Friday, September 5, 2014

Report: Wife of Former Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi Threatening to Reveal Hillary Clinton's Involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood, Role in Forming an Islamic Republic in the U.S.

Report: Wife of Former Egyptian President Mohammad Morsi Threatening to Reveal Hillary Clinton's Involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood, Role in Forming an Islamic Republic in the U.S.

As has been strongly suspected for at least three years, ladies and gentlemen, the Obama administration has been heavily involved with Mohammad Morsi's Muslim Brotherhood organization in Egypt and now, Qatar. You read in a prior blog article where I provided additional information from Al Jazeera regarding the current government's revelation to the Egyptian media and the prior mentioned Qatari government that this is in fact true; in fact, Al Jazeera is a news service based in Doha, Qatar, and is funded by the House of Thani, the state's ruling family. 

My concept of searching news services for information is this: If there is smoke, there is almost certainly a fire creating it. My job is to locate where that fire is and determine where the smoke and flames will travel. When I read a story from media service, I attempt to locate different mediums reporting the same to determine all angles. There are usually two sides or more to every story, and in my experience such as the past 48 of debating socialists on Ted Cruz's Facebook page about amnesty, they are the most naive, gullible people who claim anyone who goes to the trouble to read the news is, in fact, "crazy", "naive" as well as "stupid". Knowledge is the enemy of those who would seek subvert the sovereignty of a people residing within a democratic state of any variation. It was none other than the man who exposed Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-WI) during the hearings to expose Americans accused to be cohorts of Soviet communism who stated that a nation of sheep will governed by wolves. And so it is with today's American public, the most poorly-educated and ill-informed in our nation's history. As I sat in on a high school U.S. History and witnessed the teacher quiz her students on the second day of school  two years ago, multiple students replied that it was Babe Ruth, not Jackie Robinson, who broke baseball's color barrier; some did not know that Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States, and I recall one did not know who the current president was. The goal for public education today is not to teach life skills, deductive reason or simply to engage in the use of common sense as often as possible, but rather how to take standardized tests and pass. It is true that teachers often find legitimate measures to pass their students through excessive participatory assignments or grade-inflationary adjustments. When the principal of a school states that students only have a 31% chance to pass a course and that it is the job of all teachers to ensure that all have the means to avoid that bottom 69%, failure is not in fact being avoided, but rather encouraged due to a lack of preparation for the adult world of employment. No wonder there is today a larger percentage of Americans on welfare and nearly 93 million still out of the workforce. The unemployment rate only is dropping because more people are leaving the labor force monthly who are still eligible to work.

My intentions in this article are two-fold. The first one is obvious in how I plan to provide information for three different services, one of which is printed in Cairo, Egypt about Hillary Clinton's involvement with the Muslim Brotherhood on behalf of President Obama and their initial designs for subjugating the American people to Sharia law. The second is to inform you how President Obama can in fact be arrested by order of Congress, and you will be interested to understand in how this was determined by the U.S. Supreme Court and why, plus which president it was directed at. There is a great deal to cover, and I will not waste further time delaying that which I am now seguing to.

Mohammad Morsi's Wife: Hillary Clinton was Involved with the Muslim Brotherhood:

It is important to note how the Muslim Brotherhood has not be declared by the federal government as a terrorist organization, and how the Obama administration supported monetarily former president of Egypt Mohammed Morsi's rise to power by way of a coup d'etat as opposed through a truly democratic process, which both claim to be true. I first read of this story in The Gateway Pundit where this information was provided. Of course, this would never be provided anywhere in the mainstream media, and likely not by Fox News unless it is concrete and absolute. But again, as I am not a professional journalist, I can take a few licenses in what I choose to use to report to you, my dear friends and readers, on the issues not just in America, but globally.

I again mentioned The Gateway Pundit breaking this news, and it is there where I will first give you its report:
Morsi’s Wife Threatens to Publish Letters Exposing Hillary Clinton’s ‘Special Relationship’ With Muslim Brotherhood

Posted by Jim Hoft on Thursday, August 14, 2014, 2:38 PM
Members of liberal and Christian political groups attacked visiting US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in 2012.  They accused the Obama Administration of cutting a ‘secret deal’ with Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.


Now the wife of former Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammad Morsi has threatened to expose Hillary Clinton’s “special relationship” with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Jihad Watch reported, via Free Republic:
The wife of former Egyptian president Muhammad Morsi is the latest Muslim Brotherhood “insider” to threaten to expose the special relationship between Morsi and the Obama administration—a relationship the latter insists never existed.

Nagla Mahmoud, Morsi’s wife, is reportedly angry at some statements recently made by Hillary Clinton, including that Morsi was “naïve” and “unfit for Egypt’s presidency,” as reported by Arabic media.

In the words of El-Mogaz News, Morsi’s wife “is threatening to expose the special relationship between her husband and Hillary Clinton, after the latter attacked the ousted [president], calling him a simpleton who was unfit for the presidency. Sources close to Nagla confirmed that she has threatened to publish the letters exchanged between Morsi and Hillary.”

The report continues by saying that Nagla accuses Hillary of denouncing her former close ally, the Brotherhood’s Morsi, in an effort to foster better relations with his successor, Egypt’s current president, Sisi—even though, as Nagla laments, “he [Morsi] was faithful to the American administration.”

Earlier, the son of Khairat al-Shatter—another top ranking Brotherhood member who was arrested during the June 2013 revolution that ousted Morsi—made similar assertions, threatening to expose documents that would “undermine his [U.S. president Obama’s] political future and land him in prison.”
____________________

So much for the most transparent administration in U.S. history. As I read stories over the years where Obama spoke on how he is the Commander-in-Chief of the world's most powerful military and how the federal government was, in fact, his government, or how his latest press secretary stated that Air Force One was the president's plane and not the taxpayer's, there is one truth that is undeniable: It is the most transparent dictatorship in our history. Usurpations aside, the fact he recently handed to the Qatari government some $11 billion to use towards defense spending and discretionary expenditures is not only troublesome since it funds Hamas, but because they have been harboring the Muslim Brotherhood's higher-ups since its government was toppled by the current regime in Cairo that has outlawed and executed several other key figures of the organization for crimes against the state.

Now, you ask where The Gateway Pundit was provided this information? From Cairo's news service El Mogaz-News. As I accessed it just an hour ago, I am still attempting to procure more information. Thus far, I have found the abstract of the article, and with Google Translate's app on your browser, the Arabic can in fact be transliterated into English:
Home 
Anchorage wife Hillary Clinton threatens to publish messages between them and isolated
447  128    Printable version
Wednesday August 13, 2014 - 16:56, wrote Tariq Shaltout
Science SUMMARY said Najla Muhammad's wife Marina had threatened to expose the special relationship between her husband and Hillary Clinton after the recent attack on the isolated and described Balsazj who was not fit for the presidency .. and sources close to Najla she threatened to publish letters exchanged between her husband and between Hillary Clinton, who pays tribute to his genius confirming that it was attacked by now nigh President of Sisi despite the fact that her husband was faithful to the American administration g outlet for Khthaa and with so betrayed him and sold him after the coup, which occurred by 3 July.
_________________

I accept this is a transcript and the link provided by both The Gateway Pundit and Jihad Watch only provide the actual abstract. However, the latter organization did provided a video of  Mohammed Morsi's recorded declaration that in fact, the president was involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, but unfortunately, the broadcast is not translated nor is there a transcript of what was said, and therefore it will not be provided. The next video involves Alex Jones, who I personally find a bit paranoid although some of his claims are coming to light, which the YouTube page describes as follows:
The Director of Research at the Brookings Doha Center, Shadi Hamid, tweets out about the Egyptian media depicting Obama as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Newspaper also claims that son of Muslim Brotherhood leader threatened Obama with release of "papers" revealing his MB membership. 

_______________

Provided on that YouTube page is the link to The Examiner, where it reported last September that the president and Mrs. Clinton have been indicted for collusion with the Muslim Brotherhood by the present leader, Sisi:
News Politics Government
Egypt has documents indicating Obama is part of the Muslim Brotherhood  
See also Government Barack Obama Erdogan Malik Obama Morsi
September 3, 2013
If you would like to receive further articles, please click on SUBSCRIBE.
Surprise, surprise, President Obama’s half brother, Malik Obama, oversees much of the finances of the Muslim Brotherhood, not just in Egypt but throughout the Mideast.
When Morsi was arrested last month, the Egyptian military discovered a pile of documents linking the Obama regime with the illegal activities of the Muslim Brotherhood. Investigative journalist Jerome Corsi has obtained a copy of the document held by the Egyptian military, proving the Obama regime sent millions of dollars in bribes to the Muslim Brotherhood, paid out by the U.S. Consulate.
Conveniently, the President’s brother…is one of the architects of the major investments of the Muslim Brotherhood and oversees an $8 billion dollar bribe to the Muslim Brotherhood made by the Obama regime. The bribe was payment to guarantee that the huge tract of Egyptian land, the Sinai Peninsula, be turned over to the Muslim Brotherhood sister group Hamas, The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas mince no words about their goals for Israel, which is total annihilation.
The former Chancellor of the Constitutional Court of Egypt and current adviser, Tahani Al-Jebali stated that the reason the United States cannot fight the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood is because the brother of U.S. President Barack Obama is the architect of the investments for the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.
According to Egypt Daily News, a document exists showing the eight billion dollar “holocaust” agreement with the Obama administration that was signed by former Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi and his second in command Khairat Al-Shater. Both are under arrest by the Egyptian military for murder and treason.
Obama’s close ties certainly explains our weapons and arms shipments to Egypt along with monetary aid. It may also explain why the Obama administration ignores the persecution of Christians in Egypt.
According to Khairat Al-Shater’s son, Saad Al-Shater, prior to being arrested by the Egyptian military, his father was in possession of information linking Obama with the Muslim Brotherhood that he says would put Obama in prison.
If the Egyptian military releases this document, it would no doubt spell the end of the Obama presidency, bringing impeachment, a long prison term, and perhaps even the death penalty.
_______________

Six names which cause reason for both interest and curiosity in their ties to the White House are below:
1) Arif Alikhan
  • Former deputy mayor of Homeland Security and Public Safety for the City of Los Angeles
  • Was responsible for derailing the LAPD's plan to monitor activities within the Los Angeles Muslim community
  • Was appointed as assistant secretary for the Office of Policy Development in Barack Obama’s Department of Homeland Security in 2009
  • Became a Professor of Homeland Security and Counterterrorism in 2010
In April 2009, President Barack Obama's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano appointed Alikhan as assistant secretary for DHS's Office of Policy Development. Hussam Ayloush, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations' Los Angeles branch, praised the "well-deserved"appointment.
Alikhan subsequently served as a prosecutor in the Los Angeles U.S. Attorney's office and taught law at the University of Southern California. He also spent time working for the U.S. Department of Justice as the overseer of its Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property Program. In 2002 Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa appointed Alikhan as Deputy Mayor of Homeland Security and Public Safety for the City of Los Angeles, a position he held until 2006.
Thirteen days prior to his DHS appointment, Alikhan, a devout Sunni Muslim, had participated in a Muslim Public Affairs Council fundraiser titled "Be the Change," to support that organization's leadership-development programs. 
In early June 2009, Alikhan spoke at a banquet/fundraiser for the Islamic Shura Council of Southern California (ISCSC). A noteworthy fellow speaker was Agha Saeed, who had previously defended Palestinian Islamic Jihadleader Sami Al-Arian during the latter's prosecution on terrorism charges. At the ISCSC event, Saeed lamented the "Islamophobia" allegedly pervading post-9/11 America, and demanded that the Justice Department stop monitoring U.S. mosques for evidence of extremism.
In November 2010 Alikhan stepped down from his DHS position and took a job as Distinguished Visiting Professor of Homeland Security and Counterterrorism at the National Defense University’s College of International Security Affairs in Washington, DC. 
Mohamed Elibiary 
  • Islamic cleric
  • Admirer of the late Ayatollah Khomeini 
  • Has advised numerous law-enforcement organizations on homeland security-related matters
  • Was named to President Obama's Homeland Security Advisory Council in 2010
  • Misused classified documents in an effort to promote the notion that “Islamophobia” was widespread
Mohamed Elibiary is a Texas-based Islamic cleric who founded Lone Star Intelligence LLC, a security crisis consulting firm, and the Freedom and Justice Foundation (F&J), a Muslim nonprofit group established in November 2002 to “promote a centrist public-policy environment in Texas by coordinating the state-level government and interfaith community relations for the organized Texas Muslim community.” F&J played a key role in successfully lobbying for the passage of Texas's Halal Food Law (the state's first Muslim consumer-protection statute), and for the institution of Islamic prayers (recited by Imams) in both chambers of the State Legislature.
Elibiary was a guest speaker at a December 2004 conference in Dallas, titled “A Tribute to the Great Islamic Visionary,” which was held in honor of the late Ayatollah Khomeini. When a reporter subsequently asked Elibiary to explain why he had chosen to appear at an event honoring the iconic jihadist, Elibiary claimed not to have known in advance about the conference's agenda. When journalist Rod Dreher of the Dallas Morning News voiced skepticism about Elibiary's explanation, the latter threatened Dreher, telling him: “Expect someone to put a banana in your exhaust pipe.” 
In 2006 Elibiary co-founded the North Texas Islamic Council, to coordinate the activities of the many mosques, Islamic schools, and community groups serving the Dallas-Fort Worth area's 150,000+ Muslim residents.
In a 2006 letter to the Dallas Morning News, Elibiary defended the profoundly anti-American early Muslim Brotherhood leader and theorist Sayyid Qutb, stating: “I’d recommend everyone read Qutb, but read him with an eye to improving America not just to be jealous with malice in our hearts.”
Notwithstanding his professed admiration for the likes of Khomeini and Qutb, Elibiary managed to cultivate a reputation as a moderate Muslim -- "the country's leading Muslim deradicalization expert," according to one media report. Indeed, he went on to advise numerous federal, state and local law-enforcement organizations on homeland security-related matters. In 2008–2009 Elibiary was a Fellow at the University of Southern California's American Muslim Civic Leadership Institute. And in December 2009, he helped establish the Texas Fusion Center Policy Council to help state and local law-enforcement personnel improve their information-sharing, analytical capabilities, and community relations.  
In October 2010, President Barack Obama's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano appointed Elibiary, who had recently begunworking with the Texas Department of Public Safety's (DPS) advisory board, to DHS's Homeland Security Advisory Council. 
In October 2011 it was reported that Elibiary had recently been given access to a highly sensitive DPS database (the Homeland Security State and Local Intelligence Community of Interest, or HS SLIC) containing hundreds of thousands of intelligence reports intended solely to aid law-enforcement agencies. In fact, Elibiary was the only Homeland Security Advisory Council member (out of 26) who was permitted to view the HS SLIC.
Elibiary abused this privilege, however, when he gathered together a number of classified documents that, in his view, promoted “Islamophobia,” and presented them to a left-leaning media outlet, in hopes that the latter would write a story about DPS's bias against Muslims. (He also sought to advance the notion that Texas governor Rick Perry was an "Islamophobe.") But the media outlet declined to do the story, saying: “We looked at the reports, and they weren’t as he [Elibiary] had billed them to us. They seem to be pretty straightforward, nothing remotely resembling Islamophobia that we saw. I think he was hoping we would bite and not give it too much of a look in light of the other media outfits jumping on the Islamophobia bandwagon.” 
In early November 2011, Elibiary’s access to the HS SLIC database was revoked. He retained his post as a Department of Homeland Security advisor, however. In September 2013 he was promoted to senior advisor at the Advisory Council, a title held only by a small number of select members. 
In October 2013, Elibiary said: “I do consider the United States of America an Islamic country with an Islamically compliant constitution.” What he meant was that the Constitution and Islamic law reflect the same values and principles. 
On more than one occasion in 2013, Elibiary opined that his close friend, former Holy Land Foundation president and CEO Shukri Abu Baker -- who had been convicted in 2008 of financing the terrorist organization Hamas -- was in fact an innocent victim of political persecution.
An advocate of the U.S. forging a partnership with the Muslim Brotherhood, Elibiary in June 2014 wrote on Twitter that it was “inevitable that [the] Caliphate returns” to the Middle East.

In addition to his DHS duties, Elibiary also serves as a spokesman for the Islamic Association of North Texas, a.k.a. the Dallas Central Mosque, which boasts the largest Muslim congregation in the state. He is also a member of the Intelligence and National Security Alliance, a lifetime member of the International Association of Business Communicators, and vice president of the FBI-Dallas Citizens’ Academy Alumni Association. 

