Wednesday, September 17, 2014

URGENT: Lois Lerner Caught Helping the Muslim Brotherhood’s US Front Groups [DOCUMENTS], Plus Hillary Clinton and the Benghazi Documents Reportedly Disposed of Per Sharyl Attkisson

URGENT: Lois Lerner Caught Helping the Muslim Brotherhood’s US Front Groups [DOCUMENTS]; Hillary Clinton and Benghazi Documents Disposed of on Her Orders:

Ladies and gentlemen, all the king's horses and all the king's men may have signed the administration's death warrant, as in being arrested for treason. Last night through The Conservative Tribune, I received notice with compelling documentation through visual photocopied evidence as well as their corresponding links that in fact what I reported to you last month about Lois Lerner's involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood is indeed true. Not only will this result in the arrests of President Obama and Lois Lerner, but also Hillary Clinton and anyone involved regarding the issue and a conviction for the appropriate charges. The least time they would serve is 10 years, possibly life in prison, but also the maximum in the death penalty.

Sharyl Attkisson, investigative reporter
We also know through Sharyl Attkisson, the former CBS news correspondent and investigative reporter who abruptly resigned her post following being stonewalled by the network while investigating the initial stages of the Benghazi scandal, revealed a conversation with a member of then-Sec. of State Clinton's staff about documents that were ordered to be disposed of, following by his subsequent dismissal. Both of these will be covered, as well as my rehashing very briefly the vital information I provided you last month about Lois Lerner and the Muslim Brotherhood per the current-Egyptian government hostile to the corrupt Obama regime over his role as a key authority within the organization. 

Part I. Lois Lerner and the Muslim Brotherhood:

I first wish to cover the most recent revelation; the one involving Benghazi and Hillary Clinton will follow immediately. For the entirety of the Obama presidency, it has been speculated that he played a critical role in the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood, that according to the Egyptian government through its various state and privately-owned mediums, he may have been the power behind Mohammed Morsi. As Morsi's wife has threatened to divulge all details of the president and Mrs. Clinton's "special relationship" with the Muslim Brotherhood, it really was only a matter of time before the initial domino would launch a toppling effect. Where there is smoke, there will always be a fire, and it is our duty as citizens to investigate and learn where the smoke will trend as the winds of change. And as this is true, below is the all-too troubling report that does not shock conservatives, but will ultimately topple socialism in America and the Democratic Party for a least a generation, and perhaps for all time (Courtesy of The Conservative Tribune):

URGENT: Lois Lerner Caught Helping the Muslim Brotherhood’s US Front Groups [DOCUMENTS]
Lois Lerner is quite possibly one of the most unpopular people in America right along with Barack Obama, and after this latest scandal blowing up across the Internet, her fan base might go from a few to none rather quickly.
Documents have surfaced which indicate that Lerner granted 501 (c)(3) status to several Muslim groups that have direct connections to the Muslim Brotherhood back in 2005.
According to Shoebat.Com, Lerner approved the Hamzah Islamic Center for tax exempt status. Two members of the HIC’s board, Tareef Saeb and Emad Hamid crafted a paper on instructions for starting a mosque in America and getting approved to be a 501 (c)(3) organization.

In this paper, individuals looking to start up a mosque are encouraged to reach out to the Muslim Community Association, which is also a tax exempt organization, but it just so happens they are connected to Obama’s pals in the Muslim Brotherhood.
The MCA takes some of its cues regarding Muslim holidays from the Fiqh Council of North America, an organization that openly claims to be part of the Global Muslim Brotherhood.
Also within the pages of the HIC document, there is information given on the role of an imam where the authors cite the All Dulles Area Muslim Society as having the perfect model to follow for teachers in the mosque.
Since the HIC is connected with two major Muslim Brotherhood groups, it’s pretty safe to draw the conclusion that they agree with much of what the organization teaches and stands for.
This means that there are radical Islamic groups getting tax exempt status to spread their religion of hate and indoctrinate a new generation of jihadists, right here on American soil.
What’s worse is the HIC has a history of helping radical terrorists in the Middle East, going so far as to raise funds for Syrian fighters engaging in holy war.
Scary.
By Lerner approving these groups, who had known connections to the Muslim Brotherhood, she has committed an act of treason by aiding the enemy. It’s time for her to be arrested. Now.
She has not only violated the rights of individuals seeking to express their political opinion by forming tax exempt groups, but has gone far out of her way to help terrorists infiltrate the U.S. This must stop, which is why Americans need to stand up now and demand that Lois Lerner be brought to justice.
Please share this article on Facebook and Twitter if you would vote in favor of Lois Lerner being arrested and tried for treason.
________________
The records and paper trail I researched concludes there indeed is suspicious activity afoot within the campaign donations alone. Consider one William Obama, residing in Decatur, GA:

