Department of Homeland Security: President Barack Hussein Obama is Not Eligible to Work in the United States of America
Ladies and gentlemen, we perhaps have hit a milestone in our efforts to topple the Obama regime, and in its greatest irony, the information came not from a random sleuth within the private sector, but instead our own federal government, or should I say the Department of Homeland Security. Indeed, you read the headline correct: Barack Hussein Obama is indeed not our president because he is not legally eligible to be employed within the United States of America!
You might wonder how this happened, especially under one of the branches of the Obama Cabinet that has been guiltiest of all for targeting American citizens over political opposition to the president, among other things. The matter is as neat and pristine as the law, when applied appropriately, can get. I will provide you below what I just received from Freedom Outpost, which is a far-right wing medium that at times, posts articles which I find to be suspicious or at least borderline far-fetched.
Most employers have. E-Verify is a free verification system under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security. Registered employers can use this system to make sure that job applicants are eligible for employment.
Interestingly enough, our own President doesn't pass muster. As it would turn out, Barack Obama has been given the job of "leader of the free world," but is not eligible to be a fry cook at your local Burger King.The man couldn't even get a job sweeping the floors at the White House yet he is living there.
How can this be?
This is a media and government cover up. It goes way beyond what you might think. Big right wing news sources have been accused of their complicity in the matter as well.
I will show you documents that leave little doubt to my claims, but ultimately it probably won't matter. This is the biggest fraud in American history and no one in congress seems to care, courts won't even hear the case, and the citizens are more worried about how many TD passes their fantasy QB has today than the fact that a usurper is in office.
Nevertheless, I present the truth.
Barack Obama was caught using a social security number that was clearly not issued to him, as far back as 2010. He has used it on numerous occasions but there have been aggressive attempts to get rid of the evidence. It is hard to find these images using search engines. Try for yourself.
This is from a 2009 tax return. Even though there is a line through the social security number, it is pretty easy to make out as 042-68-4425. Some say this number was assigned to a man that was born in 1890. Who it may belong to is not important. The important fact is that Barack Obama has used, on numerous, occasions, a social security number that is very likely not rightfully his.
Barack Obama was caught using a social security number that was clearly not issued to him, as far back as 2010. He has used it on numerous occasions but there have been aggressive attempts to get rid of the evidence. It is hard to find these images using search engines. Try for yourself.
This is from a 2009 tax return. Even though there is a line through the social security number, it is pretty easy to make out as 042-68-4425. Some say this number was assigned to a man that was born in 1890. Who it may belong to is not important. The important fact is that Barack Obama has used, on numerous, occasions, a social security number that is very likely not rightfully his.
President Obama's Tax Form from 2009
Even the left-leaning Snopes, though "officially" debunking this story as "false," has really not been able to totally debunk the story. "042" social security numbers are common to Connecticut, not Hawaii, and there is a lot of question surrounding this number, no matter who it might actually belong to:
Why Barack Obama's Social Security card application might have included a Connecticut mailing address is something of a curiosity, as he had no known connection to that state at the time, but by itself that quirk is no indicator of fraud.
Maybe it is not 100% proof of fraud, but can they at least admit it is reason enough to investigate?
Kansas and my SSN starts with 512. There may be exceptions but it is highly unlikely that a man born in, and living in, Hawaii would be assigned a "042" number.
Dr. Eowyn recently published an article called 10 Reasons you shouldn't shop at Costco. It is an outstanding article but I am not sure how many will read it. I don't have a Costco within 100 miles of me, so I would be one to naturally not care much about boycotting a place I have never shopped at. But I do care about what came in #1 on Doc's list:
1. Costco knows Obama's Connecticut-issued Social Security number is fraudulent, but supports him anyway.Costco not just uses, but takes pride in using the Department of Homeland Security's E-Verify program to ensure their employees are eligible to work in the United States by screening documents of new hires against DHS and Social Security Administration (SSA) records. In fact Costco has this notice on their website:"Federal law requires all employers to verify the identity and employment eligibility of all persons hired to work in the United States."On August 17, 2011, a Costco employee who had not voted for Obama, discovered Obama failed E-Verify. Here's his/her account:I ran Obama's name, the SSN he uses, 042-68-4425 and the birth date he claims, through an E-Verify check and it came back flagged with a Special Indicator Code (SIC) for fraud . . . special indicator #8 which identifies an SSN that was determined to have been assigned based on fraudulent documents or no documents and is only given after an Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigation.We know Obama put that number on his forged Selective Service registration in 2008, we know he used it when he filed his tax return in 2010, and we know that as of March 2012, long after I ran the E-Verify check, he was still using it.We also know that this SSN was not issued to Barack Obama. It was issued to someone with a Connecticut address in March 1977.Where was Obama in March 1977? He was a fifteen year old attending high school in Hawaii! He never lived in Connecticut or traveled to Connecticut as a teenager.What document do you have to provide to the SSA to prove citizenship when applying for a SSN? A birth certificate.Someone who uses a stolen SSN, one that he obtained without providing any documentation of age or citizenship, does so because they don't have a birth certificate that would prove they are a U.S. citizen. They don't have a birth certificate that would qualify them for a SSN. They plain don't have one or the one they have identifies them as a citizen of another country.On April 27th, 2011 Barack Obama posted a forged birth certificate on the White House website. That forgery explains why Obama is using a stolen SSN. [...]Costco employs over 140,000 people and yet the person they advocated to occupy the highest office in the land, Barack Obama, failed E-Verify. Costco demands that their employees prove their citizenship and/or eligibility status but fails to hold their man in the White House to the same standard.Note: The Costco employee is not the first to discover that Obama fails E-Verify. In 2011, a researcher in Seattle, Washington named Linda Jordan ran the SSN Barack Obama had used on his 2010 tax return through E-Verify and discovered that the SSN had been flagged with a Special Indicator Code for fraud. It was not Obama's SSN. Since then she has continued to work to expose Obama's use of forged identity documents that he used to get on the ballot and in to the White House. She is the owner of We The People T.V. at obamasfakeid.com.There you have it. Barack Obama is President of the United States but is not eligible to spray the lots at your local McDonald's or collect carts at your local Wal Mart.Below is an image of an official e-verify report run on Barack Hussein Obama's fraudulent social security number.