  • Was named deputy associate counsel to President Barack Obama in 2009
  • Was appointed (by Obama) as a special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference in 2010
The son of Indian-born U.S. citizens, Rashad Hussain was born in Wyoming in 1978 and was raised in Plano, Texas. He holds a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and political science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, a master's degree in Arabic & Islamic studies from Harvard University, and a J.D. from Yale Law School. In the summer of 2000, he served as an intern in the office of Democratic congressman Richard Gephardt. 
In October 2000, Hussain spoke at a conference sponsored by the Association of Muslim Social Scientists and Georgetown University's Prince Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding. Titled “Islam, Pluralism, and Demoracy,” this gathering featured appearances by numerous leaders of the global Muslim Brotherhood, including such notables as Louay SafiJamal BarzinjiHisham Al-Talib, and AbdulHamid AbuSulayman. 
In June 2002, Hussain participated in a Congressional Staffers panel at theAmerican Muslim Council’s (AMC) 11th annual convention. At that time, AMC was headed by the Muslim Brotherhood leader Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted and incarcerated on terrorism charges.
In 2003 Hussain was a recipient of the Paul & Daisy Soros Fellowship for New Americans, which was founded by, and named after, George Soros's older brother and sister-in-law. 
After completing law school, Hussain worked as a legislative assistant for the House Judiciary Committee, then as a trial attorney at the Justice Department, and afterward as a law clerk to Judge Damon Keith on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Detroit, Michigan. 
 In 2004 Hussain wrote a major article in the Yale Law Journal stating that it was “difficult to assess” whether the U.S. government's post-9/11 counterterrorism initiatives “encroach upon” Americans' civil liberties, and “whether such initiatives enhance or undermine security.”
While attending Yale Law School, Hussain was a member of the organizing committee for an April 2004 conference held by Critical Islamic Reflections, a student group sponsored by the International Institute of Islamic Thought and the American Learning Institute for Muslims (ALIM). Among ALIM's instructors were such prominent Muslim Brotherhood figures as Tariq RamadanJamal Badawi, and Taha Al-Alwani. 
In September 2004, while still a Yale law student, Hussain took part in a session at the annual conference of the Muslim Students Association of the U.S. and Canada. Appearing alongside the daughter of Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian, Hussain characterized Al-Arian's recent prosecution on terrorism charges as “politically motivated persecution.”
In August 2008, Hussain published a paper (for the Brookings Institution) titled “Reformulating the Battle of ideas: Understanding the Role of Islam in Counterterrorism Policy.” A number of the paper's recommendations were consistent with the agendas and worldviews of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood. For example:
  • “Policymakers should reject the use of language that provides a religious legitimization of terrorism such as ‘Islamic terrorism’ and ‘Islamic extremist.’ They should replace such terminology with more specific and descriptive terms such as ‘Al-Qaeda terrorism.’”
  • “The United States should welcome and encourage the further development of mainstream Muslim organizations and moderate institutions.” (Specifically, Hussain's paper references the work of the Fiqh Council of North America, which is tied to the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.)
  • “The primary cause of broad-based anger and anti-Americanism is not a clash of civilizations but the perceived effect of U.S. foreign policy in the Muslim world.”
In January 2009, Hussain -- recruited by Cassandra Butts, advisor to (and former Harvard Law School classmate of) President Barack Obama -- was named deputy associate counsel to the President. In that position, Hussain focused on issues involving national security, new media, and outreach to the Muslim community. As Obama prepared for his June 2009 trip to Cairo, Hussain helped Ben Rhodes, the President's principal foreign-policy speechwriter, draft the address that Obama would deliver at Cairo's Al-Azhar University. According to Hussain, his own input was geared toward emphasizing the contributions that Muslims have made to American society, and clarifying the context behind some passages in the Koran.
Thirteen months later, Hussain, reflecting on Obama's Cairo address, characterized the speech as “[a framework] that recognizes that we cannot engage one-fourth of the world’s population [i.e., Muslims] based on the beliefs [i.e., jihadism] of just a fringe few and that our engagement can’t be limited to an issue like violent extremism [i.e., terrorism], but that it must be much broader than that.” 
In May 2009, Hussain spoke at a Leadership Summit of the Council for Advancement of Muslim Professionals (CAMP). Among the event's sponsoring organizations were Islamic Relief, Amana Mutual Funds, the Muslim Public Affairs Council, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, and the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding; each of these have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. 
On February 13, 2010, President Obama appointed Hussain as a special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference, a 57-country coalition that seeks to outlaw any and all criticism of Islamic people, practices, legal codes, and governments -- depicting such criticism as "Islamophobia." 
In August 2010, Hussain took part in an interfaith  "bridge-building" trip organized by the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Suhail Khan. Steven Emerson of the Investigative Project on Terrorism pointed out that "two of the Islamic leaders attending the trip ... had made anti-Semitic, radical Islamic statements or [had] justified terrorist attacks" on previous occasions.
It should be noted that, notwithstanding his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and its allies, Hussain endorses the use of the term “Hamas terrorists.” Further, he urges Muslim leaders to spread the message that genuine Islam forbids acts of terrorism and extremism. While aiming to “discredi[t] the terrorist ideology,” however, Hussain cautions against efforts to tie that objective to the imposition of democracy on Islamic nations; such efforts, says Hussain, could be perceived by Muslims as manifestations of an imperialistic mindset. Thus he proposes that the U.S. build a Muslim coalition “not limited to those who advocate Western-style democracy, and avoid creating a dichotomy between freedom and Islamic society.”  
  • Founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council
  • Accused Israelis of responsibility for the 9/11 attacks
  • Hamas and Hezbollah sympathizer
Salam Al-Marayati is the founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC), a Los Angeles-based Islamic advocacy group that defends Muslim extremist violence. MPAC has condemned the anti-terrorism measures of both the U.S. and Israel, and has called for a repeal of the Patriot Act. 
During a 1997 speech he delivered at the University of Pennsylvania, Al-Marayati equated the concept of jihad to the statements of the eighteenth-century American statesman Patrick Henry. Said Al-Marayat, "[T]he person who we think in America would epitomize jihad would be Patrick Henry, who said, 'Give me liberty or give me death.' That is a way of looking at the term jihad from an American perspective."
On the afternoon of September 11, 2001, Al-Marayati used a Los Angeles talk radio program as a forum in which to accuse the Israelis of responsibility for that morning's attacks on New York and Washington. Al-Marayati has also called for the U.S. government to unfreeze the assets of two Islamic charities, the Global Relief Foundation and the Holy Land Foundation, that were shut down by the government because of funding they had given to terrorist organizations. 
Al-Marayati refuses to call Hezbollah a terrorist group. "I don't think any group should be judged 100% this or that," he says. "I think every group is going to have . . . its claim of liberation and resistance." He has similarly justified Hamas' existence as a political entity that promotes social programs and "educational operations." "Yesterday's terrorists in the Middle East are today's leaders," he says. "The PLO is the number one example of this . . . The PLO 35 years ago was considered a terrorist organization, nobody should deal with them . . . But they became the people in authority, in Palestine, today. So Hamas today, the way it's being viewed, is exactly how the PLO was viewed 30 years ago. And in fact, even Hamas in terms of its social and educational operations is doing exactly what the PLO was doing 35 years ago, as well as its quote unquote military operations."
In October 2010, the Barack Obama administration picked Al-Marayati to represent the U.S. government at the annual Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe human-rights conference, known as the Human Dimension Implementation Meeting.
Mohamed Magid 
  • President of the Islamic Society of North America
  • Accused the Bush administration of waging a "war against Islam and Muslims"
  • Says that media references to jihad as “holy war” constitute a “misuse” of that term
  • Was named to President Obama's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2011
  • Persuaded DHS to erase from its "Countering Violent Extremism" curriculum any suggestion that Muslim terrorism draws its inspiration from the laws and doctrines of Islam
See also:  Islamic Society of North America
Born in northern Sudan in 1965, Mohamed Magid studied Islam under African Sunni scholars, one of whom was his own father, the Grand Mufti of Sudan. In 1987 Magid immigrated to the United States, where he took collegecourses in psychology and family counseling, and he taught classes on the Koran at Howard University in Washington, DC.  In 1997 Magid became imam of the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS), a mosque located in Sterling, Virginia. Soon thereafter, he became affiliated with the Islamic Society of North America(ISNA), first as its East Zone representative, then as vice president, and finally as president (a post to which he was elected in September 2010). He continues to head both ISNA and ADAMS to this day.
Ten days after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Magid, angered by what he perceived to be a growing anti-Muslim sentiment among the American people, belligerently told journalists: "We cannot be apologetic about being Muslims in this country ... We have a 
right to be Muslim."
In March 2002, federal agents raided the offices of many northern-Virginia-based Muslim organizations, including ADAMS, on suspicion that they were providing material support to terrorists. This initiative, known as "Operation Green Quest," was the largest investigation of terror-financing ever conducted anywhere in the world. Soon after the raids had been completed, Magid held a public meeting in the town of Sterling, where he encouraged "community building" among the groups that were being investigated. To this meeting, he invited such notables as Kit Gage of the National Coalition to Protect Political FreedomMahdi Bray, political advisor for the Muslim Public Affairs Council; and Nihad Awad, the pro-Hamas executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Awad told the outraged crowd: "This is a war against Islam and Muslims. Our administration [i.e., the Bush administration] has the burden of proving otherwise."
Notwithstanding his combative track record, Magid has cultivated, in media and political circles, an image as a moderate Muslim. The Huffington Post, for one, has dubbed him “America’s Imam.” In 2005 Time magazine published a lengthy profile of Magid, likewise depicting him as a voice of moderation who "work[s] closely with the FBI," "regularly opens doors for [FBI] agents trying to cultivate contacts in his Muslim community," and "alerts the bureau when suspicious persons approach his congregation." The Time report, however, angered many of Magid's Muslim constituents who viewed the FBI as their enemy. Consequently, Magid felt compelled to issue a "clarifying statement" explaining that his meetings with FBI personnel were intended mainly to "convey ... that our Muslim community needs to be treated as partners, not as suspects," and to "work with law enforcement to preserve our civil liberties and civil rights." Further, Magid emphasized that he and his fellow Muslim leaders did "not use these monthly meetings to report upon the activities of our community members."
Also in 2005, the ADAMS website displayed a list of speakers who had recently appeared at the mosque. Among these individuals were ADAMS chairmam Ahmed Tontonji, who was indicted in Operation Green Quest and was named as a defendant in a $1 trillion lawsuit filed by more than 600 surviving relatives of victims who had died in the 9/11 attacks, and Johari Abdul Malik, an Imam who had defended numerous Islamic radical and terrorist figures.
In 2011 President Barack Obama appointed Magid to serve on the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Countering Violent Extremism Working Group. In this position, Magid was authorized to train and advise personnel affiliated with the FBI and other federal agencies. He soon became a regular visitor to the White House, and merged as perhaps the most influential and sought-after Muslim authority in the United States. 
In his new DHS role, Magid, claiming that media references to jihad as “holy war” constituted a “misuse” of the term, asked Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez to: arrange for Magid to meet regularly with top Justice Department officials; allow Magid to reeducate FBI agents vis a vis Islam and its practitioners; and carefully avoid criticism of Islam, which Magid characterized as “religious bigotry and hate.” Magid and other Muslim lobbyists also persuaded government officials to ban the practice, at airports, of conducting the extra security checks on passengers traveling from a number of Islamic countries -- checks that had been instituted after a Nigerian Muslim tried to blow up a passenger plane on Christmas Day 2009.
In response to pressure from Magid and his fellow lobbyists, DHS carefully erased from its "Countering Violent Extremism" curriculum any suggestion that Muslim terrorism drew its inspiration from the laws and doctrines of Islam. In 2012, the FBI purged some 700 documents and 300 presentations from its training materials and lesson plans.
On March 8, 2013, Magid and ten religious leaders met with President Obama for a 90-minute conversation about immigration reform. Also present at the meeting was senior White House adviser Valerie Jarrett. Three days later, Magid took part in a meeting with Obama where the President listened to “recommendations” designed to help him prepare for his upcoming diplomacy trip to the Middle East.
In addition to his DHS work, Magid has also served with the National Security Council and has been a member of the FBI's Muslim, Sikh, and Arab Advisory Board.
For additional information on Mohamed Magid, click here.
Eboo Patel
Born November 9, 1975 in Mumbai, India, Eboo Patel was raised in Glen Ellyn, Illinois. After earning a bachelor's degree in sociology from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, he taught at an alternative-education program for high-school dropouts in Chicago and, inspired by Dorothy Day’s Catholic Worker Movement, established a cooperative living community for activists and artists in Chicago’s Uptown area.
Patel, a Muslim, went on to earn a doctorate in the sociology of religion from Oxford University. During his Oxford years, he ran interfaith youth projects in India, Sri Lanka, and South Africa. In 2002 Patel and a Jewish friend co-founded, with the help of a $35,000 grant from the Ford Foundation, the Chicago-based InterFaith Youth Corps (IFYC) as a forum where “service” could be used as a “bridge” to unite “young people from different faiths.” Patel remains IFYC's executive director to this day. 
In 2005 Patel and several young radicals co-authored the book Letters from Young Activists: Today’s Rebels Speak Out. Among Patel's co-authors were Chesa Boudin (the adopted son of former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers) and Ismail Khalidi (the son of Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi). The book's Preface was written by Ayers’ wife, Weather Underground co-founder Bernardine Dohrn. The back cover featured an endorsement from the convicted cop-killer and former Black Panther Party member Mumia Abu-Jamal. And on the Acknowledgments page, Patel and his fellow authors thanked Ayers personally for the “guidance” and “encouragement” he had provided.
In 2006 Patel published Building the Interfaith Youth Movement: Beyond Dialogue to Action. The book's Afterword was written by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, famous for having led an effort to construct a large mosque near the site of the 9/11 attacks in Manhattan.
In Patel's 2007 book, Saving Each Other, Saving Ourselves, the author recounts discussions that he had with Imam Rauf regarding the future of Islam in the United States. “Islam is a religion that has always been revitalized by its migration,” writes Patel. “America is a nation that has been constantly rejuvenated by immigrants. There is now a critical mass of Muslims in America.” The website of the American Society for Muslim Advancement, an organization co-founded by Rauf, once listed Patel as one of the top “Muslim Leaders of Tomorrow.”
In a 2007 interview with National Public Radio to promote his next newly published book, Acts of Faith, Patel was asked about the “affinity” he felt for the radicalism of Bill Ayers, as he described in the book. Noting that “I actually grew up in the same hometown that Bill Ayers did,” Patel replied: “I was kind of taught the same myths about America, a land of freedom and equality and justice, etc., etc. And then, when I got to college, I saw people eating out of garbage cans for dinner, and I saw Vietnam vets drinking mouthwash for the alcohol, and I thought to myself, this is not the myth that I grew up with.” This harsh reality, Patel said, caused him to feel enormous “rage,” and he credited the “faith-based movement” for having helped him “direc[t] that rage in a direction far more compassionate and far more merciful—with the Catholic Worker Movement.” “Had [I] been one of the people involved in the Weather Underground who were sitting at my kitchen table when I was 18 years old and raging,” said Patel, “my life could have been very different.”
In a June 2008 interview with the leftist evangelical ministry Sojourners, Patel reiterated the sense of rage he had felt upon realizing that “everything you were taught was wrong—about fairness, about equality, about Christopher Columbus, about Thomas Jefferson.” He elaborated that the faith movement had given him a “way to have a radical view of the world—radical equality, radical peace, radical possibility—that is love-based, not anger-based.”
In February 2009, Patel was appointed to President Barack Obama's Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships.
In an October 2009 article in Newtopia magazine, a liberal cultural publication, Patel asserted that “Muslim totalitarians” were not all that different from “the Christian totalitarians in America,” “the Jewish totalitarians in Israel,” or “the Hindu totalitarians in India.”
In late July 2011, Patel spoke at the main event of a three-day convention held by the Muslim Students Association. Specifically, he participated in a panel alongside Tariq Ramadan (grandson of Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasan al-Banna) and Siraj Wahhaj (who was named as a possible co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing).
In 2011 Patel depicted Van Jones, the revolutionary communist who had served several months as President Obama's “green jobs” czar, as an “American patriot,” a “faith hero,” and one of “the true giants of history.”

Patel is a regular contributor to the Washington Post, National Public Radio, and CNN. He has blogged for the Huffington Post, USA Today, and Sojourners, among other outlets. Moreover, he has served on the Council on Foreign Relations' religious advisory committee, the Aga Khan Foundation's national committee, and the Duke University Islamic Studies Center's advisory board. He is a fellow of the Ashoka Foundation, and has spoken in such major venues as the Clinton Global Initiative and the Nobel Peace Prize Forum. 
_______________________________

This six gentlemen have two things in common. One is how they are each academics, or professors as major universities in the U.S., or have served in those capacities in the past. The second is they have or are still serving as community organizers. Marxism is a wonderful cover to employ the spread of any ideology, as well as having wealthy benefactors to financially support these endeavors. The Islamic American Society is a confirmed terrorist conduit for funneling money from the U.S., and below you will see that the Islamic American Vote saw donations from one of the Obama aliases, and was subsequently shut down by the federal government. ***

Malik Obama, again, is the president's brother you neither hear nor read much about. That will change also because I am going to provide you with an interview with the British media outlet The Daily Mail which was conducted last fall as well with Malik Obama. What you will read will disgust you and question the Democratic Party's true intent upon the GOP's waging the war on women:
My little brother Barack Obama: He's had 12 wives, is accused of beating one of them and wants to be President (of Kenya). Meet Obama's VERY outspoken sibling
First interview with Malik Obama who claims he's also destined for greatness
Suffered defeat in election last week in bid for political power in Kenya
Brothers were best man at each other's weddings and remain in contact
Visits White House yearly and said Barack is always 'at the end of a phone'
Accountant claims he is misunderstood because he is a Muslim and black 
Said 'famous brother' has made him target of 'hatred, racism and bigotry'
Claimed US President could do more for Kenyan family by sending money
Described allegations that he beats one of his wives as 'b******t'
By ANGELLA JOHNSON
PUBLISHED: 17:00 EST, 9 March 2013 | UPDATED: 17:00 EST, 9 March 2013

Brotherly love: The young Barack was the best man at the first of his older brother Malik's 12 weddings and the two maintain a close relationship
Brotherly love: The young Barack was the best man at the first of his older brother Malik's 12 weddings and the two maintain a close relationship

For the briefest moment, Malik Obama’s eyes reflect resentment through the lenses of his metal- framed glasses.
He is fed up with people criticising him for trying to cash in on his younger half-brother’s famous name. ‘It’s also my name and my birthright. Let’s not forget that I was born before him,’ he says.
Barack may have made history as the first black President of the United States, but he is not, Malik suggests, the only member of the family destined for greatness.
For it was drummed into Malik, from a very early age, that he was special and therefore expected to make his mark in this world.
‘My father instilled that in all of us,’ he says. ‘He used to say, “No matter what, you are the very best, because I’m from the best stock. Always keep that in your mind.”
‘And, to be honest, sometimes the only thing that has kept me going was the fact that I’m an Obama; therefore I am somebody.’
Last week, the 54-year-old was forced to fall back on this restorative mantra after suffering a crushing defeat in his bid for political power in Kenya.
He stood as an independent candidate for the governorship of Siaya County in the national elections.
As if that humiliating public drubbing wasn’t enough to contend with, Malik – a practising Muslim – also faces allegations that he is a wife-beater and a philanderer who seduced 17-year-old Sheila Anyango with sweet words and a gift of £24, then made her his 12th wife when she was under the age of consent.
She has said: ‘Marrying him [three years ago] has been the biggest mistake of my life. He beats me, but mostly he’s just nasty and quarrelsome.’ She is not the first spouse to accuse him of abuse.
I find Malik licking his wounds at his base at the Barack H Obama Recreation And Rest Area on the outskirts of Kogelo, the dusty, remote village that is the family’s ancestral home.
But he’s always at the end of a phone line if I want to talk.
‘I last saw him on November 19 last year, shortly after the US election. I went to the White House and offered him my congratulations.
‘We are close but don’t live in each other’s pockets. I don’t have to be at every big party. I’ve not seen Michelle in a while.
I saw her and the children at the last inauguration, but it was very busy, so we didn’t have time to talk. I can’t say that I have a relationship with my nieces.’
Dictator's friend: Malik Obama pictured with the Colonel Gaddafi of Libya. Malik revealed that he tried to intervene in American's handling of the Libya struggle through his brother but Barack 'wasn't interested'
Dictator's friend: Malik Obama pictured with the Colonel Gaddafi of Libya. Malik revealed that he tried to intervene in American's handling of the Libya struggle through his brother but Barack 'wasn't interested'
An accountant by profession, Malik describes himself as an independent financial adviser for several American and international companies.
He complains that he is maligned and misunderstood because he is a Muslim and a black man. His voice is deep, with an American twang – he has lived in Washington since 1985 and divides his time between there and Kogelo.
‘Having a famous brother has made me a target of hatred, racism and bigotry against my religion,’ he says. ‘I recently asked Barack what advice he could give me about dealing with all the negativity. 
He just laughed and replied, “You’re a big boy. You’re my elder brother, you can take it. Anyway, it’s only four more years.” ’ 
By then Malik is hoping to have raised enough money to make a bid for the Kenyan presidency, due to be contested in five years.
Some might question his motives, but he says Barack has been encouraging. ‘Back in 2011, when I told him about my plans, he said to go for it. His only advice was that I should be honest, sincere – and to have a thick skin.’
Malik reveals how he once tried to use his family ties to change the shape of international politics – by pleading with his brother to save Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi after his people turned against him in 2011.
‘I went to see my brother and I said look, this is somebody I know and it’s terrible what is going on. Let’s see if we can talk to him and find some kind of rapprochement. He wasn’t interested.