Name/LocationEmployer/Occupation$ Amount ContributedContributed ToPrimary/
General
Date
OBAMA, BARACK
WASHINGTON, DC 20500
The United States Of America/President$2,500OBAMA FOR AMERICA - DEMOCRATP07/30/2012
OBAMA, BARACK
WASHINGTON, DC 20500
The United States Of America/President$2,500OBAMA FOR AMERICA - DEMOCRATG07/30/2012
OBAMA, DAVID
OLNEY, MD 20832
Self-Employed/Executive Director$250OBAMA FOR AMERICA - DEMOCRATG10/05/2012
OBAMA, FCUK
VXCVCX, CA 92284
 --$-25DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT07/25/2011
OBAMA, WILLIAM
DECATUR, GA 30033
Self-Employed/Small Business Owner$250OBAMA VICTORY FUND 2012 - DEMOCRATG10/04/2012

Also, one Faustin E. Obama (an irony to be said that if you take the full name's initials, it read "FEO", which in Spanish means "ugly") can be found living in Marietta, GA:

Faustin E ObamaMariettaGeorgia30060-6244770-434-60551998 1999 2000 2001 200275695133
Faustin E Obama3120 Oakton Way SW, Marietta, GA, 30060-6244

Also, there this Obama:
Helen L E ObamaMariettaGeorgia30060-6244770-434-60551998 1999 2000 200275694637

Decatur and Marietta are located north of Atlanta and are therefore embedded at the heart of the Southeast's cultural and economic hub. It should too be noted that Helen L. E. Obama is 55 years old; Malik Obama was born in 1958 and could still be 55 years old depending upon his date of birth. George Hussein Onyango Obama was born in 1982 and would fall into the 30-34 years of age range. He starred in Dinesh D'Souza's 2016: Obama's America, widely considered an anti-Obama film. The point of contention should not be whether there are aliases for the president and his "family", because there obvious are. The point is why on some, why they coincide with addresses of very key locations of Islamic centers nationally, many of whom have ties with organized terrorism aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood. One wonders why.

There are also two other Obamas I located, in which the following I took a photograph from my desktop's screen might surprise you as the one named Helen L. Edouna-Obama is George Hussein Onyango Obama, which is easy to discern once you rearrange the letters within the initials; the other is one Miris S. Obama, which might read as the anagram for "Mistress Obama" or "Ms. Obama". It is indeed coincidental, except for the fact it is not. Michelle Obama's mother, named Marian Shields Robinson, has family residing in Georgia, or at least has past generations' of her family residing in Georgia:



There you have it, ladies and gentlemen. I advise you to prepare for the inevitable investigation into George W. Bush. If he was involved, he too should take the fall; so far as I see, nothing yet directly correlates Obama's predecessor to the Muslim Brotherhood. However, it must be understood that in 2005, Barack Obama served his first year in the United State Senate and in fact, his term lasted exactly from January 3, 2005 – November 16, 2008. And at that, the details are sure to arrive steadily, but plentifully.

***

Part III: Walid Shoebat's Report from August 19, 2013

Walid Shoebat, the former PLO operative who converted to Christianity, provided these vital details about Lois Lerner, but they involve President Obama's brother, Malik, whose nickname is "Roy" and can be found at multiple addresses under multiple names in the U.S., and will therefore be provided:


Egyptian Official Ties Obama’s Brother To Brotherhood




Egyptian government and mainstream media has reported a major development regarding the role of Barack Obama’s brother (presumably, his half-brother Malik Obama) with the Muslim Brotherhood. As we have reported before, Malik is a member of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO), an arm of the Sudanese government, which is led by President Omar al-Bashir, who is himself a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.
These facts would lend credibility to the following claims from Egypt. It is also important to note that August 25th is a very key date in Egypt; it is when imprisoned Muslim Brotherhood leaders go on trial there.
The former Chancellor of the Constitutional Court of Egypt and current adviser, Tahani Al-Jebali stated that the reason the United States cannot fight the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood is because the brother of U.S. President Barack Obama is the architect of the investments for the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.
On top of that, Malik may be tied to international Muslim Brotherhood investments?!
Jebali stated she would like…
“…to inform the American people that their president’s brother Obama is one of the architects of the major investments of the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
She added…
“We will carry out the law and the Americans will not stop us. We need to open the files and begin court sessions. The Obama administration cannot stop us; they know that they supported terrorism. We will open the files so these nations are exposed, to show how they collaborated with them [the terrorists]. It is for this reason why the American administration fights us.”
Here is video of Jebali explaining this, via Youm 7: 

Jebali also appeared on Egyptian television to explain how important this news is to Americans who are concerned about their President’s actions, saying it “is a gift to the American people”, implying there is much more to come:

She noted that the cost to Egypt has been great and that her country will not allow any conspiracy against its people, the Egyptian state or any one of the members of the Security Council. Leading Egypt to Chapter 7 is unacceptable and would plunge her country into a dire state similar to that which exists in Iraq and Libya.
If these reports are correct, Turkey appears to play a central role in the conspiratorial nature of this activity and that Egypt has asserted to the international community that it will not tolerate such activity.
This information is reported by three very credible Arabic sources. [1] [2] [3]
Again, based on what we already know about Malik Obama’s affiliations, that he is a key player relative to international Muslim Brotherhood investments isn’t a shock at all.
See for yourself (again, our calls to Obama sycophant George Clooney have gone unanswered):

