare abuse. Denying foreigners the right to habeas corpus prevents excessive abuses to American civilians whose Fourth Amendment rights are now being violated.   
• No immigration is permitted from states tied to either serving as bases or sponsorship of terrorism.

Our strategic partnership with the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance (NATO) will continue with respect to securing our allies from Russian aggression while deterring the threat of terrorism to enter across the Bosporus Strait or major European airports. The level will be contingent with the following to be crucial and absolute policies set forth by our serving as the key power in the alliance:

• The Republic of Turkey, being tied to Islamic terrorism, must have its membership in NATO revoked and declared an international state sponsor for global terrorism. Any invasion by a militant force in the Middle East threatens the stability and security of Europe and the U.S. In order to prevent such a measure, the European border at the Bosporus Strait must be militarized and fortified to ensure Turkish aggression or any militant Islamist forces to invade Europe and threaten her through jihadist conquest.
• At the borders of the far eastern states of NATO, the U.S. and NATO allies must redeploy nuclear missiles to counter those reset along the Russian borders with its former Soviet satellite states. Ukraine must be permitted to determine its course, to side with Moscow or enter the European Union and the NATO community. All other states along the same front with Russia must be permitted to determine their destiny in order to prevent Russian expansion into the Slavic states through militarism and force.
• The same policy for a newly-adopted foreign immigration initiatives must be adopted in Europe and all illegal aliens deported upon location immediately. The rise of Islamic militancy in Europe continues to prove a national security threat for the U.S. and those of its NATO allies. Only through the deportation of illegal aliens of all nationalities may the hope for securing NATO member borders be restored. 
• All protectionist pacts with non-NATO nations found to be state sponsors of international terrorism must be ended. Under no condition must NATO, the European Union and the U.S. continue to engage in enabling such nations through trade and defense partnerships. The goal for energy interdependence within the alliance must comprise of the main goal to devolve all dependence upon OPEC oil through strategic trade initiatives through the U.S.'s historical capacity to monopolize the global energy market in partnership with EU-based corporations. 

American dominance within the Western Hemisphere's political and trade sphere will continue with respect to meeting its obligations as a member of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The U.S. strategic partnership with Canada must grow stronger than ever before through formally entering in the Keystone XL pipeline promise for unprecedented prosperity and free all energy dependence upon OPEC oil hegemony. Once this is accomplished, all connections with the Arab League will be severed; our commitment with our allies in Israel will be reestablished, strengthened and new opportunities for trade in its booming energy industry to provide an unprecedented opportunity for Israeli economic strength and provisions for new military and security technologies. The American foreign policy will detract from Arab League states due to the lack of interest in oil cooperation no longer mandating that the military be on high alert in counterterror measures beyond the Bosporus Strait or Israel's borders. 

With respect to the Asia-Pacific Rim, the following are crucial: 