'He didn’t want to know, which was very disappointing. But he did tell me that he shook Gaddafi’s hand when they met at a conference in Rome.’
Then he chides Barack for not doing enough to help his Kenyan relatives.
‘I’m very proud of my brother, but I would like for him to do a little bit more for the family on this side. I would like to say he could send some money. I give money when asked. That’s what family is for. We’re not well off, though people think we are.’
Praise: Michelle Obama on her first visit to Alego, Kenya, before her marriage to Barack. Malik described her as a 'great First Lady'
Praise: Michelle Obama on her first visit to Alego, Kenya, before her marriage to Barack. Malik described her as a 'great First Lady'
He is eager to position himself as patriarch. It is, he says, his right  as the first-born Obama sibling.
Malik was just one in 1959 when his father, Barack Obama Senior, left  his wife Kezia to take up a scholarship at the University of Hawaii. Malik’s sister Auma, two years younger, appears to have been conceived when his father was home on holiday. Kezia, now 72, later studied in America and lives in Bracknell, Berkshire.
In America, Barack Sr met and married Ann Dunham, an anthropologist from Kansas. But soon after she gave birth to the future US President he abandoned her and returned to Kenya.
Interviewed: Malik Obama talks to the Mail on Sunday's Angella Johnson at The Barack Obama Foundation, near the western Kenyan village of Kogelo
Interviewed: Malik Obama talks to the Mail on Sunday's Angella Johnson at The Barack Obama Foundation, near the western Kenyan village of Kogelo
There were other women and other children, before he descended into alcoholism after a car crash left him  disabled. The President is said to have struggled to come to terms with the fact his eight brothers and sisters have four different mothers.
Malik recalls: ‘My father came back in 1964 and we lived here in Kogelo, before moving to Nairobi. He was the senior manager at the Kenya Tourist Development Agency, which was a very good job. We had the very best of everything – a nice car, a lovely house, and servants.
‘But we lost it all after the accident in 1971 because he couldn’t work. I was going to one of the best private schools, but I suddenly I had to walk ten miles to get there.
‘There were times when we didn’t even have money for food. I had to scrounge meals from family members. It was tough to see my father’s disintegration. He died at 46, without ever realising objectives. Just by being alive I’ve already achieved something he didn’t.’
After graduating from the University of Nairobi with a degree in accountancy, Malik worked in Nairobi until 1985, when he moved to America.
‘Barack made contact soon after I started living in Washington and flew from Chicago, to meet me,’ he says. ‘I knew about him from the beginning, because my father used to talk about him a lot.’
Malik, who runs a small electronics shop a half-hour’s drive outside Washington, says there is nothing wrong in using his name as a force for change – but he adds that his brother’s family is not involved.
‘They’re hands-off,’ he said. ‘They’re not involved in what I’m doing. He’s doing his thing, he’s the President of United States. I am Malik Obama, doing this thing.’
He claims to have raised nearly $100,000 for his foundation, a charity set up to in 2008 to ‘do good for Kogelo’. 
But there have been questions about where the money has gone. A probe was launched over cash owed to the US taxman from his fund-raising activities. Much of the money raised had come from Malik’s Muslim connections in Saudi Arabia, Libya, Sudan and Yemen.
‘These people were happy that my brother is the President of the United States,’ he says. ‘So they invited me to conferences. I saw it as a chance to use my name in a good cause.’ 
Centre: The Barack Obama Foundation, which doubles as a recreation centre and foundation, near the western Kenyan village of Kogelo
Centre: The Barack Obama Foundation, which doubles as a recreation centre and foundation, near the western Kenyan village of Kogelo
He especially liked Gaddafi, whom he met about half a dozen times.
Moving on to the accusations about his domestic life, he vehemently denies the claims against him.
‘I don’t beat my wives, as has been alleged. It’s all b******t. I categorically deny the allegations said to have come from my wife,’ he says. 
‘Sheila went back to her mother’s home the other day after she had a row with a co-wife in the family compound. I don’t wish to go into the details, but it was between the two women, nothing to do with me.
‘She came to the polling booth with me last Monday and said she still loves me. I’m sure she will be home when she’s ready.’
One local man told me later that it was common knowledge that when any of his wives becomes ‘troublesome’ or demanding she is ‘let go’.
Malik insists he is a fair man.  ‘There have been 12 wives since my first marriage in 1981, when Barack was my best man. I have done my best with all of them, along with the children.’ He won’t, however, say how many he has.
When I ask about the reactions of the President and First Lady to his polygamous life, he shrugs and grins slyly. ‘They’ve never commented  to me about it. They keep their thoughts on such matters to themselves. But they are happy that I’m a proud Muslim.’ 
Denial: He categorically denied reports that he beats one of his 12 wives
And there is indeed some evidence for that. In his memoir, Barack recalls the wedding day, writing: ‘The person who made me proudest was Roy [the name he uses for Malik]. He converted to Islam, and has sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol. [His] new lifestyle has left him lean and clear-eyed. 
'At the wedding he looked so dignified in his black African gown with white trim and matching cap that some of our guests mistook him for my father.’
Malik says: ‘Some people go on about me being a Muslim, as if it somehow impacts on my brother’s politics. That is my faith, not his, but he respects it.
‘I would describe my relationship with Barack is a normal brotherly one, except that he’s got a country to run. And I think he’s doing a very good job on that score.’
For all his political inexperience Malik is convinced he is the man to end corruption, rampant poverty and financial mismanagement in Kenya. He says: ‘The Obama name will help to attract the kind of international investment that would bring industry and jobs.
‘I am already showing the way through my foundation. I’m building concrete bridges in the village, putting up power lines, providing homes for widows.’
He hopes of running for governor will have raised his international profile. ‘I’m not deterred by this  initial political setback,’ he says.
‘Don’t be surprised if, in five years’ time, there is another president with the name Obama.’
________________________

Little Brother Barack appears to have declared Malik persona non grata. He is an embarrassment to the president; he is also politically-damaging. If the general public knew about Malik Obama, that he has been running money, arms and munitions for the Muslim Brotherhood, what then would become of the president? Since family members cannot cause a sitting president to be charged with a crime simply by his blood relationship to the individual, the proof would be need is at least two people who witnessed what exactly transpired. The entire Egyptian government may be all that is necessary, as well as Mohammed Morsi's wife and son, to engage the military or Congress in one or both arresting the president for treason and war crimes.

Denial: He categorically denied reports that he beats one of his 12 wivesThere is a photograph of President Obama's hometown in Kenya on display in the above article. If the president is indeed not a Kenyan citizen by birth, why would the nation care to honor him in this way, or the late Libyan Muammar Gaddafi to state he is from Kenya? Gadhafi hated Israel as have most Arab State leaders; this is nearly an absolute among all rulers of these Islamic states. And for Obama to engage as The Examiner claims in a "holocaust" plot between the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas on the Sinai Peninsula where Israel is located is revealing only that he is intent upon achieving the fall of Zion and the reacquisition of this land for Islamic states. More of this information is available on the links provided in that article of course, but for convenience sake, will be provided to you below.

Uncovered Muslim Brotherhood Documents Could Put Obama in Prison

In early 2012, Muslim Brotherhood presidential candidate Mohammed Morsi pranced around Egypt proclaiming “Jihad is our path,” and thought there was nothing better than to die in the cause of Allah—that is, the exact language used by terrorists!
Despite this, Barack Obama gushed on national television after Morsi was elected President of Egypt. And oddly—or not so oddly—Obama continued to gush over Morsi while reports surfaced that the Muslim Brotherhood were setting up torture chambers for their political enemies, not to mention openly crucifying Christians!
When Morsi was deposed, the Egyptian military discovered a treasure trove of documents linking the Obama regime with the illegal activities of the Muslim Brotherhood.
One such document is a list of Muslim Brotherhood officials receiving secret bribes in U.S. currency, paid out by the U.S. consulate, amounting to millions of dollars.
Investigative journalist Jerome Corsi has obtained a copy of the document held by the Egyptian military, proving the Obama regime sent millions of dollars in bribes to the Muslim Brotherhood.
But who was managing all of this money? Did the Muslim Brotherhood walk around with hundreds of thousands of dollars in their pockets?
Enter Malik Obama, Obama’s half brother. According to Egyptian television, citing the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt:
The President’s brother…is one of the architects of the major investments of the Muslim Brotherhood.
We’re not just talking about the bribes the Muslim Brotherhood received in Egypt, but the entire Muslim Brotherhood finances—worldwide—that more than likely included an astounding $8 billion dollar bribe to the Muslim Brotherhood made by the Obama regime. The bribe was payment to guarantee that the huge tract of Egyptian land, the Sinai Peninsula, be turned over to the Muslim Brotherhood sister group Hamas, undoubtably to put Israel in an indefensible position. The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas mince no words about their goals for Israel: total annihilation.
According to Egypt Daily News, a document exists showing the eight billion dollar  “holocaust” agreement with the Obama administration that was signed by former Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi and his second in command Khairat Al-Shater, both under arrest by the Egyptian military for murder and treason.
Does this document really exist, showing the $8 billion dollar bribe signed by Obama or one of his representatives?
Undoubtably.
According to Khairat Al-Shater’s son, Saad Al-Shater, prior to being arrested by the Egyptian military, his father was in possession of information linking Obama with the Muslim Brotherhood that he says would put Obama in prison.
As reported by a multitude of Arabic news sources:
In an interview with the Anatolia News Agency, Saad Al-Shater, the son of a Muslim Brotherhood leader, the detained Khairat Al-Shater said that his father had in his hand evidence that will land the head of United States of America, President Obama, in prison.
If the Egyptian military releases this document, it would no doubt spell the end of the Obama presidency, bringing impeachment, a long prison term, and perhaps even the death penalty.
_______________________

The actions throughout the president's tenure entail his intentions to cripple the nation by first legal statute, then through illegal measures and through racial divisions unseen since prior to Rosa Parks' epic sit in on the bus in Selma, AL. In a future blog very soon, I will discuss what currently have been four major racial extremist organizations in the U.S. to appear in the rioting in Ferguson, MO - and which ones have connections to Hamas and other Islamic states.

As for Egypt Daily News, it too will be reported below:
SHOCKER: Secret $8 billion deal between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood
Below is a summary of the video in Arabic that reveals an agreement made between Barack Obama and Mohamed Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood, to give 40% of Sinai to Hamas in exchange for $8 billion has already been paid to Morsi by Obama.
No wonder Obama is asking the Egyptian Army to release Morsi: Obama has asked for the release mohamed-morsi
• SECRET agreement between the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood (not the Egyptian government) to give 40% of the Sinai and the annexation of that part of Egyptian territory in Gaza. The objective is to facilitate the conclusion of a comprehensive peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians 
• This agreement was signed by Khairat el Shater (number 2 of the Brotherhood) by Morsi and the Supreme Guide of the Mulsim Brotherhood.
• A sum of U.S. $ 8 billion was paid in exchange for the land. 
• An investigation is ongoing Morsi and El Shater. An arrest warrant was filed against the Guide to MB and other members of his office. 
• MB signatories to the agreement are liable to the death penalty for treason. 
• The Obama administration would try to reach an agreement with El Sissi (Defense Minister): recognition of the legitimacy of the “coup” in exchange for his silence about the secret agreement. But El Sissi would be more interested in the conviction of MB and discredit their organization which is Egypt’s main source of danger. 
• The Republican members of Congress are seriously looking into the case. If proven, the process of Obama impeachment could be triggered.
 ____________________

The Obama administration and the Democrats in Congress are all frightened about the president's impeachment. The issue therein lies as in this question: What are they afraid of? Why are they afraid if he has done nothing illegal? In the famous words of legendary Tennessee U.S. Senator Howard Baker who just passed away last month, you might want to ask the following: What did the president know and when did he know it? Baker was a GOP U.S. Senator, but not a conservative in the character of Ronald Reagan, although both worked very closely together during his tenure as Senate Majority Leader and during the Iran Contra Scandal. Baker called B.S. when he saw it, and it did not matter who the individual in office happened to be nor the political party affiliation. As the Democratic Party since 2000 has taken root as a cult-like faction, you might be able to explain why most inside the Beltway and in the most socialist of states blindly follow where he pulls them harshly by the leash. As was stated above, the news that Mohammed Morsi sold 40% of the Sinai Peninsula to the Obama administration is the heading in Arabic on the following YouTube pay. You should be able to access this plus play the actual video below that, unfortunately, is delivered in Arabic as well. The highlights of the video are summarized above in the article from Egypt Daily News, so you should not be entirely lost:


______________________

Walid Shoebat, the esteemed former PLO member and Christian convert released the following information on his website, which will be provided below, including video evidence which, again, are spoken in Arabic, display the actual recorded evidence that such transactions occurred:






Egyptian Official Ties Obama’s Brother To Brotherhood
by  on August 19, 2013 in General
Egyptian government and mainstream media has reported a major development regarding the role of Barack Obama’s brother (presumably, his half-brother Malik Obama) with the Muslim Brotherhood. As we have reported before, Malik is a member of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO), an arm of the Sudanese government, which is led by President Omar al-Bashir, who is himself a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.
These facts would lend credibility to the following claims from Egypt. It is also important to note that August 25th is a very key date in Egypt; it is when imprisoned Muslim Brotherhood leaders go on trial there.
The former Chancellor of the Constitutional Court of Egypt and current adviser, Tahani Al-Jebali stated that the reason the United States cannot fight the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood is because the brother of U.S. President Barack Obama is the architect of the investments for the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Tahani Al-Jebali: Obama’s brother a Muslim Brotherhood investment architect



Jebali stated she would like…
“…to inform the American people that their president’s brother Obama is one of the architects of the major investments of the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
She added…
“We will carry out the law and the Americans will not stop us. We need to open the files and begin court sessions. The Obama administration cannot stop us; they know that they supported terrorism. We will open the files so these nations are exposed, to show how they collaborated with them [the terrorists]. It is for this reason why the American administration fights us.”

Jebali also appeared on Egyptian television to explain how important this news is to Americans who are concerned about their President’s actions, saying it “is a gift to the American people”, implying there is much more to come:

She noted that the cost to Egypt has been great and that her country will not allow any conspiracy against its people, the Egyptian state or any one of the members of the Security Council. Leading Egypt to Chapter 7 is unacceptable and would plunge her country into a dire state similar to that which exists in Iraq and Libya.
If these reports are correct, Turkey appears to play a central role in the conspiratorial nature of this activity and that Egypt has asserted to the international community that it will not tolerate such activity.
This information is reported by three very credible Arabic sources. [1] [2] [3]
Again, based on what we already know about Malik Obama’s affiliations, that he is a key player relative to international Muslim Brotherhood investments isn’t a shock at all.
See for yourself (again, our calls to Obama sycophant George Clooney have gone unanswered):

One person who may want to give very serious thought to singing like a canary is Lois Lerner. Her signature is at the bottom of Malik Obama’s tax-exempt approval letter. Lerner illegally granted Malik’s foundation retroactive tax exempt status, backdating it 38 months when the law prohibits doing so further back than 27 months.
On top of that, Malik may be tied to international Muslim Brotherhood investments?!
For more on Malik Obama, click here.
**UPDATE on August 19, 2013 at 8:30pm EST**Al-Wafd, another prominent Arabic source is reporting similar news. Under the title, “Obama’s Brother is Muslim Brotherhood” and on Egypt’s National Television, (Tahani Al-Jebali) stated:
“There are many reasons why the United States does not take a strong stand against the Muslim Brotherhood.”
One such reason, which she says is a gift to the American people, is that Obama’s brother is a major operative with the Muslim Brotherhood in that he is the conduit for funneling monies for the organization.
She also added…
“Documents from the Egyptian national security must be brought into the light in order to confirm that this international organization (Muslim Brotherhood) shows exchanges with the CIA so as to reach the power center of (Egypt).”
Our work has unequivocally demonstrated that Malik Obama works with Muslim Brotherhood leaders.
______________________

And there you go. Why is Lois Lerner such a public figure of interest, and why is the Obama administration intent upon protecting her interests legally and stonewalling the investigation through Eric Holder? You now know. 

________________________

Ladies and gentlemen, for the first time in my memory aside from Jordan, the U.S. has an ally in the Arab world, and it is Egypt. They are not only supportive of America, but to our dearest friends alongside the British, Israel. Israel is threatened since America now has sovereign territory along the Sinai Peninsula as real estate sold to the president by the Muslim Brotherhood, who fund Hamas and support the Islamic State and Boko Haram. The danger is real; the proof is there. The need for the Egyptian government to finally release these documents is all that awaits the president's arrest, not impeachment. Again, this will be covered below.

From one source, El Bashaye Online, you should be able to receive the English transliteration:
Sunday August 18, 2013 10:28:19 PM - The number of readers in 2897
Said Chancellor graduates Vice President of the Constitutional Court, the former The Egyptian state is facing a blueprint price is paid by the Egyptian people and the destiny claim that faces this very firmly and that is preparing an appropriate response to the level of the United Nations and the African Organization and the European Union. And she gave Jabali information for citizens Americans did the brother of President Obama's non- brother is one of the architects of investments in the international regulation of the Brotherhood and followed graduates that the American position conspirator against Egypt, stressing the existence of position more solid with the American side, so be rejected extortion to cross Egypt's crossing of the second without looking at the ceiling American as a standard of what is happening in Egypt. noted Jabali that Egypt paid a lot in all areas to the United Nations, including not allowing a conspiring against the Egyptian people or the Egyptian state or to one of the members of the Security Council to put Egypt under Chapter VII to happen to us what happened in Iraq and Libya, describing the Turkish role as a conspiratorial, where he met the organization International confirmed that Egypt would not tolerate a prejudice its national security at this level. 
Again, read where Turkey is involved, and why in the history of U.S./Turkish relations in the post-Ottoman era, former president Bill Clinton and current-President Obama are the only ones recorded to have either visited or hosted the Turkish head of government more than any other president:
GuestHostPlace of visitDate of visit
Turkey Prime Minister Bülent EcevitUnited States President Bill ClintonWhite HouseWashington, D.C.September 27, 1999
United States President Bill ClintonTurkey President Süleyman DemirelÇankaya KöşküAnkaraNovember 15, 1999
Turkey President Ahmet Necdet SezerUnited States President Bill ClintonWhite HouseWashington, D.C.September 4, 2000
United States President Barack ObamaTurkey President Abdullah GülAnkara and IstanbulApril 6-April 7, 2009
Turkey Prime Minister Recep Tayyip ErdoğanUnited States President Barack ObamaWhite HouseWashington, D.C.May 16, 2013
 __________________

Terrorism has been a key component historically with the Turks. Along the same point when Clinton was in the White House was the height of the bin Laden hunt, which Clinton admitted he let him slip away on September 10, 2001 in order to prevent Kandahar from being wiped out. He let his conscience for a few hundred villagers slaughter nearly 3,000 American civilian lives and thousands of our armed forces personnel, not to mention millions of Islamists due to the War on Terror. The partnership, strategic of course in nature, involves Turkish contributions to stabilise Iraq and Afghanistan and highlighting the strategic importance of the İncirlik Air Base in Adana used by both US and NATO forces for operations in the region. And I would say they gained stability and solvency in Iraq to where the formation of the Islamic State's new caliphate has now taken flight as advances in Syria to wipe out rebel forces and slaughtering Christian and Yazidi villages continue to occur despite the feckless airstrikes.

From El Bilad , another Arabic news medium from Algeria:
Chancellor graduates: Obama's brother, one of the architects of the Muslim BrotherhoodViews: 515 0 0 Last Updated: 00:37 | 19/8/2013Author: country Online / Agencies
5Revealed graduates member of the Constitutional Court of the Egyptian people and the American news-caliber during a meeting with state television, Egyptian, where she said that "the brother of President Obama, one of the architects of the Muslim Brotherhood." 
and said congratulations: "I dedicate to the American people that the brother of president Obama one of the architects major investments for the organization of international Muslim Brotherhood ", noting that it would like to alert the American people to this truth. 
congratulations also showed that the American people do not want to be the state-sponsored terrorism.
___________________

I apologize again for the very crude translations; the Google Translate service does so verbatim rather than through colloquialisms. The links are again provided for you view at your discretion.

Al-Akhbar provided this, in referencing Egypt Daily News, for all to read. It, too, is an Egyptian paper:
EGYPT NEWS TODAY: GRADUATES: OBAMA'S BROTHER, ONE OF THE ARCHITECTS OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD Added on: 2013/08 / Section 19.: latest news Egypt Today - Source: Monitoring

Court of the Egyptian people and the American news-caliber during a meeting in television Egyptian official, where she said that the brother of President Obama, one of the architects Muslim Brotherhood. 
  said congratulations: I dedicate to the American people that the brother of president Obama one of the architects major investments for the organization of the International Brotherhood , noting that it would like to alert the American people to this truth. 
  congratulations also showed that the American people do not want to be in the state sponsoring terrorism.

 _____________________

Two Egyptian papers reported this, but so did the Tunisians. Political tit-for-tat can really be inconvenient for any politician, right-wing or on the left. If Obama hung a nation out to dry or fund its nation being destroyed illegally through terrorist cells, he is now preparing to swing from the gallows himself. 

***

The Obama Administration and the Democratic Party's Money Trail:

In recent days, I have read many of your comments on prior articles detailing the president's engaging in sponsoring terrorism through clandestine and, in the case of Sec. of State John Kerry, very public portrayals of the administration's inexplicable betrayal of our allies in Israel. Zion is on the fringe to be destroyed; yet today, Obama is reported by Egyptians to have just pumped $100 million into the nation to use for defense. Why the dartboard diplomacy? 

If one can track of the money trail, which many of you mentioned and wisely so, much can be explained at least regarding relationships. As this is indeed true, I used a campaign donation list to determine what, if anything, is being donated by the last name of Obama. Nothing tying a donor to the president's specific name would seem odd, but then a man named David Obama and another in Dr. David Obama, both residing in Maryland but at different zip codes, contributed the following:

Search Results
  
Download this List
To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type
Contribution Amount$450
Record Count2
  
Download this List
To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type
Name/LocationEmployer/Occupation$ Amount ContributedContributed ToPrimary/
General
Date
OBAMA, DAVID
SILVER SPRING, MD 20910
 --$250MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL COMMITTEE - DEMOCRATG01/28/2014
OBAMA, DAVID
OLNEY, MD 20832
Self/Self Employed$200DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE - DEMOCRATP11/06/2013

__________________

Coincidence? Perhaps. But how close in proximity are these towns, and are they related to the president? Wikipedia's article on Silver Spring in Maryland, which understand I attempt to avoid this resource as it can be altered by anyone on any article with any details, states this:
As an unincorporated area, Silver Spring's boundaries are not officially defined. As of the 2010 Census the United States Census Bureau defines Silver Spring as a census-designated placewith a total area of 7.92 square miles (20.5 km2), all land; however, it does contain numerous creeks and small lakes. This definition is a 15% reduction from the 9.4 sq. mi. used in previous years. The United States Geological Survey locates the center of Silver Spring at 38°59′26″N 77°1′35″W, notably some distance from the Census Bureau's datum. By another definition, Silver Spring is located at 39°0′15″N 77°1′8″W (39.004242, -77.019004).[4] The definitions used by the Silver Spring Urban Planning District, the United States Postal Service, the Greater Silver Spring Chamber of Commerce, etc., are all different, each defining it for its own purposes.
Residents of a large swath of South-Eastern Montgomery County have Silver Spring mailing addresses. This area extends roughly from the Washington, D.C.Prince George's County, Maryland and Howard County, Maryland lines to the south, east and north, and Rock Creek Park and Plyers Mill Road to the west and north-west. These boundaries make Silver Spring larger in area than any city in Maryland except for Baltimore. Some notable landmarks are the world headquarters of Discovery Communications, the AFI Silver Theatre, the NOAA headquarters, the headquarters of the Seventh-day Adventist Church and the national headquarters of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.
 ______________________

The national headquarters for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community? How ironic! Is this organization tied to terrorist cells anywhere globally? The Ahmadi sect is the organization which attempted to stop the 9/11 Memorial from mentioning that Islamic extremists were responsible, and as this is a long article, I will merely provide you the link from Jihad Watch. As a historian with a political background, I detest those who attempt to revise the history books. The organization attempted to do so, and they were thwarted in their effort to spit upon the graves of those who died senselessly.