One person who may want to give very serious thought to singing like a canary is Lois Lerner. Her signature is at the bottom of Malik Obama’s tax-exempt approval letter. Lerner illegally granted Malik’s foundation retroactive tax exempt status, backdating it 38 months when the law prohibits doing so further back than 27 months.
On top of that, Malik may be tied to international Muslim Brotherhood investments?! 
For more on Malik Obama, click here.
**UPDATE on August 19, 2013 at 8:30pm EST**
Al-Wafd, another prominent Arabic source is reporting similar news. Under the title, “Obama’s Brother is Muslim Brotherhood” and on Egypt’s National Television, (Tahani Al-Jebali) stated:
“There are many reasons why the United States does not take a strong stand against the Muslim Brotherhood.”
One such reason, which she says is a gift to the American people, is that Obama’s brother is a major operative with the Muslim Brotherhood in that he is the conduit for funneling monies for the organization.
She also added…
“Documents from the Egyptian national security must be brought into the light in order to confirm that this international organization (Muslim Brotherhood) shows exchanges with the CIA so as to reach the power center of (Egypt).”
Our work has unequivocally demonstrated that Malik Obama works with Muslim Brotherhood leaders.  

___________________

Yes, yes, this is all hypothetical because to date, Egypt has yet to release all the located files for the public's consumption both in their country and of course, here. But again, the more which is unraveled, the greater the cause for concern, to be cautious, and as Ronald Reagan once stated, to trust, but verify.

***

 Part II. The Nation May Not Have to Worry About Being Ready for Hillary:

The war on women seems arbitrary public within the socialist establishment, and no female figure in U.S. has achieved so much for having contributed so little other than death and mayhem than Hillary Clinton. As Mrs. Clinton is the former First Lady of her husband Bill, she never received any national acclamation until Bill became president, and her history of ethical violations date to the mid-1970s, including the Watergate investigation where she was fired for a breach of ethics. This, however, is treason, of unbridled corrupt that in itself causes one to sadly understand that Richard Nixon's role in the Watergate scandal is minor by comparison, as well as to all of Obama's scandals. And since this is true, I will provide the information pertinent to the details from Sharyl Attkisson, which may finally be the death knell which destroys Hillary Clinton politically and land her either in prison or on death row for treason:

Benghazi Bombshell: Clinton State Department Official Reveals Details of Alleged Document Review



As the House Select Committee on Benghazi prepares for its first hearing this week, a former State Department diplomat is coming forward with a startling allegation: Hillary Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to the Accountability Review Board investigating security lapses surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012, terrorist attacks on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, Libya.

New Benghazi allegation puts spotlight on Hillary Clinton confidants, alleged after-hours document review.
UPDATE: Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff allegedly present at after-hours document review.
According to former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, the after-hours session took place over a weekend in a basement operations-type center at State Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. This is the first time Maxwell has publicly come forward with the story.
At the time, Maxwell was a leader in the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, which was charged with collecting emails and documents relevant to the Benghazi probe.
Ray Maxwell (Photo: Sharyl Attkisson)
Raymond Maxwell, former State Department deputy assistant secretary (Photo: Sharyl Attkisson)
“I was not invited to that after-hours endeavor, but I heard about it and decided to check it out on a Sunday afternoon,” Maxwell says.
He didn’t know it then, but Maxwell would ultimately become one of four State Department officials singled out for discipline—he says scapegoated—then later cleared for devastating security lapses leading up to the attacks. Four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were murdered during the Benghazi attacks.
‘Basement Operation’
Maxwell says the weekend document session was held in the basement of the State Department’s Foggy Bottom headquarters in a room underneath the “jogger’s entrance.” He describes it as a large space, outfitted with computers and big screen monitors, intended for emergency planning, and with small offices on the periphery.
When he arrived, Maxwell says he observed boxes and stacks of documents. He says a State Department office director, whom Maxwell described as close to Clinton’s top advisers, was there. Though the office director technically worked for him, Maxwell says he wasn’t consulted about her weekend assignment.
A 'basement operation'? Department of State building in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Wayan Vota/Creative Commons)
‘Basement operation’: The Department of State in Washington. (Photo: Wayan Vota/Creative Commons)
“She told me, ‘Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light,’” says Maxwell. He says “seventh floor” was State Department shorthand for then-Secretary of State Clinton and her principal advisers.
“I asked her, ‘But isn’t that unethical?’ She responded, ‘Ray, those are our orders.’ ”

Did Hillary Clinton aides withhold damaging Benghazi documents?
A few minutes after he arrived, Maxwell says, in walked two high-ranking State Department officials.
In an interview Monday morning on Fox News, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, named the two Hillary Clinton confidants who allegedly were  present: One was Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff and a former White House counsel who defended President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial. The other, Chaffetz said, was Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan, who previously worked on Hillary Clinton’s and then Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns.