• America's commitment must grow and expand to unprecedented levels of force and activity in conjunction with allies in Japan and South Korea. Full military capacity must be restored to Japan, but the pact we hold through our base at Okinawa will remain as contingent to this guarantee that the partnership remains fruitful. A defense pact between the U.S., Japan and South Korea to deter the emerging threat of continual Russian and Chinese-partnership military and economic shifts to shut out trade and expand through force must be formed, with Taiwan once again recognized as a sovereign state ruled under democratic virtues in orders to provide a buffer along the Formosa Strait to deter Chinese aggression into the South China Sea as Japan has historical ties to the Island of Formosa. 
• The Philippines should be included in this new partnership as a joint initiative of establishing greater U.S. cooperation with Manila's military's presence will provide yet another zone to deter Chinese expansion. Negotiations with Vietnam, an old enemy but under threat by Beijing of engulfing its capacity to press forth in free enterprise reform in oil, must commence and a new understanding and strategic partnership to not merely surround China around its southeastern periphery, but to heal old wounds and to work towards more popular democratization or at least a role by their peoples to determine the course of Hanoi's direction. 
• The most crucial partnership must be developed with India, which now is in conflict diplomatically with China and growing ever closer to Japan in friendship. India stands to surpass China in total population in a matter of years, not to mention the same regarding the economy. Its military is mighty and large and can serve as the final means to surround China as a deterrent to its expansion into Central Asia. As Pakistan has pledged to aid Beijing with Islamic terrorists in the Uighur region and further persecution of Tibetan monks becomes ever more problematic, such a shift stands to align the U.S. foreign policy with potentially Bangladesh as well as engage in dissolving diplomatic ties with member states failing to curb the drug trade within the Golden Triangle. 
• Maintaining ties with Afghanistan with dates to the 1979 Soviet invasion must continue and the government in Kabul strengthened and the economy, expanded, must as the Marshall Plan after World War II was able to achieve for war-torn Europe. Through greater economic prosperity in providing the means to achieve that goal, the trend towards engaging in further illicit opium harvests and the terrorism which so greatly profits off it will create a strong, free and independent nation which will have the liberty to choose its direction as our partnership in preventing Chinese and Islamic terrorist expansion and potential partnership. The pressure must continue on Pakistan to perpetuate its commitment to democratization and to press forth in its initiatives to crush terrorism once and for all time. The promise this initiative creates also buttresses the American presence along the Iranian border in the west to pressure Tehran into diffusing its nuclear ambitions and repressive tactics in funding sporadic attacks in this region of Afghanistan.

The purpose is not merely to engage in a geopolitical shift into the Asia-Pacific theatre, but to expand into Southwest Asia and Asia Minor to counteract and suppress Iranian expansionist designs through a potential coup d'etat as with the Pakistani ISI (Inter-State Intelligence) in 1992 installing the Taliban in power as a buffer state when President George H.W. Bush failed to do so in the aftermath of the Soviet Union's evacuation in February 1989.

The commitment to preserving American interests in the Western Hemisphere per the Monroe Doctrine (1823) and the Roosevelt Corollary (1905) is crucial to precluding transglobal aggression from Iran, China and Russia as each have deployed their naval fleets over the past year-plus. During the winter, Russian warships docked in Havana Harbor while the fledgling fleet deployed from Iran entered U.S. maritime waters. Neither were met with resistance nor any measurable concern; the president's complacency and wanton care for national security and the oldest foreign policy commitment served as a potentially-devastating catastrophe as with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Adolf Hitler at Munich in 1938 ("there is peace in our time."). The U.S. Naval presence must be increased off the coast of South Florida adjacent to the Keys and beyond the Annapolis corridor both north and south. Sanctions must be at the ready for any foreign adversary endeavoring its geopolitical shift to undermine American interests, which includes interference within the NAFTA pact. 

A compilation of the U.S. and British national flags, a potential emblem to visually associate with any alliance.

Finally, ties to strengthen our special relationship with the United Kingdom must be vigorously pursued through a cooperative trade and defense pact which includes all English-speaking states. This would comprise of the following:

1. The United States
2. The United Kingdom
3. Canada
4. Australia
5. New Zealand
6. India

The above six states should be targeted as the charter members; membership, however, is arbitrary to any Commonwealth nation's voluntary commitment per their best interest. The entire British Commonwealth of Nations are denoted on the following map.

Such a commitment could solidify a full-scale geopolitical shift as British Commonwealth states are locate on each continent, in all hemispheres. With diplomatic ties between Britain and India strained with China, the partnership would be the most important not only for all states involved, but globally. U.S. and British naval fleets have strongholds in the Atlantic and Pacific, the North Sea and in the Mediterranean based at Gibraltar. Australia also serves as a representative and could partner with the U.S. and British navies to apply pressure against Beijing, while India's fleet would patrol the Indian Ocean as well as the Arabian Sea. Any state considered a Global South developing country could benefit from installations of free enterprise capitalist systems consistent with other members nations as part of the agreement's conditions. Each nation's human rights record is crucial and should be considered before granted admission to the trade/defense alliance.