When I searched for "Ahmadiyya Muslim Community" on the site, I could not find anything leading to the organization regarding suspicious funding destinations. However, in simplifying my search to "Muslim", I located the following, the latter one of which you might find interesting for the above-mentioned Afgen Sheikh:
2 RECORDS
NameContact Address$ Expenses$ Receipts
Michigan Muslim Democratic Caucusc/o Shahid Tahir30600 Telegraph Rd., Suite 2226
Bingham Farms, MI 48025
00
Muslim American Vote14403 Saturn Way
Boyds, MD 20841
00

With regards to specifically addressing the Muslim American Vote, the site stated this:
Organization Info
Group NameMuslim American Vote
Stated PurposeWe advocate for candidates who, first and foremost, support economic policies that generate American jobs and invest in the American economy. We support candidates who believe in the importance of fairness and equal opportunity for access to health care and investing in our education infrastructure to ensure America's position as a global leader.
Email Addressinfo@muslimamericanvote.org
Established Date07/27/2012
Contact PersonAfgen Sheikh
Contact Address14403 Saturn Way
Boyds, MD  20841
Mailing Address14403 Saturn Way
Boyds, MD  20841
Contributions Received
(since 07/27/2012)
$0
Expenditures Made
(since 07/27/2012)
$0



The information on Afgen Sheikh is juicy, and perhaps most peculiar is his eerily close proximity to the White House, where the address is 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and the address where Sheikh resides is 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue:




















Sheikh is practically the president's next door neighbor. But wait! There is much more:






  
He apparently loves hashtags as much as Barack's wife, Mooch. If you would love to read his Twitter feed, it can be accessed here.

The address at 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue is far more disturbing since there are multiple corporations calling that specific address as its home base for operations in America. Witness IBEX Corp., and the global map where its other locations are. All of them are in Islamic states notorious for terrorism. And when you understand that this is a corporation which specializes in outsourcing businesses and telecommunications, the future of state-funded terrorism must be in this ring of nations: the U.S., Britain, Pakistan, Senegal and the Philippines. Not coincidentally, The New York Times on June 5, 2014 reported that Boko Haram attacked and slaughtered scores of villagers near Senegal's capital city of Dakar, which is in very close proximity to the nations borders with Cameroon and Nigeria:
AFRICA
Nigerian Sect Kills Villagers Along Border
By ADAM NOSSITER JUNE 5, 2014
Three girls who escaped after they were abducted by the Boko Haram sect attended a news conference in Nigeria’s capital, Lagos, on Thursday. Credit Akintunde Akinleye/Reuters
DAKAR, Senegal — The Boko Haram men, disguised in army uniforms, gathered the villagers together and promised them protection.
Then, shouting “Allahu akbar,” they opened fire, killing scores, according to three officials from the area, in northeast Nigeria along the country’s border with Cameroon.
That massacre — on Tuesday morning in the village of Attagara — was the bloodiest in a series of attacks by the sect this week in Nigeria’s far north, according to officials and Nigerian news reports, as the killings by Boko Haram continued unabated, and apparently unchecked by the country’s military.
The deadly assaults have become so pervasive that the officials spoke of the sect’s having established virtual control over an entire area in the country’s far northeast, and even hoisting their black flag in one village, Ashigashiya. A precise death count has not been established, the officials said, because the army and other government authorities were not yet present. 
This week’s attacks appeared to follow a familiar pattern of retaliation against villagers who resisted the sect, and the deadliest of them mimicked the mass abduction of schoolgirls in the same area in April that has focused global attention on Boko Haram — sect members in army uniforms lulled villagers, assembling them in a large group before mowing them down.
“They killed almost all the people that gathered together in the village,” a man from Attagara said. He described himself as a “community leader,” but declined to give his name.
“Some of the people, they tried to escape to the bush, and they followed them,” he said. “Women that were carrying male children, they would kill the child.”
“They burn the houses,” he said. “They have burned my house. They have burned my everything.”
He said women from Attagara had buried at least 50 inhabitants. Senator Ndume said 42 had been buried; and the Borno state assembly representative for the area, Ahmed Usman Jaha, said about 100 had been killed there. The Nigerian news media spoke of hundreds of deaths in the area.
The apparent lack of military intervention, even as the killings continued, was likely to raise renewed questions about the capacity of the Nigerian armed forces to confront the onslaught by Boko Haram. Foreign nations that are assisting the Nigerians in the hunt for the kidnapped schoolgirls have already raised such doubts, and now they are appearing in Nigeria as well.
This week, the military’s spokesman was forced publicly to deny news reports that some senior army officers were being court-martialed for collusion with Boko Haram.
The virulence of this week’s attacks appears to have been spurred, in part, by military pressure on Boko Haram from the Cameroon side of the border, according to Senator Ndume. Over the last week, Cameroon has deployed thousands of troops to its far north, taking up what is becoming a regional campaign against the group. In doing so, it appears to have pushed Boko Haram out of some previously safe redoubts across the border from Nigeria.
The sect has emptied out a substantial area in Nigeria’s northeast, with thousands of refugees now clustering in Maiduguri.
On Sunday morning, its forces surrounded Attagara on motorcycles and began firing on people, according to Mr. Jaha and the community leader. Vigilantes in the village fired back, they said, and the attack was repelled.
But on Tuesday, villagers learned that another attack was coming. Several went to an army post not far away, the community leader said, and begged for protection. When they returned, the village was full of men in army uniforms who claimed that they were there to help, he said.
Speaking Thursday night from Maiduguri, Mr. Jaha said, “Unfortunately, the people in the community assumed they were military personnel.”
The community leader said, “Some of the dead bodies are still there.”
“They could not bury everybody,” he said. “That area has been almost completely taken over by the Boko Haram,” he added. “They are almost in control.”
A version of this article appears in print on June 6, 2014, on page A4 of the New York edition with the headline: Nigerian Sect Kills Villagers Along Border. Order Reprints|Today's Paper|Subscribe
There again is why so little is discussed today about Boko Haram: They were never declared until last year to be a terrorist cell. They were funded by the administration to blackmail the Nigerian government into bending to the president's will or meet economic sanctions, which indeed has been confirmed even in our own mainstream media, but which none of the major cable news networks ever truly addressed out of fear of targeting if I had to guess. Canada Free News, however, did just recently, and addressed both Hillary Clinton and John Kerry's involvement while Secretaries of State:
Obama Administration Threatened Nigeria with Sanctions in 2013 for Fighting Boko Haram
Author
By Fred Dardick  May 14, 
Hillary Clinton wasn’t the only Obama administration official who went to bat for Boko Haram over the past few years. Soon after John Kerry took over as Secretary of State, the U.S. Ambassador to Nigeria, Terence P. McCulley, accused the Nigerian government of butchery during a confrontation with Boko Haram terrorists in Baga, a Nigerian town on the shores of Lake Chad, and in May 2013 threatened to withdraw U.S. military aid from the West African nation.
Boko Haram militants attacked a Nigerian military outpost in April 2013 outside Baga, killing one soldier. Following the three-day battle human rights activists, including the George Soros-funded and liberal aligned Human Rights Watch, which is not exactly known for its impartiality when it comes to reporting on Islamic issues, claimed the Nigerian military wantonly slaughtered 183 civilians and burned down over 2,000 homes and businesses.
The Nigerian government denied the claims saying the death toll and destruction had been vastly overstated by its enemies, and in fact 30 Boko Haram terrorists, 6 civilians and one soldier, had died in the fighting. Reports from the Baga clinic, which treated 193 people following the battle, but only 10 with serious injuries, seemed to back up the Nigerian government claim that no large-scale massacre had occurred.
The U.S. Nigerian Ambassador, blindly believing any Islamist sob story that crossed his path, responded in a May 2013 meeting with human rights activists by defending Boko Haram: 

Mr. Terrence announced to the activists that the US congress had previously passed a law that bars the United States from rendering military assistance to any government that violates basic rights of citizens. He said the Obama led US government has therefore ceased to assist Nigeria militarily in obedience to the law.
The threat of military sanctions, and whether or not they were actually implemented, is an open question as there has been zero coverage of this issue in the mainstream media, may have had a chilling effect on Nigerian military operations against Boko Haram. Since Ambassador McCulley’s proclamation the Nigerian civilian death toll by Boko Haram Islamic militants has skyrocketed over the past year.
No wonder the Nigerian government was initially reluctant to accept U.S. assistance with finding the more than 200 Christian girls kidnapped by Boko Haram last month. Emboldening Nigeria’s Islamic terrorist enemies and having been already accused by the Obama administration of crimes against humanity for fighting militants who were responsible for hundreds of civilian deaths since 2010, they likely felt that Obama’s belated support was more a product of diplomatic CYA than actually caring about the fate of kidnapped Nigerian children. 
The Nigerian Voice, which would be more authoritative on the problem than any U.S. or other international medium, corroborates this most directly:
US Withdraws Military Assistance To Nigeria Over Baga, Human Rights Violations
By thewillnigeria.com
SAN FRANCISCO, May 02, (THEWILL) – The United States Government has withdrawn military assistance to Nigeria citing various human rights violations by Nigerian security forces, particularly the military which is currently engulfed in a controversy over the killing of dozens and destruction of hundreds of residences in Baga, a town in Borno State during a clash with members of the Boko Haram.
The United States Ambassador to Nigeria, Mr. Terence P. McCulley in a private meeting Thursday in Abuja with about ten members of the human rights community in Nigeria disclosed the US government position.
The US supports the Nigerian military and security agencies with training, intelligence and weapons.
The Human Rights Watch (HRW) in a report released in Johannesburg, South Africa, said its investigations into the fighting in Baga, showed that 183 people were killed, contrary to the claims by the military, which also investigated the incident and has maintained that 36 persons and a soldier died in the clash.
HRW which cited a community leader as its source, also said its analysis of satellite images of Baga, before and after the clash, showed that 2,275 buildings, majority of which were likely residences, were razed by fire with another 125 severely damaged.
THEWILL gathered from a source at the meeting who opted to remain anonymous that the Ambassador called the meeting to feel the pulse of the human rights community over the violations of basic rights of citizens by security forces under the Goodluck Jonathan administration.
As the meeting progressed, Mr. Terrence announced to the activists that the US congress had previously passed a law that bars the United States from rendering military assistance to any government that violates basic rights of citizens. He said the Obama led US government has therefore ceased to assist Nigeria militarily in obedience to the law.
The source said Mr. Terence listened as his visitors expressed frustrations with the Nigerian government over its inability to bring to justice security operatives that have violated rights of fellow citizens.
The source further told THEWILL that the activists pleaded with the US Ambassador to cancel any invitation extended to President Goodluck Jonathan to attend any meetings of global world leaders in protest of the nation’s worsening human rights record.
The Ambassador however agreed with their position and assured the rights activists of the US government’s unflinching support for democracy and the rights of citizens. He assured them that their position would be communicated to the Department of State headed by Senator John Kerry.
Some of the activists at the meeting include Mr. Clement Nwankwo, Mr. Emmanuel Onwubiko of the Human Rights Writers' Association of Nigeria; Kole Shettima of the MacArthur Foundation and Auwal Rafsanjani of the Executive Director at Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC) amongst others.
Finally, why won't Boko Haram be destroyed, just as neither the Islamic State and Hamas, nor al-Qaeda or the Taliban? Well, leave it to the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, which as an Israeli foreign policy think-tank, knows a thing or two about being the victims of repeated genocide attempts:
The Possibility of Nigerian Partition
The crisis created by the Nigerian government’s inability to cope with the Boko Haram threat has led some of the country’s Christian intellectuals and politicians to maintain that Nigeria has no future as a unified state. They note that the developed parts of Nigeria are mostly in Christian-populated areas, and call for a partition if necessary. Nigerian Muslims, for their part, continue to support the unified state. Their complacent attitude toward the jihadists could change, however, when President Goodluck’s tenure ends in February 2015 and a Muslim president is elected instead.
It is this potentially explosive situation that has prompted the concern of the Western powers. A partitioned Nigeria would have dire implications for the stability of the neighboring regimes and for world energy supplies, since Nigeria is the sixth largest producer of crude oil. Irredentist effects could be expected in Mali, Niger, Chad, Mauritania, and further afield in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia. Subduing Boko Haram is in the West’s interest and could become its top priority in Africa.
In other words, Obama's favorite word regarding his concern that domestic discontent with his policies will lead to America's Balkinization is now becoming a reality, and why recently Boko Haram has proclaimed the Maghreb region of Sub-Saharan Africa as their caliphate.  Each offshoot of Boko Haram, which originated as with most Sunni terrorist factions through the Muslim Brotherhood, will be governing each provincial district and under Obama, who is still funding since no word has ever been provided as to any cessation of it even post-terrorist cell declaration, will serve as his regional source for his visionary Pan African state. For a president who is attempting to form a protectionist scenario in the guise of a Pan African state primarily governed by his allies who are dictators, or how he continues to fund Hamas, the Islamic State, al-Qaeda and the Taliban and of course Boko Haram, it is similar to my fond quip regarding the Democratic Party and, most egregiously than any president in our history, Obama: They only like to allow people the right to choice if it amounts to killing unborn babies. Why else would the government continue funding Planned Parenthood clinics, of which 79% of these evil institutions are located in poor black and Hispanic communities, where blacks comprise of only 13% of our population and is now just the third largest minority demographic, while 64% of all U.S. abortions are performed on all minority groups?  It is a very Hitler-like practice to engage in eugenics, which was precisely one of the major strategies employed to engage in the genocide of those who tainted the master race or were political opponents of Der Fuhrer, and why precisely abortions on demand must be banned.  And how better may the terrorists through Afgen Sheikh accomplish this than through such an entanglement of corporate webs and charities as what you will read below:

The U.S., Britain, Senegal, Pakistan and the Philippines are all hot targets or state-sponsors of terrorism



















Notice the list of charities, many of which are notorious for being "for-profit" organizations.


The next issue with Sheikh are his records for fundraising per the Federal Election Commission (FEC). I find some of the language within these documents interesting, as in his organization not being required to file reports with the regulatory body:
You will notice within these documents that repeated violations by its treasurer, Afgen Sheikh, of failure to report his campaign funds and suddenly the "about-face" by the FEC and later Sheikh's revelation that he intends to funnel unlimited funds into non-official capacities leads one to wonder just what he was financing:







Why would the FEC determine on August 26, 2013 in its last correspondence with Afgen Sheikh that he no longer needed to file reports with the Commission?
Pursuant to 2 U.S.C. §433(d)(2) of the Federal Election Campaign Act, and Commission regulations at 11 CFR §102.4, the Commission intends to administratively terminate the reporting obligation of your committee. As such, your committee is no longer obligated to file reports. However, any receipt or disbursement of funds by the committee for the purpose of influencing a Federal election or supporting a federal candidate will void the administrative termination. In such an event, the committee will be required to begin filing reports with the appropriate office. The first such report will include any activity since the date of the last report filed by the committee. 
Sheikh forwarded this reply over a year earlier on July 27, 2012:
Federal Election Commission 
999 E Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20463 
Re: Form 1, Statement of Organization—Unlimited Contributions 
To Whom It May Concern: 
This committee intends to make independent expenditures, and consistent with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision in SpeechNow v. FEC, it therefore intends to raise funds in unlimited amounts. This committee will not use those funds to make contributions, whether direct, in-kind, or via coordinated communications, to federal candidates or committees. 
Respectfully submitted. 
Tre§8urer'0 Nam§! 
, Treasurer 
Well, the Muslim American Vote was established on July 27, 2012, and he was released from his obligations 364 days later. And as for that address of who actually is there? Well, that is evidently a residence for one Muhammad Z. Chishti. Of course, Afgen Sheikh has multiple address in the D.C. area as well as near Miami:










Of course, it grows more disturbing. Read the following search from the White Pages, which I had to take a screen shot since the site will not save a search:



Ironically, David E. Obama resides in Olney, where the Muslim American Vote is headquartered. Does this mean that Afgen Sheikh is David E. Obama?
MUSLIM AMERICAN VOTE
14403 SATURN WAY
BOYDS, MD 20841
Treasurer Name: AFGEN SHEIKH
Committee Designation:   U (UNAUTHORIZED)
Committee Type:   O (INDEPENDENT EXPENDITURE-ONLY COMMITTEE)
Below is Sheikh's address in Boyds, MD:
14403 Saturn Way
Boyds, MD 20841-4006
And his phone number, which again he provided as his cell at 202-643-6262, is a landline number, not a mobile phone. Apparently, it is a Washington, D.C. address, and also has been reported online as a scam number, and a political questionnaire of sorts asking first if someone owned a dog.
 Cj replies to Jen
This number has called many times an left no message.  Caller ID says Washington DC.  Finally last night the message 'do you have a small dog' was left on our answering machine. - Houston, TX
Scott replies to Jen
Its a scam. They ask you a simple question like "do you have a small dog?" and if you answer "yes" they record you saying "yes" to authorize charges on your phone bill. If you say "no" they have a recording asking "did you have any problems with your charges?" then you saying "no." I got multiple calls a day. The caller ID is think say act 10.

Islamic terrorists engage in stealth to fund their activities; I dare say if this is tied to Sheikh, this is one too. But IBEX Global has another number: 1-202-289-9898

For Muhammad Zia Chishti, he has donated to the following politician, the Democrat U.S. Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire:

Search Results
  
Download this List
To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type
Contribution Amount$1,000
Record Count1
  
Download this List
To a Spreadsheet or Other File Type
Name/LocationEmployer/Occupation$ Amount ContributedContributed ToPrimary/
General
Date
CHISHTI, ZIA
WASHINGTON, DC 20005
The Resource Group/Ceo$1,000SHAHEEN FOR SENATE - DEMOCRATP11/27/2013

And according to Friends Korner, the following was confirmed about Zia Chishti:
Zia Chishti Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer
Zia Chishti is co-founder, chief executive officer and director of Align Technology, Inc., the Sunnyvale, CA. firm that uses 3-D computer imaging technology to design clear plastic, removable, orthodontic “aligners” that let adults straighten teeth without wearing metal braces. Align Technology also manufacturers the “aligners,” marketed and distributed nationwide as the Invisalign System™. In his position as CEO, the 28-year old Mr. Chishti is responsible for the general management of Align Technology, overall corporate strategy, fund-raising and the development and application of the technology process.
Mr. Chishti graduated from Columbia University (New York City) in 1992, where he studied economics and computer science. He received his MBA from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business (Palo Alto, CA) where he met Ms. Wirth and, together, the two started Align Technology in 1997.
Like many breakthroughs, the idea for Align grew from happenstance. Mr. Chishti wore a clear plastic retainer as an adult to stabilize his teeth after his braces were removed. He noticed when he neglected to wear his retainer for days at a time that his teeth would begin to shift back to their former state. Upon reinsertion, the retainer would move his teeth back again to their final position, indicating that a single clear plastic retainer was capable of moving teeth. It was a simple leap of logic that led to his conclusion that a series of such devices worn in sequence would be able to achieve complete orthodontic treatment. Aided with a background in computer science (and Ms. Wirth as a partner) the two entrepreneurs realized the benefit of applying 3-D computer imaging graphics to the field of orthodontics.
Prior to starting Align (from 1992 to 1995) Mr. Chishti worked as a financial analyst in the New York and London offices of investment banking firm Morgan Stanley. He also served as a management consultant in the London office of consulting firm McKinsey & Co (1996). A resident of Sunnyvale, CA, Mr. Chishti was born in the seaside town of Bar Harbour, ME, was raised in Pakistan and came to the U.S. at the age of fifteen to attend college.
In 2001, People Magazine named him one of the Top 50 Bachelors:
Zia Chishti 
INVENTOR 
AGE: 29 
HEIGHT: 6' 
RESIDENCE: Sunnyvale, Calif. 
STATUS: Never married 
COLLEGE: Columbia, 1992; Stanford, M.B.A., 1997 
RÉSUMÉ: On a date nine years ago, Chishti says he was told, "You're a good-looking guy, but your teeth are horrible." He got them straightened with metal braces but was inspired to invent clear, plastic teeth aligners. Chishti's company, Align Technology, went public in January, putting his estimated net worth at $23 million. 
CONTINENTAL SHIFT: Chishti was born Wilson Lear in Bar Harbor, Maine. After his American dad died in 1974, Chishti moved to Pakistan with his mother, Saadia, now 64, who changed her son's name to protect him from discrimination. 
MEMORABLE GUY: Chishti "is a workaholic, no doubt about it," says his business partner Kelsey Wirth, 31. "I forget birthdays, dinner dates," admits Chishti. "It just happens." 