“When Cheryl saw me, she snapped, ‘Who are you?’” Maxwell says. “Jake explained, ‘That’s Ray Maxwell, an NEA deputy assistant secretary.’ She conceded, ‘Well, OK.’”
Maxwell says the two officials, close confidants of Clinton, appeared to check in on the operation and soon left.
Maxwell says after Mills and Sullivan arrived, he, the office director and an intern moved into a small office where they looked through some papers. Maxwell says his stack included pre-attack telegrams and cables between the U.S. embassy in Tripoli and State Department headquarters. After a short time, Maxwell says he decided to leave.
“I didn’t feel good about it,” he says.
Cheryl Mills, left, was Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff and former White House counsel who defended President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial. (Photo: Newscom)
Cheryl Mills, left, was Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff and a White House counsel who defended President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial. (Photo: Newscom)
We contacted Mills and Sullivan to ask about the allegations and the purpose of the described separation of documents, but they did not return calls or emails. We reached out to Clinton, who declined an interview request and offered no comment. A State Department spokesman told us it would have been impossible for anybody outside the Accountability Review Board (ARB) to control the flow of information because the board cultivated so many sources.
‘Unfettered Access’?
When the ARB issued its call for documents in early October 2012, just weeks after the Benghazi attacks, the executive directorate of the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs was put in charge of collecting all emails and relevant material. It was gathered, boxed and—Maxwell says—ended up in the basement room prior to being turned over.
In May 2013, when critics questioned the ARB’s investigation as not thorough enough, co-chairmen Ambassador Thomas Pickering and Adm. Mike Mullen responded that “we had unfettered access to everyone and everything including all the documentation we needed.”
Maxwell says when he heard that statement, he couldn’t help but wonder if the ARB—perhaps unknowingly—had received from his bureau a scrubbed set of documents with the most damaging material missing.
An armed man waves his rifle as buildings and cars are engulfed in flames after being set on fire inside the US consulate compound in Benghazi late on Sept. 11, 2012. (Photo: Getty Images/Newscom)
An attacker celebrates as buildings and cars burn at the consulate compound in Benghazi late Sept. 11, 2012. (Photo: Getty Images/Newscom)
Maxwell also criticizes the ARB as “anything but independent,” pointing to Mullen’s admission in congressional testimony that he called Mills to give her inside advice after the ARB interviewed a potential congressional witness.
In an interview in September 2013, Pickering told me that he would not have done what Mullen did. But both co-chairmen strongly defend their probe as “fiercely independent.”
Maxwell also criticizes the ARB for failing to interview key people at the White House, State Department and the CIA, including not only Clinton but Deputy Secretary of State Thomas Nides, who managed department resources in Libya; Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs Andrew Shapiro; and White House National Security Council Director for Libya Ben Fishman.
“The ARB inquiry was, at best, a shoddily executed attempt at damage control, both in Foggy Bottom and on Capitol Hill,” Maxwell says. He views the after-hours operation he witnessed in the State Department basement as “an exercise in misdirection.”
U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens. Four Americans, including Stevens, were murdered in Benghazi. (Photo: Newscom)
Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were murdered in Benghazi. (Photo: Newscom)
Sullivan did not respond to emails or to messages sent to him through his current teaching job at Yale Law School. Mills did not respond to a message passed to her through Black Rock, a major global investment firm where she is on the board of directors. Clinton’s press officer ultimately referred us to the State Department, though none of the three currently works there.
State Department Response
A State Department spokesman, Alec Gerlach, calls the implication that documents were withheld “totally without merit.” Gerlach says: “The range of sources that the ARB’s investigation drew on would have made it impossible for anyone outside of the ARB to control its access to information.”