So how does one simply go from being ineligible to flip burgers to arguably being the most powerful man in the world?
The truth is that all large media sources and both "parties" in congress are complicit. There is no longer regard for law in America. There aren't enough good guys to overcome those who are hiding these things from America. Those who will speak up are simply disregarded as crazy conspiracy theorists, even when their stories are backed with solid evidence.
We are being set up for a fall and that's a fact.
Be ready because it is coming.
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.
You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.
Conclusion: As Optimus Prime Stated, "We've Been Had!", and My Research Into the President's Birth Certificate
This does not at all surprise me because I have conducted my own research just with his shorthand birth certificate from the White House. I debated to show you sooner or later, but as this article has been released, you need to read what I have found. The entire document, according to British legal resources on former colonial holdings and even the hospital at which he was "born" are all spurious; there is not one consistent detail that matches chronologically with the history of what was presented and what is fact. Because of this, I am going to place what I have on the table and allow for you to decide what you believe, including both my photocopy of his birth certificate as well as the actual .PDF formatted one available from the White House's website:
Primary Source Material #1: The President's Birth Certificate
Below is the White House's .pdf file with the image of Barack Obama's birth certificate:
The White House.gov: Barack Obama's Birth Certificate in case the document, again in .pdf formatting, does not appear despite my posting a HTML code within this article's document correctly.
Primary Source Material #2: British Documentation of the UK and Its Colonies
Pay very close attention to each detail provided, and do not read this certificate with a carefree eye. The next document courtesy of the British government, which was the colonial government of Kenya until 1963, or two years after Barack Obama was reported to have been born, will show the first discrepancies in legal language:
The corroborating URL is again courtesy of the British government (gov.uk).
Note now a few major issues in legal titles and the years' in which they ended, corresponding directly with the British end to each colonial holding. The first I will reference addresses what year Obama was reported to have been born and where his father was stated to have lived during his early life:
Obama's father, whose name on the certificate was reported as Barack Hussein Obama, was written to have been born in Kenya, East Africa and having been 25 years old when Barack's date of birth, 4 August 1961, transpired. The first issue is with what Kenya was declared in 1961. The British government, as before stated, still controlled Kenya as its sovereign territory, though let us not mistaken the fact that the empire was dying as it had existed since the Jamestown settlement here even in 1607 nearly 20 years following Sir Francis Drake's epic defeat of the Spanish armada, thus launching more than 350 years where Britannia ruled the waves. As such, Britain had an official title for this colony, which as provided in the government's .pdf document above, was East Africa Protectorate, which discontinued as its colony on 12 December 1963, two years, four months and eight days approximately following Barack Obama's date of birth on 4 August 1961. Of course, this alone would not preclude the president from legal eligibility as our chief executive since it was not Obama himself who was reported to have been born in Kenya. But the document said that his father was 25 years old at the time of Obama's date of birth, and that he was born in Kenya, East Africa. Why the discrepancy in name and year chronologically since if the president's father, was born in either 1935 or 1936 in this British colony and the document did not in fact acknowledge at all that it was a British colony at the time his father was written to have been born? At the very least one should draw suspicion to this and ask "Why?" As "complex" as David Axelrod claims the president is intellectually, as in he is more intelligent than anyone else in the world, how could anyone regardless of intellect simply predict upon Britain's granting freedom to Kenya the Nairobi government's choice for the nation's official name? That at the least is a sign of the utmost arrogance in presumption since this document could not have been manufactured upon Obama's birth on 4 August 1961. I have not heard in recent years from my close friend Nostradamus, and since he has been dead for about 500 years, I do not believe that somewhere in his gravesite in France that he has bothered himself with any random quatrains to instruct the immaculate manifestation of the future Manchurian candidate who would be president.
Sadly for the president, Barack Obama Sr., was a British citizen, and three years old when Britain declared war on Germany in 1939 following Hitler's invasion of Poland.