Michigan as a state holds the largest concentrated city for Muslims in America in Dearborn, and that does not surprise me in the least, as Michigan trends to the blue. But Boyds, MD? Another Maryland address, and like most townships in the state, likely in close proximity to Silver Spring and Olney. 

With regards to the Dr. David Obama in Olney, MD, well, it is listed below in a database.
How many with the name Obama can we find living in the U.S???
Not nearly enough for all 57 states! (even if you count the duplicates)
Social Security Death Index
Name: Renee L. Abena Obama
SSN: 215-71-0752
Born: 31 Oct 2004
Died: 25 Dec 2004
State (Year) SSN issued: Maryland (2004-2005) 
U.S. Phone and Address Directories, 1993-2002
NameSpouseCityStateZip CodePhone NumberResidence YearsRecord Number
Paula BucknerObama KPahoaHawaii96778-9017808-965-71761998 1999 2000 2001 2002293052601
Barack ObamaBostonMassachusetts02111617-623-12661993 1994269779798
Yuko ObamaLos AngelesCalifornia213-661-26891994258363214
A ObamaSilver SpringMaryland20901-1318301-681-37131995 1996 1997180191595
Fr Jos ObamaPittsburghPennsylvania15123412-884-86581995242238579
Naohito ObamaBrooklineMassachusetts02146-2714617-731-55891995 1996 1997 1998164704621
O ObamaMontebelloCalifornia90640213-724-41701995 1996 1997 1998159843697
Yuko ObamaLos AngelesCalifornia90000213-661-26891995 1996 1997178005642
Barack ObamaChicagoIllinois60615-5916312-684-48091996 1997182282054
Barack, Lwyr ObamaChicagoIllinois60610-3811312-751-11701996216792205
Jay ObamaGreat NeckNew York11023-2140516-487-04791996 1997171939187
Michelle ObamaChicagoIllinois60615-5916312-684-48091996 1997182282055
Sheree ObamaGreenbeltMaryland20770-2124301-474-70101996 1997180120312
Barack ObamaChicagoIllinois60615-5916773-684-48091998 1999 2000 2001 200215979964
Edjoa D ObamaOlneyMaryland20832-1834301-570-25251998 1999139296709
Faustin E ObamaMariettaGeorgia30060-6244770-434-60551998 1999 2000 2001 200275695133
Gaston ObamaMetairieLouisiana70006-3951504-457-03631998162866735
Helen L E ObamaMariettaGeorgia30060-6244770-434-60551998 1999 2000 200275694637
Michelle ObamaChicagoIllinois60615-5916773-684-48091998 1999 2000 2001 200215980413
Jay ObamaKings ParkNew York11754-2833516-724-33611999146345937
Naohito ObamaBrooklineMassachusetts02446-2092617-731-55891999 2000 200149089595
O ObamaMontebelloCalifornia90640323-724-41701999141267693
David ObamaOlneyMaryland20832-1834301-570-24242000 2001 200224632414
George ObamaSaint LouisMissouri63103-2330314-588-9697200034677019
Jay ObamaKings ParkNew York11754-2833631-724-33612000 2001 200249090118
Barack ObamaChicagoIllinois60649-1914773-363-19962001 2002116475025
David E ObamaOlneyMaryland20832-1834301-924-27762001 200293100001
George ObamaSaint LouisMissouri63103-2058314-652-28772001129969578
Hiroya ObamaClevelandOhio44120-3451216-991-75682001 200290055157
O ObamaWest CovinaCalifornia91790909-468-55962001 2002122955341
Obama H E ObamaMariettaGeorgia30060-6244770-434-60552001134643985
Yuko ObamaLos AngelesCalifornia90001323-939-22302001 200295997448
Josefina A ObamaDentonTexas76210-6818940-384-17672002125506052
Ramond ObamaLaurelMaryland20707-5844301-604-8516200292982461
Vincent ObamaHyattsvilleMaryland20784-1816301-583-9274200292967239
U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 1
NameBirth DatePhone NumberAddress
Isidore Obama4 Aug 1941365-88652349 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20008-2853 (1993)
Antoinette M Obama18 May 19556790 Surreywood Ln, Bethesda, MD, 20817-1585 (1989)
Susie Obama15 Jun 195651 Rumford Rd, Kings Park, NY, 11754-4115 (1991)
Roy A Obama15 Mar 1958773-58317507 Mandan Rd Apt 201, Greenbelt, MD, 20770-2126 (1993)
Michael S Obama1 Sep 195911880 Lucile St, Culver City, CA, 90230-6205 (1994)
Barack H Obama4 Aug 1961623-12665450 S East View Park # 1, Chicago, IL, 60615-5916 (1994)
Barack Hussein Obama4 Aug 1961623-1266365 Broadway Apt B1, Somerville, MA, 02145-2440 (1988)
Henri B Obama12 Jan 1967469-72161425 S Eads St, Arlington, VA, 22202-2847
Yuko Obama15 Aug 1967PO Box 931246, Los Angeles, CA, 90093-1246 (1995)
David E Obama1 Sep 1968000-40637333 New Hampshire Av, Hyattsville, MD, 20783 (1996)
Yumie Obama1 Sep 19721110 Cypress Ave Apt 108, San Mateo, CA, 94401-2980
Vincent C Obama15 Jun 197311235 Oak Leaf Dr Apt 1720, Silver Spring, MD, 20901-1306 (1995)
Jay Obama1 Sep 19758 Corporate Center Dr, Melville, NY, 11747-3193 (1995)
Toshimi Obama334-98181962 Bellomy St Apt 21, Santa Clara, CA, 95050-5738
Samuel N Obama773-58318623 Flame Av 4, Silver Spring, MD, 20912 (1988)
M Obama320 Waterford CT Apt B, Lafayette, IN, 47905-4587 (1989)
Gaston M Obama12717 N 19th St Apt A7, Tampa, FL, 33612-4597 (1991)
Felicite Obama6790 Surreywood Ln, Bethesda, MD, 20817-1585 (1992)
Takinori Obama15760 Patelca St, Riverside, CA, 92500 (1992)
Abongo Malik Obama513-14377244 Landover Rd C, Hyattsville, MD, 20785 (1993)
Michelle Obama5450 Eastview Pk 1 S, Chicago, IL, 60615 (1993)
Edjoa Obama4510 Commons Dr, Annandale, VA, 22003-4955 (1994)
Bertrand O Obama681-371311235 Oak Leaf Dr Apt 1720, Silver Spring, MD, 20901-1306 (1996)
Gaston M Obama300 Gentilly Bv, New Orleans, LA, 70122
Gaston M Obama463-44531037 President St, Brooklyn, NY, 11225-1302 (1996)
Junechi Obama11 Wooleys Ln Apt 3d, Great Neck, NY, 11023-2122 (1996)
Junishi Obama8 Corporate Center Dr, Melville, NY, 11747-3193 (1996)
Naoya Obama16 Sherwood 260, Modesto, CA, 95350 (1996)
Sheree Obama7978 Lakecrest Dr, Greenbelt, MD, 20770-3306 (1996)
Michelle L Robinson
[Michelle L Obama]
29 Jul 1937363-45305450 Eastview Pk 1 S, Chicago, IL, 60615 (1993)
Susie Kay Saul
[Susie Obama]
15 Jun 1956265-104251 Rumford Rd, Kings Park, NY, 11754-4115 (1989)
Sheree A Wood
[Sheree A Obama]
2 Jun 1959474-70107513 Mandan Rd, Greenbelt, MD, 20770-2124 (1995)
U.S. Public Records Index, Volume 2
NameBirth DateAddress
Febe R Obama29 Jul 19183408 W Beach Ave, Chicago, IL, 60651-2331
Barack Obama365 Broadway St, Boston, MA, 02111
Bertrand H Obama11235 Oak Leaf Dr, Silver Spring, MD, 20901-1318
Faustin E Obama3120 Oakton Way SW, Marietta, GA, 30060-6244
Gaston M ObamaGentilly Blvd, New Orleans, LA, 70122
George Obama10 Plaza Sq, Saint Louis, MO, 63103-2330
Naohito Obama1440 Beacon, Brighton, MA, 02135
Naohito Obama1440 Beacon St, Brookline, MA, 02446-2092
O O Obama3 Jun 1944116 Washington St, Brighton, MA, 02135-4302
O O Obama3 Jun 1944116 Washington St, Brighton, MA, 02135-4302
O O Obama3 Jun 194424 Colgate Rd, Roslindale, MA, 02131-1124
Joseph E Obama30 Mar 1954363 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, 02115-4941
Bernard E Obama23 Apr 19606665 W End Ave 5t, New York, NY, 10025
Barack Obama4 Aug 19611440 E 52nd St, Chicago, IL, 60615-4131
Masaki Obama19 Sep 1962207 W Jefferson St Rm 642, Bloomington, IL, 61701-3960
Masaki Obama19 Sep 1962207 W Jefferson St Rm 642, Bloomington, IL, 61701-3960
Michelle Obama17 Jan 19645450-1 S Eastview Park, Chicago, IL, 60615
Michelle Obama17 Jan 19645450-1 S Eastview Park, Chicago, IL, 60615
Josefina A Obama24 May 19762700 Colorado Blvd Apt 524, Denton, TX, 76210-6824
Josefina A Obama24 May 19762700 Colorado Blvd Apt 526, Denton, TX, 76210-6824
Josefina A Obama24 May 19766425 Westheimer Rd Apt 717, Houston, TX, 77057-5123
George W Obama29 Sep 19783401 Grand Forest Dr, Saint Louis, MO, 63103
223 posted on 4/13/2011 8:36:16 PM by Brown Deer (Pray for 0bama. Psalm 109:8)
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]
Who would have thought that so many Obamas reside within the U.S.? It reveals the Dr. David Obama in Olney, MD; there is also one from Silver Spring known only as "A. Obama". The president has multiple addresses himself according this list:  
Barack H Obama4 Aug 1961623-12665450 S East View Park # 1, Chicago, IL, 60615-5916 (1994)
Barack Hussein Obama4 Aug 1961623-1266365 Broadway Apt B1, Somerville, MA, 02145-2440 (1988)
August 4, 1961 is the president's date of birth officially. Another list provides the following:
Barack Obama4 Aug 19611440 E 52nd St, Chicago, IL, 60615-4131
Multiple addresses in Chicago? Please. Chicago is a rather expensive city to reside in within the downtown area. He may have been a community organizer, but this is the president's address at that location, and his birthday is again consistent with his birth certificate. 

But wait, there is yet another address for a Barack Obama, in Boston:
Barack Obama365 Broadway St, Boston, MA, 02111
Learning this causes me to feel compelled to listen to my downloaded .mp3 of Ricky Nelson's Travelin' Man. But Michelle Obama is also mentioned on here, and let us not exclude Mrs. Robinson, as she is also referred to on this list:
Michelle Obama5450 Eastview Pk 1 S, Chicago, IL, 60615 (1993)
This address was Mrs. Obama's in 1993, or at least through that date. There are more, of course:
Michelle L Robinson
[Michelle L Obama]
29 Jul 1937363-45305450 Eastview Pk 1 S, Chicago, IL, 60615 (1993)
This of course is a duplicate, and are these:  
Michelle Obama17 Jan 19645450-1 S Eastview Park, Chicago, IL, 60615
Michelle Obama17 Jan 19645450-1 S Eastview Park, Chicago, IL, 60615
The most disturbing of these names is one Malik Obama, the name of the president's older brother accused of serving as the conduit between the White House and Cairo for the Muslim Brotherhood:
Abongo Malik Obama513-14377244 Landover Rd C, Hyattsville, MD, 20785 (1993)
In again deferring to Wikipedia on the history of the Obama family, the following can be noted on brother Malik:
Barack Obama's half-brother, also known as Abongo or Roy, was born c. March 1958,[99] the son of Barack Obama, Sr., and his first wife, Kezia.[103] Malik Obama was born and raised in Nairobi, Kenya.[104] He earned a degree in accounting from the University of Nairobi.[105] The half brothers met for the first time in 1985[104] when Barack flew from Chicago to Washington, D.C., to visit Malik.[106] Malik and his half-brother Barack were best men at each other's weddings.[104] Barack Obama brought his wife Michelle to Kenya three years later, and they met with Malik again while meeting many other relatives for the first time.[107] 
There is a major issue with the above line "The half brothers met for the first time in 1985 when Barack flew from Chicago to Washington, D.C., to visit Malik." Recall when you read The Daily Mail in the interview with Malik where he stated the following:
Malik insists he is a fair man.  ‘There have been 12 wives since my first marriage in 1981, when Barack was my best man. I have done my best with all of them, along with the children.’ He won’t, however, say how many he has.
How could Obama have met Malik in 1985, and yet have served as his elder brother's best man during his first wedding? It is about as suspicious as the gaps in the president's birth certificate, and I am still at some going to order the copies of Barack Obama Sr. from the British National Archives, which I have, but need to learn how to properly format my request with regards to call numbers.

With regards to the last half of the highlighted sentence, Barack flew from Chicago to Washington, D.C., to visit Malik. Well, there is another inconsistency with this story:
After graduating from the University of Nairobi with a degree in accountancy, Malik worked in Nairobi until 1985, when he moved to America.
Barack made contact soon after I started living in Washington and flew from Chicago, to meet me,’ he says. ‘I knew about him from the beginning, because my father used to talk about him a lot.’
Malik, who runs a small electronics shop a half-hour’s drive outside Washington, says there is nothing wrong in using his name as a force for change – but he adds that his brother’s family is not involved.
‘They’re hands-off,’ he said. ‘They’re not involved in what I’m doing. He’s doing his thing, he’s the President of United States. I am Malik Obama, doing this thing.’
The interview given by Malik now has two contradictory statements. He first stated Barack was his best man at his first wedding in 1981. How, though, can the president have been at his wedding in presumably Nairobi at that point, and yet have not met Malik until 1985 when the older brother moved to Washington from Nairobi 

This is not simply Malik's word against the world. In the president's book, he wrote the following about his pride in Malik:
And there is indeed some evidence for that. In his memoir, Barack recalls the wedding day, writing: ‘The person who made me proudest was Roy [the name he uses for Malik]. He converted to Islam, and has sworn off pork and tobacco and alcohol. [His] new lifestyle has left him lean and clear-eyed. 
'At the wedding he looked so dignified in his black African gown with white trim and matching cap that some of our guests mistook him for my father.’
Another Roy A. Obama is on the list too:
Roy A Obama15 Mar 1958773-58317507 Mandan Rd Apt 201, Greenbelt, MD, 20770-2126 (1993)
This is, in fact, the president's brother, at a different home in Maryland, with the same year provided. Wikipedia corroborates this providing his date of birth as March 1958. 

One of Roy's wives are provided at the corresponding address at Greenbelt, MD:
Sheree A Wood
[Sheree A Obama]
2 Jun 1959474-70107513 Mandan Rd, Greenbelt, MD, 20770-2124 (1995)
Another Obama relative in Brookline, MA, where one of the president's Massachusetts addresses is located, also has resided there at some point:
Naohito ObamaBrooklineMassachusetts02146-2714617-731-55891995 1996 1997 1998164704621
The lady Wikipedia provides with connections to Brookline, MA is named Ruth Baker Obama:
Ruth (Baker) Ndesandjo
Born Ruth Beatrice Baker in the United States around 1937, the daughter of Maurice Joseph Baker and Ida Baker of Newton, Massachusetts, who are of Lithuanian Jewish descent.[118] Ruth Baker was a 1954 graduate of Brookline High School in Brookline, Massachusetts, and a 1958 graduate of Simmons College in Boston with a degree in business.[118] She was a suburban elementary school teacher when she met and began dating Barack, Sr., in Cambridge in June 1964, a month before his return to Kenya in August 1964.[118] She followed Obama, Sr., back to Kenya five weeks later, and married him in Kenya in a civil ceremony on December 24, 1964.[118] She later became a private kindergarten director in Kenya.[119] She had two sons with Barack Obama, Sr.: Mark and David. She and Barack Sr. separated in 1971 and divorced about 1973. Since she remarried when her sons were young, they took their stepfather's surname, Ndesandjo, as their own. Her third son, Joseph Ndesandjo, was born c. 1980 in her second marriage.

Naohito had two sons with Barack Sr., but nowhere is mentioned a name by Naohito. If she is an American citizen, did she change her name? If so, why?

The issue with the name "David Obama" is interesting. The address and information for him provided above are as follows:

David Ndesandjo (c. 1967 – c. 1987)
Barack Obama's half-brother (also known as David Opiyo Obama), son of Barack Obama, Sr. and his third wife, Ruth Baker, an American. He died in a motorcycle accident several years after his father's death in a car accident

And if this is so, who is this man residing in Olney, MD?
David E Obama1 Sep 1968000-40637333 New Hampshire Av, Hyattsville, MD, 20783 (1996)
There are no specific dates as to when David Ndesandjo was born. However, it is estimated he was around 1967. And David E. Obama read to have been born on September 1, 1968, the following year. Is this a coincidence too?  

Here is more for you read:
David ObamaOlneyMaryland20832-1834301-570-24242000 2001 200224632414
And this address, also of Olney, MD, with corresponding number:
Edjoa D ObamaOlneyMaryland20832-1834301-570-25251998 1999139296709
And this, how very bizarre it is indeed!:
Naohito Obama1440 Beacon, Brighton, MA, 02135
Naohito Obama1440 Beacon St, Brookline, MA, 02446-2092
O O Obama3 Jun 1944116 Washington St, Brighton, MA, 02135-4302
O O Obama3 Jun 1944116 Washington St, Brighton, MA, 02135-4302
O O Obama3 Jun 194424 Colgate Rd, Roslindale, MA, 02131-1124
Joseph E Obama30 Mar 1954363 Massachusetts Ave, Boston, MA, 02115-4941
Why is Naohito Obama residing at one address showing 1440 Beacon St., Brighton, MA, 02135 when the other address is strikingly similar at 1440 Beacon St., Brookline, MA, 02446-2092? Finally, who is "O O Obama" and why do two of his addresses read 116 Washington St., which is in Brighton, MA according to this, but the third states 24 Colgate Rd, Roslindale, MA, 02131-1124? Who is Joseph E. Obama, and why does he reside at the Boston address? Finally, why are so many Obamas residing around the Washington, D.C., area

For instance:
Isidore Obama4 Aug 1941365-88652349 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20008-2853 (1993)
Antoinette M Obama18 May 19556790 Surreywood Ln, Bethesda, MD, 20817-1585 (1989)
And then these:
A ObamaSilver SpringMaryland20901-1318301-681-37131995 1996 1997180191595
Ramond ObamaLaurelMaryland20707-5844301-604-8516200292982461
Vincent ObamaHyattsvilleMaryland20784-1816301-583-9274200292967239
Isidore Obama4 Aug 1941365-88652349 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, DC, 20008-2853 (1993)
Antoinette M Obama18 May 19556790 Surreywood Ln, Bethesda, MD, 20817-1585 (1989)
Roy A Obama15 Mar 1958773-58317507 Mandan Rd Apt 201, Greenbelt, MD, 20770-2126 (1993)
Henri B Obama12 Jan 1967469-72161425 S Eads St, Arlington, VA, 22202-2847
David E Obama1 Sep 1968000-40637333 New Hampshire Av, Hyattsville, MD, 20783 (1996)
Vincent C Obama15 Jun 197311235 Oak Leaf Dr Apt 1720, Silver Spring, MD, 20901-1306 (1995)
Samuel N Obama773-58318623 Flame Av 4, Silver Spring, MD, 20912 (1988)
Felicite Obama6790 Surreywood Ln, Bethesda, MD, 20817-1585 (1992)
Abongo Malik Obama513-14377244 Landover Rd C, Hyattsville, MD, 20785 (1993)
Edjoa Obama4510 Commons Dr, Annandale, VA, 22003-4955 (1994)
Bertrand O Obama681-371311235 Oak Leaf Dr Apt 1720, Silver Spring, MD, 20901-1306 (1996)
Sheree Obama7978 Lakecrest Dr, Greenbelt, MD, 20770-3306 (1996)

The names provided appear to be mixtures of sometimes Asian named with the "Obama" Arabic name. And as the original question stands as to who exactly is David Obama of Silver Spring, MD and Dr. David Obama of Olney, MD, well, multiplicity is not possible, nor is the rather bizarre concept of a doppleganger. On the other hand, these are all aliases for the president or family members presently alive and no longer residing at these addresses, or dead, deceased and still with records as residing at the address provided, and still further the issue of why they often appear to be anagrams related to the official names provided. 