“The allegations are as serious as it gets,” says one lawmaker of the alleged Benghazi document review.
Gerlach says the State Department instructed all employees to cooperate “fully and promptly” with the ARB, which invited anyone with relevant information to contact the board directly.
“So individuals with information were reaching out proactively to the board. And, the ARB was also directly engaged with individuals and the [State] Department’s bureaus and offices to request information and pull on whichever threads it chose to,” Gerlach says.
Benghazi Select Committee
Maxwell says he has been interviewed privately by several members of Congress in recent months, including Chaffetz, a member of the House Oversight Committee, and Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the House Select Committee on Benghazi.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, and Chairman of the House Benghazi Select Committee, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C. (Photo: Newscom)
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, speaks with Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., chairman of the Benghazi Select Committee, (Photo: Newscom)
When reached for comment, Chaffetz told me that Maxwell’s allegations “go to the heart of the integrity of the State Department.”
“The allegations are as serious as it gets, and it’s something we have obviously followed up and pursued,” Chaffetz says. “I’m 100 percent confident the Benghazi Select Committee is going to dive deep on that issue.”
Former Obama Supporter
Maxwell, 58, strongly supported President Barack Obama and personally contributed to his presidential campaign. But post-Benghazi, he has soured on both Obama and Clinton, saying he had nothing to do with security and was sacrificed as a scapegoat while higher-up officials directly responsible escaped discipline.
Maxwell spent a year on paid administrative leave with no official charge ever levied against him. Ultimately, the State Department cleared Maxwell of wrongdoing and reinstated him. He retired a short time later, in November 2013.
Maxwell worked in foreign service for 21 years as the well-respected deputy assistant secretary for Maghreb Affairs in the Near East Bureau and is a former chief of staff to the ambassador in Baghdad. Fluent in Portuguese, Maxwell is a Navy “mustanger,” which means he successfully made the leap from the enlisted ranks to commissioned officer.
Courtesy of Sharyl Attkisson
Raymond Maxwell speaks with investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson in Washington. (Photo: Courtesy Sharyl Attkisson)
Maxwell also is a prolific poet. While on administrative leave, he published poems online: allegories hinting at his post-Benghazi observations and experiences.
A poem entitled “Invitation” refers to his placement on  leave in December 2012: “The Queen’s Henchmen / request the pleasure of your company / at a Lynching — / to be held / at 23rd and C Streets NW [State Dept. building] / on Tuesday, December 18, 2012 / just past sunset. / Dress: Formal, Masks and Hoods — / the four being lynched / must never know the identities/ of their executioners, or what/ whose sin required their sacrifice./ A blood sacrifice — / to divert the hounds- / to appease the gods — / to cleanse our filth and /satisfy our guilty consciences…”
In another poem called “Trapped in a purgatory of their own deceit,” Maxwell wrote: “The web of lies they weave / gets tighter and tighter / in its deceit / until it bottoms out — / at a very low frequency — / and implodes…Yet all the while, / the more they talk, / the more they lie, / and the deeper down the hole they go… Just wait…/ just wait and feed them the rope.”
Former Deputy Assistant Secretary for the Maghreb Region Raymond Maxwell during a visit to Algiers in 2011. (Photo: YouTube via U.S. Embassy in Algiers)
Maxwell in Algiers in 2011 as deputy assistant secretary for the Maghreb region. (Photo: YouTube via U.S. Embassy in Algiers)
Several weeks after he was placed on leave with no formal accusations, Maxwell made an appointment to address his status with a State Department ombudsman.
“She told me, ‘You are taking this all too personally, Raymond. It is not about you,’ ” Maxwell recalls.
“I told her that ‘My name is on TV and I’m on administrative leave, it seems like it’s about me.’ Then she said, ‘You’re not harmed, you’re still getting paid. Don’t watch TV. Take your wife on a cruise. It’s not about you; it’s about Hillary and 2016.’ ”
Since retiring from the State Department, Maxwell has obtained a master’s degree in library information science.

***

Conclusion: A Word of Advice from Shayrl Attkisson

In conclusion, I will not be doing any further analyses since I am more curious as to what more will be reported. But as you know, Ronald Reagan stated, "Trust, but verify." You do not simply trust what you are told, but rather be confident in seeing what you see. Ms. Attkisson understands this as one of America's foremost investigative journalists, and I want to finish this by sharing with you one very crucial piece of advice:
"Investigative Journalist who tries to give you information others don't want you to have. What you do with it is your own business. Do your own research. Seek advice from those you trust. Make up your own mind."
Her biographical information may be found here.

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

My Reply to British Prime Minister David Cameron's Plea to Scotland to Vote "No" to Independence

My Reply to British Prime Minister David Cameron's Plea to Scotland to Vote "No" to Independence: 

For more information on Scottish Independence/Devolution Vote,


I have replied to other posts by the prime minister in recent months. I reside in the southeast U.S. in Knoxville, TN, located snug in the Tennessee Valley at the foothill of the Great Smoky Mountains (Appalachian Mountain chain). Where I live, the most prevalent ancestry is that of one of mine: Scots-Irish, who are British. How accurate you will see this from an outsider's perspective is arbitrary to the individual, but though I do not spell nor speak using the Queen's English, do not be fooled by any thought of my ignorance to geopolitical issues as I am both a historian and a political blogger. What is transpiring with the devolution vote has a eerily similar history here, "across the pond", regarding the issue of nullification, or states' rights. Allow me to share with you what I am talking about.

When the Constitution was completed on September 17, 1787, the Connecticut Compromise served as the key to achieving the document's final ratification the following year on September 13. The Connecticut Compromise, proposed by Roger Sherman, called for as part of a bicameral legislative apparatus an upper house where unlike its lower counterpart, would be equally distributed among each state with two representatives; the lower house would be divided into districts gerrymandered by population, which is why some states have far more congressmen and congresswomen. The upper house, originally proposed to have each state's two representatives determined by their legislatures, was devised to ensure that through this system, state governments also had a stake in federal polity. Today, that upper house of Congress is known as the Senate. It no longer experiences its senate seats being filled by the legislatures per the Seventeenth Amendment (1913) under the Woodrow Wilson, the first Democrat to consider himself a "progressive", but rather by plebiscite now instead. States have virtually no say in the federal government, and conservatives like myself have long advocated that the Seventeenth Amendment be repealed and reverted to the old measures of state legislature appointees. 