Lastly, Barack Obama Sr., who was a polygamist as I informed you about some two blogs back. The birth certificate lists him as a 25 year old man when the president was born. However, how can Obama have stated this on his campaign trail in 2008?
For further general information into the British migrated archives, please refer the following .pdf file courtesy of the British National Archives.
To the next contradictory parcel, Obama's father, is listed as his race being "African."
Kapiolani Medical Center Confirms 'African' Never Used On Birth Certificates in 1961 or Now
The Birther Summit in Honolulu: Day 1
image credit: Honolulu Civil Beat
We spent a very long (and hot) day talking with many people on the island and filming several scenes with the “big check” that will be compiled into a video once we get home. There was one conversation, however, that I want to share with you tonight. We spent at least a couple hours at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children today. I got a call this morning from a reporter with the Honolulu Civil Beat who wanted to interview us, so he met us at the Medical Center. His story should run tomorrow.
After that interview, we went into the records office, and Miki asked to file a form to get her son's birth records. While she was filling out the form, I happened to overhear a woman who was sitting at a desk say something about the “race” field on a birth certificate she was preparing. I asked her if this was the office that responsible for filling out the birth certificate information for babies born there, and she said that it was.
Because she had just asked something about the “race” field on the birth certificate she was working on, I asked, “Back in 1961, would anyone have ever entered 'African' as the race of a parent?” She said, “No, back then they probably would have listed a black person's race as 'negro.'” I asked, “So, the word 'African' wouldn't have been used, because that is a nationality and not a race, right?” And she responded, “Right. Nowadays we can use 'African American' though.” To which I added, “But, the word 'African' by itself has never been used as an entry for race?” And she simply said, “No. Never.”
And there you have it . . . from the folks at Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children.
Dean HaskinsExecutive Director, The Birther Summit202.241.3648434.426.7202 (mobile)
http://deanhaskins.wordpress.com
Birthers: $10,000 for Obama Birth News Clip
The birther conspiracy — i.e., the theory that Barack Obama was not born in the United States and is thus ineligible to be president — seemed to have been put to rest when the White House posted Obama's long-form birth certificateon the Internet in April.
But, while the mainstream media may have dropped coverage of the matter, birthers continue their work.
This week, Dean Haskins, executive director of The Birther Summit, is in Honolulu to promote a $10,000 award for whomever can produce the actual edition of the Honolulu Advertiser or the Honolulu Star-Bulletin that reported Obama's Aug. 4, 1961, birth.
Even if the print version is produced, however, Haskins' mission will continue.
Civil Beat spoke with Haskins Tuesday outside Kapiolani Medical Center, where the president says he was born.
UPDATE: Kapiolani Medical Center Shuck and Jive On Day 2: Hawaii Department of Health ShowdownMORE HERE
FLASHBACK:
__________________________
Well folks, Barack Hussein Obama is a "Negro" according to his birth certificate, even in Hawaii. But one last detail is far more disturbing than just that, and that is the discrepancy in the Kapiolani Medical Center's name in 1961 and when it changed to that name on his birth certificate.
On the president's birth certificate, the Kapi'olani Medical Center was called Kapiolani Gynecological and Maternity Hospital. Recall that his birthdate on the document is August 4, 1961. The hospital, however, does not corroborate this evidence:
About Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women & Children
Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women & Children is well recognized as Hawai‘i’s leader in the care of women, infants and children. With 207 beds and 66 bassinets, the nonprofit hospital is Hawai‘i’s only maternity, newborn and pediatric specialty hospital. It is also a tertiary care, medical teaching and research facility. Specialty services for patients throughout Hawai‘i and the Pacific Region include intensive care for infants and children, 24-hour emergency pediatric care, air transport, maternal fetal medicine, and high-risk perinatal care. More than 1,500 employees and 630 physicians provide specialty care at Kapi‘olani Medical Center. The hospital is home to Kapi‘olani Women’s Center and Kapi‘olani Women’s Cancer Center - the state’s only dedicated breast health and gynecological cancer centers. Kapi‘olani offers numerous community programs and services, such as the Kapi‘olani Child Protection Center and Sex Abuse Treatment Center. Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women & Children is an affiliate of Hawai‘i Pacific Health, the state’s largest health care provider. Learn more at www.kapiolani.org.Mission
The mission of Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women & Children is to improve and advocate for the health and well-being of women, children and adolescents of Hawai‘i and the Pacific Region.A History of Caring
Queen Kapi‘olani founded the Kapi‘olani Maternity Home in 1890. She held bazaars and luau to raise the $8,000 needed. In 1909, Albert and Emma Wilcox donated the funds to open Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital, a hospital for Hawai‘i’s children envisioned by Dr. James R. Judd and Sanford Dole. In 1978, the two hospitals merged to become Kapi‘olani Medical Center for Women & Children.
__________________
Kapiolani Gynecological and Maternity Hospital has never been a name of any segment of the facility. In fact, the closest semblance was "Kapi'olani Maternity Home", the hospital's original title from 1890. Therefore, the president's document is not accurate here either.
***
Thanks for trying, Mr. President, or should I say, an illegal immigrant!
No comments:
Post a Comment