For instance, why is this year provided regarding Michael S. Obama?:
Michael S Obama1 Sep 195911880 Lucile St, Culver City, CA, 90230-6205 (1994)
Recall the story provided in the interview by Malik:
Malik was just one in 1959 when his father, Barack Obama Senior, left  his wife Kezia to take up a scholarship at the University of Hawaii. Malik’s sister Auma, two years younger, appears to have been conceived when his father was home on holiday. Kezia, now 72, later studied in America and lives in Bracknell, Berkshire.
In America, Barack Sr met and married Ann Dunham, an anthropologist from Kansas. But soon after she gave birth to the future US President he abandoned her and returned to Kenya.
So, Auma was born in 1961 while on holiday, in Kenya, the same year the president was born. How ironic then, the twists and turns of this tale! Of course, Malik may not be lying on this issue at all; he only knows Barack according to all accounts from what his father informed him regarding his younger brother. And the other issue involved the detail of Ann Durham, the alleged mother of the president. Where exactly are the details as to where he met Ann Durham in the U.S., and since Hawaii was not a U.S. state until 1959, when was he conceived and then delivered? The issue with dates is a major problem with Malik's story. 

To perhaps understand the inconsistencies just with corroborating all details chronologically, refer again to Kezia Obama's details, again from Wikipedia, complete with citations as with all of them:
Kezia Obama
(Also known as Kezia Aoko[96] and as "Grace," she was born c. 1940.[97][98]) She is Barack Obama, Sr.'s first wife; she married him in Kenya in 1958 before he studied abroad in the United States. They had at least two children together:Abongo [Roy] and Auma; and she has also claimed Bernard and Abo Obama as sons by Barack Sr.
She lives in Bracknell, Berkshire, England.[99][100] On March 22, 2009, Kezia Obama made a guest appearance on the British television show Chris Moyles' Quiz Night.[101] Her sister, Jane, is the 'Auntie Jane' mentioned at the very start of Dreams from My Father; she telephoned Obama in the US in 1982 to tell him that his father had been killed in a car accident in Kenya.[102]

______________________________

In remaining true to Islamic law, it is necessary to ask if Barack Sr. was a polygamist? If so, since he was a British citizen, how was he not arrested for the crime of being married to Kezia and Ann Durham? No mention of a divorce is disclosed, and as Auma and Malik are claimed to be the daughter and son of Barack Sr. and Kezia, Bernard and Abo Obama are claimed by her as sons with the president's father. 

The scariest relationship is the one with Omar Okech Obama, who undoubted is the figure named O.O. Obama. The details for him are below:
O ObamaMontebelloCalifornia90640323-724-41701999141267693
O ObamaWest CovinaCalifornia91790909-468-55962001 2002122955341
O O Obama3 Jun 1944116 Washington St, Brighton, MA, 02135-4302
O O Obama3 Jun 1944116 Washington St, Brighton, MA, 02135-4302
O O Obama3 Jun 194424 Colgate Rd, Roslindale, MA, 02131-1124
Omar Okech Obama
At times using a variation of the name of his father, Onyango Obama,[143][144] Omar Okech Obama is a half-uncle of Barack Obama.[145] Born on June 3, 1944, in Nyang'oma Kogelo, he is the eldest son of Onyango and his third wife,Sarah Obama. He moved to the United States in October 1963 when he was 17 years old as part of Kenya president Tom Mboya's Airlift Africa project, to send promising Kenyan students to the US for education, particularly undergraduate and graduate school.[143][146] Once he arrived in the country, his half-brother, Barack Obama, Sr., found him a place at a boys' school then known as Browne & Nichols, in Cambridge, Massachusetts.[143] He later dropped out of school and changed his name to O. Onyango Obama.[143] He has operated a liquor store in Framingham, where he resided as of March 2011.[143][147] Barack Obama lived with Onyango in the 1980s while a student at Harvard Law School in Cambridge.[148]
Omar Okech Obama was subject to a deportation order in 1989.[149] After an unsuccessful appeal, he was given a new deportation order in 1992.[149][150] He was arrested on August 24, 2011, for driving under the influence, or DUI,[149]and was held in jail until September 9, 2011, on a federal immigration warrant.[144][151] The Boston Herald reported in August 2011 that Obama had had a valid Social Security card "for at least 19 years."[152] On November 30, 2012, theBoard of Immigration Appeals remanded the immigration case to the Executive Office for Immigration Review for reconsideration of the original order of deportation, which was issued in 1986 and re-issued in 1992.[153][154]
An immigration judge ruled on January 30, 2013, that Onyango Obama would receive a deportation hearing.[146] Onyango's attorneys said that his defense at the December 3, 2013, deportation hearing would be a reliance on the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, because Onyango had resided in the U.S. since before January 1, 1972, the cutoff date of the 1986 amnesty.[155] At the hearing, Immigration Judge Leonard I. Shapiro ruled that Onyango was eligible for permanent residence and that Onyango would receive a green card.[156]
________________________________

And as for all those Obamas who donated to the president's campaign in 2012, here you are:

Name/LocationEmployer/Occupation$ Amount ContributedContributed ToPrimary/
General
Date
OBAMA, BARACK
WASHINGTON, DC 20500
The United States Of America/President$2,500OBAMA FOR AMERICA - DEMOCRATP07/30/2012
OBAMA, BARACK
WASHINGTON, DC 20500
The United States Of America/President$2,500OBAMA FOR AMERICA - DEMOCRATG07/30/2012
OBAMA, DAVID
OLNEY, MD 20832
Self-Employed/Executive Director$250OBAMA FOR AMERICA - DEMOCRATG10/05/2012
OBAMA, FCUK
VXCVCX, CA 92284
 --$-25DNC SERVICES CORPORATION/DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE - DEMOCRAT07/25/2011
OBAMA, WILLIAM
DECATUR, GA 30033
Self-Employed/Small Business Owner$250OBAMA VICTORY FUND 2012 - DEMOCRATG10/04/2012

_____________________ 

Onyango Obama is the key to this detailing. Did he or did he not bring along the president when he was an infant from Kenya as part of the Airlift Africa policy of the first Kenyan president Tom Mboya? Malik claimed his father arrived in Hawaii on holiday in 1959, still married because no record of his interview stated that Kezia and Barack Sr. were divorced, and he married Ann Durham. If this is true, his marriage to Durham was never legal. As a result, Barack Sr. was not granted a Green Card, was not an American citizen, he should have been arrested for polygamy, meaning the president's citizenship would not have existed since he was not in Hawaii in 1960. when Auma was born and when the president reported was born on August 4. Per DC Clothesline, the following information is provided, included links to the specific sites cited as well as all call numbers need to adequately place your order for copies of the president's father's records:

British National Archives show a son was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya


the-national-archives
The British National Archives (BNA) is an executive agency of the government of the United Kingdom. Based in Kew in southwest London, the BNA is the UK government’s official archive, containing 1,000 years of history from Domesday Book to the present, with records from parchment and paper scrolls to digital files and archived websites, including Foreign Office and Colonial Office correspondence and files. The collections held by the BNA can be searched using their online catalogue. Entrance to the Archives is free.

On April 18, 2012, the BNA released the first batch of thousands of “lost” colonial-era files believed to have been destroyed, including files on Britain’s former colony of Kenya. Reporters at the UK’s The Guardian were among the first who looked at some of the newly released colonial files. They found that the name of Barack Obama (henceforth, Obama Sr.), the father of the POS in the White House, is on the top of a list of names revealed in a hitherto secret British colonial file of Kenyans studying in the United States.
But it’s not just UK journalists who can access the British National Archives; anyone can. In May 2012, someone conducted a search of the Archives using the search term “Obama” and found that an unnamed son of Obama Sr. was born in Kenya in 1961. Since the POS in the White House is the only known son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before 1963 when Kenya became officially independent from the UK, it is reasonable for us to conclude that the POS is that unnamed son of Obama Sr. born in Kenya in 1961. And in fact, the claimed birth date of the POS is August 4, 1961.

Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (l); Stanley Ann Dunham (r).

BELOW ARE EXCERPTS FROM DAN CROSBY’S ON-SITE REPORT FROM KEW FOR THE DAILY PEN, “OBAMA’S KENYA BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES,” JULY 18, 2012:

Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives. [...]
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.
Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya.  Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly.  Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials asthe Obama administration has coincidentally paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.
Also, the presence of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington.  Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent high school graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama [Sr.] are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA.  The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961.  Barack Obama [Sr.] is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender.  However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives.  According to researchers, Obama [Sr.]’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books.  Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama [Sr.] birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.
However, evidence shows these records were available for public accessbefore August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.


Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009.  African news agency expressed surprise at Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.
For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…
The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.
On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name his newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S.
Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.
Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.
[...], in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history thatbirth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.
In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. [...] Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.
[...] If Obama [Sr.] is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.
[...] Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama [Sr.] ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.
Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child.  A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.
Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama [Sr.] had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.
[...] Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaiiin the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of presidentwhen he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.
[...] Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.
[...] Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures. [...] The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961.  The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. [...]

UPDATE (Aug. 25, 2012):

According to Dan Crosby, the specific sources of information pertaining to births of Kenyan nationals under British jurisdiction can be researched in the following BNA files (Courtesy: British National Archives):
General Register Office
SERIES RG36
Registers and Returns of Births, Marriages and Deaths in the Protectorates etc of Africa and Asia
Legal status:    Public Record(s)
Language:    English
Creator names:    General Register Office, 1836-1970
Covering Birth Registration dates:    1895-1965
Physical description:    15 volume(s)
Access conditions:    Available in microform only
Held by:    The National Archives, Kew
Scope and content:    Notifications forwarded by officials responsible for civil registration under administrative ordinances in Nyasaland, Kenya, Somaliland, Uganda, Sudan, Palestine, Sarawak, Malaya, including Johore and Selangor, and British North Borneo, commencing at varying dates.
Publication note:    Geoffrey Yeo ‘The British Overseas, A Guide to Records of Their Births, Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths and Burials Available in the United Kingdom’, London, 2nd edn, 1988.
Related material:    Some earlier returns from the East African territories in the period during which they were under Foreign Office control are in the consular registers retained in the custody of the registrar general.
Place:    Kenya, Africa (Territory Thereof): 1920 – 1963
Subjects:    Birth: registration
~Eowyn
Dr. Eowyn is a regular contributor to The D.C. Clothesline and the Editor of Fellowship of the Minds. This article originally appeared on FOTM in August of 2012 but I thought our readers may appreciate it. -Dean Garrison

Don't forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.

____________________________


Conclusion: How the President May Be Arrested for Treason without Being Served with Articles of Impeachment

For the sake of saving your eyeballs from popping out from the extensive research provided, I will very quickly conclude this article with how President Obama may be arrested by order of either Congress or the U.S. Armed Forces for Treason. In engaging in a more scholarly means for discussing this, I simply will reference you to the Constitution of the United States and a little known U.S. Supreme Court case involving the feud between Chief Justice Roger Taney and President Abraham Lincoln regarding te suspension of habeas corpus in Ex parte Merryman (1861). I discovered these on my own.

As stated, Article III details the duties granted the Judiciary Branch, or the U.S. Supreme Court. Specifically, it states the following:

Article III.

Section. 1.