In 1798, in protest to President John Adams signing into law the Federalist Party's bill known as the Alien and Sedition Acts, Thomas Jefferson and his protege James Madison rallied support among the Democratic-Republican Party in opposing the law. Just over the prior year, the federal government had been blackmailed by Revolutionary France as it impressed our merchant marine vessels in the Atlantic at the onset of more than a generation of constant warfare between Britain and initially, the Directory government (Napoleon rose to power in 1799 following a coup d'etat of the French national assembly following a tainted plebiscite in which some 99% "voted' in favor of his new government). Through 1793 when the French Revolution grew extraordinarily violent as the world's first experiment in far left-wing totalitarianism achieved through anarchy funded by Jacobins under Maximilien Robespierre's Committee of Public Safety, Jefferson's faction had supported French influences over the British in deference to King Louis XVI serving a key role in his deploying the French Navy to aide then-Gen. George Washington's siege at Yorktown in 1781 by bombarding the coastline, which resulted in the final victory over Lord Cornwallis' Red Coats; two years later, the Treaty of Paris was signed, formally granting the U.S. its independence. As a result of the French blackmail of the federal government in what is known today as XYZ Affair that resulted in the Quasi War, the Acts were passed and provided the federal government power to incarcerate any civilian known to advocate anti-government propaganda or mere sentiment, as well as tighten regulations on immigration through banning French migrants to fears of Jacobinism rising to further exacerbate the situation. What resulted was Jefferson's Kentucky Resolutions and Madison's Virginia Resolution, which both claimed that when the federal government engages in unconstitutional legal practices, state's had the power to negate, or nullify, those laws. In the case of Jefferson's Kentucky Resolutions, though, his proclamation was far more radical; he advocated secession, which led to more than 60 years of controversies involving the slavery question, or what in the U.S. was called "the peculiar institution". Multiple compromises beginning with the Missouri Compromise in 1820 were passed by Congress and signed into law by successive presidents, only to stall the onset of the Civil War following abolitionist Abraham Lincoln's election to the presidency in November 1860. The following month, South Carolina seceded, and early the next year, the Confederate army fired upon the U.S. military garrison off the coast of Charleston, SC known as Fort Sumter. By 1865, the war was settled, but at a staggering cost in lives' lost that within that war alone comprises as many as those lost during the four major U.S. conflicts of the 20th Century. States' rights, however, still remained a hot topical issue.

You have probably read of the Jim Crow laws in the South. Dreadful as they were in repressing and segregating the black community in the South and still the situation upon the great migration north being equally as bad despite no such laws, the Seventeenth Amendment was not passed for the reason of stemming the tide of civil rights violations as Wilson was a virulent racist. The issue of civil rights lingered for decades until the series of civil rights movements were launched in the 1950s. As public education today is for all intents and purposes nationalized through the Common Core standards which advocate indoctrination of our students, teaching biology using such a method as "baby daddy genetics", manufacturing a standard for solving mathematics which at times teaches how to arrive at a wrong answer and why it could be correct, or discussing how conservatives are obstructionists while borderline worshipping Obama through entire units teaching of his rise to power in a racist world, states are gradually abolishing the standards due to their serving as the Obama administration's measure for political extortion or blackmail, much like the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). If states fail to "accept" the president's terms, they risk having their state-appropriated funds cut off in nearly its entirety. With state courts being overridden illegally by the Federal Justice Department under Eric Holder, what once was the world's greatest experiment in a democratic-republican government has now become dominated by wealthy elitists who are funded by billionaires in Silicon Valley, Hollywood and the music industry as well as a few on Wall Street. And while Wall Street, Hollywood Boulevard and Silicon Valley prosper through increased tax breaks, loopholes and exemptions as well the wealthiest Americans seeing records levels of wealth and stocks soaring to record levels, the bottom 90% are growing steeply poorer by the year, where today, nearly 93 million working age Americans are out of the labor force, or nearly 30 million more people in that statistic alone than in entire British population. The states have no say as to how they truly address this other than slashing taxes and deregulating; Tennessee is now, for instance, considered the number three state to do business as our economy is growing rapidly as is most of the South, particularly here in Knoxville, Nashville and Chattanooga. Rural areas have been far slower to grow due to corporate conglomerates killing small businesses and corrupt labor unions aligned with organized crime in many cases have destroyed over many decades our once bustling industrial sector. If you need verification, simply read about Detroit, which filed for bankruptcy last year and is now receiving water supplies from Canada.

From my perspective, a cohesive United Kingdom is a better Britain for all. What I would suggest is to federalize it as we technically still are, or perhaps akin to the Swiss canton system. More autonomy should be granted to all Britons culturally, not simply concentrating nearly all true political power into the House of Commons; France for example has a cultural ministry to attempt to preserve all that is French from becoming anglicanized. The Scots surely have a right to demand greater control over their lives by growing more intune with their history and culture; those two concepts of history and culture compromise of the concept behind tradition which Edmund Burke (1729-97) himself advocated as founding tenets behind conservatism, granting a national identity to John Locke's classical liberalism of 1689 in his Second Treatise of Civil Government that influenced your landmark Bill of Rights. By federalizing all the major nationalities within the British Isles while still taking care of preserving all the protection, privileges and perks of being represented in Parliament, you will have gone a long way towards addressing the controversies of killing what people in Edinburgh or Glasgow consider to be "Scottish", or Cardiff as "Welsh", or London and its Cockney peoples and the East Enders; and of course the Irishmen in the Northern Ireland region. Returning to the people's cultural roots while ending the multiculturalism that sadly is not only destroying the British confederated ethos of what once was so unique and beautiful about Britannia but here as well is important; and you need badly to both provide an updated bill of rights or some hardcopy legal code, as well as tighten your borders before the further influx of illegal immigrants or even those legally being naturalized kill your identity as well as continue taxing your state welfare system. America no longer has a southern border due to President Obama's funding Latin American revolutions and their resulting in amnesty policies where today, many thousands who are undocumented reside in the U.S. are receiving welfare benefits, being permitted to vote and often times without any accounting of how many times they do so, and now we have the issue with the Islamic State and al-Qaeda operatives partnering with Mexican drug cartels, as well as the Mexican military attacking our border patrols. Do not make these mistakes; you are too great a nation, and despite at times our two peoples showing contempt as if our British parent is bickering with your American child, we will always have a unique, special relationship. To me, Britannia will always rule the waves across the pond.