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
Section. 3. provides the specific details of the sole crime declared by the federal constitution, which is treason:
Section. 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Article II. states the following may be punishable by Congress, all of which the president has committed in terms crime:
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; 
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
Most importantly, it the Necessary and Proper Clause grants Congress the capacity to make laws and enact them as they see fit. In theory, the Legislative Branch supersedes all others due to its direct representation of the people:
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
The Necessary and Proper Clause leads to Taney's ruling in Ex parte Merryman:
Ex parte Merryman and Debates on Civil Liberties During the Civil War
Legal Questions Before the Court
Did the President have authority to suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus? 
Chief Justice Taney said that the President did not have the authority to suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus and that the Constitution reserved that authority for the Congress. 
Taney based his opinion in Ex parte Merryman on the Constitution, the tradition of habeas corpus in English law, and a decision of the Supreme Court. The Constitution’s only reference to habeas corpus appeared in Article I, Section 9, which enumerated powers that the Congress was prohibited from exercising. Although that clause of the Constitution did not specify which branch of government had the limited authority to suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in times of crisis, Taney, like most earlier commentators, assumed that placement of the clause in Article I indicated that the power to suspend was limited to the Congress. Taney’s review of English law demonstrated that the monarch had long been prohibited from suspending the privilege of habeas and that English legal authorities agreed that suspension was the prerogative of the Parliament. Taney cited a Supreme Court decision of 1807, in which Chief Justice John Marshall had written that the Congress alone had the authority to suspend the privilege to the writ, and Justice Joseph Story’s famous Commentaries, which said only the Congress could determine if a rebellion or invasion justified suspension. 
In the opening of his opinion, Taney expressed “some surprise” at reports that Lincoln claimed the authority to suspend the writ, “for I had supposed it to be one of those points of constitutional law upon which there was no difference of opinion, and that it was admitted on all hands, that the privilege of the writ could not be suspended, except by act of Congress.” 
Could the military detain an individual on charges of violating U.S. law? 
Chief Justice Taney said that a military officer had no authority to arrest an individual for a criminal offense. If a member of the military suspected an individual of violating a U.S. law, he had an obligation to inform the U.S. attorney, who would determine if the matter should be brought before a district judge or a commissioner authorized to issue an arrest warrant. Taney offered some of his strongest language to condemn the actions of the military officers who ordered and carried out the arrest of Merryman. They had “by force of arms, thrust aside the judicial authorities and officers to whom the constitution has confided the power and duty of interpreting and administering the laws, and substituted a military government in its place.” The arrest and detainment of Merryman, according to Taney, had violated essential rights guaranteed by the Constitution’s Bill of Rights. Merryman had been seized without a warrant and with no presentation of evidence, in violation of the Fourth Amendment; he had been detained without any hearing or other due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment; and he was now held at a “strongly garrisoned fort,” with no prospect of a speedy trial in a court of justice, in violation of the Sixth Amendment. If the military had this authority to decide what constituted a crime and what constituted sufficient evidence to imprison someone, “the people of the United States are no longer living under a government of laws, but every citizen holds life, liberty, and property at the will and pleasure of the army officer in whose military district he may be found.” 
Taney also asserted that the military officers had no reasonable expectation that the civil authorities would be unable to enforce the law, since no one in Maryland had heretofore resisted the process of any federal court or judicial officer. The district judge, the commissioner, the district attorney, and the marshal for the District of Maryland all lived within a few miles of Merryman, and would have been easily accessible to a military authority who suspected treasonous activity. 
What jurisdiction did the federal courts have over a petition for a writ of habeas corpus from an individual detained by the military? 
Section 14 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 authorized federal courts as well as individual district judges and Supreme Court justices to issue writs of habeas corpus to inquire into the reasons for a commitment, or imprisonment, under the order of a federal court or other federal authority. Although most habeas writs issued by the federal courts related to criminal proceedings, some federal courts had issued writs of habeas corpus to individuals held by the military, such as in New Orleans in the closing days of martial law imposed during the War of 1812. A Supreme Court decision of 1807 limited the Supreme Court’s habeas jurisdiction to appeals of lower federal court orders and thus excluded military prisoners from submitting petitions directly to the high Court. Although Chief Justice Taney acknowledged that the Supreme Court did not have jurisdiction to issue a writ of habeas corpus to an individual held in custody by the military, he reportedly believed that individual justices, sitting “in chambers” (outside a regular court session), did have such authority. In the Merryman proceedings, however, Taney was intentionally vague about whether he has acting as Chief Justice in chambers or as the circuit justice for the U.S. Circuit Court for Maryland. In 1867, Chief Justice Salmon Chase denied a habeas petition from a military prisoner whose attorney cited Taney’s personal belief in a justice’s authority to grant the writ in chambers. Although the decision was unpublished, Chase privately told a senator that he had denied the petition because justices sitting on their own had the authority to grant habeas writs only to petitioners from their assigned circuits. 
What did the federal courts decide in related cases? 
In re McDonald, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, 1861 (16 Federal Cases 17) 
Just days before the arrest of Merryman, another Army general in another border state refused to appear in a federal court in answer to a writ of habeas corpus. Like Taney, the federal judge in the Eastern District of Missouri declined to enforce the writ but offered a strongly argued defense of the judiciary’s authority to enforce constitutional rights even in the midst of a civil war. 
Emmett McDonald served as a captain in a Missouri militia company that in the spring of 1861 gathered arms at a camp named for the state’s secessionist governor and prepared to attack the U.S. arsenal in nearby St. Louis. On May 10, federal forces took control of the militia’s camp, seized the arms, and forced the militia members to march to St. Louis. Gathering crowds taunted the federal forces and sang cheers to Jefferson Davis and the Confederacy. Fighting broke out, leaving several dead and numerous civilians wounded. The militia members were released on the condition that they pledge not to take up arms against the Union, but McDonald refused and remained in the custody of the U.S. forces. McDonald then petitioned the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted by Judge Samuel Treat and delivered to General William Harney, who had just assumed command of the Army’s Department of the West. By the time Harney received the writ, he had transferred McDonald to the custody of troops in Illinois, outside the court’s jurisdiction. 
General Harney did not appear in court and sent a letter explaining that McDonald was not in his custody. Harney informed Treat that the existing crisis in Missouri compelled him to observe a “higher law,” even if it appeared he was violating the forms of law. Although Lincoln’s authorization of the suspension of habeas corpus did not extend to Missouri, Harney believed that the President’s order to disperse “all armed rebels hostile to the United States” justified his predecessor’s raid on the militia camp and the detention of McDonald. The general added that if McDonald had been in his custody, he would have taken no action to release a prisoner who had been a member of the offending militia. 
Judge Treat had no options for enforcing the writ, but he filed in the district court a lengthy opinion that established the jurisdiction of his court over habeas petitions from persons detained by the military. Treat’s exhaustive survey of habeas decisions in the federal courts and English precedents led him to conclude that Section 14 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 granted federal courts the authority to issue writs of habeas corpus to prisoners detained by any federal authority, not just those arrested by formal judicial process. The judge emphasized that the protections of the Bill of Rights were most likely to be ignored by authorities outside the courts, where the established procedure demanded some public explanation of an arrest and commitment. If the courts were denied jurisdiction over habeas writs from those held by the military or other federal authorities outside the judiciary, then citizens would be “powerless when arbitrary will, assuming to act in the name of the United States, chooses to trample upon every constitutional guarantee for the protection of individual liberty.” 
When Congress reconvened in early July, Representative Francis Preston Blair of Missouri introduced a bill to consolidate Missouri as a single judicial district and thus eliminate Treat’s judgeship. The bill passed the House within a few weeks but failed in the Senate, and Treat continued to serve as a federal judge until his retirement in 1887. Emmett McDonald eventually fought for the Confederacy and was killed in action in 1864. 
Ex parte Vallandigham, U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio, 1863 (28 Federal Cases 874) 
In the denial of a writ of habeas corpus for a prominent politician imprisoned by the military, a federal judge from Ohio offered military officers enormous discretion in the suppression of public sympathy for the Confederacy or of criticism of the President’s war strategy. Representative Clement Vallandigham of Ohio was one of Lincoln’s fiercest critics in the Congress during the first years of the Civil War. As a nationally known and charismatic “Copperhead,” Vallandigham used his seat in the House of Representatives to challenge the President’s leadership and to condemn the abolitionists, whom he blamed for the war. Vallandigham lost reelection to a fourth term in Congress and returned to Ohio, where he planned to run for governor. In May 1863, before a large crowd in Mount Vernon, Ohio, Vallandigham attacked General Orders No. 38, in which General Ambrose Burnside of the Department of the Ohio had recently declared martial law and made it a crime to express any public sympathy with the Southern rebels. Burnside ordered Vallandigham’s arrest and trial by a military commission on charges of giving aid and comfort to Confederate forces and attempting to weaken public support for the government. The commission found Vallandigham guilty and sentenced him to imprisonment for the duration of the war. 
Vallandigham petitioned the U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio for a writ of habeas corpus. After soliciting arguments from Burnside and his counsel as well as from the lawyers for Vallandigham, Judge Humphrey Leavitt denied the writ. An earlier decision by the same court had established that a habeas writ would not be granted if the judges were confident that no subsequent order of the court would result in the release of the prisoner. Leavitt was convinced that the Army would not obey an order in this case, but he also offered a substantive and potentially far-reaching argument for denying the writ of habeas corpus. Vallandigham’s lawyers had argued that an individual who was not in military service, and therefore not subject to the rules of war, could not be arrested by the military or tried before a military commission. Judge Leavitt acknowledged that by the strict standards of the Constitution, the arrest violated civil liberties protected by the Bill of Rights, but Leavitt said that “the court cannot shut its eyes to the grave fact that war exists.” With the republic in peril, a judge needed to interpret the Constitution so as to serve the larger goal of saving the nation from “hopeless ruin.” Leavitt also deferred to the judgment of military officers who were charged with carrying out the President’s orders to preserve and defend the Union. In time of war, it was impossible for a judge to know all that the President and his generals needed to do to preserve the Union. Leavitt cited the recent Emancipation Proclamation as an example of the expansive powers justified by military necessity. The legality of an arrest ultimately “depended on the necessity for making it.” 
After the denial of the habeas writ, Vallandigham’s lawyers petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review his trial by the commission. The Supreme Court, citing a lack of jurisdiction over appeals from a military tribunal, denied the writ. Lincoln and his cabinet had no advance notice of Burnside’s general order or of his decision to arrest Vallandigham. Secretary of War Edwin Stanton feared that the circuit justice might grant the writ of habeas corpus, and he prepared for Lincoln an order suspending habeas corpus in this case. Lincoln declined to issue the order. Following Vallandigham’s conviction and the denial of his habeas petition, Lincoln commuted the prison sentence and ordered General Burnside to send Vallandigham to a Confederate general in Tennessee. Vallandigham soon left the Confederate states and went to Canada, from where he monitored his unsuccessful campaign for governor of Ohio. He returned to the United States in 1864 and campaigned against Lincoln’s reelection. 
Ex parte Milligan, Supreme Court of the United States, 1866 (71 U.S. Reports 2) 
Lambdin Milligan of Indiana was suspected to be a member of a secret society, the Order of American Knights, that allegedly conspired to seize arms at a U.S. arsenal and to free Confederate prisoners of war. He was arrested by Army officers in October 1864 and tried by a military commission on charges of conspiracy against the government, aiding the rebels, inciting insurrection, disloyal practices, and violating the laws of war. The commission found Milligan and two collaborators guilty and sentenced them to death by hanging. Lincoln delayed the execution, but after Lincoln’s assassination, President Andrew Johnson ordered the military to proceed with the punishment. Nine days before the scheduled execution, lawyers for Milligan petitioned the U.S. Circuit Court for Indiana for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition stated that the Habeas Corpus Act of 1863 provided that Milligan, who had never served in the military, should either have been brought before a civilian court to be tried or been released from custody. 
The judges of the circuit court, Justice David Davis and Judge David McDonald, differed on the questions of the issuance of a habeas writ, the release of Milligan from custody, and the jurisdiction of the military commission. As provided for by law, the judges certified their split and sent the case to the Supreme Court. All nine justices voted to overturn the verdict of the military commission, but they disagreed about the grounds of their decision. 
Justice Davis wrote for the majority in an opinion based on constitutional rights. The end of “the late wicked Rebellion” offered the opportunity for a more reasoned consideration of the questions presented by the case, and Davis thought that “no graver question was ever considered by this Court.” One of the clearest provisions of the Constitution was “infringed when Milligan was tried by a court not ordained and established by the Congress, and not composed of judges appointed during good behavior.” The arrest and trial of Milligan violated the protection against search and seizure without a warrant, the guarantee of a jury in a criminal trial, and the requirement for a grand jury indictment in a charge carrying the death penalty. Davis went beyond these questions of constitutional protections in criminal procedure to disallow the establishment of military commissions in areas where the civilian courts continued to operate without interruption. “Martial law can never exist where the courts are open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction.” Davis also held that martial law could be imposed only in areas that are in rebellion or in which an invasion has already occurred, and that the threat of an invasion was never sufficient to justify martial law. The safety of the country had not required martial law in Indiana, where the federal courts were capable of trying anyone accused of treason. 
Chief Justice Salmon Chase wrote a concurring opinion for the minority of four justices and based his decision solely on the statutory authority provided by the Habeas Corpus Act of 1863. As Davis had also held, Chase wrote that the wartime statute granted military authorities the power to arrest without being held answerable to a writ of habeas corpus, but this expansive power was limited by the act’s requirement that the military report to the federal courts the names of all individuals arrested and that following the end of the next grand jury meeting, all prisoners not indicted could petition the federal judge for release. The military commission in Indiana had met neither of those requirements. The four-justice minority asserted that the Congress had the authority to establish the military commission that was held in Indiana. 
Although the Milligan decision would be celebrated as a landmark case in civil liberties, it initially faced enormous criticism, particularly from Republicans who feared that it would undermine the use of military commissions to enforce equal rights for freed slaves and Unionists in the South. Radical Republicans, like Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania, linked the Milligan decision with Dred Scott, and feared that the Supreme Court would once again come to the defense of the white South. 
Ex parte McCardle, Supreme Court of the United States, 1869 (74 U.S. Reports 506) 
William McCardle was arrested by officers of the military government of Mississippi established under the Reconstruction Act of 1867, and he was tried by a military commission on charges of publishing libelous articles in his newspaper. McCardle’s attorney petitioned the U.S. Circuit Court for Mississippi for a writ of habeas corpus, and on the return argued that by the terms of Ex parte Milligan, McCardle could not be tried by a military court in a state with a functioning civil federal court. Judge Robert Hill of the circuit court denied McCardle’s release and returned him to the custody of the military government. Under the terms of the Habeas Corpus Act of 1867, McCardle appealed Hill’s circuit court decision to the Supreme Court, and the case was argued over four days in early March 1868. The 1867 act gave the federal courts jurisdiction to grant habeas writs to individuals held by state as well as federal authorities, and it provided a right of appeal to the Supreme Court from any habeas decision in the U.S. circuit courts. 
Congress, fearing that the Supreme Court might declare unconstitutional the Reconstruction Act of 1867, in late March and before the Court announced a decision, repealed the 1867 provision for habeas appeals to the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Salmon Chase, citing the Congress’s constitutional authority to define the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction, declared in a unanimous opinion that the 1868 repeal act denied the Court any jurisdiction in the case, and the Supreme Court dismissed McCardle’s appeal. 
Chase noted at the close of his opinion that the Supreme Court retained the habeas jurisdiction granted by the Judiciary Act of 1789. In 1869, the Supreme Court relied on that jurisdiction in the case of Edward Yerger, who was tried for murder by a military commission in Mississippi. Yerger had petitioned the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Mississippi for a writ of habeas corpus, and, after a hearing, that court remanded Yerger to military custody. Yerger’s attorneys then petitioned a Supreme Court justice to issue a writ of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court ruled that the appellate jurisdiction defined by the Judiciary Act of 1789 gave it the authority to issue a writ to Yerger because he remained in custody as a result of a decision of a U.S. circuit court.
 ________________________________________
Of course, whether Congress decides upon acquiring the supermajority it stands to win on November 4, 2014 or if the military decides to deny President Obama his right to habeas corpus, he can be arrested for treason, for printing counterfeit money that has no gold  nor silver standard value through his quantitative easing policy, for engaging in unlawful military covert action in Afghanistan when he in fact never provided proof in May 2011 of whether Osama bin Laden actually died, and for his ties to the Muslim Brotherhood whereupon the Egyptian government presents publicly the documentation proving the president's activities with the former Egyptian political party was intent upon casting aside the Constitution of the United States as well as funding terrorism through Hamas prior to its adopting the Hamas-Doha Agreement with regards to the Palestinian Authority:
A reconciliation deal between Fatah and Hamas was reached by the two governments in Cairo on 27 April 2011. The two agreed to form a unity government,[46] and to hold elections in both territories within 12 months of the establishment of such a government.[47][48] The deal also permitted the entry of Hamas into the Palestine Liberation Organization and holding of elections to its Palestine National Council decision-making body. The deal was further ratified in the 2012 Hamas–Fatah Doha agreement, which was made with the background of Hamas relocation from Damascus, due to the simmering Syrian civil war. 
Of course, since the Egyptian Revolution occurred from January 5 to February 11, 2011 while Hamas was still declared a terrorist organization not a party or government of a sovereign state of its own in the Gaza Strip, the president was funding Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood's rise to power. As the State Department still has not declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, Hamas was; therefore, the president was aiding and abetting an enemy of the United States. As of today, Hamas is still declared a terrorist state, with the most recent list available being issue in 2005 courtesy of U.S. Department of State. Below is the statement on Hamas, which includes it being a conduit and spawn of the Muslim Brotherhood, and why the president will be arrested upon Congress gaining a supermajority of GOP lawmakers following the November elections.
HAMAS 
a.k.a. Islamic Resistance Movement
Description 
HAMAS was formed in late 1987 as an outgrowth of the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Various HAMAS elements have used both violent and political means, including terrorism, to pursue the goal of establishing an Islamic Palestinian state in Israel. It is loosely structured, with some elements working clandestinely and others operating openly through mosques and social service institutions to recruit members, raise money, organize activities, and distribute propaganda. HAMAS’ strength is concentrated in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. 
Activities 
HAMAS terrorists, especially those in the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, have conducted many attacks, including large-scale suicide bombings, against Israeli civilian and military targets. HAMAS maintained the pace of its operational activity in 2004, claiming numerous attacks against Israeli interests. HAMAS has not yet directly targeted US interests, although the group makes little or no effort to avoid targets frequented by foreigners. HAMAS continues to confine its attacks to Israelis inside Israel and the occupied territories. 
Strength 
Unknown number of official members; tens of thousands of supporters and sympathizers. 
Location/Area of Operation 
HAMAS currently limits its terrorist operations to Israeli military and civilian targets in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and Israel. Two of the group’s most senior leaders in the Gaza Strip, Shaykh Ahmad Yasin and Abd al Aziz al Rantisi, were killed in Israeli air strikes in 2004. The group retains a cadre of senior leaders spread throughout the Gaza Strip, Syria, Lebanon, Iran, and the Gulf States. 

BREAKING NEWS: The Islamic State Threatens Vladimir Putin's Life, Russia; Has Lost Its Quest for a Global Caliphate

BREAKING NEWS: The Islamic State Threatens Vladimir Putin's Life, Russia; Has Lost Its Quest for a Global Caliphate


Obama golfs while the world burns; Putin swims with sharks
Word up, people! The U.S. may be spared from the worst of the Islamic State's wrath after all! When a bully picks on a bigger piece of meat, the hamburger that is the bully will not fare well in a taste test against filet mignon. As you just read the heading, the Islamic State just issued a threat on Vladimir Putin's life and in the process, promises to topple Moscow and Russia. Now, this can mean two things. For one, while Vladimir Putin invades Ukraine and topples Kiev, he will send a smaller force of his world-class military to destroy the Islamic State within the corner of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan and the Levant crossing onto the Sinai Peninsula. And as I had initially started this post shortly past the last, I received a notification from Facebook of a bomb threat called into the Moscow International Airport; the threat of the Islamic State is indeed very real to Muscovites and all of Russia.

Unlike President Obama, who to this day continues to finance the Islamic State's missions through a cloak-and-dagger method of espionage and subterfuge, or how he admitted to funding Hamas, has been reported by the Nigerian media just last year of supporting Boko Haram's diffusion of terror through the Maghreb region of northern and central Africa, is providing weaponry and funding in stealth to al Qaeda operatives in Libya, and now twice have our embassies been sacked and to our greatest concern to date aside from Islamic State entries into the U.S. through our southern border, 11 jetliners have been hijacked with no trace as of yet of their whereabouts, the future of American popular sovereignty under the democratic model of republican government is in doubt. To date, the Second Amendment has not been repealed and most attempts to undermine it have either been defeated or blocked by Congress or our federal courts, but as Obama frequently resorts to his pen and phone to issue executive orders so he does not engage in battles with the House GOP leadership, our Constitution has become as worthless of a piece of paper as a long piece of toilet paper following a person "dropping a deuce". 

As the rule of law today is arbitrary to what race you are, the gender of which you were born, if you are a wealthy financier of the Democratic Party and our president or if you are in Silicon Valley or Hollywood and the music industry, or if you are either a Muslim or atheist, no conservative, Christian or Jew is safe; we know this through multiple government agencies targeting tax exempt organizations either in opposition or out of favor of Obama. As the IRS itself continues to obstruct Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) while he investigates the matter through hiding E-mails and Eric Holder unabashedly informing Gowdy he will not turn over those messages, the federal government is today not simply out of control, but now the American Politburo whose intelligentsia has doomed us all if our conservative officials fail to act in our best interests for safety, security and our right to free expression and privacy.

While Obama has no intention of slaying the monster our taxed wages created, Vladimir Putin will not stand by idly and be intimidated. The matter alone that he ordered over the years approximately one million executions of Islamic terrorists within Chechnya, Dagestan and South Ossetia's separatist rebel alliances or how his mandating the razing of all mosques inside Moscow is the proof inside the pudding. As I see it, Obama seded America's sovereignty when he sold us to Islamic terrorists or the  state-sponsors who provide us with oil. Oil has for a generation and a half served as a rich dish often served cold in Middle East foreign policy; its has also played crucial roles in all major wars for the past century.

The Nature of the Islamic State's Threats to Putin and Russia

Genghis Khan is one of most notorious barbarians in world history, or at about whom the world knows well through reading their history texts. In fact, Genghis Khan created mankind's largest empire in history from Mongolia across the more than 4,000 miles of Siberian and Russian expanses; he nearly wiped out the entire global population of Islamic peoples for toppling territories he controlled as well as beheading his envoy of diplomats. Such a measure, not lost at all upon Genghis Khan, did not call for peace talks nor their bastard child of appeasement, but instead a show of such awesome force that his brand of barbarism far surpassed the Muslims of the day. Today, people consider Genghis Khan a savage, but celebrate Muhammad as noble prophet. Unfortunately, a man who owned some estimated at 40 slaves, who kept concubines as sex slaves, who married a six year old named Aisha and had sex with her when she reached nine years old, and who as a slaveholder of blacks who he called "raisin heads", and who beheaded between 500 and 800 Jews of Banu Qurayza does not by any Western standards for the measurement of morality constitute the characteristics of one proclaiming to be the founder of any religion of peace. 

How does this apply to Vladimir Putin? With all due respect, he stands to lose the most in terms of territory, and he is even greater danger of a massive onslaught of Islamic militancy not just the Islamic State, but too out of Chechnya, Dagestan, South Ossetia and even the Crimean Peninsula. The Crimean Peninsula, in fact, was won in one of the many wars between the Russian Empire and the last caliphate, the Ottoman Empire, and the results of the overwhelming Russian victories over time aided in the destruction of their Turkish foes, and by 1924, the abolition of the empire outright in favor of Mustafa Kermel Ataturk establishing the Republic of Turkey, even changing the name of Constantinople to "Istanbul".

Britannica can explain these wars in better detail and especially brevity than me. I know a few general facts about Russian history, but not to the degree as might a historian who specializes in it or the Slavic peoples:
Russo-Turkish wars, series of wars between Russia and the Ottoman Empire in the 17th–19th century. The wars reflected the decline of the Ottoman Empire and resulted in the gradual southward extension of Russia’s frontier and influence into Ottoman territory. The wars took place in 1676–81, 1687, 1689, 1695–96, 1710–12 (part of the Great Northern War), 1735–39, 1768–74, 1787–91, 1806–12, 1828–29, 1853–56 (the Crimean War), and 1877–78. As a result of these wars, Russia was able to extend its European frontiers southward to the Black Sea, southwestward to the Prut River, and south of the Caucasus Mountains in Asia.
The early Russo-Turkish Wars were mostly sparked by Russia’s attempts to establish a warm-water port on the Black Sea, which lay in Turkish hands. The first war (1676–81) was fought without success in Ukraine west of the Dnieper River by Russia, which renewed the war with failed invasions of Crimea in 1687 and 1689. In the war of 1695–96, the Russian tsar Peter I the Great’s forces succeeded in capturing the fortress of Azov. In 1710 Turkey entered the Northern War against Russia, and after Peter the Great’s attempt to liberate the Balkans from Ottoman rule ended in defeat at the Prut River (1711), he was forced to return Azov to Turkey. War again broke out in 1735, with Russia and Austria in alliance against Turkey. The Russians successfully invaded Turkish-held Moldavia, but their Austrian allies were defeated in the field, and as a result the Russians obtained almost nothing in the Treaty of Belgrade (September 18, 1739).
The first major Russo-Turkish War (1768–74) began after Turkey demanded that Russia’s ruler,Catherine II the Great, abstain from interfering in Poland’s internal affairs. The Russians went on to win impressive victories over the Turks. They captured Azov, Crimea, and Bessarabia, and under Field Marshal P.A. Rumyantsev they overran Moldavia and also defeated the Turks in Bulgaria. The Turks were compelled to seek peace, which was concluded in the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca (July 21, 1774). This treaty made the Crimean khanate independent of the Turkish sultan; advanced the Russian frontier southward to the Southern (Pivdennyy) Buh River; gave Russia the right to maintain a fleet on the Black Sea; and assigned Russia vague rights of protection over the Ottoman sultan’s Christian subjects throughout the Balkans.
Russia was now in a much stronger position to expand, and in 1783 Catherine annexed the Crimean Peninsula outright. War broke out in 1787, with Austria again on the side of Russia (until 1791). Under General A.V. Suvorov, the Russians won several victories that gave them control of the lower Dniester and Danube rivers, and further Russian successes compelled the Turks to sign the Treaty of Jassy (Iaşi) on January 9, 1792. By this treaty Turkey ceded the entire western Ukrainian Black Sea coast (from the Kerch Strait westward to the mouth of the Dniester) to Russia.
When Turkey deposed the Russophile governors of Moldavia and Walachia in 1806, war broke out again, though in a desultory fashion, since Russia was reluctant to concentrate large forces against Turkey while its relations with Napoleonic France were so uncertain. But in 1811, with the prospect of a Franco-Russian war in sight, Russia sought a quick decision on its southern frontier. The Russian field marshal M.I. Kutuzov’s victorious campaign of 1811–12 forced the Turks to cede Bessarabia to Russia by the Treaty of Bucharest (May 28, 1812).
Russia had by now secured the entire northern coast of the Black Sea. Its subsequent wars with Turkey were fought to gain influence in the Ottoman Balkans, win control of the Dardanelles and Bosporus straits, and expand into the Caucasus. The Greeks’ struggle for independence sparked the Russo-Turkish War of 1828–29, in which Russian forces advanced into Bulgaria, the Caucasus, and northeastern Anatolia itself before the Turks sued for peace. The resulting Treaty of Edirne (September 14, 1829) gave Russia most of the eastern shore of the Black Sea, and Turkey recognized Russian sovereignty over Georgia and parts of present-day Armenia.
The war of 1853–56, known as the Crimean War, began after the Russian emperor Nicholas I tried to obtain further concessions from Turkey. Great Britain and France entered the conflict on Turkey’s side in 1854, however, and the Treaty of Paris (March 30, 1856) that ended the war was a serious diplomatic setback for Russia, though involving few territorial concessions.
The last Russo-Turkish War (1877–78) was also the most important one. In 1877 Russia and its ally Serbia came to the aid of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bulgaria in their rebellions against Turkish rule. The Russians attacked through Bulgaria, and after successfully concluding the Siege of Pleven they advanced into Thrace, taking Adrianople (now Edirne, Tur.) in January 1878. In March of that year Russia concluded the Treaty of San Stefano with Turkey. This treaty freed Romania, Serbia, and Montenegro from Turkish rule, gave autonomy to Bosnia and Herzegovina, and created a huge autonomous Bulgaria under Russian protection. Britain and Austria-Hungary, alarmed by the Russian gains contained in the treaty, compelled Russia to accept the Treaty of Berlin (July 1878), whereby Russia’s military-political gains from the war were severely restricted.
There too is the issue with World War I, where the Ottoman Turks joined the Central Powers alongside Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Among their foes within the Triple Entente was Russia, it too in its dying days as an empire under Romanov dynastic rule. History.com provides a brief synopsis for what and why the Ottomans enterred, its involvement with Russia and why Tsar Nicholas II was desperate for a victory over his age-old foe, and at what price the conflict would be paid by both parties:
On November 14, 1914, in Constantinople, capital of the Ottoman Empire, the religious leader Sheikh-ul-Islam declares an Islamic holy war on behalf of the Ottoman government, urging his Muslim followers to take up arms against Britain, France, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro in World War I.
By the time the Great War broke out in the summer of 1914, the Ottoman Empire was faltering, having lost much of its once considerable territory in Europe with its defeat in the First Balkan War two years earlier. Seeking to ally themselves with one of the great European powers to help safeguard them against future loss, the ambitious Ottoman leaders--members of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), known collectively as the Young Turks--responded favorably to overtures made by Germany in August 1914. Though Germany and Turkey secretly concluded a military alliance on August 2, the Turks did not officially take part in World War I until several months later. On October 29, the Ottoman navy--including two German ships, Goeben and Breslau, which famously eluded the British navy in the first week of the war to reach Constantinople--attacked Russian ports in the Black Sea, marking the beginning of Turkey's participation in the war.
The sheikh's declaration of a holy war, made two weeks later, urged Muslims all over the world--including in the Allied countries--to rise up and defend the Ottoman Empire, as a protector of Islam, against its enemies. "Of those who go to the Jihad for the sake of happiness and salvation of the believers in God's victory," the declaration read, "the lot of those who remain alive is felicity, while the rank of those who depart to the next world is martyrdom. In accordance with God's beautiful promise, those who sacrifice their lives to give life to the truth will have honor in this world, and their latter end is paradise."
The origins of the war were steeped in nationalism, predicated upon ethnic and religious identity; it also was steeped in jingoism, or a nationalism based upon racial superiority. The best example to explain jingoism is to refer you to reading Sir Rudyard Kipling's The White Man's Burden. But as that is from a British perspective, Russia's interests lie primarily within the parameters of forming a Pan Slavic state, which among those would be Serbia, Montenegro and the Hungarian portion of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. The formation of alliances between historical adversaries Britain and France to oppose German expansion westward beyond the Rhineland was crucial in also including the Russians, who would serve as a backend deterrent to potential aggression from Berlin. In response, German Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen developed his now-famous plan to march west in sweeping away quick victories in Belgium and the Netherlands, into France, following by a reversal towards the east. The plan, very ambitious and extraordinarily aggressive, never materialized as a true success due to rate of advanced weaponry not equating with the 19th Century style of combat still employed. Germany did, however, defeat Russia by 1917, and served as a major catalyst for the Bolshevik Revolution after more than a decade of false starts and thwarted rallies by Tsar Nicholas II.