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Congress Can Serve Obama a "Poison Pill" to Stop Him from Implementing Amnesty Unilaterally

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Congress Can Serve Obama a "Poison Pill" to Stop Him from Implementing Amnesty Unilaterally

The sign of the times for the president could become very bleak, very soon, ladies and gentlemen. Considering Princeton University declared today that the United State of America is no longer a democratic nation, this informative commentary by Judge Andrew Napolitano is comforting. The issue therein becomes will Congress stand up to Obama, or continue to be intimated and "limp" before him? After all, the president's approval rating has dipped into the 35% range, and we have yet to complete his six year in office.

And about the report from Princeton? Well, I will include it below in a .PDF format:

  

It is a sad but fundamental truth. The American people elected congressmen and senators to serve our interests, but they are being completely and criminally bypassed. The actual document is a few pages, and it is of course available for your consumption. I will, however, provide a synopsis of it from Mad World News which I believe you may find a bit more expedient in understanding the controls of the project:
Princeton University conducted a recent study on the past 20 years of legislation. What they concluded should alarm both Liberals and Conservatives. What they found is that the government of the United States has been replaced. It is not a Democracy as many are calling it. It is not even a Republic as it was founded by the Constitution. We are not a government for the people, nor are we by the people.
The scientific study being attributed to Princeton was conducted by Martin Gilens of Princeton University and Benjamin I. Page of Northwestern University, and they combed through years of legislation from the 1990’s until the modern era. What they concluded is that we have left the Republic in shambles and have formed a new form of government despite the Constitution. They conclude that the Teaparty, Occupy Movement, Libertarians, and others are all correct.
They conclude that the United States has became an Oligarchy.
When the Tea Party yells, “the elite ‘Main Street’ Republicans are working on their own agenda, not the people,” they could very well be correct.
When Occupy yells, “we are a nation ruled by the 1%,” they might also be correct.
When the Libertarians yell, “both sides have betrayed us for their own agenda of the elite ruling class”, they may also be correct.
They use four theoretical traditions to base their conclusions.
  1. Majoritarian Electoral Democracy – or the tyranny of the elected majority from the 1800’s.
  2. Economic Elite Domination – a tradition implemented to where the policy making is dominated by those who have substantial economic resources.
  3. Majoritarian Pluralism – warned about in the Federalist Papers which helped found our Republic
  4. Biased Pluralism – or policy driven with an “upper class” accent.
Out of 1923 policy changes, 1779 of them raised an alarming question as to who controls the country. What they found is that “the preferences of the average American appear to have only a minuscule, near-zero, statistically non-significant impact upon public policy.”
In other words, if you are an average American citizen with middle to lower-income, your opinion is not even recognized.
Frantic Liberal Progressives are right on a few things in light of the new data. Economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez constructed income statistics based on income from 1913 through 2013, and the data lent credence to Princeton’s research.
New Princeton Study Concludes America is NOT a Democracy 

New Princeton Study Concludes America is NOT a Democracy

Piketty and Saez also calculated that as of September 2013 the top 1% of earners had captured 95% of all income gains since the Great Recession ended. The other 99% saw a net 12% drop to their income. So not only is oligarchy making the rich richer, it’s driving policy that’s made everyone else poorer. ~MIC
However, they have some things wrong in their panic as well.
For one, they agree that everyone believes that there should be mandatory background checks, even at gun shows. What they fail to note is that the argument is not for background checks, but that the majority of US Citizens reject the notion of gun registration, as history has shown registration leads to confiscation 99% of the time. Since the 1986 gun law, background checks have been mandatory, even at gun shows. The slipping through the cracks are on illegal guns, not legally purchased guns. IF the database was updated properly by the FBI and people were reported as REQUIRED…
The next point is Progressives using this to back Hairy Reed’s attempt to change the Constitution and obliterate the First Amendment, which is being voted on in secret on September 9th. That’s right, while everyone is blindsided by terrorist attacks, an open border, ISIS, and everything else, the Senate’s now shown Oligarchy is using it to attack FEC vs Citizens United and McCutcheon vs FEC. Progressives are trying to twist it with the view that it gives power to the Oligarchy to allow them to exist. It does quite the opposite. In fact, the proposed amendment does nothing to stop the top 50 political donors, but would empower them to maintain their Oligarchy! They would still be able to keep up business as usual. It would stop you from being able to oppose them!
In fact, the conclusion is even more dismal if you look at the two lists. The first is the group that sees 90% of their legislation passed. The second sees 43% to 60% of their legislation passed.
The first group consists of:
Business and professional groups