The prospect of Putin conquering Ukraine quickly is better understood by one of the Russian Empire's victories over the Ottoman Turks. In 1783, the enlightened despot Catherine the Great annexed the Crimean Peninsula entirely, once a territory strategically under Ottoman control. For the Turks, it was a crushing blow; it had served as a launchpad to interior invasions of Russia. Once that the port of Sevastopol no longer was a source for any measure of a naval base, any amphibious invasions or occupations and blockades were dashed, and the matter of fighting Russia was to become the perilous plight of land wars. Russia, the world's third most populous nation, held a sizable advantage in continental pitched battles, and in this instance, the Ottomans were easily defeated. For Putin, his annexing of the Crimean Peninsula was not simply a matter of a slow buildup to an full-scale assault from its eastern border; it meant that once NATO decided to involve itself militarily, the port of Sevastopol would have to be invaded amphibiously. It also meant that as a part of NATO, Turkey, the closest nation to the Crimean Peninsula, would be the likely western ally to launch an assault, thus serving as a return to the old, or potentially a terrorist insurrection from both the interior and in the Middle East. This is why, despite agreeing to the contrary, Russia has a strategic partnership with Iran, whereby Moscow provides Tehran with technology to build nuclear reactors in exchange for having a role in Iran's nationalized oil corporation, which stretches past Afghanistan into Pakistan and India.

As news from The Times of Israel announced that the Obama administration has entered into an alliance with Iran in the war to destroy the Islamic State to secure Iraq and Syria, diplomatic relations stand to be complicated between Moscow and Tehran, as both continue to jockey to maintain the regime of Bashar al-Assad, who just two years ago the Obama Doctrine sought to topple through funding Islamic rebels, one of which was Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (or Syria or Sham), which today is known as the Islamic State. The price American foreign policy, longstanding for 35 years, will hinge upon the nuclear question for Tehran:
Khamenei approves cooperation with US forces battling IS
Iran’s leader gives authorization to Qods Force commander as Washington, Tehran hold nuclear talks in Geneva
BY LAZAR BERMAN AND AFP September 5, 2014, 3:15 pm
Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei delivering a speech on the 25th anniversary of the death of the late founder of the Islamic Republic Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, at his mausoleum in a suburb of Tehran on June 4, 2014. (photo credit: AFP/ HO /Iranian Supreme Leader's Website)
Iran’s supreme leader authorized cooperation with the United States to combat the Islamic State in Iraq
According to the BBC, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei gave his approval for Gen. Qassem Soleimani, commander of the Revolutionary Guards Qods Force to work with the US and other countries battling IS.
Meanwhile,US and Iranian officials met for a second day of negotiations in Switzerland Friday as they work towards hammering out a full nuclear deal ahead of a November deadline.
The US team led by Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns and Under Secretary Wendy Sherman began meeting Thursday with an Iranian delegation led by Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi in a luxury Geneva hotel.
No information filtered out from the first day of closed-door talks, and it remained unclear whether they would wrap up Friday or continue into Saturday.
EU and US officials did announce Thursday that broader talks would be held on September 18 in New York between Iran and the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany, and would be led by European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton.
That will mark the first meeting of the so-called P5+1 and Iran since they failed to meet a July 20 deadline for implementing a comprehensive and complex deal on curbing Tehran’s enrichment capabilities and number of centrifuges.
The deadline has been pushed forward to November 24.
The West suspects Iran wants to acquire nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists the program is purely for peaceful purposes.
In exchange for accepting curbs on its nuclear activities, Iran wants a slew of crippling US, EU and UN sanctions to be lifted.
But any deal will have to be approved by the Islamic leadership in Tehran as well as by the US Congress, where many lawmakers are seeking to impose even tougher sanctions on Iran.
The Geneva talks come after Washington last weekend unleashed a new round of sanctions against Tehran.
State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf meanwhile called Thursday on Iran to “fully and without delay” cooperate with UN watchdog the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), after its inspectors were refused access to a military base outside Tehran that they have been trying to visit since 2005.
Over the past year, Tehran and Washington have pursued exhaustive talks on the nuclear deal, marking a dramatic turnaround in relations for two countries that had virtually no official communication since the aftermath of the 1979 Islamic revolution, which toppled the Western-oriented shah.
Switzerland, which represents US interests in Tehran and has hosted many of the nuclear talks, only applies “targeted” economic sanctions on Iran that do not include oil.
The Swiss city of Lausanne has since 2003 hosted Iranian Oil Company subsidiary the Naftiran Intertrade Company Sarl (NICO), which for the past two years has been the target of EU sanctions.
Former NICO chief Seyfollah Jashnsaz in early July hailed “Switzerland’s fairer approach to Iran”, pointing out that the subsidiary had ensured $100 billion worth in Iranian oil sales between 2010 and 2014.
“We apply targeted sanctions. We do not want the sanctions to hurt everyone, especially in the civil society,” Swiss Economic Affairs Ministry spokeswoman Livia Leu told public broadcaster RTS.
__________________

And there you go with the political intrigue. I cannot yet refer to this as appeasement with Iran; to this point, it reeks of the alliance the U.S. and Britain had with the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin, which simply implied "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". And while the Soviet Union was a key ally in taking down Hitler from the East, it led subsequently to 26 years of cold war where tensions over global nuclear destruction and the race for global influence between capitalism and communism drove the foreign policies of both sides as well as Western Europe. It also led to the creation of NATO to defend the Western allies from an attack from the Eastern Bloc states. Syria will remain under heavy Iranian influence as a Shi'ite Islamic state, but where the future conflict may life with Tehran will be over U.S. or Iranian control and influence of Iraq. This will rehash the old wounds from the Iran-Iraq War between 1980 and 1988 where nearly a million died fighting a battle of attrition which settled nothing.

***

Putin and Russia versus the Islamic State, and the First Die is Now Cast

The situation with Russia again is most interesting both in Moscow's diplomatic snafu with the West over Ukraine and now in Putin's obligation to defend his nation against the very real threat of an Islamic uprising. The latter may conflict with Putin's decision to conquer Kiev, or at least in how he chooses to do so. To date, he has only funneled rubles into rebel forces hands as well as providing weaponry and munitions. With the threat from the Islamic State, however, he must consider his enemies within the separatist regions of Chechnya, Dagestan (where the Tsarnaevs are from) as well as South Ossetia. Islamic terrorism engages primarily in guerilla warfare, in exploding vehicles outside of major building of strategic importance, and by using the media to document mass executions and media journalists' beheadings to intimidate their infidel foes. To Putin's credit, he indeed has executed approximately 1,000,000 Muslims found guilty of terrorist activities and for treason; he also has razed to the ground all mosques in Moscow. Russia indeed has the port of Sevastopol under naval control along, of course, with the entire Crimean Peninsula, and that strategically is crucial for Putin. However, Moscow is sandwiched to the east by Islamists and soon, the Islamic State, and from the west by NATO. The existential crises faced by America and Western Europe has finally reached the doorsteps of the Kremlin. 

The Daily Mail provided the initial report on the threat. My initial reaction was to laugh almost uncontrollably; my thought was that the Islamic State had just signed its own death warrant and the end of its dream for a global caliphate:
'This message is addressed to you, oh Putin': ISIS now threatens Russia over its ties to Syria's Assad and promises to 'liberate Chechnya and all the Caucasus'
Vladimir Putin was threatened because of close ties to Bashar al-Assad
In video, ISIS rebel sits in cockpit of captured Russian-made fighter jet
Second fighter warns Putin that his 'throne is in danger and will collapse'
Added: 'With permission of Allah we will liberate Chechnya and Caucasus'
It puts Putin on same side as the West in holding back Muslim extremism
At same time, Krelim leader remains at loggerheads with U.S. and Europe
By WILL STEWART FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 07:49 EST, 3 September 2014 | UPDATED: 09:06 EST, 4 September 2014
Vladimir Putin was today directly and personally threatened by the Islamic State because of his close ties to Syrian leader Bashar Hafez al-Assad.
The chilling warning, delivered by a member of the terror group, puts the Kremlim leader on the same side as the West in holding back Muslim extremism.
But at the same time, he remains at loggerheads with the U.S. and Europe in the worst crisis since the Cold War.
In a video on Al-Arabiya TV channel, an ISIS rebel sits in the cockpit of a captured Russian-made fighter aircraft in the Tabak area of the Syrian province of Rakka.
A second fighter warns: 'This message is addressed to you, oh Vladimir Putin. These are your aircraft which you sent to Bashar, and with the help of Allah we will send them back to you.
'Remember this. And with the permission of Allah we will liberate Chechnya and all the Caucasus.
"The Islamic State exists and it will exist and it will expand with the help of Allah. Your throne is already shaking. It is in danger and it will collapse  when we get to you. We are on the way with Allah's permission.'
The threatening footage comes with Russian subtitles, but the voice of a Russian speaker can be heard too.
In the sequence, in which the Islamic warriors clamber over the Sukhoi fighter, they also threaten the Syrian dictator, branding him a 'pig' and vowing to 'use these aircraft to get to you'.
The message of hate to Putin follows his strong support for Assad, without which he is likely to have been toppled. 
Putin is also loathed by Islamic extremists and terror groups for crushing attempts to set up an Islamic state in Chechnya, and in other mainly Muslim regions of southern Russia such as Dagestan.
The Russian leader has long argued that the West has missed the danger of such extremist groups while criticising him for human rights abuses in his clampdown.
The video was released amid a warning to Putin that far from NATO being his biggest threat - as Russian propaganda is daily arguing - the real danger to him is from Muslim extremism on his southern flank.
This was highlighted today in The Moscow Times newspaper by Judy Dempsey,  senior associate and editor-in-chief of Strategic Europe at Carnegie Europe.
'Outgoing NATO secretary general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, has repeatedly spoken about an "arc of instability" around Europe,' she wrote.
'He has repeatedly warned Russia that it would suffer the consequences after Putin's decision in March to invade and then annex Crimea, Russian involvement in eastern Ukraine and Putin's call for immediate talks on "statehood" of southern and eastern Ukraine, or Novorossiya. 

'But it is clear that so far Western sanctions and NATO's threats and rhetoric are no deterrence when it comes to thwarting Putin's ambitions.
'What could deter him is his own combustible southern flank and Islamic State, which Russia would be very unwise to ignore. 
'It is these threats that are far, far more dangerous to Russia than NATO's limited intentions in Poland and the Baltic states.
Ties: The Russian leader was targeted by the rebels because of his ties to Bashar Hafez al-Assad (pictured)
***

Conclusion: What Does This Mean for the U.S. and NATO? A Mixed Bag of Tricks

So, what does this mean for the U.S. approach to attacking the Islamic State as well as our involvement with NATO over Russia and the Islamic State? It appears very unclear, but then everything about the president seems to look as if the foundation of the house will be divided every time as if it were based upon Jenga blocks or quicksand. However, in a very odd way, the Islamic State and Russia might serve the West a major purpose in NATO deterring Moscow's eventual launch of a full-scale invasion into the heart of Ukraine until it takes Kiev. It requires a mixed bag of tricks and playing one side against the other. Deceit, therefore, must be employed to stifle both foes and to potentially kill two birds with one stone. Regardless of how this ends, it will be global conflict, and Israel, China, Japan, Pakistan, India, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and the area few have any inkling on, the Golden Triangle, will be involved. The main objective is to prevent Russian and Chinese expansion into the Western Hemisphere in both nation's shift militarily and in engaging in economic protectionist cartels. 

As Israel will no doubt defend their sovereignty as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is militarizing that area to defend against the Islamic State, Al-Nusra, al-Qaeda and Hezbollah, Russia has a very strong advantage militarily. The lone concern for Putin is not his military superiority and his alliance with the Assad regime, but whether his military fighting has evolved beyond the Soviet failures at guerilla warfare during the Afghanistan campaign which aided President Reagan's toppling of communism during the 1980s. In a bizarre scenario, Israel may align with Russia both out of necessity as well as to spite the Obama administration, and at that, the inevitable formation of the terrorist quartet coalition will lose by way of fighting to the last man. If Egypt sides with Russia and Israel as might Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the plight to prevent global war may be averted, no thanks to President Obama at least in the Middle East. For the U.S., the task then becomes easy in principle, yet impossible in its implementation and potentially catastrophic for the American people since Obama appears to still be siding with the Islamic State following providing key figures in authority with intelligence to conduct their illicit operations in genocide. As the Islamic State is now in the U.S., this scenario becomes all the more crucial in the act of diversionary tactics in the game of military chess play.

Russia will have no choice but to cross over into the Arabian peninsula north of the Sinai Peninsula connection of Levant that is directly north of Israel. To do this, it will have to enter through Turkey, which is a NATO ally of the U.S. and Britain. Depending upon Washington and London's objections or lack thereof, that may lead to NATO declaring war on Putin, which then complicates matters far more. NATO will attack with the U.S.'s supply of superior weaponry and munitions and the entire coalition of manpower (including our own contribution of troops represented within the alliance) into the heart of Ukraine while Turkey's full military force, itself considerable as it is ranked globally in the top 10, will attack Russian forces from the south. The objective will then shift to encircling Russian forces much like Marshal Georgy Zhukov did to the German army at Stalingrad in February 1943. The cost in terms of military casualties as well as collateral civilian lives will be enormous, but no warfare has been waged successfully since before the Crimean War during the mid-1850s that did not include a total warfare package. The issue with the Crimean Peninsula, which is of great concern to Russia since it has always coveted it dating to the reign of Catherine the Great's expansion during her launching of campaigns against the Ottoman Turks, will require the U.S. Navy and British Royal Navy to bombard the coastline from the Black Sea and then impose a blockade to prevent any further incursions from Russian vessels later deployed or potential amphibious invasions by the Islamic State and its terrorist ring of allies with access to a very rudimentary contingent of vessels akin to modern frigates. The tandem of U.S. and British naval fleets are exponentially superior, and will be too overwhelming as an awesome force just with our presence for Russia to counter. To prevent possible Chinese People's Liberation Army advances through Central Asia's former Soviet republics Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan, sending NATO forces through Georgia, Belarus and Lithuania will be crucial, but also to cut off Islamic terrorist cells in the separatist settlements of Chechnya, Dagestan and South Ossetia before any measurable Islamic State coalition can reach those territories to serve as bases for operations. Enough ground forces from NATO combined with U.S. Air Force superiority and others among our allies willing to contribute to our airpower should serve as a deterrent for serious attempts by Chinese forces too overstretched in supply lines to risk wasting precious resources simply to construct its own series of military bases.

The greatest challenge for the U.S. will lie in the Asia-Pacific theater depending upon how well our Navy and Air Force presence intimidates our Chinese opponents. You recall how I told you I authored in February a very extensive blog article which was never published discussing the very disturbing chain of events destabilizing the peace geopolitically both in foreign policy and diplomacy as well as international trade that will be affected. As China and Russia are very closely aligned in every imaginable way, the important idea is in the case of war with Beijing to somehow stall Russia from aiding the Chinese air force and elite naval fleet. As Beijing just launched its very first aircraft carrier within the past two years and their destroyers are rapidly acquiring new and improved additions, Russia already has two aircraft carriers and itself, a formidable but aging navy. The difference therein lies in their air forces, whereas Russia still uses excellent MiG fighter jets from the end of the Soviet-era, while China still buys to this day Russian manufactured armaments, artillery, munitions and tanks; Beijing's air force, however, is also expanding from Chinese industrial might and capacity. But as they do this, China also is expanding its forces through its mighty industrial capacity which today is far superior than our own since what once was a large manufacturing sector here was long ago outsourced to China due to our labor unions destroying cost effectiveness. And since Beijing continues to do this while still holding a nearly $2 trillion trade debt over the U.S.'s heads, any terms for a harsh arbitration of peace by our diplomats must include China forgiving all our outstanding trade debts under threat of total annihilation as well as the dissolution of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in favor of representative democracy with free speech and creative expression. With Russia, the U.S. has superiority in numbers if there should be a land war in Ukraine or along the Siberian border with Chinese Sinkiang. If our land forces attack China on the mainland, a blitzkrieg strategy is crucial to its success. Our air power superiority over China will neutralize our deficiency in numbers; if we do not utilize this method, all hope for a win on the ground is lost before any potential conflict is waged. The potential of countering a battery coalition of Sino-Russo naval and air force conflicts will come from Japan's fleet as it counters China's alongside our own global reach in the region, the East and South China Seas should be secured, mainland China blockaded and the ability to engage in multiple amphibious landing inevitable and unstoppable with the appropriate strategy to not force a confrontation in numbers with the People's Liberation Army. Inciting military and economic cooperation from the Philippines, long an American ally as a former colonial holding and now a strategic trading partner in the Indian Ocean, as well as Vietnam as it faces a potential Chinese invasion in its dispute over oil and natural gas maritime claims, will be crucial as the Vietnamese must be aided in its ability to militarize its border with China while Manila will mobilize its armed forces along its archipelago to provide defense against a sea invasion by Chinese naval deployments. Taiwan will be the key in the South China Sea for the U.S. and Japan to serve as our coalition's base for launching airstrikes in southern China and to possibly blockade Hong Kong's Victoria Harbor between Kowloon and the actual island of Hong Kong. To this point, British foreign relations with China are deteriorating over Beijing's attempt to sabotage free suffrage in Hong Kong, which was transferred to Chinese rule in 1997. It is important to continue supporting our special allies in London diplomatically in both NATO, our mutual counterterrorism agenda and with respect to the Asia-Pacific Rim's rising tensions.