Airlines

American Bankers Association
American Council of Life Insurance
American Farm Bureau Federation
American Hospital Association
American Medical Association
Association of Trial Lawyers
Automobile companies
Chamber of Commerce
Computer software and hardware
Credit Union National Association
Defense contractors
Electric companies
Health Insurance Association
Independent Insurance Agents of America
Motion Picture Association of America
National Association of Broadcasters
National Association of Home Builders
National Association of Manufacturers
National Association of Realtors
National Beer Wholesalers Association
National Federation of Independent Business
National Restaurant Association
Oil Companies
Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers
Recording Industry Association
Securities and investment companies
Telephone companies
Tobacco companies
Note: You can see why GE does not pay income tax despite operating a business on American soil, or why the disaster of Obamacare is being allowed despite unpopularity. No matter what group spins it, these are the associations that get their way most of the time.
The second group consists of:
AARP

AFL-CIO

American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees
American Israel Public Affairs Committee
American Legion
Christian Coalition
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
National Rifle Association
National Right to Life Committee
United Auto Workers union
Veterans of Foreign Wars of the U.S.
Note: The second group sees most of their legislation in the 60%-43% range passed. It’s not nearly the 90%+ of the first group.
What about the majority of the American People? Well, unless you side with one of these groups, your legislation is passed at a negative percentile.
Using their data, they have accurately predicted, with a margin of error, that if you are an average citizen, you may see 20% of your legislation passed as compared to the lobbyists, special interests, and economic elite who will find they get their way the majority of time.
It really is disheartening. This is not what our Founding Fathers intended. This is not even Constitutional.
It is past time that we quit bickering over silly arguments that have been made to divide a country to continue an elite rule. Stop arguing over race, it is just a pigmentation of our skin and inside we are all the same. Stop arguing over idiotic ideologies that have no sound evidence. Socialism has failed in every society, resulting in Cuba and China moving to a free market system. Do you want to see proof of Obamacare in action? Take a look at our VA system!
Start arguing to the elite that Congress needs to put patches on their suits like NASCAR. Start demanding accountability of Senators that list their parents basement as an address to stay in power. Start demanding term limits. Start demanding accountability of the political elite to stop scamming the welfare and disability system. Start demanding that Senators stop saying they know what is best and instead do their JOB.  Start demanding they stop arguing if a team name is racist and start taking care of the 355 bills left on the Majority Leader’s desk to rot.
You want to see a change back to the Constitution and a true “change you can believe in”? That starts with us. We have to put aside our political party and work together to fix it. With this study, it is no longer an argument of left or right, but right or wrong.
If this study sickens you, then the solution to fixing it begins with us “Average American” people.
“To know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of one hundred battles.”~ Sun Tzu.  You can follow more of my work on Facebook at Journalist Brandon Walker.
______________________________

The concept that the American people are one nation, indivisible is not accurate at all. When the U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of wealthy billionaire tycoons and labor unions or powerful PACs and special interests to donate as much as they would like, Main Street, U.S.A. suffers. We do not have a voice any longer, and we have not since before most of you and myself were born. We vote, and our elected officials instead serve Wall Street, the UAW and the Teamsters or the AFL-CIO, Bill Gates or Warren Buffet and of course Hollywood and our musicians. They preach they are individuals who know what is best for we, the people, but they are instead padding their wallets at our expense, exploiting us all while we continue to cater to their whims by paying their salaries through our taxed incomes or through consumerism. At some point, this issue must be resolved, but I am not certain as to how it will be accomplished.

_______________________________

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Obama Can Be Served a "Poison Pill" on Amnesty

Rather than humble pie, I would rather see the president engage in projectile regurgitation. America's favorite judge stated this on Fox News Blog, albeit it was televised. The possibilities are endless if it is actually employed:
'Poison Pill': How Republicans Could Nullify Obama's Executive Action on Immigration
President Obama spoke last week of his intention to take executive action on immigration reform. Then over the weekend, the White House said any action will be delayed until after the November midterm elections.

President Obama spoke last week of his intention to take executive action on immigration reform. Then over the weekend, the White House said any action will be delayed until after the November midterm elections.
 win control of the Senate in November?
Fox and Friends asked Judge Andrew Napolitano, who outlined a "poison pill" scenario in which the GOP-controlled Senate could seek to nullify the actions on immigration reform.
He explained that the most significant thing that the House and Senate could do would be to insert the language into a larger bill, since the president does not have line-item veto power. 
"He can't cross out something that he doesn't like and sign the rest. So if there's legislation he really needs and the country really wants and must have - like funding the Defense Department - they could sneak in there legislation nullifying these executive orders [and] he'd be forced to sign it," said Napolitano, adding that President Obama remains devoted to an "ideological view of transforming American society."
"These are not happy times in Washington ... [and] it's going to get worse in the next two years."
Watch his full analysis above.BY 
OX


____________________________-

In hearkening Dirty Harry played by the legendary Clint Eastwood, I will simply close with this:


(Let's pray that our GOP congressmen and senators grow a set soon.)